14. Presentation - Safety System Design
Transcript of 14. Presentation - Safety System Design
![Page 1: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ENG / SERVICES
Machinery SafetySafety System Design
![Page 2: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Purpose
The purpose of this module is to give you an understanding of the process of safety system design.
After this session you will:• Be able to identify the two international standards related to
interlocks and safety related control systems• Have a basic understanding of the ISO 13849-1 process for defining
the required Performance Level (PL) of a safety related control system
Note: This session is not intended to give you the specialist skills to design a safety related control systems. Persons with these skills may be available in your MES E&A group and are available from external consultants, e.g. Rockwell.
![Page 3: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Machinery Safety – Control Systems EN 954-1 S Severity of Injury S1 = Slight (normally reversible) injury S2 = Serious (normally irreversible) injury, including
death F Frequency and/or duration of exposure to the
hazard F1 = Seldom to quite often and/or short exposure
time F2 = Frequent to continuous and/or long exposure
time P Possibility of avoiding the hazard P1 = Possible under specific conditions
P2 = Nearly impossible Circuit Category
B = Basic, Able to operate under expected conditions
1 = B + Proved components and safety principles
2 = B + Proved safety principles + tested at appropriate intervals
3 = B + Proved safety principles + a single fault does not lead to loss of safety function + if possible, individual faults should be detected
4 = B + Proved safety principles + a single fault in each of these parts does not lead to loss of safety function + individual faults are detected before the next safety function
Ris
k E
stim
atio
n
SUPERCEDED
![Page 4: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
New Standards
EN 62061 – Safety of Machinery• “Functional safety of safety related electrical,
electronic and programmable electronic systems”• Applies only to electrical control systems• International Electrotechnical Commission
ISO 13849-1 – Safety of Machinery• “Safety related parts of control systems –
principles for design”• Applies to all types of control systems – electrical,
pneumatic, mechanical, hydraulic• Uses the same categories for defining the system
structure as EN 954-1, i.e. B,1,2,3 and 4.• International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO)
![Page 5: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
ISO 13849 Working Method (Simplified)
Determine the System Scope(space, usage, time, environment)
Identify the Risk Sources(all work operations during the life cycle)
Estimate the Risk(determine PL with S, F and P)
Evaluate the Risk(Is action required?)
Reduce the Risk(Avoid, Protect/Safety Devices,
Information)
Identify the Safety Functions
Determine PLr(Often from Risk Estimate)
Design and implement the solution for the safety function
Calculate the PL
START
END
Verify that PL ≥ PLr
![Page 6: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
PLr = Performance Level required to manage the Risk Source – How significant is the risk and therefore what “risk reduction performance” does the solution need to have.
S Severity of injury• S1 Slight (normally reversible, bruises, abrasions,
puncture wounds, minor crushing injuries)• S2 Serious (normally irreversible or death, skeletal
injuries, amputations, death)
F Frequency and/or exposure to hazard
• F1 Seldom to less often and/or exposure time is short (less than once per hour)
• F2 Frequent to continuous and/or exposure time is long (more than once per hour)
P Possibility of avoiding hazard or limiting harm
• P1 Possible under specific conditions (slow machine movements, plenty of space, low power)
• P2 Scarcely possible (quick machine movements, crowded, high power)
Calculate the PLr
![Page 7: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
ISO 13849 Working Method (Simplified)
Determine the System Scope(space, usage, time, environment)
Identify the Risk Sources(all work operations during the life cycle)
Estimate the Risk(determine PL with S, F and P)
Evaluate the Risk(Is action required?)
Reduce the Risk(Avoid, Protect/Safety Devices,
Information)
Identify the Safety Functions
Determine PLr(Often from Risk Estimate)
Design and implement the solution for the safety function
Calculate the PL
START
END
Verify that PL ≥ PLr
![Page 8: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Eliminate the Risk
Elimination(completely remove the hazard)
Substitution(substitute a hazardous machine or process with a non hazardous one)
Engineering(guarding, enclosure, automation)
Administration(Training, SOP’s, reducing number and time of
exposure, LOTO, signs)
PPE(Avoid, Protect/Safety Devices, Information)
![Page 9: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
ISO 13849 Working Method (Simplified)
Determine the System Scope(space, usage, time, environment)
Identify the Risk Sources(all work operations during the life cycle)
Estimate the Risk(determine PL with S, F and P)
Evaluate the Risk(Is action required?)
Reduce the Risk(Avoid, Protect/Safety Devices,
Information)
Identify the Safety Functions
Determine PLr(Often from Risk Estimate)
Design and implement the solution for the safety function
Calculate the PL
START
END
Verify that PL ≥ PLr
Determine PLrequired(Often from Risk Estimate)
![Page 10: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
PLr = Required Performance Level for the remaining Risk Source
S Severity of injury• S1 Slight - normally reversible (bruises, abrasions,
puncture wounds, minor crushing injuries)• S2 Serious - normally irreversible or death (skeletal
injuries, amputations, death)
F Frequency and/or exposure to hazard
• F1 Seldom to less often and/or exposure time is short (less than once per hour)
• F2 Frequent to continuous and/or exposure time is long (more than once per hour)
P Possibility of avoiding hazard or limiting harm
• P1 Possible under specific conditions (slow machine movements, plenty of space, low power)
• P2 Scarcely possible (quick machine movements, crowded, high power)
Calculate the PLr
![Page 11: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
ISO 13849 Working Method (Simplified)
Determine the System Scope(space, usage, time, environment)
Identify the Risk Sources(all work operations during the life cycle)
Estimate the Risk(determine PL with S, F and P)
Evaluate the Risk(Is action required?)
Reduce the Risk(Avoid, Protect/Safety Devices,
Information)
Identify the Safety Functions
Determine PLr(Often from Risk Estimate)
Design and implement the solution for the safety function
Calculate the PL
START
END
Verify that PL ≥ PLr
![Page 12: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Safety Function
Interlock Switch Safety Relay Redundant monitored contractors Line stops
Light curtain Safety Relay Redundant monitored contractors Line stops
Emergency Stop 1 Safety Relay Redundant monitored contractors Line stops
Emergency Stop 2 Identical to Emergency Stop 1 so no need to calculate
Two hand device Safety PLC Machine stop input to robot, redundant Robot stops
Light curtain Safety PLC Machine stop input to robot, redundant Robot stops
Non contact sensor Safety PLC Machine stop input to robot, redundant Robot stops
INPUT LOGIC OUTPUT RESULT
![Page 13: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
ISO 13849 Working Method (Simplified)
Determine the System Scope(space, usage, time, environment)
Identify the Risk Sources(all work operations during the life cycle)
Estimate the Risk(determine PL with S, F and P)
Evaluate the Risk(Is action required?)
Reduce the Risk(Avoid, Protect/Safety Devices,
Information)
Identify the Safety Functions
Determine PLr(Often from Risk Estimate)
Design and implement the solution for the safety function
Calculate the PL (of the Safety Solution)
START
END
Verify that PL ≥ PLr
![Page 14: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Calculate PL of the safety function (simplified)
Safety Function Design
ComponentArchitecture
(Category B,1,2,3 or 4)
DiagnosticCoverage
Common Cause Failure
B Basic, Able to operate under expected conditions1 B + Proved components and safety principles2 B + Proved safety principles + tested at appropriate
intervals3 B + Proved safety principles + a single fault does
not lead to loss of safety function + if possible, individual faults should be detected
4 B + Proved safety principles + a single fault in each of these parts does not lead to loss of safety function + individual faults are detected before the next safety function
Nil <60%Low >60% to <90%Medium >90% to <99%High >99%
DiversitySeparationElectromagnetic compatibilityProtection against pollution
PLPerformance Level
MTTFMean Time to Failure
Nil <60%Low >60% to <90%Medium >90% to <99%High >99%
![Page 15: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Calculate PL of the safety function (not simplified !!)
USE A SPECIALIST
![Page 16: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
ISO 13849 Working Method (Simplified)
Determine the System Scope(space, usage, time, environment)
Identify the Risk Sources(all work operations during the life cycle)
Estimate the Risk(determine PL with S, F and P)
Evaluate the Risk(Is action required?)
Reduce the Risk(Avoid, Protect/Safety Devices,
Information)
Identify the Safety Functions
Determine PLr(Often from Risk Estimate)
Design and implement the solution for the safety function
Calculate the PL
START
END
Verify that PL ≥ PLr
![Page 17: 14. Presentation - Safety System Design](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070603/577ccefe1a28ab9e788e99b9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Questions?