14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 1

Neutrino Oscillation Facility Neutrino Oscillation Facility Design Study in FP7Design Study in FP7

14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 2

• FP7 call and first discussion with EU officers

• DS structure

• Future actions

Neutrino Oscillation Facility Design Neutrino Oscillation Facility Design Study in FP7Study in FP7

14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 3

Work Program: Work Program: CapacitiesCapacities

14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 4

FP7 Capacities Work Programme: FP7 Capacities Work Programme: InfrastructuresInfrastructures

14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 5

Design Studies budgetDesign Studies budget

14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 6

ESFRI and CERN strategy ESFRI and CERN strategy group reportgroup report

14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 7

Discussion with EU officersDiscussion with EU officers(meeting the 05/01/07 with D. Pasini and C. Kurrer)(meeting the 05/01/07 with D. Pasini and C. Kurrer)

•Encouragements for a neutrino DS,•not more than 5 M€ by EU,•duration: 4 years,•possibility to extent the DS using the 2010 call,•meanwhile possible to participate to IA proposals,•but very difficult to obtain funding for R&D,•IA more for improving existing facilities,•investigate for ERC grants (young physicists).

14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 8

Neutrino Oscillation Facility Design Neutrino Oscillation Facility Design Study in FP7Study in FP7

Title: European Design Study of a High Intensity Neutrino Facility

Acronym: EURO-

Aim:Study and comparison (physics performances and cost) of the different options in order the neutrino European community to be ready for the particle physics decisions of 2010-2012.

Duration: 4 years

Cost: <5 M€ (+institutes participation ~50% with a minimum of 25%)

Coordinating person: R. Edgecock

Host institutes: CCLRC

more details in: http://gdrneutrino.in2p3.fr/documents/euro_nu_DS.pdf

14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 9

p-driver

target

collector

front-end

accel.

stor. ring

technologies

beam

OverviewOverview

SB BB NF

13 CPV MSW…

(non-acc. ?)

LAr

Cerenkov

Emulsions

magnetized

physics

detectors

facilities

optional or not baseline

14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 10

p-driver

target

collector

front-end

accel.

stor. ring

technologies

beam

Work PackagesWork Packages

Super-BeamSuper-Beam

Neutrino FactoryNeutrino Factory

Beta-BeamBeta-Beam

in order to underline synergies…

Near det.

Beam instr.

Far det.

Perform.

Comparison

DetectorsDetectors

PhysicsPhysics

14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 11

Work PackagesWork Packages

1. Management (R. Edgecock, M. Lindroos, M. Dracos)

2. Super-Beam (M. Zito, C. Densham)

3. Neutrino Factory (K. Long, J. Pozimski)

4. Beta-Beam (complementarities with EURISOL DS) (A. Fabich, M. Benedikt)

5. Detectors (near, far, beam instrumentation) (P. Soler, xx)

6. Physics (performances, comparisons) (P. Hernandez, A. Donini)

14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 12

Distribution of resourcesDistribution of resourcesWP months %

Management 48 7.4

Super-Beam 168(78 target

36 horn

24 p-driver

30 integration)

25.9(12.0 target

5.6 horn

3.7 p-driver

4.6 integration)

Neutrino Factory 144 22.2

Beta-Beam 132 20.4

detectors 84 13.0

physics 72 11.1

TOTAL 648 ~13.5 FTE/year

14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 13

EURO-EURO- and ESGARD and ESGARD• ESGARD supports the DS on neutrinos with all the partners ready to contribute. It is in

line with the strategy document and would enhance the EU role in this field.

• P-driver is studied elsewhere. Therefore, it should only be in this DS for consistency of the whole project, with a lower priority and without asking for money.

• Detectors should not be a large part of the DS and be only included for consistency of the project. Astrophysics community is working on detector proposals.

• Caveat:

1. all ingredients must be part of the project so that its success does not depend on institutes external to the collaboration.

2. There must be a unique coordinator who can be helped by additional scientific coordinators if necessary.

14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 14

Proposal preparationProposal preparation• Proposal preparation: R. Edgecock, M. Lindroos, M. Dracos (under BENE SG

supervision).

• Identify all interested institutes: under way (summary of the project already prepared: http://bene.web.cern.ch/bene/euro_nu_DS.pdf)

• Propose WP coordinators: finished

• Proposal presentation: 7 Feb. (BENE SG meeting) and 28th March(?).

• Draft to be sent to the participating institutes for approval: end of March

• Discussion with Brussels: end of March

• Signature by participating institutions: beginning of April

• Final proposal agreed: 20 Apr.

• Proposal delivery: 2nd May

14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 15

ENDEND

14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 16

Possible participantsPossible participantsBulgaria: Sofia

France: Grenoble, Saclay, Strasbourg

Germany: Julich, Rostock

Italy: Bari, Genoa, LNF, LNGS, LNL, LNS, Milan

Latvia: IPUL

Russia: Dubna, ITEP, Novosibirsk

Sweden: Uppsala

Switzerland: CERN, ETH, Geneva, PSI

UK: Brunel, CCLRC, IC, Oxford, Sheffield, Warwick

Poland: Cracow

14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 17

Work Package Proposal 1Work Package Proposal 1

• WP1 – Management:Coordinator: Edgecock Lead lab: CCLRC

Consortium Board Membership: DS

coordinators WP coordinators 1 member/institute Purpose: Oversight of DS Meetings:

Twice per year or as required

Steering Committee Membership: DS coordinators

WP coordinators IDS

representatives Others ex-officio as required Purpose: Running the DS Meetings:

Every two months