13 -1 Performance Evaluation in the Decentralized Firm CHAPTER.
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
231 -
download
3
Transcript of 13 -1 Performance Evaluation in the Decentralized Firm CHAPTER.
13 -1
Performance Performance Evaluation in Evaluation in
the the Decentralized Decentralized
FirmFirm
CHAPTERCHAPTER
13 -2
1. Define responsibility accounting, and describe four types of responsibility centers.
2. Tell why firms choose to decentralize.3. Compute and explain return on investment (ROI)
and economic value added (EVA).4. Discuss methods of evaluating and rewarding
managerial performance.5. Explain the role of transfer pricing in a
decentralized firm.
ObjectivesObjectivesObjectivesObjectives
After studying this After studying this chapter, you should chapter, you should
be able to:be able to:
After studying this After studying this chapter, you should chapter, you should
be able to:be able to:
13 -3
Responsibility accounting is a system that measures the results of each responsibility
center according to the information managers need to operate their centers.
Responsibility accounting is a system that measures the results of each responsibility
center according to the information managers need to operate their centers.
13 -4
Types of Responsibility CentersTypes of Responsibility Centers
Cost center: A responsibility center in which a manager is responsible only for costs.
Revenue center: A responsibility center in which a manager is responsible only for sales.
ContinuedContinued
13 -5
Types of Responsibility CentersTypes of Responsibility Centers
Profit center: A responsibility center in which a manager is responsible for both revenues and costs.
Investment center: A responsibility center in which a manager is responsible for revenues, costs, and investments.
13 -6
ACCOUNTING INFORMATION USED TO MEASURE ACCOUNTING INFORMATION USED TO MEASURE PERFORMANCEPERFORMANCE
CapitalCapital Cost Sales Investment Other Cost Sales Investment Other
Cost center x
Revenue center Direct cost xonly
Profit center x x
Investment center x x x x
13 -7
Reasons for DecentralizationReasons for Decentralization
1. Ease of gathering and using local information
2. Focusing of central management
3. Training and motivating segment managers
4. Enhanced competition, exposing segments to market forces
13 -8
Return on InvestmentReturn on InvestmentReturn on InvestmentReturn on Investment
ROI = Operating income
Average operating assets
Beginning net book value + Ending net book value
2
13 -9
Comparison of ROIComparison of ROI
Electronics Medical SuppliesElectronics Medical Supplies Divisions DivisionsDivisions Divisions2003:
Sales $30,000,000 $117,00,000Operating income 1,800,000 3,510,000Average operating assets 10,000,000 19,500,000ROI 18 18% %
$1,800,000$10,000,000
13 -10
Comparison of ROIComparison of ROI
Electronics Medical SuppliesElectronics Medical Supplies Divisions DivisionsDivisions Divisions2004:
Sales $40,000,000 $117,00,000Operating income 2,000,000 2,925,000Average operating assets 10,000,000 19,500,000ROI 20 15% %
$2,000,000$10,000,000
13 -11
Margin and TurnoverMargin and TurnoverMargin and TurnoverMargin and Turnover
ROI = Margin x Turnover
Operating IncomeSales
SalesAverage operating assets
13 -12
MARGIN AND TURNOVER COMPARISONSMARGIN AND TURNOVER COMPARISONS Electronics Medical SuppliesElectronics Medical Supplies
Division Division Division Division
Margin 6.0% 5.0% 3.0% 2.5%Turnover x 3.0 x 4.0 x 6.0 x 6.0ROI 18.0% 20.0% 18.0% 15.0%
2003 2004 2003 20042003 2004 2003 2004
13 -13
1. It encourages managers to focus on the relationship among sales, expenses, and investments.
2. It encourages managers to focus on cost efficiency.
3. It encourages managers to focus on operating asset efficiency.
Advantages of ROIAdvantages of ROI
13 -14
1) It can produce a narrow focus on divisional profitability at the expense of profitability for the overall firm.
2) It encourages managers to focus on the short run at the expense of the long run.
Disadvantages of ROIDisadvantages of ROI
13 -15
Economic value added (EVA) is after-tax operating profit minus the total annual cost of capital.
EVA = After-tax operating income – (Weighted average cost of capital x Total capital employed)
EVA = After-tax operating income – (Weighted average cost of capital x Total capital employed)
13 -16
There are two steps involved in computing cost of capital:
1. Determine the weighted average cost of capital (a percentage figure)
2. Determine the total dollar amount of capital employed
13 -17
Weighted Average Cost of Capital
Suppose that a company has two sources of financing: $2 million of long-term bonds paying
9 percent interest and $6 million of common stock, which is considered to be of average risk. If the company’s tax rate is 40 percent and the rate of interest on long-term government bonds is 6 percent, the company’s weighted average
cost of capital is computed as follows:
Suppose that a company has two sources of financing: $2 million of long-term bonds paying
9 percent interest and $6 million of common stock, which is considered to be of average risk. If the company’s tax rate is 40 percent and the rate of interest on long-term government bonds is 6 percent, the company’s weighted average
cost of capital is computed as follows:
13 -18
Weighted Average Cost of Capital
Amount Percent x After-Tax Cost = Weighted Cost
Bonds $2,000,000 0.25 0.09(1 –0.4) = .054 0.0135
Equity 6,000,000 0.75 0.06 + 0.06 = .120 0.0900
Total $8,000,000 0.1035
Thus, the company’s weighted cost of capital average is 10.35 percent.
Thus, the company’s weighted cost of capital average is 10.35 percent.
6m/8m
1 = 100% laba0,4 = 40% pajak
0,06 = risk free for common stock
13 -19
Suppose that Mahalo, Inc., had after-tax operating income last year of $900,000. Three
sources of financing were used by the company: $2 million of mortgage bonds paying 8 percent interest, $3 million of unsecured bonds paying 10 percent interest, and $10 million in common stock, which was considered to be no more or less risky than other stocks. Mahalo, Inc. pays
a marginal tax rate of 40 percent.
EVA ExampleEVA ExampleEVA ExampleEVA Example
13 -20
Weighted Average Cost of Capital
Weighted Amount Percent x After-Tax Cost = Cost
Mortgage bonds $ 2,000,000 0.133 0.048 0.006Unsecured bonds 3,000,000 0.200 0.060 0.012Common stock 10,000,000 0.667 0.120 0.080 Total $15,000,000Weighted average cost of capital 0.098
13 -21
Mahalo’s EVA is calculated as follows:
After tax operating income $900,000
Less: Cost of capital 784,000
EVA $116,000
EVA ExampleEVA ExampleEVA ExampleEVA Example
13 -22
A number of companies have discovered that EVA helps to encourage the right kind of behavior from their divisions in a way that emphasis on operating income alone cannot. The underlying reason is EVA’s reliance on the true cost of capital.
Behavioral Aspects of EVA
13 -23
Behavioral Aspects of EVAIn many companies, the responsibility for investment decisions rests with corporate management. As a result, the cost of capital is considered a corporate expense. If a division builds inventories and investment, the cost of financing that investment is passed along to the overall income statement and does not show up as a reduction from the division’s operating income.
13 -24
Why would managers not provide good service? There are three reasons:
1. They may have low ability
2. They may prefer not to work as hard as needed
3. They may prefer to spend company resources on perquisites
Incentive Pay for ManagersIncentive Pay for ManagersIncentive Pay for ManagersIncentive Pay for Managers
13 -25
Incentive Pay for ManagersIncentive Pay for ManagersIncentive Pay for ManagersIncentive Pay for Managers
Perquisites are a type of fringe benefit given to managers over and above a salary.
A nice office
Use of a company car or jet
Expense accounts
Paid country club memberships
13 -26
The value of a transferred good is
revenue to the selling division and cost to the buying division. This value is called
transfer pricing.
Transfer PricingTransfer PricingTransfer PricingTransfer Pricing
13 -27
(1) divisional performance measures
(2) firmwide profits
(3) divisional autonomy
Transfer PricingTransfer PricingTransfer PricingTransfer Pricing
Transfer pricing affects both transferring divisions and the firm as a whole through its impact on--
13 -28
Opportunity Cost ApproachOpportunity Cost Approach
This approach identifies the minimum and maximum price that a selling division would be willing to accept and the maximum price that a
buying division would be willing to pay.
The minimum transfer price is the transfer price that would leave the selling division no worse off if the goods were sold to an internal division than if the
good were sold to an external party (floor).
The minimum transfer price is the transfer price that would leave the selling division no worse off if the goods were sold to an internal division than if the
good were sold to an external party (floor).
The maximum transfer price is the transfer price that would leave the buying division no worse off if an
input were purchased from an internal division than if the good were purchased externally (ceiling).
The maximum transfer price is the transfer price that would leave the buying division no worse off if an
input were purchased from an internal division than if the good were purchased externally (ceiling).
13 -29
The Transfer Pricing Illustration
Tyson Manufacturers produces small appliances. The Small Parts Division produces parts used by the Small Motors Division. The parts also are sold to other manufacturers and
wholesalers.
13 -30
The Transfer Pricing Illustration
The Small Motors Division is operating at 70 percent
capacity. A request is received for 100,000 units of a certain
model at $30 per unit. A component for this motor can be supplied by the Small Parts Division. The transfer price is
$8 despite the Small Parts Division only experiencing a
cost of $5 per unit.
13 -31
The Transfer Pricing Illustration
Using the $8 transfer price, the total cost is $31 per unit,
calculated as follows:
Direct materials $10Transferred-in component 8Direct labor 2Variable overhead 1Fixed overhead 10 Total cost $31
Direct materials $10Transferred-in component 8Direct labor 2Variable overhead 1Fixed overhead 10 Total cost $31
13 -32
The Transfer Pricing Illustration
The Small Motors Division is operating at 70 percent capacity,
so the $10 fixed cost is not relevant. Recalculating the cost--
The Small Motors Division can pay the Small Parts Division $8 per unit and still make a substantial
contribution to the overall profitability of the Division.
Direct materials $10Transferred-in component 8Direct labor 2Variable overhead 1Total cost $21
Direct materials $10Transferred-in component 8Direct labor 2Variable overhead 1Total cost $21
13 -33
Negotiated Transfer PricesNegotiated Transfer Prices
When imperfections exist in competitive markets for the
intermediate product, market price may no longer be suitable.
When imperfections exist in competitive markets for the
intermediate product, market price may no longer be suitable.
13 -34
Negotiated Transfer PricesNegotiated Transfer Prices
In this case, negotiated transfer prices may be a practical
alternative. Opportunity costs can be used to define the boundaries
of the negotiation set.
In this case, negotiated transfer prices may be a practical
alternative. Opportunity costs can be used to define the boundaries
of the negotiation set.
13 -35
Disadvantages of Negotiated Transfer Prices
Disadvantages of Negotiated Transfer Prices
1. A division manager who has private information may take advantage of another divisional manager.
2. Performance measures may be distorted by the negotiated skills of managers.
3. Negotiation can consume considerable time and resources.
13 -36
Despite the disadvantages, negotiated price transfer prices
offer some hope of complying with the three criteria of goal
congruence, autonomy, and accurate performance evaluation.
Despite the disadvantages, negotiated price transfer prices
offer some hope of complying with the three criteria of goal
congruence, autonomy, and accurate performance evaluation.