12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

download 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

of 20

Transcript of 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    1/20

    Radiation: Processes and Properties

    Surface Radiative Properties

    Chapter 12

    Sections 12.4 through 12.7

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    2/20

    Emissivity

    Surface Emissivity

    Radiation emitted by a surface may be determined by introducing a property

    (the emissivity) that contrasts its emission with the ideal behavior of a blackbody

    at the same temperature.

    The definition of the emissivity depends upon ones interest in resolving

    directional and/or spectral features of the emitted radiation, in contrast

    to averages over all directions (hemispherical and/or wavelengths (total).

    The spectral, directional emissivity:

    ,

    ,

    ,

    , , ,, , ,

    ,

    e

    b

    I TT

    I T

    The spectral, hemispherical emissivity (a directional average):

    2 2

    0 0

    2 2

    0 0

    /

    ,

    /

    , ,

    , , , cos sin,,

    , , cos sin

    e

    b b

    I T d dE TT

    E T I T d d

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    3/20

    Emissivity (cont)

    The total, hemispherical emissivity (a directional and spectral average):

    0 b

    b b

    T E T d E TT

    E T E T

    ,, , ,

    To a reasonable approximation, the hemispherical emissivity is equal to

    the normal emissivity.

    n

    Representative values of the total, normal emissivity:

    Note:

    Low emissivity of polished metals and increasing emissivity for unpolished

    and oxidized surfaces.

    Comparatively large emissivities of nonconductors.

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    4/20

    Emissivity (cont)

    Representative spectral variations:

    Note decreasing with increasing for metals and different behavior for nonmetals.,n

    Representative temperature variations:

    nWhy does increase with increasing for tungsten and not for aluminum oxide?

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    5/20

    Abs, Ref & Trans

    Response to Surface Irradiation: Absorption, Reflection

    and Transmission

    There may be three responses of a semitransparentmedium to irradiation:

    Reflection from the medium refG, .

    Absorption within the medium absG, .

    Transmission through the medium trG, .

    Radiation balance

    ref abs tr G G G G , , ,

    In contrast to the foregoing volumetric effects, the response of an opaque material

    to irradiation is governed by surface phenomena and 0, .trG

    , ,ref tr G G G

    The wavelength of the incident radiation, as well as the nature of the material,

    determine whether the material is semitransparent or opaque.

    Are glass and water semitransparent or opaque?

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    6/20

    Abs, Ref & Trans (cont)

    Unless an opaque material is at a sufficiently high temperature to emit visible

    radiation, its coloris determined by the spectral dependence of reflection in

    response to visible irradiation.

    What may be said about reflection for a white surface? Ablacksurface?

    Why are leaves green?

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    7/20

    Absorptivity

    Absorptivity of an Opaque Material The spectral, directional absorptivity:

    , ,

    ,

    ,

    , ,, ,

    , ,

    i abs

    i

    I

    I

    The spectral, hemispherical absorptivity:

    2 2

    0 0

    2 2

    0 0

    /

    , , ,

    /

    ,

    , , , , cos sin

    , , cos sin

    abs i

    i

    G I d d

    G I d d

    To what does the foregoing result simplify, if the irradiation is diffuse?

    If the surface is diffuse?

    The total, hemispherical absorptivity:

    0

    oabsG dG

    G G d

    If the irradiation corresponds to emission from a blackbody, how may the

    above expression be rewritten?

    Assuming negligible temperature dependence,

    The absorptivity is approximately independent of the surface temperature,

    but if the irradiation corresponds to emission from a blackbody, why does

    depend on the temperature of the blackbody?

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    8/20

    Reflectivity

    Reflectivity of an Opaque Material

    The spectral, directional reflectivity: Assuming negligible temperature

    dependence:

    , ,

    ,

    ,

    , ,, ,, ,

    i ref

    i

    II

    The spectral, hemispherical reflectivity:

    22

    0 0

    /

    , , ,

    ,

    , , , , cos sin

    , ,

    ref i

    i

    G I d d

    G I

    To what does the foregoing result simplify if the irradiation is diffuse?

    If the surface is diffuse?

    The total, hemispherical reflectivity:

    0

    0

    abs G dGG G d

    Limiting conditions of diffuse and

    spectral reflection. Polished and rough surfaces.

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    9/20

    Reflectivity (cont)

    Note strong dependence of and 1 on .

    Is snow a highly reflective substance? White paint?

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    10/20

    TransmissivityTransmissivity

    The spectral, hemispherical transmissivity: Assuming negligible temperature

    dependence,

    ,trG

    G

    Note shift from semitransparent to opaque conditions at large and small wavelengths. The total, hemispherical transmissivity:

    0

    0

    trtrG dG

    G G d

    ,

    For a semitransparent medium,

    11

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    11/20

    Kirchhoffs Law

    Kirchhoffs law equates the total, hemispherical emissivity of a surface to its

    total, hemispherical absorptivity:

    Kirchhoffs Law

    However, conditions associated with its derivation are highly restrictive:

    Irradiation of the surface corresponds to emission from a blackbody at the

    same temperature as the surface.

    However, Kirchhoffs law may be applied to the spectral, directional properties

    without restriction:

    , ,

    Why are there no restrictions on use of the foregoing equation?

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    12/20

    Diffuse/Gray Surfaces

    Diffuse/Gray Surfaces With 2 2

    0 0

    2 2

    0 0

    /

    ,

    /

    cos sin

    cos sin

    d d

    d d

    and 2 20 0

    2 2

    0 0

    /

    , ,

    /

    ,

    cos sin

    cos sin

    i

    i

    I d d

    I d d

    Under what conditions may we equate to ?

    With

    0 b

    b

    E d

    E T

    ,

    and 0 G d

    G

    Under what conditions may we equate to ?

    Conditions associated with

    assuming a gray surface:

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    13/20

    Problem: Surface Emissivity and Absorptivity

    Problem 12.49: Determination of the solar absorptivity and total emissivity

    of a diffuse surface from knowledge of the spectral

    distribution of and the surface temperature.

    KNOWN: Spectral, hemispherical absorptivity of an opaque surface.

    FIND: (a) Solar absorptivity, (b) Total, hemispherical emissivity for T s = 340K.

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    14/20

    Problem: Surface Emissivity and Absorptivity (cont)

    SCHEMATIC:

    ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Surface is opaque, (2) = , (3) Solar spectrum has G = G,Sproportional to E,b (, 5800K).

    ANALYSIS: (a) The solar absorptivity may be expressed as

    S ,b ,b0 0E ,5800K d / E ,5800K d .

    The integral can be written in three parts using F(0 ) terms.

    S 1 2 30 0.3 0 1.5 0 0.3 0 1.5F F F 1 F .

    From Table 12.1,

    T = 0.3 5800 = 1740 mK F(0 0.3 m) = 0.0335T = 1.5 5800 = 8700 mK F(0 1.5 m) = 0.8805.

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    15/20

    Problem: Surface Emissivity and Absorptivity (cont)

    Hence,

    S 0 0.0355 0.9 0.8805 0.0335 0.1 1 0.8805 0.774.

    (b) The total, hemispherical emissivity for the surface at 340K may be expressed as

    ,b b0E ,340K d / E 340K .

    With = , the integral can be written in terms of the F(0 ) function. However, it isreadily recognized that since

    0 1.5 m,340K F 0.000 at T 1.5 340 510 m K

    there is negligible emission below 1.5 m.

    It follows that

    0.1

    COMMENTS: The assumption = is satisfied if the surface is irradiated diffusely or ifthe surface itself is diffuse. Note that for this surface under the specified conditions of solar

    irradiation and surface temperature, S. Such a surface isspectrally selective.

    P bl E B l f I di t d S f

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    16/20

    Problem: Energy Balance for an Irradiated Surface

    Problem 12.90: Determination of the emissivity and absorptivity of a coated

    vertical plate exposed to solar-simulation lamps and the magnitude

    of the irradiation required to maintain a prescribed plate

    temperature.

    KNOWN: Vertical plate of height L 2 m suspended in quiescent air. Exposed surface withdiffuse coating of prescribed spectral absorptivity distribution subjected to simulated solar

    irradiation, GS,. Plate steady-state temperature Ts 400 K

    P bl E B l f I di t d S f ( t)

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    17/20

    Problem: Energy Balance for an Irradiated Surface (cont)

    FIND: Plate emissivity, , plate absorptivity, , and plate irradiation, G.

    ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-state conditions, (2) Ambient air is extensive, quiescent, (3)

    Spectral distribution of the simulated solar irradiation, GS, , proportional to that of a blackbody

    at 5800 K, (4) Coating is opaque, diffuse, and (5) Plate is perfectly insulated on the edges and the

    back side, and (6) Plate is isothermal.

    PROPERTIES: Table A.4, Air (Tf 350 K, 1 atm): 20.92 10-6 m2s, k = 0.030 W/mK,

    = 29.90 10-6 m2/s, Pr 0.700.

    SCHEMATIC:

    P bl E B l f I di t d S f ( t)

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    18/20

    Problem: Energy Balance for an Irradiated Surface (cont)

    ANALYSIS: (a) Perform an energy balance on the plate as shown in the schematic on a per unitplate width basis,

    in outE E 0

    4s sG T h T T L 0

    where and are determined from knowledge of and h is estimated from an appropriatecorrelation.

    Plate total emissivity: Expressing the emissivity in terms of the band emission factor, F (0 - T),

    1 s 1 s1 20 T 0 TF 1 F

    0.9 0 0.1 1 0 0.1

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    19/20

    Problem: Energy Balance for an Irradiated Surface (cont)

    Plate absorptivity: With the spectral distribution of simulated solar irradiation proportional to

    emission from a blackbody at 5800 K,

    1 s 1 s1 20 T 0 TF 1 F

    0.9 0.7202 0.1 1 0.7202 0.676

  • 7/27/2019 12B-Chapter 12, Sec 12-1.4 - 12.7 Black

    20/20

    Problem: Energy Balance for an Irradiated Surface (cont)

    Irradiation on the Plate: Substituting numerical values into Eq. (1),

    4 48 2

    0.676G 0.1 5.67 10 W m K 400 K 25.66W m K 400 300 K 0

    2G 1052 W m