114 BAB 4
-
Upload
deasysartika -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of 114 BAB 4
-
8/3/2019 114 BAB 4
1/3
114 BAB 4
Change and the ongoing process of legal-economic reconstruction through the
nexus process thus makes necessary an evolutionary-historical approach that accounts
for the array of factors and forces promoting both continuity and change over time.
Mutual Interdependence, Conflict,
and the Problem of Order.
The Institutionalists view the legal - economic system as a system of manual
interdependence rather than atomistic independence. the economiy, says Schmid
(1989, p. 59), is "a universe of human relations," not merely "a universe of
commodities," and within this worls each individual has scarcity relationships with
position off of contract curvers to positions on contract curves in the process of
exhausting gains from trade, the Institutionalist approach place strong emhasis on (1)
who gets to play, (2) where one starts in the game, and (3) the strategic behavior (i.e.,
the conscious, calculated choices) of participants that frame the position, role, and
status of each individual.
Given the importance of human interdependence and the emphasis on who
plays and what are the starting points within the Institutionalist approach, the
emphasis of this approach is on conflict rather than harmony, where The role of the
legal system, including both common and constitutional law, is to provide a
framework or process for conflict resolution and the development of legal rights
(Samuel and Mercuro, 1979, p.166). The fundamental problem here is that of order,
which Samuels 91972a, p. 584) defines as the reconciling of freedom and control, or
autonomy and coordination including hierarchy and equality, with continuity and
change. The ultimate meaning of the legal and economic process, says Samuels
(1971, p. 449), is in terms of their functioning toward resolving the problem (s) of
order. The existence of conflicting interest necessitates both and a method (or
methods) for determining how these conflicts are to be resolved.
Thus, society is recognized, at leats in part, as a cooperative venture for
mutual advantage where there is both an identity and conflict of interests in ongoing
human relations. Within this system of mutual interdependence, societal institutions,
including the lel system, both enhance the scope of cooperative endeavors and
-
8/3/2019 114 BAB 4
2/3
channel political legal economic conflict, of whose interests government will give
effect through law and otherwise, is the resolution of the problem of order in society
a working out of a societal structure that promotes coherence, security, and
orderliness in human relations. Indeed, the manner by which a society comes to
channel conflict says much about its ultimate character.
RIGHTS, POWER, AND GOVERNMENT
From the institutional perspective, law is fundamentally a matter of right
creation and re-creation. Consistent with the positive, desriptive nature of this
approach, Institutionalists are concerned with the rights (re) creation process and the
impact of this process on legal economic decsion making and activity. To
understand the importance of rights from the institutional perspective, it is firs
necessary to understand the Institutionalist conception of the determination of the
individual choice process and the activities open to individuals.
Individual decision making is a function of ones opportunity set, which
consists of the available alternatives for action or choice , each with a relative
opportunity cost, which are open to the individual (Samuels, 1974, p. 120). However,
these opportunity sets are not without limit in their scope; rather, reflecting human
interdepence and scarcity, each individuals opportunity set is constrained, and indeed
shaped, by the opportunity sets of others in society. Each individual desires to make
choices from a set that is as uncostrained as possible, which, in turn, means that
individuals will wish to control the choices, and hence opportunity sets, of others who
may constrain their choice. The exten of each individuals ability to determine his or
her own choices and to influence the opprtunity sets, and hence choices, of others is
the outcome of a process ofmanual coercion, where the ability to coerce is simply the
ability of A to impact Bs opportunity set without Bs consent. An individuals
capacity to exercise coercion is, in turn, a function of that individuals power, defined
as the means or capacity with which to exercise choice (Samuels, 1972b, p. 65), and
this power is relative to the power of others. Thus, The opportuity set of the
individual, within which he attempts a constrained maximizing equilibrium, is a
functon of the total structure of mutual coercion, grounded upon relative power
(Samuel, 1972b, p. 65). Moreover, power is also a dependent variable in this process,
being a function of the choices made from opportunity sets that exist and evolve
through time (Samuels, 1972b, p. 66).
-
8/3/2019 114 BAB 4
3/3
The origin of rights in the resolution of conflict of interest brings to the fore
the point that rights have a dual nature the opportinity set enhancement of those
who have rights and the opportunity set restriction of those who are exposes to them
(Samuels, 1974, p. 122). Virtually every legal change imposes both benefits and costs,
the enhancement of some opportunity sets and the simultaneous restiction of others.
Externalities are thus ubiquitous and reciprocal - any (re) definition, (re) allocation,
or change in the ecternal ity remains; it is merely shifted. In institutional law and
economics, system of property, tort, and contract law, then do not providesolutions to
situations of externality, but rather only resolutions, as externalities, and hence benefit
and harm, are channel in a particular direction through the legal delimitation of rights.
Government is seen