110719 Webinar #3 - FINAL...
Transcript of 110719 Webinar #3 - FINAL...
7/19/2011
1
Partnership for Patients-National Priorities Partnership©
Patient Safety Webinar Series
Webinar #3: Preventing Adverse Drug Events in Your
Organization
J l 19 2011July 19, 2011
Today’s Hosts and SpeakerModerator Bernie Rosof, MD, Chairman, Board of
Directors, Huntington Hospital, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, NPP Co Chair
© National Priorities Partnership
NPP Co-Chair
Featured speaker Michael Cohen, MS, ScD, RPh, President,
Institute for Safe Medication Practices
2
Today’s Reactor Panel
Steven Meisel, PharmD, Director of Patient Safety, Fairview Health Services
David Bates, MD, MSc, Chief Quality Officer Brigham and Women’s Hospital
© National Priorities Partnership
Officer, Brigham and Women s Hospital Bob Galvin, MD, MBA, Chief Executive
Officer, Equity Healthcare, The Blackstone Group
3
7/19/2011
2
Welcome to the Patient Safety Webinar SeriesThe objectives of the series are to:
Share strategies for “getting started” to accelerate improvements in national patient safety efforts
© National Priorities Partnership
safety efforts
Highlight the role of public-private partnership in achieving Partnership for Patients goals
Describe the role of the NPP in catalyzing action and enabling change
4
Objectives for Today’s Webinar
Provide an opportunity for thought leaders in the field of adverse drug events to share best practices, success stories, and strategies for getting started
© National Priorities Partnership© National Priorities Partnership
Generate action in organizations and communities nationwide
Provide examples of public-private partnerships working collaboratively to achieve results
5
About the Audience
© National Priorities Partnership6
7/19/2011
3
Audience Regional Location
© National Priorities Partnership7
Polling Question
Which demographic best describes your organization or community?
© National Priorities Partnership
g y
8
Developing a National Quality Strategy
Health reform legislation, the Affordable Care Act (ACA), requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to “establish a national strategy to improve the delivery of healthcare services, patient health outcomes, and population health.”
HR 3590 §3011, amending the Public Health Service Act (PHSA) by adding §399HH (a)(1)
© National Priorities Partnership9
7/19/2011
4
HHS’ Domains and Principles for the National Quality Strategy
Principles reflect: Patient-centeredness and
family engagement Quality care for patients of
all ages, populations, i l ti d
BETTERCARE
service locations, and sources of coverage
Elimination of disparities Alignment of public and
private sectors
10© National Priorities Partnership
AFFORDABLECARE
HEALTHY PEOPLE/
COMMUNITIES
HHS 2011 National Quality Strategy:Six National Priorities
1. Making care safer by reducing harm caused in the delivery of care.
2. Ensuring that each person and family are engaged as partners in their care.
3. Promoting effective communication and coordination of care.4. Promoting the most effective prevention and treatment practices
for the leading causes of mortality, starting with cardiovasculardisease.
5. Working with communities to promote wide use of best practices to enable healthy living.
6. Making quality care more affordable for individuals, families, employers, and governments by developing and spreading new health care delivery models.
11© National Priorities Partnership
NPP has been specifically asked to provide input to HHS on identified priorities as well as at least:
NPP’s Ongoing Role in Consultation to HHS on the National Quality Strategy
three goals per priority area two strategic opportunities per goal two measures per goal
12© National Priorities Partnership
7/19/2011
5
Partnership for Patients Goals
Keep patients from getting injured or sicker. By the end of 2013, preventable hospital-acquired conditions would decrease by 40%compared to 2010.
Help patients heal without complication. By the end of 2013, preventable complications during a transition from one care setting to another would be decreased so that all hospital readmissions would be reduced by 20%compared to 2010.
13
Partnership for Patients Nine Areas of Focus
Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections
Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections
Pressure Ulcers Surgical Site Infections Venous
ThromboembolismBlood Stream Infections Injuries from Falls and
Immobility Obstetrical Adverse
Events
Thromboembolism Ventilator-Associated
Pneumonia Adverse Drug Events
14
Partnership for Patients Adverse Drug Events
Goal: Hospitals will reduce preventable adverse drug events by 50% by 2013 Over adverse drug events by 50% by 2013. Over
three years, this would prevent 830,000 ADE’s.
15
7/19/2011
6
How Will Change Actually Happen?
And how will it happen at And how will it happen at scale?
How Will Change Actually Happen? There is no “silver bullet,” but we know we
must:
work together provide thoughtful incentives provide thoughtful incentives engage patients and families, authentically engage leadership assist in the painstaking work of improvement
Approaches to Preventing Adverse Drug Events in Health Systemsy
Michael R. Cohen, MS, ScD, RPhPresident
Institute for Safe Medication Practices
18
7/19/2011
7
Sources of Information
Staff Voluntary reporting; paper, hotline, or online
reports “Good Catch” programs Staff meetingsPatients
19
Patients Satisfaction surveys Focus groups Patients instructed to “SPEAK UP”
Patient is partner/patient pledge
Group or individual visits to other locations
Sources of Information
Proactive Risk Assessment
Medication safety self assessments External sources
20
Patient Safety Organizations ISMP-ASHP-NCCMERP National Alert Network
Leadership walk arounds
ISMP Medication Safety Self Assessment
ISMP Medication Safety Self Assessment® for Hospitals 2011 Self Assessment
Automated Dispensing Cabinets
21
p g Antithrombotic Therapy Bar Coding Self Assessment Community/Ambulatory Pharmacy Physician Practices
7/19/2011
8
22
23
External Sources of Risk Identification
Error reporting programs TJC sentinel event alerts FDA
ISMP National Medication Error Reporting Program FDA MedWatch program FDA Patient Safety news
24
at e t Sa ety e s
PA-PSRS ISMP QuarterWatch and Quarterly Action Agenda
Professional publications ISMP publications Patient safety journals
Knowledgeable consultants
7/19/2011
9
25
26
www.patientsafetyauthority.org
27
7/19/2011
10
www.accessdata.fda.gov/psn/
28
Sources of Information
Concurrent Risk Assessment
Pharmacy Interventions (clinical or dispensing staff)
Nursing Interventions
29
Nursing Interventions Direct observation (AU MEDS)
(http://www.medaccuracy.com/) - Barker, et. al., Auburn University
Triggers and markers
Retrospective Risk Assessment Data from technology Overrides of automated dispensing cabinets CPOE and pharmacy system alerts Smart pump data Bedside scanning data etc
Sources of Information
30
Bedside scanning data, etc. Chart reviews Internal voluntary reporting Share information about errors that happen within
department and corrected! IHI trigger tool Review of aggregate RCA data
7/19/2011
11
Sharing and Learning
Safety newsletters to staff Work with your Patient Safety Organization Partnership for Patient Safety Collaborative projects with stakeholders in your
31
p j yarea Project in Philadelphia area to make use of
HYDROmorphone safer
Importance of Consumer Involvement
© National Priorities Partnership32
Importance of Consumer Involvement
33
7/19/2011
12
HYDROmorphone Experience
Equianalgesic potency to morphine not understood
Orders for excessive doses and/or short intervals between doses
Opioid naïve status is often not consideredO h i ifi ib i f Other significant contributing factors are not being appreciated: Patient’s age, respiratory disease, concomitant
therapy with other opioids, benzodiazepines, etc. Lack of patient monitoring Actions taken
Available at www.ismp.org
35
Key Questions for the Audience
1. What has your organization done to reduce adverse drug events? What have you found to be the most effective approach?
2. In your experience, what were the barriers to
© National Priorities Partnership
implementation and keys to success?
To provide comments, please type into the chat box at the bottom of your screen or
dial 1-888-857-6930 (confirmation code 9987491).
36
7/19/2011
13
Polling Question
Do you have a system in place for identifying vulnerable populations at risk of adverse drug
© National Priorities Partnership
p p gevents?
37
Polling Question
What are you currently doing to follow up with patients to minimize adverse drug
events?
© National Priorities Partnership
events?
38
Reactor Panel Discussion
Moderated by Bernie Rosof
© National Priorities Partnership
NPP Co-Chair
39
7/19/2011
14
Frontline Provider Perspective
Steven Meisel, PharmDDirector of Patient SafetyFairview Health Services
40
Health System Perspective
Steven Meisel Pharm DSteven Meisel, Pharm.D.
Director of Patient Safety
Fairview Health Services
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Harm vs. Error
Potential Adverse Events
Preventable Adverse Events
MedicationErrors
Adverse Drug Events
7/19/2011
15
Strong Organizational Leadership &
Culture
P ti t
Build Adaptability, Resilience, &
Teamwork
Deploy Known Best Practices & Design New Best Practices
Patient
Safety
Training
Total reports are down 40.3% from 2007 to 2010 and 13.3% from 2009 to 2010.
44
*100% review of triggers associated with anticoagulants, narcotics, sedatives, and antidiabetic agents. Other ADEs not
included.
15% reduction from 2009
Frontline Provider Perspective
David Bates, MD, MScChief Quality Officer
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
45
7/19/2011
16
MD
Pharmacist
Impact on Serious Medication Errors
Med Ordering
Transcription
OrderingErrors (49%)
TranscriptionErrors (11%)
Order Entry &decision support‐55% reduction
PharmacyBarcoding‐
RN Patient
Medication on Wards
MedicationAdmin Record
Dispensing
Administration
DispensingErrors (14%)
AdministrationErrors (26%)
Errors (11%)
46
Barcoding67% reduction
‐eMAR/barcodingat bedside‐ 51% reduction
eMAR‐100% reduction
CPOE Cumulative net savings were $16.7 million over 10 years, and net
operating $9.5 million [Kaushal, JAMIA, 2006] Leading contributors
Renal dosing guidance Tools to help nurses Specific drug guidance Adverse drug event prevention
Financial Impact of Interventions
Barcoding At time of dispensing [Maviglia, Archives Int Med 2007]
5-year cumulative costs = $2.3M $1.4M one-time investment (pre go-live, first 2 years) $343K/yr recurring (post go-live, last 3 years)
5-year cumulative benefits = $5.5M 5-year cumulative net benefit = $3.3M Break-even within 1st year after go-live
At point of care
Healthcare Purchaser Perspective
Bob Galvin, MD, MBAChief Executive Officer
Equity Healthcare, The Blackstone Group
48
7/19/2011
17
Employer/Purchaser Thoughts on ADE’s
Why employers care◘ Healthy, productive employees◘ Value of healthcare spend◘ Want to trust the healthcare system
Hits close to home◘ Aerospace….fuselage cracks due to mis-aligned rivets
Challenger o-ring: lack of low temperature testing
49
Challenger o ring: lack of low temperature testing◘ Entertainment…Spiderman falls due to improperly rigged harness
Healthcare more complex but both sides can learn from each other◘ Build quality into design◘ Usable continuous feedback◘ Redundant systems◘ Root cause analysis ◘ Culture and communication
Employer Role
Support Safety agenda
◘ All major employer groups have signed onto Partnership for Parents
Use tools we have – create external environment that supports safety efforts
◘ Transparency to employees/families Leapfrog Group CPOE one of three initial leaps Insist on public disclosure Annual survey drives accountability
◘ Purchasing leverage – focus on payment reform
CPR (Catalyst Payment Reform) - new employer non-profit group
Influence insurers to pay for quality
Push for e-prescribing: meaningful use criteria, adoption of Bridges to Excellence, etc
Adopt Medicare payment changes on re-admission, other avoidable errors
New payment models should reward safety
Make dollars available for investments in QI
Make business case to hospital leaders that allocating dollars to quality is in their financial interest
50
Questions for the Panelists
From your perspective, how would you manage these high-risk scenarios:
An elderly patient taking 12 medications, prescribed
© National Priorities Partnership
y p g pby 4 different specialists?
A patient who does not adhere to taking all his medications exactly as prescribed?
A patient who speaks English as a second language?
51
7/19/2011
18
Questions for the Panelists
What is your advice for webinar participants who want to accelerate change and achieve success?
© National Priorities Partnership
What policy or environmental supports are needed to accomplish your goals?
52
Discussion with the Audience
Please use the chat box at the bottom of your t d t ti t th
© National Priorities Partnership
screen to send a comment or question to the moderators, or dial 1-888-857-6930 (confirmation
code 9987491).
53
Polling Question
Have you experienced recent success with reducing adverse drug events in your
© National Priorities Partnership
organization?
54
7/19/2011
19
Polling Question
What tools are you currently using to reduce adverse drug events?
© National Priorities Partnership
reduce adverse drug events?
55
Audience Discussion Questions
1. What changes in your payment system would make it easier for you to accelerate success in reducing adverse drug events?
© National Priorities Partnership
success in reducing adverse drug events?
2. How do you identify and measure adverse drug events in your organization?
56
Audience Discussion Questions
3. What do you do in your organization to actively engage each patient in his or her care?
© National Priorities Partnership
care?
4. What action might you take based on what you heard today?
57
7/19/2011
20
Polling Question
When do you plan to act on the
© National Priorities Partnership
information provided in this webinar?
58
Polling Question
Did you find tangible actions and practices you can put to use in your organization or
it i thi bi ?
© National Priorities Partnership
community in this webinar?
59
Conclusion
Next Steps, Further Resources, and C l di R k
© National Priorities Partnership
Concluding Remarks
60
7/19/2011
21
Further Resources
Partnership for Patients website:
www.healthcare.gov/center/programs/partnership/index.html
National Priorities Partnership website:
www.qualityforum.org/Setting_Priorities/NPP/National_Priorities
© National Priorities Partnership
_Partnership.aspx
National Quality Forum patient safety webpage:
www.qualityforum.org/Topics/Safety_pages/Patient_Safety.aspx
61
Patient Safety Webinar SeriesUpcoming webinar topics:
Infections in Intensive Care Units – August 3 Surgical Site Infections – August 16
P Ul d I j i f S t b 9
© National Priorities Partnership
Pressure Ulcers and Injuries from – September 9 Obstetrical Adverse Events – September 28 Venous Thromboembolism - October 5
To register: eo2.commpartners.com/users/pfp/
62
Concluding Remarks
Michael Cohen, Featured Speaker
© National Priorities Partnership
Bernie Rosof, NPP Co-Chair
63
7/19/2011
22
Thank YouA recording of this webinar will be available on the
National Quality Forum website within 48 hours. When
© National Priorities Partnership
Q yyou exit, you will automatically be directed to an
evaluation about this webinar.
For further questions, please contact [email protected]
64