1.1 INTRODUCTION - Shodhgangashodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/8381/7/07_chapter 1.pdf ·...
Transcript of 1.1 INTRODUCTION - Shodhgangashodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/8381/7/07_chapter 1.pdf ·...
1
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Trace metal (element) analysis is utilized in a wide range of
applications, including medical diagnostics, medical and biological
research, pharmaceutical analysis, contamination of food and drinking
water, food content analysis, nutritional evaluation, geological,
environmental analysis and semiconductor quality control. Trace metals
can be detected in biological samples; such as blood or urine, foods and
food supplements, pharmaceuticals, chemical compounds, potable water,
along with several other matrices. Trace analysis begins with the raw
material stage. In spite of exercising maximum care, pharmaceutical raw
materials may be contaminated by numerous substances such as
environmental factors, selective use, or as a consequence of natural
processes. The heterogeneous physicochemical properties of the
substances, the diversity of the matrices and divergent statutory
requirements impose very high demands on the analytical laboratory.
Some inorganic impurities are toxic even at low levels, and these
impurities should be monitored to ensure safety. Sources of inorganic
impurities include those deliberately added to the process (e.g.,
catalysts), carried through a process that is conducted according to good
manufacturing practices (e.g., undetected contaminants from starting
materials or reagents), those coming from the process (e.g., leaching from
pipes and other equipments), and those occur naturally (e.g., from
naturally derived plant or mineral sources). Regardless of source, the
2
control of these impurities may be certified by a vendor, but purchasers
also must confirm the absence of impurities before using these
manufactured materials.
United States Pharmacopoeia
The United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) classified impurities in
various sections;
- Impurities in Official Articles
- Ordinary Impurities
- Organic Volatile Impurities
For most drugs, the reactive species consists of;
• Water- that can hydrolyze some drugs or affect the dosage form
performance
• Small electrophiles- like aldehydes and carboxylic acid
derivatives
• Peroxides- that can oxidize some drugs
• Metals- which can catalyze oxidation of drugs and the
degradation pathway
• Leachable or Extractable- can come from glass, rubber stoppers,
and plastic packaging materials.
Metal oxides such as NaO2, SiO2, CaO, MgO, are the major
components leached/extracted from glass.
Generally most synthetic materials contain leachable
oligomers/monomers, vulcanizing agents, accelerators,
plasticizers, and antioxidants.
These impurities are needed to be analyzed by using different
analytical methods.
3
Analytical Method Development for Impurity Analysis
New drug development requires meaningful and reliable analytical
data to be produced at various stages of the development.
a) Sample selection for analytical method development
b) Screening of Chromatographic conditions and Phases, typically
using either isocratic or linear solvent- strength mode of gradient
elution.
c) Optimization of the method to fine-tune parameters related to
ruggedness and robustness
The impurities can be identified predominantly by following
methods:
• Reference standard method
• Spectroscopic method
• Separation method
• Isolation method
• Characterization method
Reference standard method
The key objective of this is to provide clarity to the overall life cycle,
qualification and governance of reference standards used in development
and control of new drugs. Standards serve as the basis of evaluation of
both process and product performance and are the benchmarks for
assessment of drug safety for patient consumption. These standards are
needed, not only for the active ingredients in dosage forms but also for
impurities, degradation products, starting materials, process
intermediates, and excipients.
4
Spectroscopic Methods
The Ultra Violet (UV), Infra Red (IR), Mass Spectral (MS), Nuclear
Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Raman spectroscopic methods are
routinely being used for characterizing impurities.
Separation Methods
The Capillary electrophoresis, Chiral Separations, Gas
Chromatography, Supercritical Fluid Chromatography, Thin Layer
Chromatography (TLC), High Performance TLC, High Performance Liquid
Chromatography are regularly being used for separation of impurities
and degradation products.
Isolation methodsIt is often necessary to isolate impurities. The instrumental
methods are used for isolation of impurities as it directly characterizes
the impurities. Generally, chromatographic and non-chromatographic
techniques are used for isolation of impurities prior to its
characterization. The term ‘chromatographic reactor’ refers to the use of
an analytical-scale column as both a flow-through reactor, and
simultaneously, a separation medium for the reactant(s) and product(s).
A list of methods that is used for isolation of impurities is given below.
• Solid-phase extraction methods
• Liquid-liquid extraction methods
• Accelerated solvent extraction methods
• Supercritical fluid extraction
5
• Column chromatography
• Flash chromatography
Characterization Methods
Highly sophisticated instrumentation, such as MS attached to a
GC or HPLC, are inevitable tools in the identification of minor
components (drugs, impurities, degradation products, metabolites) in
various matrices. For characterization of impurities, different techniques
are used; which are as follows:
MSIt has an increasingly significant impact on the pharmaceutical
development process for several years. Advances in the design and
efficiency of the interfaces, that directly connect separation techniques
with Mass Spectrometers have afforded new opportunities for monitoring,
characterization, and quantification of drug-related substances in API
and pharmaceutical formulations. If single method fails to provide the
necessary selectivity, orthogonal coupling of chromatographic techniques
such as HPLC-TLC and HPLC-CE, or coupling of chromatographic
separations with information rich spectroscopic methods such as HPLC-
MS or HPLC-NMR may need to be contemplated, but hopefully as a
development tool only rather than a tool for routine QC use.
The LC-MS-MS systems are used for complex mixture analysis of
thermally unstable and biologically relevant molecules, viz.,mosapride, is
largely attributed to the “soft” nature of atmospheric pressure chemical
6
ionization (APCI), and atmospheric pressure ionization (APPI). HPLC-
DAD-MS (HPLC coupled with a diode array UV detector and a mass
spectrometer) and such other techniques are almost routinely used. NMR
has now been added to this combination to provide HPLC-DAD-NMR-MS
capabilities in a commercial instrument. Numerous applications have
been sought in the areas of drug designing and in monitoring quality,
stability, and safety of pharmaceutical compounds, whether produced
synthetically, extracted from natural products or produced by
recombinant methods. The applications include alkaloids, amines, amino
acids, analgesics, antibacterial, anticonvulsants, antidepressant,
tranquilizers, antineoplastic agents, anesthetics, macromolecules,
steroids, miscellaneous.
The compendial method is based on the assumption that each
element present in the sample matrix will react with thioacetamide 100%
or to the exact extent as the Pb standard to form a sulfide species. The
insolubility of most sulfides has long been used in remediation efforts in
the environmental field, where heavy metals are precipitated to remove
them from soils, waters and other contaminated areas. In the same way,
the compendial method assumes that any sulfides generated in the
sample will form a precipitate which can then be compared to the
precipitate formed by the Pb standard. The compendial method also
assumes that the reaction kinetics for the formation of the potential
7
sulfides is very similar to the reaction kinetics for the formation of lead
sulfide in the standard solution and that the reaction kinetics is not
impacted significantly by the sample matrix. Since many metal sulfides
can form colloids, the compendial method requires that the visual
sample comparison be performed in a relatively short amount of time
after the precipitate has formed (~ 5 min) to minimize any effects that
Ostwald ripening may cause. Lastly, since the compendial method relies
on a visual comparison, it assumes that the visual characteristics of the
potential sulfides formed are similar enough to the lead sulfide and
unaffected by the sample matrix to be considered essentially identical.
One crucial assumption that is not mentioned above is that the
heating and/or ashing step that the sample must undergo does not
result in the loss of any of the elements of interest and preclude them
from forming precipitates or colloids for comparison. For the volatile
elements, such as mercury and selenium, this assumption lacks
scientific merit, and given the known toxicological effects of these
elements, highlights the need for the development of a more reliable and
accurate method. A USP committee on the “Harmonization of the USP,
EP and JP Heavy Metals Testing Procedures” acknowledge several of the
shortcomings in the compendial methods.
8
1.2 REVIEW OF EARLIER WORKS
1.2.1 Review of earlier works on trace metals analysis in organic
matrices
The inorganic impurities originates from various reaction vessels,
electrodes, catalysts, reagents, solvents, plumbing and raw materials and
other equipments used during the synthesis of pharmaceuticals. All
these are characteristic in synthetic route of a manufacturing process.
The potential impurities of several drugs palladium and its compounds
are routinely monitored [1-6]. Catalysts containing Tungsten were
processed in synthesis of several pharmaceuticals. Important activity in
pharmaceutical industry is monitoring of heavy metals, final drug
substances and in-process intermediates not only because of the catalyze
decomposition but also for their potential toxicity. Serious health
hazards may occur even at very low doses with heavy metals like lead
and cadmium in pharmaceuticals [8,9]. Longer exposures to lead cause
adverse effects on behavioral and psychological activities in living beings.
0.06 mg of lead intake per day for one month is enough for chronic
poisoning. Osteomalacia, obstructive lung and kidney dysfunction
diseases are caused due to chronic toxicity. Cadmium accumulates into
human body and has half life of 30 years which is another human
carcinogen [9] and is a serious health hazard. It accumulates in the
human body and has a biological half-life of 30 years. The levels of heavy
9
metals in pharmaceuticals are controlled by limit tests and usually
defined by regulatory agencies which are permissible with the tests,
make sure no inorganic based contaminants are introduced into drugs at
any of the steps in manufacturing process. The proposed limit of Pt in
calcium folinate is 20 µg g−1 by European Pharmacopoeia (EP) [10]. The
collective monitoring of total metal content in pharmaceutical products is
proposed by all Japanese Pharmacopoeia [JP], British Pharmacopoeia
[BP], European Pharmacopoeia [EP] and United States Pharmacopoeia
[USP]. The precipitation method of metal sulfides from an aqueous
solution and for visual comparison of the color, these methods involve to
that of similarly treated standard solution of lead. The methods
discussed are laborious in terms of less sensitive, non-specific, less
accurate and time consuming. In pharmaceuticals there is a great need
for the development of selective and highly sensitive technique for
determination of trace metals to ensure the safety and efficacy of drugs
for human consumption.
Detrimental effects of some of the heavy metals found in
medicinal products, European medicines agency [EMEA] has described
the guidelines on specification limits for residues [11]. For analysis of
trace elements atomic spectrometric techniques like ICP-AES, ICP-MS &
AAS are widely used for analysis of trace elements [12, 13]. When the
concentration of analyte is high, generally used technique is Flame-AAS
[F-AAS] or when analyte concentration is low, graphite furnace AAS [GF-
AAS] is Suitable. Their application is limited for the analysis of impurities
10
due to their relatively high detection limits. For determination of each
metal, highly specific hallow cathode lamps are used. In the analysis of
pharmaceutical Products, inductively coupled plasma plays a major
significant role [15,16]. ICP-MS is a multi-elemental technique but could
not be used for spectral interferences and accuracy at ultra trace levels.
For fast multi-elemental determination of heavy metals in different
sample matrices at ultra trace and trace concentrations is one of the
sensitive analytical technique [ICP-MS].Mass spectrometer coupled with
inductively coupled plasma ionization is emerged as a most suitable and
powerful technique for analysis of trace elements in pharmaceuticals and
bulk drugs [26-45].
In pharmaceutical industry ICP-MS provides a major service for
the analysis of heavy metals in drugs. Limitations of ICP-MS include non
availability of certified reference standard and high capital investment for
most of the pharmaceutical products [46-70]. ICP-MS method has been
developed and applied for the determination of Lead Isotope ratios in Port
wine. 24 port wine samples of different ages and characteristics are
tested by this method [71-80].
Lead isotope ratios in the analyzed samples were tested with
ICP-MS equipped with Nickel cones, peristaltic sample delivery pump
and nebulizer. Mass 208 was selected to maximize the ion intensity and
optimum instrumental conditions. Lead isotopic standard solution as
external correction and with TI as the internal standard chosen as mass
bias correction, because of constant natural isotope ratio and proximity
11
in mass to the analyte of interest TI was selected as internal standard.
Under selected experimental conditions this method was found to be
suitable for mass bias correction. Lead isotope ratios of RSD values
associated to mean values found to be about 0.3% for 208Pb/206Pb and
207Pb/206Pb and 0.8% for 204Pb/206Pb. They analyzed all port wine
samples and observed the significant decrease of the lead concentration
with the age [81-90]. To eliminate sample carry over effects and to abate
size cyclonic chamber these methods was developed. To obtain freedom
from matrix effects isotope dilution technique was applied using the long
lived isotope 129I. To avoid loss of Iodine at initial stages sample pre
treatment and special care was taken. A High Pressure Asher Autoclave
concentrated nitric acid in closed vessel was used for sample digestion
and an optimized heating program was used for nitric acid digestion. To
alter the chemical form of potentially volatile species a lengthy sample
preparation is mandatory or additional oxidizing reagents were not added
such as perchloric acid. Proposed method results compared with neutron
activation analysis [NAA] [91-100]. The RSD of both methods were
comparable and author found that resulting to be 10% for NAA and 8%
for ICP-MS.ICP-MS techniques were applied by Caroli et al to assess the
feasibility of producing new certified reference material for trace elements
in honey [101-110]. The following list of elements was considered, they
are Fe, Ni, Mn, Sn, Pb, Zn, As, Cd, Cr and Cu. For the simultaneous
12
multi-elemental analysis of essential and toxic elements the double
focusing ICP-MS was investigated as a powerful tool for number of
matrices by different groups [126-130]. Caroli et al carried out a ring test
to determine multi-elemental distribution pattern of honey collected from
two botanical origins and to evaluate a long term stability of honey
samples. Extensive studies conducted by many authors to determine Cu,
Cd, Pd, Fe and Zn in different food items, the extensive results obtained
were tested by different laboratories by ICP-MS or ICP method adopted
by AOAC International [111-120].
To investigate elemental concentration in vegetables such as
onions and peas, Gunderson et al has applied ICP-MS, produced in
conventional Danish agricultural crops and organic crops [121-125].
Under carefully controlled contamination free conditions sampling,
sample preparation and ICP-MS analysis were performed. Sixty three
trace and major elements were determined in Onion and Peas collected
from conventionally cultivated sites and fifty five elements from
organically cultivated sites by using High Resolution [HR] ICP-MS. To
characterize the analyzed samples with regard to geographic origin it is
possible by comparison of elemental concentration profiles by
multivariate analysis. For the simultaneous multi-elemental analysis of
essential and toxic elements the Double Focusing ICP-MS was
investigated as a powerful tool for number of matrices by different group
[126-130].
13
1.2.2 Review of Earlier Works on Ion chromatographic analysis
There is a great amount of potentially interfering matrix
components usually trace level analytes and with measured one. This is
a common problem in most of the methods in field of analytical
chemistry in real samples. When the sample contains high concentration
of ionic species becomes a severe problem in ion chromatography [134-
149]. This method has not been widely studied for the simultaneous
determination of five common inorganic cations and seven common
inorganic anions. Xu et al [150-160] has made an approach to determine
common inorganic ions and also performed cation exchange
chromatography/ single column ion exclusion chromatography for
cations and ions separation and also used DL-malicacid-methanol-water
as eluent. For successful separation of only five common cations Ca2+, K+,
Mg2+, Na+ and NH4+ and four common anions Cl-, F-, NO3-, and SO42-.
This method was used in past years particular attention has been given
for the speciation and trace analysis in high ionic matrices of
environmental and biological samples [160-179].
The final chromatogram was influenced considerably by varying
the retention times of anlayte ions by means of different processes of
matrix components [180-209], by change of matrix ion content the
composition inside the column and self elution was effected.
14
The high matrix anion concentrations with retention behaviour of
analyte anions in sample strongly count-on the relative affinities of mass
and eluent anions. The eluent anion has a significantly lesser affinity
than matrix components, matrix anions self elution effect prevents other
anions from being retained by shortens the retention time of solutes and
stationary phase, when the eluent was changed it predominates the
matrix anion and had an affinity for stationary phase less than eluent it
prolonged the retention time of anlaytes, eluent ions replace matrix
component in stationary phase, sample in the separator column was
followed by modified eluent which was very poor in eluent component but
enriched with matrix ion [210-216].In this method three anions SO42-,
Cl- and NO3- could be separated, are the anionic species have limited
selectivity [211-224]. To evaluate the real quality of natural waters by
the method described in US EPA 300.0, five cations determined together
with seven anions.
15
1.3 PRESENT WORK
There are two main objectives in the present thesis,
a) Method developments for trace heavy metals analysis in Proton pump
inhibitor compounds and its intermediates using ICP-MS.
b) Ion chromatographic determination of inorganic anions in Proton
Pump Inhibitors
The goal of this work was to develop a quick and sensitive
screening method for the analysis of trace heavy metals by using
Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry Dynamic Reaction Cell
(DRC), elements like Cd, Co, Cu, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pt, Pb, Pd, Sn, Se, Sb, V
and Zn in rabeprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole (PPIs) and their
intermediates [51, 78, 87]. Histamine receptor blockers are inferior to
that of gastric acid suppression by PPIs. For various disorders like acid
peptic disorders, peptic ulcer diseases, non steroidal anti-inflammatory
drug induced gastropathy and gastro esophageal reflux disease. PPIs
have been proved as improved treatment. The side effects of PPIs have
been found to be minimal and few drug interactions are significant.
These are generally considered safe for long term treatment. Proton
pump inhibitor has shown great success to treat acid- related gastro-
intestinal disease.
16
The DRC ICP-MS method have been developed & investigated in
every step of synthesis in order to establish source of the heavy metal
contamination for the monitoring of trace metals during the synthesis to
meet rigorous standard limit requirements. In many ways heavy metal
contamination may be carried to intermediates and bulk drug
substances by solvents, reagents, electrodes and raw materials used in
synthesis. A quadrupole ICP-MS equipped with DRC was employed for
the determination of 15 elements Zn, V, Sn, Se, Sb, Cd, Cr, Cu, Co, Mn,
Fe, Ni, Pd, Pb and Pt. The ammonia gas (NH3) is used as a reaction gas in
DRC mode and the effectiveness of NH3 gas in reducing or eliminating
polyatomic ions and studying effect of carbon interference in the analysis
are also reported.
ICP-MS has been selected as one of the basic alternative methods,
because it has good sensitivity, optimal sample size, reasonable
elemental interferences and self controlled multi-elemental analysis with
selection of suitable range of elements. For many of the elements of
interest detection limits (DL) at ppb and sub ppb levels are commonly
achieved with ICP-MS. ICP-MS detection limits are sensitive and permits
the analyst to utilize less concentrated sample solutions, minimizing
potential effects of sample matrix, eliminating minimum quantity of
sample size and consisting of wide variety of organic molecules which
include bases, free acids and salts in developing a method, by sample
17
dilution it is desirable to minimize the sample matrix effects to less
extent.
Objective of this work is the development of a procedure for the ion
chromatographic determination of fluoride, chloride, bromide, nitrate,
phosphate and sulfate in aqueous solutions of Rabeprazole sodium,
Pantoprazole sodium and Omeprazole sodium (PPIs). The clear solutions
of PPI were analyzed for the inorganic anions content by estimation on
ion chromatograph equipped with a conductivity detector [150-160]. The
eluents used for separation of anions are sodium carbonate, and sodium
bicarbonate using the Metrosep Anion Dual 1 anion-exchange column. In
the absence of matrix standards, the separation efficiency has been
investigated by spiking samples with varying amounts of anionic
standards with spike recoveries obtained between 102 to 120 %. The
sample organic matrix strongly interferes in analytical procedures. It was
observed that presence of matrix increased the conductance of
monovalent anions. The matrix enhancement factor was calculated for
each anion in the matrix.
To determine inorganic anions with a single eluent in a single run this
analytical method provides better operating conditions. The equipment
consists of anion exchange column, one pump, one injection valve, with
conductivity detector.
18
1.4 REFERENCES
[1] J.G. Hardman, L.E. Limbird, P.B. Molinoff, R.W. Ruddon, A.G.
Gilman, Good and Gilman’s The pharmaceutical Basics of
Therapeutics, 9th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, (1999), 3–63.
[2] S. Gorog (Ed.), Identification and determination of Impurities in
Drugs, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, (2000), 748.
[3] S. Ahuja, Impurities Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals, Marcel Dekker
Inc., New York, (1998), 42.
[4] S. Husain, R. Nageswara Rao, Monitoring of process impurities in
drugs, in:Z. Deyl, I. Miksik, F. Tagliaro, E. Tesarova (Eds.),
Advanced Chromatographic and Electromigration Methods in
Biosciences, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, (1998), 834–888.
[5] R. Nageswara Rao, V. Nagaraju, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 33 (2003)
335–377.
[6] T. Wang, S. Walden, R. Egan, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 15 (1997)
593– 599.
[7] H.M. Kingston and L.B. Jassie, Introduction to Microwave sample
preparation, ACS Professional Reference Book, American Chemical
Society, Washington, DC, 1988
[8] M.M. Guzman, A.j. Garcian-Fernandez, M. Gomenz-Zapata, A.
Luna, D. Romero, J.A. Sanchez-Garcia, Toxicol. Lett. 88 (1996) 60.
19
[9] International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), and World
Health Organization (WHO),IARC Working Group on the Evaluation
of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Beryllium, cadmium, mercury
and exposures in the glass manufacturing industry, Vol. 58,
(1994), 444.
[10] European Pharmacopoeia Supplement, 3rd ed., Council of Europe,
Strasbourg, (1999), 326.
[11] http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/swp/444600en.pdf.
[12] N.H. Bings, A. Bogaerts, J.A.C. Broekaert, Anal. Chem. 78 (2006)
3917–3946.
[13] D. Beauchemin, Anal. Chem. 78 (2006) 4111–4136.
[14] K.W. Jackson, L. Shijun, Anal. Chem. 70 (1998) 363R–383 R.
[15] A.L. Stoica, M. Peltea, G.E. Baiulescu, M. Ionica, J. Pharm.
Biomed. Anal.36 (2004) 653–656.
[16] L. Wang, M. Marley, H. Jahansouz, C. Bahnck, J. Pharm. Biomed.
Anal.33 (2003) 955–961.
[17] J.A.C. Broekaert, Spectrochim. Acta 55B (2000) 737–749.
[18] M. Guilhaul, Spectrochim. Acta 55B (2000) 1511–1525.
[19] K.L. Sutton, J.A. Caruso, J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 243–258.
[20] A. Montaser (Ed.), Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry,
1st ed., Wiley–VCH, New York, 1998.
20
[21] H.H. Williard, L.L Meritt, Jr, J.A. Dean and F.A. Settle, Jr,
Instrumental methods of Analysis, 7th Edn, Wadsworth Publishing
Company, Belmont, CA, 1988
[22] I. Jarvis, Hand book of Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass
Spectrometry, Blackie, Glasgow and Landon,(1990) 172–224.
[23] D. Gunther, B. Hattendorf, Trends Anal. Chem. 24 (2005) 255–
265.
[24] V. Camel, Analyst 126 (2001) 1182–1193.
[25] M. Hoenig, Talanta 54 (2001) 1021–1038.
[26] R.C. Richter, D. Link, H.M. Kingston, Anal. Chem. 73 (2001) 31A–
37A.
[27] J. Huang, X. Hu, J. Zhang, K. Li, Y. Yan, X. Xu, J. Pharm. Biomed.
Anal. 40 (2006) 227–234.
[28] C.A. Krone, E.J.Wyse, J.T.A. Ely, Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 52 (2001)
379–382.
[29] B.P. Bourgoin, D. Boomer, M.J. Powell, S. Willie, D. Edgar, D.
Evans, Analyst 117 (1992) 19–22.
[30] M. Niemela, H. Kola, K. Eilola, P. Peramaki, J. Pharm. Biomed.
Anal. 35 (2004) 433–439.
[31] D. Amarasiriwardena, K. Sharma, B.M. Barnes, Fresenius J. Anal.
Chem. 362 (1998) 493–497.
21
[32] G.M. Scelfo, A.R. Flegal, Environ. Health. Persp. 108 (2000) 309–
313.
[33] R.E. Wolf, Atom. Spectrosc. 18 (1997) 169–174.
[34] T. Wang, Z. Ge, J. Wu, B. Li, A.S. Liang, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.
19 (1999) 937–943.
[35] K.W. Busch and M.A. Busch, Multi-element Detection systems for
Spectrochemical Analysis, Wiley, Newyork, 1990.
[36] A. Lasztity, A. Kelko-levai, I. Varga, K. Zih-Perenyi, E.
Bertalan,Microchem. J. 73 (2002) 59–63.
[37] R. Lam, E.D. Salin, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 19 (2004) 938–940.
[38] T. Wang, J. Wu, R. Hartman, X. Jia, R.S. Egan, J. Pharm. Biomed.
Anal.23 (2000) 867–890.
[39] C.A. Ponce de Leon, M. Montes-Bayan, J.A. Caruso, Anal. Bioanal.
Chem.374 (2002) 230–234.
[40] T.R. Crompton, Analytical Instrumentation for the Water Industry,
Butterworth-Heinmann, Oxford, 1991.
[41] D.A. Skoog and J.L. Leary, Principles of Instrumental Analysis, 4th
Edn Saunders college Publishing, Orlando, FL, 1992.
22
[42] K. Soltyk, A. Lozak, P. Ostapczuk, Z. Fijalek, J. Pharm. Biomed.
Anal. 32(2003) 425–432.
[43] R.J.H. Waddell, N.N. Daeid, D. Littlejohn, Analyst 129 (2004) 235–
240.
[44] S.-I. Suzuki, H. Tsuchihashi, K. Nakajima, A. Matsushita, T.
Nagao, J.Chromatogr. A 437 (1998) 322–327.
[45] A.S.R.K. Murty, U.C. Kulshresta, T.N. Rao, M.V.N.K. Talluri, Indian
J.Chem. Technol. 12 (2005) 231–299.
[46] S.P. Dolan, D.A. Nortrup, P.M. Bolger, S.G. Capar, J. Agric. Food
Chem.51 (2003) 1307–1312.
[47] X.-H.Wu, D.-H. Sun, Z.-X. Zhuang, X.-R.Wang, H.-F. Gong, J.-X.
Hong,F.S.C. Lee, Anal. Chim. Acta 453 (2002) 311–323.
[48] P. Raman, L.C. Patino, M.G. Nair, J. Agric. Food Chem. 52
(2004)7822–7827.
[49] K. Soltyk, Z. Fijalek, Chem. Anal. 45 (2000) 879–886.
[50] E.-S. Ong, Y.-L. Yong, S.-O. Woo, J. AOAC Int. 82 (1999) 963–967.
23
[51] C. Vandecasteele and C.B. Block, Modern methods of Trace
Element Determination, Wiley, Chichester, 1993
[52] A. Sanz-Medel, Spectrochim. Acta 53B (1998) 197–211.
[53] M.V. Hulle, C. Zhang, X. Zhang, R. Cornelis, Analyst 127 (2002)
634–640.
[54] US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug
Administration websitehttp://www.fda.gov.
[55] FAO/WHOFood Standards Codex Alimentarius Comission official
website http://www.codexalimentarius.net/.
[56] R.R. Barefoot, J. Chromatogr. B 751 (2001) 205–211.
[57] K.L. Sutton, D.T. Heitkemper, Comp. Anal. Chem. 33 (2000) 501–
530.
[58] B.S.N. Rao, J. Food Sci. Technol. 31 (1994) 353–361.
[59] A. Sanz-Medel, M. Montes-Bayon, M.L.F. Sanchez, Anal. Bioanal.
Chem.377 (2003) 236–247.
[60] J.A. Caruso, M. Montes-Bayon, Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 56 (2003)
148–163.
[61] J. Szpunar, R. Lobinski, A. Prange, Appl. Spectrosc. 57 (2003)
102–112A.
[62] R. Cornelis, J. Caruso, H. Crews, H. Heumann, Handbook of
Elemental Speciation: Techniques and Methodology, Wiley,
Chichester, (2003), 605–634.
24
[63] G.Christian, Analytical Chemistry, 5th Edn, Wiley, Chichester,
1994
[64] B. Bouyssiere, J. Szpunar, R. Lobinski, Spectrochim. Acta 57B
(2002)805–828.
[65] P.C. Uden, J. Chromatogr. A 703 (1995) 393–411.
[66] K. Sutton, R.M.C. Sutton, J.A. Caruso, J. Chromatogr. A 789
(1997)85–126.
[67] R. Lobinsjki, D. Schaumloffel, J. Szpunar,Mass Spectrom. Rev. 25
(2006)255–289.
[68] C. Casiot, V. Vacchina, H. Chassaigne, J. Szpunar, M. Potin-
Gautier, R.Lobinski, Anal. Commun. 36 (1999) 77–80.
[69] P.A. Gallagher, X. Wei, J.A. Shoemaker, C.A. Brockhoff, J.T. Creed,
J.Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 14 (1999) 1829–1834.
[70] J.I.G. Alonso, J.R. Encinar, P.R. Gonzalez, A. Sanz-Medel, Anal.
Bioanal.Chem. 373 (2002) 432–440.
[71] J. Bettmer, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 372 (2002) 33–34.
[72] H.E. Taylor, R.A. Huff, A. Montaser, Novel applications of
ICPMS,in: A. Montaser (Ed.), Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass
Spectrometry,Wiley–VCH, New York, NY, (1998) 711.
[73] E.H. Larsen, Spectrochim. Acta 53B (1998) 253–265.
25
[74] G. Horlick, A. Montaser, Analytical characteristics of ICPMS, in:
A. Montaser (Ed.), Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass
Spectrometry,Wiley–VCH,New York, NY, (1998) 543–547.
[75] B. Markert and I.H.L. Zittau, Instrumental Element and Multi-
Element Analysis of Plant Samples. Methods and Applications,
Wiley, Chichester, 1996.
[76] J.R. Arthur, F. Nicol, G.J. Beckett, Bio. Trace Elem. Res. 33 (1992)
37–42.
[77] J.C. Miller and J.N. Miller, Statistics for Analytical Chemistry, 2nd
Edn, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1988
[78] A. Montaser and D.W. Golightly, Inductively coupled plasmas in
Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. VCH, New York, 1987
[79] S.M. Bird, P.C. Uden, J.F. Tyson, E. Block, E. Denoyer, J. Anal.
Atom.Spectrom. 12 (1997) 785–788.
[80] L. Bendahl, B.G. Igaard, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 19 (2004) 143–
148.
[81] H.G. Infante, G.O. Connor, M. Rayman, R.Wahlen, J. Entwisle, P.
Norris,R. Hearn, T. Catterick, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 19 (2004)
1529–1538.
[82] R. Waddell, C. Lewis, W. Hang, C. Hassell, V. Majidi, Appl.
Spectrosc.Rev. 40 (2005) 33–39.
26
[83] C.B. Hymer, J.A. Caruso, J. Chromatogr. A 1114 (2006) 1–20.
[84] S. McSheehy, L. Yang, R. Sturgeon, Z. Mester, Anal. Chem. 77
(2005)344–349.
[85] K.G. Heumann, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 378 (2004) 318–329.
[86] B. Buckely, W. Fang, W. Johnson, C. Gilmartin, Is there Cr(VI) in
the mineral supplements you are taking? in: Presented at the
FACSS XXII Conference, Rutgers University, Cincinnati, OH, USA,
(1995) 15–20.
[87] M. Thompson and J.N. Walsh, A Handbook of Inductively coupled
Plasma Spectrometry, 2nd Edn, Balckie Academic and Professional,
Glasgow, 1989.
[88] F. Adams, R. Gijbels and R. Van Grieken, Inorganic Mass
Spectrometry, Wiley, New York, 1988
[89] H. Chassaigne, R. Lobinski, Anal. Chem. Acta 359 (1998) 227–235.
[90] A. Makarov, J. Szpunar, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 14 (1999) 1323–
1327.
[91] P. Krystek, R. Ristsema, J. Trace Elem. Med. Bio. 18 (2004) 9–16.
[92] S.S.K. Kumarath, R.G. Wuilloud, A. Stalcup, J.A. Caruso, H. Patel,
A.Sakr, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 19 (2004) 107–113.
27
[93] C.J. Duckett, N.J.C. Bailey, H. Walker, F. Abou-Shakra, L.D.
Wilson,J.C. Lindon, J.K. Nicholson, Rapid Commun. Mass
Spectrom. 16 (2002) 245–247.
[94] E.H. Evans, J.-C. Wolff, C. Eckers, Anal. Chem. 73 (2001) 4722–
4728.
[95] B.O. Axelsson, M. Jornten-Karlsson, P. Michelsen, F. Abou-
Shakra, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 15 (2001) 375–385.
[96] C.M.R. Almeida and M.T.S.D. Vasconcelos Anal. Chim. Acta 396
(1999) 45.
[97] M. Haldimann, A. Eastgate and B. Zimmerli Analyst 125 (2000)
1977.
[98] X. Hou, C. Chai, Q. Li and K. Wang Fresenius’ J. Anal. Chem. 357
(1997) 1106.
[99] A.R Date and A.L. Gray, Applications of Inductively Coupled
Plasma Mass Spectrometry, Blackie Academic and Professional,
Glasgow, 1989.
[100] L. Jorhem and J. Engman J. AOAC Int. 83 (2000) 1189.
[101] V. Gundersen, I.E. Bechmann, A. Behrens and S. Stürup J. Agric.
Food Chem. 48 (2000) 6094.
28
[102] B. Wyrzykowska, K. Szymczyk, H. Ichichashi, J. Falandysz, B.
Skwarzec and S.-I. Yamasaki J. Agric. Food Chem. 49 (2001) 3425.
[103] J. Falandysz, K. Szymczyk, H. Ichihashi, L. Bielawski, M. Gucia, A.
Frankowska and S.-I. Yamasaki Food Addit. Contam. 18 (2001)
503.
[104] K.E. Jarvis, A.L. Gray, I. Jarvis and J.G. Williams, Plasma Source
Mass Spectrometry, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge,
1990.
[105] J.M. Marchante-Gayón, C. Sariego Muñiz, J.I. García Alonso and
A. Sanz-Medel Anal. Chim. Acta 400 (1999) 307.
[106] L. Loens, F. Vanhaecke, J. Riondato and R. Dams J. Anal. At.
Spectrom. 10 (1995) 569.
[107] C.N. Ferrarello, M.R. Fernández de la Campa, C. Variego Muñiz
and A. Sanz-Medel Analyst 125 (2000) 2223.
[108] C.N. Ferrarello, M.R. Fernández de la Campa, H. Goenaga Infante,
M.L. Fernández Sáncez and A. Sanz-Medel Analusis 28 (2000) 351.
[109] K.L. Sutton and J.A. Caruso J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 243.
[110] A. Seubert Trends Anal. Chem. 20 (2001) 274.
[111] S.J. Hill, L.J. Pitts and A.S. Fisher Trends Anal. Chem. 19 (2000)
120.
29
[112] J. Szpunar Trends Anal. Chem. 19 (2000). 127.[96]
S. McSheehy, W. Yang, F. Pannier, J. Szpunar, R. Lobin ski, J.
Auger and M. Potin-Gautier Anal. Chim. Acta 421 (2000) 147.
[113] J. Zheng, M. Ohata, N. Furuta and W. Kosmus J. Chromatogr. A
874 (2000) 55.
[114] M. Kotrebai, J.F. Tyson, E. Block and P.C. Uden J. Chromatogr. A
866 (2000) 51.
[115] J.A. Caruso, D.T. Heitkemper and C. B’Hymer Analyst 126 (2001)
136.
[116] G. Holland and A.N. Eaton, Applications of Plasma Source Mass
Spectrometry, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1991.
[117] C. Guillou, M. Lipp, B. Radovic, F. Reniero, M. Schmidt and E.
Anklam J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 49 (1999) 329.
[118] R. Goodacre and R.J. Gilbert Analyst 124 (1999) 1069.
[119] R.J.Gilbert, R. Goodacre, A.M. Woodward and D.B. Kell Anal.
Chem. 69 (1997) 4381.
[120] F. Garcia-Wass, D. Hammond, D.S. Mottram and C.S. Gutteridge
Food Chem. 69 (2000) 215.
30
[121] The United States Pharmacopoeia, The National Formulary, XXII,
United States Pharmacopoeial Convention, 12601 Twinbrook
Parkway, Rockville, MD 20852, (1990) 1523.
[122] British Pharmacopoeia, The Stationery Office under license from
The Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, Norwich,
England, A174 (Ph. Eur. Meth. 2.4.8) (2000).
[123] European Pharmacopoeia, third ed. (Suppl.), 2001, Council of
Europe, Strasbourg Cedex, France, (2000), Method 2.4.8, 41–42.
[124] Japanese Pharmacopoeia, 13th ed., Yakiyi Nippo Ltd., Tokyo,
Japan, (1996) 42–43.
[125] B.R. Kim, W.A. Gaines, M.J. Szafranski, E.F. Bernath and A.M.
Miles. J. Environ. Eng. 128 (2002), 612–623.
[126] D. Hesterberg, D.E. Sayers, W. Zhou, G.M. Plummer and W.P.
Robarge. Environ. Sci. Tech. 31 (1997) 2840–2846.
[127] L.J. Barnes, F.J. Janssen, P.J.H. Scheeren, J.H. Versteegh and
R.O. Koch. Can. Inst. Min. Metall. 101 (1992) C183–C189.
[128] C.L. Wang, A.M. Lum, S.C. Ozuna, D.S. Clark and J.D. Keasling.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 56 (2001) 425–430.
[129] E.H. Evan, J.J. Giglio, T.M. Castillano and J.A. Caruso, Inductively
coupled and Microwave Induced Plasma Sources for Mass
Spectrometry, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1995.
31
[130] D.H. Everett, Basic Principles of Colloid Science, The Royal Society
of Chemistry, London, England, (1988) 148–149.
[131] K. Blake, Pharm. Forum (1995) 21.
[132] N. Lewen, S. Mathew, M. Schenkenberger, 1998 Winter Conference
on Plasma Spectrochemistry, poster FP23, 9 January 1998.
[133] P.R. Marheni, A.R. Haddad and McTaggart, J. Chromatogr. 564
(1991) 221.
[134] P.E. Jackson In: R.A. Meyers, Editor, Encyclopedia of Analytical
Chemistry, Wiley, Chichester (1991) 2779.
[135] B. Gade, J. Chromatogr. 640 (1993) 227.
[136] M. Novič, B. Divjak, B. Pihlar and V. Hudnik, J. Chromatogr. A
739 (1996) 35.
[137] S. Colombini, S. Polesselo, S. Valsecchi and S. Cavalli, J.
Chromatogr. A 847 (1999) 279.
[138] S. Cavalli, S. Polesselo and S. Valsecchi, J. Chromatogr. A 1085
(2005) 42.
[139] M. Novič, B. Divjak and B. Pihlar, J. Chromatogr. A 827 (1998) 83.
[140] B. Divjak, W. Goessler, P.R. Haddad and M. Novič, J. Chromatogr.
A 1008 (2003) 89.
[141] H. Saitoh and K. Oikawa, Bunseki Kagaku 33 (1984), E441.
32
[142] Y. Hunag, S. Mou and J.M. Riviello, J. Chromatogr. A 868 (2000)
209.
[143] P.R. Haddad and P.E. Jackson, Ion Chromatography: Principles
and Applications (Journal of Chromatography Library, Vol. 46),
Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990).
[144] J. Weiss, Ion Chromatography (2nd ed.), VCH, Weinheim
(1995).
[145] M. Yamamoto, H. Yamamoto, Y. Yamamoto, S. Matsushita, N.
Baba and T. Ikushige, Anal. Chem. 56 (1984) 832.
[146] K. Ohta and K. Tanaka, Anal. Chim. Acta 373 (1998) 189.
[147] K. Ohta, K. Tanaka and J.S. Fritz, J. Chromatogr. A 731 (1996)
179.
[148] M.G. Kiseleva, P.A. Kebets and P.N. Nesterenko, Analyst 126
(2001) 2119.
[149] D.J. Pietrzyk and D.M. Brown, Anal. Chem. 58 (1986) 2554.
[150] T. Umemura, K. Tsunoda, A. Koide, T. Oshima, N. Watanabe, K.
Chiba and H. Haraguchi, Anal. Chem. Acta 419 (2000) 87.
[151] K. Tanaka, K. Ohta, P.R. Haddad, J.S. Fritz, A. Miyanaga, W. Hu
and K. Hasebe, J. Chromatogr. A 884 (2000) 167.
33
[152] K. Tanaka, K. Ohta, P.R. Haddad, J.S. Fritz, K.-P. Lee, K. Hasebe,
A. Ieuji and A. Miyanaga, J. Chromatogr. A 850 (1999) 311.
[153] K. Tanaka, K. Ohta, J.S. Fritz, S. Matsushita and A. Miyanaga, J.
Chromatogr. A 671 (1994) 239.
[154] K. Tanaka, K. Ohta, P.R. Haddad, J.S. Fritz, A. Miyanaga, W. Hu,
K. Hasebe, K.-P. Lee and C. Sarzanini, J. Chromatogr. A 920
(2001) 239.
[155] R. Saari-Nordhaus and J.M. Anderson Jr., J. Chromatogr. 549
(1991) 257.
[156] K.J.B.A. Karim, J.-Y. Jin and T. Takeuchi, J. Chromatogr. A 995
(2003) 153.
[157] M. Amin, L.W. Lim and T. Takeuchi, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 384
(2006) 839.
[158] M. Amin, L.W. Lim and T. Takeuchi, Talanta 71 (2007) 1470.
[159] Determination of Anions in Acid Rain by Ion Chromatography,
Application Update 146, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, 2003.
[160] P.N. Nesterenko, Trends Anal. Chem. (2001) 20.
[161] Q. Xu, W. Zhang, C. Xu and L. Jin, Analyst 125 (2000) 1065.
[162] H. Small, T.S. Stevens and W.C. Bauman. Anal. Chem. 47 (1975)
1801–1805.
34
[163] J. Weiss. In: (15th ed.),Handbook of Ion Chromatography, Dionex,
Sunnyvale, CA (1986).
[164] J.S. Fritz, D.T. Gjerde and C. Pohlandt, Ion Chromatography.
Hüthig, Heidelberg (1982).
[165] T.H. Jupille, D.W. Togami and D.E. Burge. Ind. Res. Dev.
(February 1983), 151. [5]. J.R. Bensen. Am. Lab. (1985) 30.
[166] J.D. Mulik and E. Sawicki. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13 (1979) 804.
[167] C.A. Pohl and E.L. Johnson. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 18 (1980) 442.
[168] E.L. Johnson. Int. Lab. (April 1982) 110.
[169] G. Schmuckler. J. Chromatogr. 313 (1984) 47.
[170] J.S. Fritz. Anal. Chem. 59 (1987) 335A.
[171] W.T. Frankenberger, Jr., H.C. Mehra and D.T. Gjerde. J.
Chromatogr. 504 (1990) 211.
[172] H. Small. J. Chromatogr. 546 (1991) 3.
[173] P.K. Dasgupta. Anal. Chem. 64 (1992) 775A.
[174] R. Smith, Ion Chromatographic Applications. , CRC Press, Boca
Raton, FL (1988).
[175] H. Small, Ion Chromatography. , Plenum Press, New York, NY
(1989).
35
[176] M.A.O. Bynum, S.Y. Tyree, Jr. and W.E. Weiser. Anal. Chem. 53
(1981) 1935
[177] R.E. Smith. Anal. Chem. 55 (1983), 1427.
[178] L.K. Tan and J.E. Dutrizac. Anal. Chem. 58 (1986) 1383.
[179] F.C. Smith and R.C. Chang. CRC Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 9 (1980)
197
[180] T. Moeller and R. O'Conner, Ions in Aqueous Solutions. In: ,
McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY (1971) 302–303.
[181] R. Smith, Ion Chromatographic Applications. In: , CRC Press, Boca
Raton, FL (1988) 13–18.
[182] A.J. Collins, Geochemistry of Oilfield Waters. , Elsevier, New York
(1975).
[183] I.L. Marr. In: (15th ed.),Anal. Proc. (London) 29 (1992),153.
[184] T. Sunden, M. Lindgren, A. Cedergren and D.D. Siemer. Anal.
Chem. 55 (1983) 2.
[185] F.J. Trujillo, M.M. Miller, R.K. Skogerboe, H.E. Taylor and C.L.
Grant. Anal. Chem. 53 (1981) 1944.
[186] K.J. Stutts. Anal. Chem. 59 (1987) 543.
36
[187] H.C. Mehra, K.D. Huysmans and W.T. Frankenberger. J.
Chromatogr. 508 (1990) 265.
[188] J. Weiss. In: (15th ed.),Handbook of Ion Chromatography, Dionex,
Sunnyvale, CA (1986) 100–102.
[189] J.R. Kreling and J. DeZwaan. Anal. Chem. 58 (1986) 3028.
[190] S. Charbonneau, R. Gilbert and L. Lepine. Anal. Chem. 67 (1995)
1204.
[191] J.B. Fisher. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 51 (1987) 2459
[192] R.P. Lash and C.J. Hill. Anal. Chim. Acta 108 (1979) 405.
[193] J.B. Finlayson. In: New Zealand Geothermal Workshop, University
of Auckland, Auckland (9 November 1981) 149–155.
[194] P.E. Jackson and W.R. Jones. J. Chromatogr. 538 (1991) 497.
[195] S. Rokushika and F.M. Yamamoto. J. Chromatogr. 630 (1993)
195.
[196] B.P. Downey and D.R. Jenke. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 25 (1987) 510.
[197] W.G. Robertson, D.S. Scurr, A. Smith and R.L. Orwell. Clin. Chim.
Acta 126 (1982) 91.
[198] R.P. Singh, S.A. Smesko and G.H. Nancollas. J. Chromatogr. 495
(1989) 239.
37
[199] R.P. Singh and G.H. Nancollas. Kidney Int. 28 (1985) 985
[200] R.P. Singh and G.H. Nancollas. J. Chromatogr. 433 (1988) 373.
[201] R.P. Singh. Clin. Chem. 34 (1988) 2390.
[202] R.P. Singh and G.H. Nancollas. Anal. Lett. 19 (1986) 1487.
[203] H. Itoh and Y. Shin bori. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 60 (1987) 1327.
[204] H.H. Streckert and B.D. Epstein. Anal. Chem. 56 (1984) 21.
[205] D.P. Hautman and M. Bolyard. J. Chromatogr. 602 (1992) 65.
[206] A. Siriraks, C.A. Pohl and M. Toofan. J. Chromatogr. 602 (1992),
89
[207] S.A. Wilson and C.A. Gent. Anal. Lett. 15A (1982) 851.
[208] K.L. Evans and C.B. Moore. Anal. Chem. 52 (1982) 1908.
[209] M.P. Harrold, A. Siriraks and J. Riviello. J. Chromatogr. 602 (1992)
119.
[210] R.P. Singh, K. Alam, D.S. Redwan and N.M. Abbas. Anal. Chem. 61
(1989)1924.
[211] A.J. Muller and C. McCrory-Joy. Corr. Sci. 27 (1987) 695.
[212] S.E. Atwood. J. Chromatogr. 602 (1992)213.
[213] D.D. Siemer. Anal. Chem. 52 (1980) 1874.
38
[214] S.G. Chen and S.J. Wang. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 111 (1987)
429.
[215] L. Balconi, R. Pascali and F. Sigon. Anal. Chim. Acta 179 (1986)
419.
[216] I.K. Henderson and R. Saarinordhaus. J. Chromatogr. 602 (1992)
149. [134] J.G. Grasselli. Anal. Chem. 55 (1983) 1468A.
[217] L. Joergensen, Weimann and H.F. Botte. J. Chromatogr. 602
(1992), 179.
[218] R. Sheriadan. J. Chromatogr. 371 (1986) 383.
[219] J. Mulik, R. Puckett, D. Williums and E. Sawicki. Anal. Lett. 9
(1976) 653.
[220] W.C. Askew and S.J. Morisani. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 27 (1989) 42.
[221] A.F.M. Ahmed, R.P. Singh and A.H. Elmubarak. Atmos. Environ.
24A (1990) 2927.
[222] C.A. Hordijk, J.J.M. van Engelen, F.A. Jonker and T.E.
Cappenberg. Water Res. 23 (1989) 853.
39
[223] J. Crowther, F.B. Lo, M.W. Rawlings and B. Wright. Environ. Sci.
Technol. 29 (1995) 849.
[224] E.G. Bradfield and D.T. Cooke. Analyst (London) 110 (1985) 1409.