10122619 ppt

30
Relationship Quality and Purchase Intention and Behavior: The Moderating Impact of Relationship Strength Presenter : Sharon Chang Instructor : Dr. Teresa Hsu Nov. 12, 2012 1

description

 

Transcript of 10122619 ppt

Page 1: 10122619 ppt

Relationship Quality and Purchase Intention and Behavior: The Moderating Impact of Relationship Strength

Presenter : Sharon ChangInstructor : Dr. Teresa HsuNov. 12, 2012

1

Page 2: 10122619 ppt

Citation Cannière, M., Pelsmacker, P., & Geuens, M.

(2010). Relationship Quality and Purchase Intention and Behavior: The Moderating Impact of Relationship Strength. J Bus Psychol, 25, 87-98.

2

Page 3: 10122619 ppt

OutlineIntroduction

Literature Review

Methodology

Result & Conclusion

Reflection

3

Page 4: 10122619 ppt

Introduction

4

Page 5: 10122619 ppt

Introduction

In the business world, research is increasingly focusing on the customer-firm relationship. Marketing shifts away from brands to customers as the focal object of research.

- Background

5

Page 6: 10122619 ppt

IntroductionThe purpose of this study-

To investigate the link between perceived relationship quality, purchase intention and behavior, and the moderating role of relationship strength

6

Page 7: 10122619 ppt

Introduction- Conceptual Framework

The relationship quality-buying behavior chain and the moderating role of relationship strength

7

Page 8: 10122619 ppt

Literature Review

8

Page 9: 10122619 ppt

Literature ReviewRelationship strength is the intensity of the relationship between the customer and the firm, as reflected in the length and the regularity if the customer’s buying history.

(Grayson & Ambler, 1999; Jap & Ganesan, 2000; Kumar et al., 2003; Verhoef et al., 2001)

9

Page 10: 10122619 ppt

Literature Review Loyalty is built up of attitudinal

loyalty, which leads to repeat patronage intentions, which in turn lead to loyal behavior and, finally, to more profits.

(Reinartz & Kumar, 2000)10

Page 11: 10122619 ppt

Hypothesis 1A positive perception of relationship quality has a positive impact on buying intention.

H1a

A positive buying intention has a positive impact on various aspects of buying intention.

H1b

11

Page 12: 10122619 ppt

Hypothesis 2A stronger relationship has a positive impact on buying intention.

H2a

A stronger relationship has a positive impact on various aspects of buying intention.

H2b

12

Page 13: 10122619 ppt

Hypothesis 3The impact of relationship quality on buying intention is stronger for customers with a stronger relation with the company.

H3a

The impact of buying intention on buying behavior is stronger for customers with a stronger relation with company.

H3b

13

Page 14: 10122619 ppt

Methodology

14

Page 15: 10122619 ppt

Survey data-Gathered from apparel retailers, are in the low-to mid-price range.

Return the questionnaire-★960 questionnaires were received in summer season.★266 questionnaires were received in winter season.

Questionnaire-★2,306 questionnaires were distributed in summer season.★2,500 questionnaires were distributed in winter season.

Procedure

15

Total : 1,226 questionnaires Total : 4,806 questionnaires

Page 16: 10122619 ppt

634 Participants90.1%Female7.7%

less than 30 years old

20.8%Between 51 & 60

30.8%Between 30 & 40

31.5%Between 41 & 50

9.1%Older than 60

9.9%male

Participant1226 questionnaires were received Linkable-634 questionnaires Nonlinkable-575 questionnaires

Page 17: 10122619 ppt

17

Criterion

Variables

Total expenditure

Number of visits with

buying eventNumber of

product types

MeasuresThe three indicators measure partially different aspects of buying behavior.

Page 18: 10122619 ppt

Measures

Moderating

Variables

Length of relationship with

retailer(1-10 seasons)

Number of seasons with

buying event (1-10)

18

Length and buying frequency reinforce each other in this multiplicative definition of relationship strength.

Page 19: 10122619 ppt

Predictor Variables

19

A pretest of the remaining items among 30 customers of the shop under study confirmed the relevance, validity, and reliability of the scales used. Each scale contained three items.

Measures-

Page 20: 10122619 ppt

Result & Discussion

20

Page 21: 10122619 ppt

Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA)

Trust

satisfactionCommitment

21

0.91 0.98

0.91

Each of the pairs of relationship quality Constructs were highly correlated.

It is used to test whether measures of a construct are consistent with a researcher's understanding of the nature of that construct (or factor).

Result

Page 22: 10122619 ppt

Result

22

Table 2

The means and standard deviations of the variables used in the analyses is given.

Page 23: 10122619 ppt

Result

23

Means of two regression analyses with purchase intention.

Page 24: 10122619 ppt

Result A regression analysis as in the

relationship quality-intention section was carried out for each behavioral outcome variable.

24

Page 25: 10122619 ppt

25

Result

In all three models purchase intention had a significant impact on actual purchase behavior.

Page 26: 10122619 ppt

ResultHypotheses Supported/

ConfirmedH1aH1bH2aH2bH3a

H3b

26

√√

A positive perception of relationship quality has a positive impact on buying intention.

A positive buying intention has a positive impact on various aspects of buying intention.

A stronger relationship has a positive impact on buying intention.

A stronger relationship has a positive impact on various aspects of buying intention.

The impact of relationship quality on buying intention is stronger for customers with a stronger relation with the company.The impact of buying intention on buying behavior is stronger for customers with a stronger relation with company.

Page 27: 10122619 ppt

27

In this study, a strong correlation was found between the various components of relationship quality, which has led us to consider them as one “relationship quality” construct.

Conclusion

Page 28: 10122619 ppt

Reflection

28

Page 29: 10122619 ppt

ReflectionFurther research should focus upon the development of better survey items that would discriminate these conceptually related, but distinct constructs.

29

Page 30: 10122619 ppt

30

Thank you