100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

download 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

of 45

Transcript of 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    1/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    IDB GROUP REFORM PROJECT: PHASE IIPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ASSESSMENT REPORT

    TEMPLATE

    Islamic Development Bank

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    MISSION INFORMATION

    COUNTRY Indonesia

    PERIOD June 26th July 07th, 2010

    PROJECT NAME IDB PNPM Integrated Community Driven

    Development(ICDD) Project, 2-IND-0131/0132

    TEAM MEMBERS Dr. Othman Elfiel, IRD, AGRD

    Dr. Safiullah Munsoor, SP, ISFD

    Dr. Ishthiaq Akbar, IRD, AGRD

    Mr. Ahmad Ompo Surono, IRD, AGRDReport No 02

    Last Monitoring Mission November 2009

    Overall performance

    Green: Rated 3 and above: Performing well/ highly satisfactory

    Yellow: Rated 2 to 3: Performing/ satisfactory needs considerable

    improvements

    Red: Rated less than 2: Unsatisfactory, needs major overhaul and immediate

    attention by IDB

    PROCESSING

    Steps Comments and Signature Date

    Project Officer

    PIAR Team Leader

    Division Manager

    Clearance

    1

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    2/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    ABBREVIATIONS

    ADB : Asian Development BankBAPPENAS : National Development Planning Agency

    CDD : Community Driven Development

    CIO : Community Implementing Organization

    EA : Executing Agency

    GDP : Gross Domestic Product

    GOI : Government of Indonesia

    HDI : Human Development Index

    ICDD : Integrated Community Driven Development

    ID : Islamic Dinar

    IDB : Islamic Development Bank

    Kabupaten : District (Bahasa Indonesia)

    Kecamatan : Sub-District (Bahasa Indonesia)

    Kelurahan : Urban Village or Ward (Bahasa Indonesia)

    KDP : Kecamatan Development Project (PNPM-Rural)

    MDGs : Millennium Development Goals

    M&E : Monitoring and Evaluation

    MFIs : Micro-Finance Institutions

    MIS : Management Information System

    MOPW : Ministry of Public Works

    MTPRP : Mid-term Poverty Reduction Plan

    NCB : National Competitive BiddingNGO : Non-Governmental Organization

    O&M : Operation and Maintenance

    PIU : Project Implementation Unit

    PMU : Project Management Unit

    PNPM : National Program for Community Empowerment

    RISP : Rural Infrastructure Support Project

    SHG : Self Help Group

    TOT : Training of Trainers

    UPP : Urban Poverty Program (PNPM-Urban)

    US$ : United States DollarVCC : Village Community Committee

    WB : World Bank

    2

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    3/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    Overall status of implementation: achievements & issues/constraintsbeing faced

    A project supervision mission for the Integrated Community Development Driven

    (ICDD) Project was carried out from June 26 to July 07, 2010. The mission officially

    began with a kick-off meeting in Jakarta on June 28, 2010. During the mission,

    meetings and discussions were held with officials from the Ministry of Public Works

    (MOPW) the Executing Agency (EA), the National Planning Agency (BAPPENAS),

    Ministry of Finance (MOF), and the World Bank.

    The Mission visited and met the local communities (VCCs, KSMs, Facilitators,volunteers, Local Government, etc.) in three Kelurahan (urban villages) in West Java(Bekasi and Bogor) on July 1, and three Kelurahan in Aceh on July 4, 2010, alongwith staff and experts of the Executing Agency (MOPW), BAPPENAS and MOF.

    Table-1: Implementation Progress of Phase-II, as of July 2010

    No.

    Scope as per Financing Plan OverallCompleti

    on To-date(% oftotal)

    Expected Completion Dateand Comments

    1.Capacity Building andInstitutional Development

    (i) Socialization, awareness building

    and empowerment activities forcommunities 95 To be Completed by JulyAugust.Implementation underway for

    remaining Kelurahan(ii) formation of village committees,

    community groups (InstitutionalDev.)

    100

    (iii) Training Program for capacitybuilding of facilitators,communities, and localgovernment official

    75Basic level training almost

    100% complete. Intermediate& advanced training to begin

    with Phase-II(iv)Media Activities (posters, radio

    shows, etc.)75 Ongoing throughout project

    2. Communication and Advocacy 0 To commence by July 2010

    3. Monitoring & Evaluation(related MDGs) 0 To commence by July 2010

    4.Consultancy/ FacilitationServices(Recruitment and deployment ofNational, Provincial and City levelconsultants and over 2000 Facilitators)

    97Procurement to be completed

    by July 2010

    5.Project Management Unit (PMU)(setting up and fielding of PMUs atDistrict level)

    100PMUs established in all

    locations

    3

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    4/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    Overall, 82% (i.e. 4013 out of 4871) Kelurahan (Urban Villages) across the projectlocations have finalized the 'Open-Menu' and are eagerly awaiting the disbursementof funds to begin implementation, with the remaining expected to be completed by

    July 2010.

    Overall rating is Green due to the implementation process and the results both in

    community level and local government level is satisfactory.

    4

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    5/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    PART - 1: BASIC PROJECT DATA (basic project information inputted into the

    system soon after appraisal remains constant.)

    1. PROJECT KEYS

    Country Indonesia

    Project Identification Number/Code: 2-IND-131 and 2-IND-132

    Project Title: IDB PNPM ICDD

    Project Location(s): 14 Provinces across

    Indonesia

    Main Sector(s): CDD

    Sub Sector(s): Multiple

    Beneficiary: Government of Indonesia

    Executing Agency: Ministry of Public Works

    CO-FINANCIERS AND EXTERNALPARTNERSList all other sources and amounts of financing,technical assistance or other sources used inthis project.

    Government of Indonesia

    Address of the Executing Agency Directorate General of

    Human Settlements,

    Jl. Pattimura 20 KebayoranBaru

    Jakarta Seletan 12110

    [email protected]

    Item/Mode Estimated at AppraisalMode -1 (Istisnaa) Mode -2 (Loan)

    Amount (ID, $, etc) USD 68 million USD 15 millionService Fee/Mark-up 3.825 Not exceeding 1.25 %

    Repayment period 15 years 18 years

    Grace Period/Gestation Period 5 years 7 yearsGuarantee Sovereign Sovereign

    5

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    6/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    3. KEY DATES AT APPRAISAL

    Key Dates Modes

    Loan Istisnaa

    Identification Date 06/08 06/08

    Concept Clearance Date 07/08 07/08

    Preparation Date 17-27/08/08 17-27/08/08

    Appraisal Date 09-20/11/08 09-20/11/08

    Approval Date 10/01/09 10/01/09

    Signature Date 16/03/09 TBC

    Effectiveness Date 20/06/09 TBC

    Project (physical) Commencement Date 01/09 01/09

    Last Date for First Disbursement: 20/12/09 TBC

    Last Date for Last Disbursement: 31/12/10 31/12/10

    Project Closing Date 31/12/10 31/12/10

    Actual Date of First Disbursement 07/11/09 TBC

    Number of Extensions 0 0

    Actual Date of Last Disbursement 0 0

    Project (Physical) Completion Date n/a n/a

    6

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    7/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    4. PROJECT COST AT APPRAISAL

    All costs are local. Please see Financing Plan below.

    Components

    (Description)

    Cost

    US$ equivalent, millionForeign

    currency

    Local currency TOTALIDB GOB

    A. Block Finance - 5.855 0.362 6.217B. Capacity Building and Institutional

    Development

    - 0.693 1.478 2.171

    C. Communication and Advocacy - 0.985 0.033 1.018D. Monitoring and Evaluation - 0.239 - 0.239E. Consultancy Services (incl. Facilitators) - 0.051 - 0.051F. PMU - - 0.330 0.330G. Start Up Workshop - 0.030 - 0.030

    H. Familiarization with IDB Procedures andGuidelines

    - 0.009 - 0.009

    I. Financial Auditing - 0.025 0.003 0.028Total Base Cost 7.887 2.206 10.093

    Contingencies (Physical & Price) - 0.789 0.221 1.009Total Project Cost - 8.676 2.426 11.102

    Exchange rate at Appraisal - 1 US$ Tk - 69.00

    S#

    A Block Fin

    B Capacity

    C Commun

    D Monitorin7

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    8/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    - 1 ID Tk - 1.53

    5. FINANCING PLAN AT APPRAISAL

    Parties

    Financing PlanUS$ equivalent, million

    AmountTerms

    Service Fee/Mark UpRepayment

    periodGracePeriod

    Guarantee

    IDB 8.676 0.014 18 yrs 7 yrsGovernment 2.427 0.24

    0.48Total 11.102 0.981 25 yrs -

    8

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    9/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    6. TOTAL PROJECT COST AND DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNTS BY FINANCIERS

    Sl

    No

    Items Cost million US$Total IDB GOB

    A) Block FinanceB) Capacity Building and Institutional Development

    C) Communication and AdvocacyD) Monitoring and EvaluationE) Consultancy Services (incl. Facilitators)F) PMUG) Start Up WorkshopH) Familiarization with IDB Procedures and GuidelinesI) Financial Auditing

    Sub Total of (D+E+F+G+H+I)Total Base Cost

    Physical & Price Contingencies (IDB 100%)Total Project Cost

    9

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    10/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    6. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AT APPRAISAL

    A

    B Signing of the10

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    11/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    6. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CURRENTLY

    No 2008

    Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M June

    A Project Appraisal

    B Signing of the Financing Agreement

    C Effe ctivene ss of the Fina ncing Agre eme nt

    1 Setting up of PMUs

    2 Procurement of Consultants

    3 Training/Capacity Building

    4 Consultancy & Facilitacion

    5 Establihing Urban Village Committees (new location)

    6 Finalizing or Review the Scope (PJM Pronangkis)

    7 Release of Block Grant

    8 Implementation of The Scope

    9 M & E/Audi ting (by IDB)

    10 Project Completion

    11 Project Follow up & Completion Missions

    LOAN

    ISTISNA'A

    Activities2009 2010 2011

    NMCBaseline &

    CommFacilitator & City

    Coord.

    OCs

    11

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    12/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    7. DISBURSEMENT PLAN AT APPRAISAL

    US$ equivalent, million

    Item Loan

    (USD)

    Istisnaa

    (USD)

    Total Percentage

    2009 5,116,822 46,154,357 51,271,179

    2010 9,883,178 21,845,643 31,728,821

    Total 15,000,000 68,000,000 83,000,000

    12

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    13/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    PART-2: IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS

    OBJECTIVES AND LOG FRAME SUMMARY

    Project objectives:

    The Integrated Community Driven Development (ICDD) Project, which is part of the

    overall National Program for Community Empowerment (PNPM), aims to reducepoverty by empowering communities so that they will be effective development

    players and partners through a comprehensive, integrated community-based

    approach. The overall objectives of the project are to (i) improve the socio-economic

    conditions of communities in the targeted areas, especially women and the poorest,

    through (a) improving community infrastructure, both, physical and social; (b) social

    activities aimed at the dependent/ vulnerable segments of the communities; (c)

    facilitating economic growth and livelihood development, and (ii) build capacities &

    skills of communities and their local institutions.

    13

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    14/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    Narrative Summary Performance Target

    Goal:

    1. Reduction of poverty in 14

    Provinces of Indonesia

    1. 5-10% Increase in the Gross Income level of the 14

    Provinces, 5 years after project completion (pc)Purpose:

    1. Improve the socio-economic

    conditions of the population of

    111 districts within the project

    area, especially women and the

    poorest

    1a. Improve the physical andsocial infrastructure in the

    target areas

    1.b Contribute to the social

    security of the

    vulnerable/dependant in the

    communities

    1.c Facilitate economic growth

    and livelihood development

    2. Build the capacity and skills of

    the communities and local

    institutions

    1. At least 1/3 of 4,871 urban villages (Kelurahans)

    targeted by the project graduate from the list of

    'less-developed areas', 2 years after pc

    1a. All 4,871 Kelurahans provided with at least 20%

    of key necessary infrastructure (access roads,

    water & sanitation, schools, health centres,markets, etc) , 1 year after pc

    1b(i). At least 20% of the vulnerable/ dependant in

    target villages have access to basic needs, and

    percentage of orphans receiving scholarships

    graduate from secondary school, 2 years after pc

    1c(i). Direct employment for 2.4 million people (50%

    women) and indirect employment for 5.0 million

    people from the target population, 1 year after pc

    1c(ii). Trade volume in the project area increases by

    10%, 1 year after pc

    1c(iii). Skilled jobs and micro-enterprises increases by

    15%, 2 years after pc2(i). At least 3000 sustainable self-help groups

    operating within the communities and at least USD

    2.5 million worth of micro-credit provided to the

    communities, 2 years after pc

    2(ii) The Institutional Capacity of the MOPW and

    Local Govt. is strengthened to manage and

    implement Community Empowerment and

    Development programs, after pcOutputs:

    1. Communities mobilized and

    empowered

    2. Poverty assessments and Medium

    Term Poverty Reduction Plans

    (MTPRP) completed

    3. Community needs identified and

    prioritized in Open Menus

    4. Block Finances disbursed to all

    target Kelurahan s

    5. All Kelurahan -level community

    projects completed

    6. Self-Help Groups formed andactive

    7. Project well-coordinated,

    recorded, monitored and

    supervised

    1. 2785 facilitators trained as 'Master trainers' by

    month 6, and 4871 Village Community Committees

    (VCC) formed and trained by the Facilitators by

    month 4-5

    2. All villages undertake self-poverty profiling &

    assessment, and produce MTPRPs by month 5-6

    3. All villages submit final 'Open menus', which are

    accepted by the communities, by month 6-8

    4. Block Finances released in three tranches of 30%

    (upon final approval of Open Menus), 50% (upon

    20% progress) and 20% (upon 60% progress) to bedisbursed completely by 2010

    5. All villages implement and complete the activities

    described in the Open Menus by 2011

    6. 3000 SGHs (sustainable KSMs) established and

    trained, 24 months after project start

    7. Capable and efficient PMUs and Consultants

    established and operational at National, Provincial

    and District levels by month 2, Monitoring and

    Evaluation (M&E) Specialist in place by month 2Component Activity:

    Block Finance;B. Capacity Building and Instit. Dev.Communication and Advocacy;

    Inputs/Resources:

    Project cost (US$ millions)

    A. Block Finance;B. Capacity Building and Instit.

    Total

    88.9115.599

    IDB

    56.9115.599

    14

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    15/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR PROJECT LAUNCH

    This table will apply for the first project launch mission; should remain same for

    following PIARs.

    Requirements Status

    Ratings (1-4)1

    Last

    Report

    (Date)

    This

    Report

    Follow

    up

    actions

    1 PIU/PMU

    PIU location and structureagreed

    Qualified manager andstaffs recruited/retained

    PIU/PMU is integrated withtheexecuting/implementingagency

    Yes

    Completed

    Yes

    4 4

    2 Planning documents

    Annual work plan detailingactivity and budgetrequirements

    Request in for counterpartfunds in annual budget

    Done

    Done

    4 4

    3 Implementation Systems

    Agreed procurementarrangements are in place

    Bidding documents for thefirst year program areready

    Financial Managementand Disbursementarrangements are in place.

    Yes

    Yes

    Yes

    4 4

    4 Monitoring systemavailable and updated

    Base line data available In complete 3 3

    Base linedate

    shouldbe

    updatedin 2009

    Total Average 3.75 3.75

    1Please refer to Annex I the Performance Rating Scale for definition of ratings

    15

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    16/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    PHYSICAL PROGRESS

    Overall physical progress is generally satisfactory with the procurement processes for certain consultancy

    assignments to be expedited.Component Implementation Status Issues/Recommendation

    1. Block Finance

    2. Consultancy Services

    3. Capacity Building andInstitutional Development

    4. Communication andAdvocacy

    5. Monitoring & Evaluation(MDGs)

    6. PMU

    7. Start Up Workshops

    1. 78,2% of Block Finance has alreadybeen disbursed and utilized by thecommunity with 100% physicalcompletion by March 2010

    2.a. Facilicators and city coordinatorshave established in May 2009

    b. NMC will be established in July2010

    c. OCs have been established in Jan2010

    d. Baseline contract is waiting forselection consultants clearancesfor IDB

    3.a. Awareness activities and Basicand intermediate Training atcommunity and local government

    level have been implemented andare satisfactory

    b. There is no no budget for printingmaterial for training modules andkits/media socialization.

    4. TOR and Procurement processunder preparation

    5. The Procurement is underway byIDB

    6. PMUs and PIUs established at

    1. 21,8% of Block Finances begandisbursing in April 2010 and 100%physical completion is expected by March2011

    2. a.

    b. NMC assignment awaiting clearance ofrevised Draft Contract by IDB. To bemobilized by July 2010

    c.-

    d. Awaiting clearance of 1st phase ofconsultant qualification evaluation by IDB.To be procured by August 2010

    3. a.Advanced training for KSMstrengthening, Livelihood developmenthave not been completed since EA isawaiting for the NMC mobilization

    b. there is a proposal to utilize balance ofcontingencies for printing material costs,once all major activities are completed.

    4. To expedite the procurement, theconsultant to be procured throughConsultant Qualification method ofEvaluation

    5.- IDB is facing delays in procurement andis seeking alternative ways of undertakingthe assignment.6. Increase the capacity of PIUs at locallevels to improve coordination and

    16

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    17/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    8. Familiarization Visit to IDBHQ

    9. Financial Auditing

    10. Contingencies

    national, provincial and city level

    7. This Activities already included inNMC Contract and will be held aftermobilization of NMC

    8. Already done

    9. in the process audit by BPKP(national audit)

    10. Some funds of the LoanContingencies have been utilized

    facilitation

    7. This start-up/ orientation workshop isintended to serve as awareness of the ICDDproject to national stakeholders

    8. Already done

    9. Report will be submitted by September2010

    10. Used some of the contingencies forconsultancy

    17

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    18/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    2.3. PHYSICAL PROGRESS

    Adherence to Time

    Components Target

    (proportion of the works to

    be completed under each

    component as per

    appraisal)

    Actual

    (works

    completed

    up to this

    mission)

    Variation/

    Slippage

    (%)

    Rating

    0 4

    Recommendations to

    improve the rating

    This

    mission

    Rate

    Follow-

    up

    actions

    By when By

    whom

    Target Achievement

    A. Block Finance 100 78.2 78.2 4 To becompleted

    by 2011 PMU.Facilitato

    & VCCs

    B. Capacity Building and Institutional

    Development

    n/a

    C. Communication and Advocacy n/aD. Monitoring and Evaluation n/aE. Consultancy Services (incl. Facilitators) n/aF. PMU n/aG. Start Up Workshop n/aH. Familiarization with IDB Procedures and

    Guidelines

    100 100 100 4

    I. Financial Auditing 100 90 90 4 Report willbe

    submitted

    Sept 2010 PMU

    Average scoreHighlights the main findings and issues thereof.

    18

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    19/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    Adherence to Cost

    Components Total Estimated Cost atAppraisal

    Actual Cost (cumulative)up To This Mission

    Variation(%)

    Highlight the main findingsany issues and suggested

    remedial actionsTotal IDB GOI Total IDB GOI Follow-up

    actionsBy

    whenBy

    whomA. Block Finance 88.911 56.91

    1

    32.00

    0

    46.15 20.3 Completedby 2010

    B. Capacity Building and InstitutionalDevelopment

    5.599 5.599 -

    C. Communication and Advocacy 0.100 0.100 - 0D. Monitoring and Evaluation 0.100 0.100 - 0E. Consultancy Services (incl.

    Facilitators)

    29.571 19.71

    4

    9.857 5.12 11.1

    54

    F. PMU 2.000 0.000 2.000 2.000G. Start Up Workshop 0.075 0.075 - 0H. Familiarization with IDB Procedures

    and Guidelines

    0.025 0.025 - 0

    I. Financial Auditing 0.100 0.000 0.100 - 0.100Sub Total of (D+E+F+G+H+I)

    Total Base Cost 126.48

    1

    82.52

    4

    43.95

    7

    Physical & Price Contingencies (IDB 10%,

    GOB 2.50%)

    0.476 0.476 -

    Total Project Cost 126.95

    7

    83.00

    0

    43.95

    7

    19

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    20/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    CONTRACT AWARD STATUS

    Contract Type

    Total Planned Contracts Awarded Contracts Pending Comments

    # ofcontracts

    IDR(x10000)

    US$

    equiv.

    value

    # ofcontracts

    IDR(x10000)

    US$

    equiv.

    value

    # ofcontracts

    IDR(x10000)

    US$ equiv.

    value

    Goods n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

    Works 88,911,0000

    88.911

    Services :

    1.NMC 8.590,000 859 12.616.725 1.262 0 0 Cost of NMC

    and OCs is also

    partly covered

    by the

    Capacity

    Building

    activities

    (training and

    socialization)

    component

    Contract

    facilitator and

    CC for 1 year

    2.OC S ( 1 4 ) 54.860,000 5,4

    86

    72.818.283 7.282 0 0

    3.City

    Coordinator

    27.410,000 2,7

    41

    1.208.400 121 0 0

    4.Facilitators 107.650,625 10,7

    65

    90.737.400 9.074 0 0

    5.CommunityAdvocacy

    1.000.000 100 1.000.000 100

    6.M&E (MDG)

    Exp.

    1.000.000 100 1.000.000 100

    Total 200.510.6

    25

    20,051 179.380.80

    8

    17,939 2.000.000 200

    20

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    21/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    Summary/Issues need follow-up:

    21

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    22/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    SUMMARY/ ISSUES NEED FOLLOW-UP:

    2.4. b Compliance with the contracts

    Review major products/ services/ works already delivered (contacts awarded as listed in the above table) between the last mission (or effectiven

    date) and this mission matched with the contract in terms of time, cost and quality.Contracts

    completed

    Organization Rating Rating 0 4 Recommendations to Improve The RaCost

    0 4

    Time

    0 4

    Quality

    0 4

    This mission

    Rate

    Last mission

    Rate

    Follow up actions By when By w

    GOODSn/a

    TOTAL

    WORKSOpen Menu 4 4 3 3.67

    TOTAL

    SERVICESconsultancy 4 2.75 3 3.25

    TOTALGRAND TOTAL

    Average Score 3.46Highlight the main findings and any issues thereof

    22

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    23/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    COUNTERPART FUNDING

    Partners Counterpart disbursements Rating 2

    0 4

    Recommendations to improve the

    rating

    Target

    (proportion of

    disbursements

    made up to thismission)

    Cumulative

    Actual

    (proportion of

    disbursements

    made up to

    this mission)

    Cumulative

    Variation

    /

    Slippage

    (%)

    This

    missio

    n

    Rate:

    Last

    missio

    n

    Rate:

    Follow-up

    actions

    By when By

    whom

    Executing Agency 22.000 24.296 4

    Average score 4

    Highlight the main findings and any issues thereof.

    2Please refer to Annex I the Performance Rating Scale for definition of ratings

    23

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    24/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    CUMULATIVE DISBURSEMENTS STATUS

    Year

    Planned

    Disbursem

    ent

    US$

    million

    Actual

    Disbursemen

    t

    US$ million

    %

    Variance

    2009 50 51,2 +2.4%

    2010 33 - -100%

    4

    5

    n50

    60

    Sample Graph showing Cumula

    24

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    25/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    MONITORING SYSTEM

    Please review and rate the monitoring system of

    the project to date since the effectiveness date (or

    last mission).

    Rating 3

    0 4

    Recommendations to improve the

    ratingThis

    mission

    Rate

    Last

    mission

    Rate

    Follow-up

    actions

    By whom and

    when

    M&E framework in place that outlines performance

    indicators and methods of data collection for each

    indicator, when and by whom

    3 3

    Improve M&E

    framework,

    strengthening

    using new

    applications for

    data collection

    By EA,

    Advisory and

    NMC

    Base line data is available or defined 3 3

    Need updated

    information and

    verification

    By EA,

    Advisory and

    Baseline

    Consultant

    Dedicated staffs to run the system available 3.5 3

    Need regular

    training, esp. to

    increase

    competency on

    running M&E

    system

    By EA, NMC,

    OC and City

    Coordinator

    Regular reporting about the progress towards results and

    the problems during implementation 2.75 3

    Reporting and

    updating of MISsystem needs

    improvement

    By EA and NMC

    M&E system used by the executing agency, the Bank and

    other stakeholders3.5 4

    Not yet accessed

    by IDB

    Average score 3.15 3

    Highlight the main findings and any issues thereof

    3Please refer to Annex I the Performance Rating Scale for definition of ratings

    25

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    26/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    PART 3. PROGRESS TOWARDS RESULTS

    PROJECT RESULTS IMPACT AND OUTCOMES

    (If a results framework was established at appraisal, fill in the table below, otherwise provide brief

    narrative)

    Results Key Performance

    Indicators

    Base

    Line

    Data

    Target

    at

    Apprais

    al

    Actual Rating4

    0 4

    Recommendations to improve

    the ratingThis

    mission:

    Rate

    Last

    missionRate

    Follow-up

    actions

    By

    when

    By

    whom

    Outputs

    1.Communities

    mobilized and

    empowered

    1.Facilitators

    trained by month 6,

    and Village

    Community

    Committees (VCC)

    formed and trained

    by month 4-5

    2785

    Facilitat

    ors

    4871

    VCCs

    2844

    Facilitator

    s

    4866

    VCCs

    4 4

    1.Policy to

    handle the

    turn Over of

    the facilitators

    is almost 20%

    2.After

    clarified, 5

    kelurahans are

    double count

    based on

    NationalStatistic

    bearau (BPS)

    July

    2010

    July

    2010

    IDB &

    PMU

    PMU &

    Bappe-

    nas

    2. Poverty

    mapping &

    Medium Term

    Poverty

    Reduction Plans

    (MTPRP)

    completed

    2.All villages

    undertake self-

    poverty profiling &

    assessment, and

    produce MTPRPs by

    month 5-6

    4871

    Villages

    4866

    Villages

    (self-

    pover-ty

    Profiling)

    4866

    Villages

    (MTPRP)

    4 3

    Expedite VCC

    facilitation

    contin

    ues

    4Please refer to Annex I the Performance Rating Scale for definition of ratings

    26

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    27/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    3. Community

    needs identified

    and prioritized

    in Open Menus

    3.All villages submit

    final 'Open menus',

    which are accepted

    by the

    communities, by

    month 6-8

    4871

    Villages

    4866

    Villages

    4 3

    Expedite VCC

    facilitation

    contin

    ues

    VCCs &

    commu

    -nities

    4.Block

    Finances

    disbursed to

    all target

    Kelurahans

    1.Block Finances

    released in three

    tranches of 30%

    (upon final approval

    of Open Menus),

    50% (upon 20%

    progress) and 20%

    (upon 60%

    progress) to be

    disbursed

    completely by 2010

    4871

    Villages

    Partial

    disbursem

    ent made

    to 4866

    kelurahan

    . 3805

    kelurahan

    have

    100%

    physical

    completio

    n

    3 3

    21,8% of Block

    Finances will

    be disbursed

    and utilized by

    the community

    April

    untill

    Dec

    2010

    VCCs &

    commu

    -nities

    5. All Kelurahan-

    level

    community

    projects

    completed

    1.All villages

    implement and

    complete the

    activities described

    in the Open Menus

    by 2012

    4871

    Villages

    3805

    kelurahan

    have

    complete

    d 100%

    open

    menu

    activities

    3 -

    21,8% of the

    Open Menu will

    be completed

    April

    untill

    Dec

    2010

    VCCs &

    commu

    -nities

    6. Self-Help

    Groups

    formed and

    active

    3000 SGHs

    established and

    trained, 36 months

    after project start

    3000

    SGHs in

    4871

    Villages

    Although

    106.277

    KSMs

    have

    been

    establishe

    d, the

    number of

    sustainabl

    e,

    KSMs/SHG

    4 - only about

    10.000 SGHs

    have got the

    on the job

    training

    related with

    admi-nistration

    for book

    keeping .

    Incresing

    the SGHs

    July

    untill

    Dec

    2010

    Advisor

    NMC,

    Nationa

    l

    Trainer

    s, OCs

    and

    Facilita

    rs

    27

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    28/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    s is

    17,575

    economic

    SGHs/KSM

    with

    99167

    members

    capacity about

    livelihood,

    economic

    development

    and syariah

    system

    7. Project well-

    coordinated,

    recorded,

    monitored

    and

    supervised

    Capable and

    efficient PMUs and

    Consultants

    established and

    operational at

    National, Provincial

    and District levels

    by month 4,

    Monitoring and

    Evaluation (M&E)

    Specialist in place

    by month 10

    Month

    10

    1.PMU

    estabishe

    d on Jan

    09

    2.Local

    PIU

    establishe

    d on Jun

    09

    3.

    Facilictrs

    & city

    cord.

    establishe

    d on May

    09

    4.NMC willbe esta-

    blished on

    July 2010

    5.OCs

    establishe

    d on Jan

    10

    3 -

    1.M & E will be

    handle by

    IDB team

    2.Communicati

    on &

    Advocacy

    will be

    integreted in

    NMC

    Contract

    July

    2010

    PMU &

    IDB

    8. Capacity

    Building

    4. Total

    participants/

    community training

    14598

    members

    from 4866

    VCCs

    318831

    3 3 Continuous

    training and

    need

    strangthen the

    moduls related

    July

    untill

    Dec

    2010

    IDB,

    PMU,

    Advisor

    y &

    NMC

    28

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    29/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    board of

    106.277

    SGHs

    48660

    volunteer

    s

    2844

    facilitator

    s

    350

    national

    trainers &

    OCs

    with livelihood,

    economic

    development

    and syariah

    system

    Outcomes

    9.- Social Capital 5. Number of

    volunteers

    170310

    volunteer

    s

    recruited

    & 121650

    volunteer

    s trained

    44

    General and

    basic training

    need strengthen

    with advanced

    and specific

    training

    10. - Local

    Governance

    6. (a) Transparency

    6. (b) Accountability

    4 3

    Continuous

    facilitation,

    increase local

    government

    awareness11. Preliminar

    y impacts, if any

    7. Neighborhood

    development/

    improvement

    3 3

    -Average score 3.5 3.3

    Highlight the main findings and any issues thereof.

    Guidance Note: This table is to be filled when applicable, e.g. when a project is at a stage when results

    have started to emerge.

    29

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    30/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    3.2. Risk Log

    Assess potential risks and assumptions underlying the outputs and outcomes initially identified as in the project appraisal document.

    Risks Rating

    0 4

    Recommendations to mitigate the

    risks

    State reasons, if any, if the

    recommendations from the

    last missions were not

    implemented.

    This mission

    Rate

    Last mission

    Rate

    Follow-up actions By

    when

    By

    whom

    OutputsLocal Govt. funding 2 Socialization to the

    local govern. toallocate the

    sharing fund.

    Implementation of

    sanctions to the

    local government

    who more than two

    years do not

    allocate co sharing

    2011 GOI

    Poor quality

    facilitation by

    Facilitator and CC

    2 Conduct periodic

    performance

    evaluation of

    facilitator. Apply

    the sanction and

    reward system for

    the facilitator. Use

    contingensi funds

    for replacement

    and training costs

    of new facilitators.

    2011 GOI

    Lack of Printing

    Material, Modul,

    and Kits for Training

    and socialization

    2 Using the

    contingency fund

    to finance the

    needs of printing

    materials, modules

    2011 GOI

    30

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    31/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    and kits of training

    and socialization

    Delay in issuing

    budget documents

    2 Budget Financing

    Block grants

    through

    Reimbursements

    method should

    improve

    disbursements

    performance in

    2010. The GOI will

    finance the block

    grant component

    through pre-

    financing without

    waiting loan

    signing.

    OutcomesOthers Cluster

    Programs and

    Sectoral programs

    do not compensate

    Coordinating the

    delivery of various

    sectoral poverty

    alleviation

    programs -channeling

    though BKMs could

    be a politically

    sensitive issue and

    may be at risk of

    not receiving much

    support from key

    line

    ministries/departm

    ents in order to

    operationalize it

    31

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    32/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    under ICDD

    phase2. The

    project intends to

    mitigate this risk

    by piloting the

    concept to poverty

    programs

    managed and

    implemented by

    the Ministry of

    Public Works, since

    it is the

    implementing

    agency under the

    project

    Lack of

    Commitment and

    Capacity of Local

    Government to

    support community

    Programs

    There is a risk that

    the capacity of

    local government

    is not sufficient to

    support PNPM

    programs at the

    Kelurahan level

    and to ensure thatthey are aligned

    with broader city

    investment and

    physical planning.

    Under the

    proposed project

    funds will be

    available to

    provide capacity

    building to local

    governments.

    32

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    33/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    Average score 2Rate 4 almost zero risk; Rate 3 low risk; Rate 2 risky; Rate 1 high risk; Rate 0 very high risk

    33

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    34/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    PART 4.a) STATUS OF LAST REVIEW ACTION PLAN (Date: __ / __/_____)

    34

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    35/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    Item Issue Follow-up Action Responsible Current Status

    1. Block Finance(Istisnaa)Disbursement

    In EA monitoringstatus, 4013 (82%)Kelurahan have nowfinished the openmenu, but its only(75.6%) that wereincluded forpreparation of firstIstisnaa disbursement.The Total amount ofIstisnaa to bedisbursed first is aboutRp 507,65 M or US$46,15 million

    MOF and IDB to signAgreement and IDB todisburse

    Review CommunityPlan based oninfrastructure, socialand econ. activities

    Review CommunityPlan based onhandling of theimpact earthquake inWest Sumatera

    Disburse Istisnaa toBKM account

    Disburse and utilizeBlock Grant toCommunity (KSM)

    IDB

    MOPW

    100% of Kelurahan have

    finished the Open Menu

    and 78.2% of block

    finance has been

    disbursed and these

    78.2% kelurahan have

    achieved 100% physical

    completion

    2. ConsultantServices (Incl.Facilitators)

    a. Delay in NMCprocurement

    o Submission Shortlist

    of NMCo Submission technical

    evaluation of NMCo Sub mission final

    evaluation andcontract clearance ofNMC

    o Mobilization of NMC

    MOPW

    Procurement is complete

    and awaiting clearance of

    draft contract for signing

    of contract and

    mobilization

    b. Delay of OCsMobilization

    Approval of RevisedNational Budget

    Mobilization of OCs

    MOFAll OCs have been

    mobilized by January 2010

    c. Mobilization offacilitators Team andCity Coordinator team

    Done

    done

    3. Training andAwarenessProgram

    a. Training ofLivelihood, Pro Poor,and Economic Growthfor Facilitators inIntermediate/ AdvancedLocations(KSMs will be activewhen the revolvingFund has beendisburshed to BKM, onMarch or April 2010)

    Serial Discussions,workshops andstudies to understandand finalize thecurriculum content for Training of Livelihoodand Economic Growth

    Training of Trainersfor NMC and OCsrelated withLivelihood

    Training of City

    Advisory & IDBTeam

    Advisory & IDBteam

    NMC and OCssupervised by

    AdvisoryFacilitator & City

    Cord.

    Although a draft version

    was prepared by EA &

    advisory consultant, there

    will be a completed

    curriculum enhancement

    during Phase-II of the

    project.

    35

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    36/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    PART 4.b) ACTION PLAN FOR THIS REVIEW

    RECOMMENDATIONS AND FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS (Summarize below key findings and recommendations)

    Key Findings Key Issues and

    Challenges

    Recommended Actions

    Follow-up actions By when By whom1. Block Finance(Istisnaa)

    Disbursement

    In EA monitoring status,21,8% of Block Finances

    will be disbursed andutilized by the community

    Disburse Istisnaa to BKMaccount

    Disburse and utilize BlockGrant to Community (KSM)

    April-Dec 2010 MOPW

    2. ConsultantServices (Incl.Facilitators)

    a. Delay in NMCprocurement

    o Mobilization of NMC Initial July 2010 MOPW

    b.Mobilization of OCs Done Jan 2010 MOPW

    c. Turn over of thefacilitators (10-20%)

    Mapping the currentcondition of the facilitatorsteam

    additional facilitatorsrecuritment and basictraining using thecontingencies cost

    Mobilization of the subtitudefacilitators

    July 2010

    August 2010

    Sept 2010

    MOPW

    3. Training andAwarenessProgram

    a. Training of Livelihood,Pro Poor, and EconomicGrowth for Facilitators inIntermediate/ AdvancedLocations(KSMs will be active whenthe revolving Fund hasbeen disburshed to BKM,on March or April 2010)

    Serial Discussions,workshops and studies tounderstand and finalize thecurriculum content for Training of Livelihood andEconomic Growth

    Training of Trainers for NMCand OCs related withLivelihood

    Training of City Coordinatorand Facilitator Teams

    Training for BKM, KSM andvolunteers

    July-August

    Sept 2010

    Oct 2010

    Nov-Dec 2010

    Advisory &IDB Team

    Advisory &IDB teamNMC and

    OCssupervisedby AdvisoryFacilitator &City Cord.

    36

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    37/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    b. The Budget is only forTraining activities in Basicand Intermediate location,but there is no budget forprinting material ofmodules

    Budget allocation for theprinting material of trainingmodules in basic andintermediate locations

    July 2010 Advisory, CBNMC and &

    IDB

    c. The Budget is only forSocialization andawareness activities

    Budget allocation for the Kitsand Media Socializations inbasic and intermediatelocations

    August 2010 Advisory, CBNMC and &

    IDB

    4.Communicationand Advocacy

    a. Communication andAdvocacy activities atcommunity and localgovernment level hasbeen done but with smallsupport of kits and media

    The Procurement Process Willbe finalized

    Sept 2010 MOPW & IDB

    b. Maximize impactfulactivities at national level

    Arrange the communicationand advocacy at national level(TV, national newspaper, etc)

    Oct 2010 Advisory,NMC and &

    IDB5. Monitoringand Evaluation(MDGs)

    Procurement of Firm toHandle Baseline Studyand Mid Term Review isstill going on

    Finalizing theprocurement process.

    Using MIS existing asbasis of baseline data untilthe firm/ individualconsultant of M&E is

    mobilized to verify/updatedata

    August 2010 forprocurement

    MOPW & IDB

    6. ProjectManagementUnits (PMU)

    The PMU was establishedat national, provincial andcity level since February2009 until now

    Support the capacity of PMUat all level to provide socialand technical assistance tothe communities and localgovernment

    May-July 2010 Advisory,MOPW

    7. Start-upWorkshops

    Plan the structure andscope of the Start-upWorkshops due to widecoverage. To be done inclose coordination withIDB FR

    a. Workshop of Review anddevelop ICDD program design(Preparation of Program)

    Sept 2010 Advisory,PMU, MOPW

    & IDB

    37

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    38/45

    Project Implementation Assessment Report

    b. Workshop of IslamicMicrofinance and implementpilot scheme within ICDDproject

    Oct 2010 Advisory,NMC, & IDB

    c. Workshop of Livelihood andeconomic growth forCommunity Groups

    Nov 2010 Advisory,NMC, & IDB

    8. FamiliarizationVisit to IDBHeadquarters

    The activities is done involving the executingagency, other Ministries &PMU

    June 2010 PMU,executingagency,

    otherMinistries &

    IDB9. FinancialAuditing

    in the process audit byBPKP

    Submit the Audit reporting Sept 2010 MOPW

    10.Contingencies

    There are clearly activitiesthat require additionalfinancing throughcontingencies

    Propose the Budget allocatedare for: the city coordinatorteam cost, printing materialof training modules andkits/media of socialization,and special additional grants(infrastructure) for WestSumatera

    Sept 2010 Advisory,MOPW and

    IDB

    38

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    39/45

    SUGGESTED ANNEXES (As required)

    1. Detailed project implementation schedule (Updated implementation bar chartand attached table)

    2. Details of costs and financing plan (table attached)

    3. Organizational structure

    4. Detailed project log frame

    5. Executing Agencys comments on the Banks last PIAR

    6. List of progress and review reports

    7. Map of the project location(s) as needed

    8. Aide Memoire

    9. Action Letter

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    40/45

    SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST5

    A Block Fin

    C Communic

    - S ecialist

    S#

    5 Add footnote for any component for which financing plan has been modified, e.g. additional financing, cancellation, projectscope changes, etc.

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    41/45

    ANNEX I: PERFORMANCE RATING SCALE

    General (applicable to most indicators) Rating Scoreif performance is highly satisfactory 4

    if performance is satisfactory 3

    if performance is partially satisfactory 2if performance is unsatisfactory 1if performance is highly unsatisfactory 0

    Rating for Cost Variationif cost variation is within +/- 10 percent of the appraisal cost estimates 4if cost variation is within +/- 20 percent of the appraisal cost estimates 3

    if cost variation is within +/- 30 percent of the appraisal cost estimates 2

    if cost variation is within +/- 50 percent of the appraisal cost estimates 1if cost variation is more than +/- 50 percent of the appraisal costestimates

    0

    Rating for Adherence to Time scheduleDelay is defined as difference in months between original closing date

    and actual closing dateif delay is less than 12 months 4

    if delay is between 12 to 24 months 3if delay is between 24 to 36 months 2

    if delay is between 36 to 48 months 1if delay is over 48 months 0

    Overall AssessmentThe overall assessment would be the simple un-weighted average ofscores for all indicators, under each criteria/sub-criteria. This will bedetermined by adding all rating scores and dividing the total by thenumber of component indicators. The numerical average will then beconverted into descriptive ratings as follows:Highly Satisfactory (HS) 3< R 4

    Satisfactory (S) 2

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    42/45

    ANNEX 2

    Amounts in USD Millions

    Istisna'a Loan

    A Block Finance 56.911 56.911 64% 32.000 36% 88.911

    B Capacity Building and Institutional Development 5.599 5.599 100% 5.599

    C Communication and Advocacy

    - Specialist firm 0.050 0.050 0.050

    - Documentation and Audio/Visual Expenses 0.050 0.050 0.050

    Sub-Total 0.100 0.100 100% 0.100

    D Monitoring and Evaluation (MDGs)

    - Specialist 0.090 0.090

    - Baseline Study (incl. socio-economic survey) 0.050 0.050 0.050

    - Mid-TermEvaluation and Final Assessment 0.050 0.050 0.050

    Sub-Total 0.100 0.100 100% 0.100

    E Consultancy Services (incl. Facilitators)

    - National Management Consultant 0.483 0.376 0.859 0.430 1.289

    - Oversight Consultant (Provincial level Consultant) 3.086 2.400 5.486 2.743 8.229

    - City Coordinators (District level Consulant) 1.713 1.028 2.741 1.371 4.112

    - Facilitators 5.807 4.958 10.765 6.611 17.376

    Sub-Total 11.089 8.762 19.851 64% 11.154 36% 31.005

    F Project Management Unit (PMU) 2.000 100% 2.000

    G Start-up Workshops 0.075 0.075 100% 0.075

    H Familiarization with IDB procedures and guidelines 0.025 0.025 100% 0.025

    I Financial Auditing 0.100 100% 0.100

    Base Cost 68.000 14.661 82.661 65% 45.254 35% 127.915

    J Contingencies (total 8% Physical & Price for all components except A and E) 0.339 0.339 0.339

    Grand Total 68.000 15.000 83.000 65% 45.254 35% 128.254

    The Block Finance will be utilized for Infrastructure, Social and Economic activities based on the priority needs of the communities reflected in the 'open menus'

    Full-fledged modular-based training and awareness raising activities on social mobilization, community empowerment and building of pro-poor institutions

    This specialist will be financed by IDB outside the project cost

    TotalItemsS# IDB % IDB Total IDB % GOI GOI %

    Detailed Financing PlanIDB PNPM - Integrated Community Driven Development Project, Indonesia

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    43/45

    ANNEX 3: IDB Loan Fund Withdrawal Recapitulation - PNPM 2009 (as per first quartal ofF.y. 2010)

    USD (Loan) USD (Istisna'a) IDR USD (Loan) USD (Istisna'a) IDR USD USD (Istisna'a)

    1

    1Block Finance 56.911.000,00 534.963.400.000 46.154.357,00 437.774.076.145 - 43.982.159,81

    2Capacity Building 5.599.000,00 52.630.600.000 - - - - -

    3Communication and Advocacy 100.000,00 940.000.000 - - - - -

    4Monitoring and Evaluation 100.000,00 940.000.000 - - - - -

    5Consultant Services 8.625.000,00 11.089.000,00 185.311.600.000 5.116.822,00 48.481.888.000 771.021,45 1.629.473,75

    6Start-up Workshops 75.000,00 705.000.000 - - - - -

    7Familiarization with IDB

    procedures and guidelines25.000,00 235.000.000 - - - - -

    8Contingencies 476.000,00 4.474.400.000 - - - - -

    Jumlah 15.000.000,00 68.000.000,00 780.200.000.000 5.116.822,00 46.154.357,00 486.255.964.145 771.021,45 45.611.633,56

    No Loan Ceiling Disburse Loan (RKBI) Expenditure RK Category

    2 3 4

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    44/45

  • 8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3

    45/45

    Photographs from the MissionMeetings with the Stakeholders (Ministries, Local Govt. Communities) and

    Damage caused by the Earthquake