100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
Transcript of 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
1/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
IDB GROUP REFORM PROJECT: PHASE IIPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ASSESSMENT REPORT
TEMPLATE
Islamic Development Bank
Project Implementation Assessment Report
MISSION INFORMATION
COUNTRY Indonesia
PERIOD June 26th July 07th, 2010
PROJECT NAME IDB PNPM Integrated Community Driven
Development(ICDD) Project, 2-IND-0131/0132
TEAM MEMBERS Dr. Othman Elfiel, IRD, AGRD
Dr. Safiullah Munsoor, SP, ISFD
Dr. Ishthiaq Akbar, IRD, AGRD
Mr. Ahmad Ompo Surono, IRD, AGRDReport No 02
Last Monitoring Mission November 2009
Overall performance
Green: Rated 3 and above: Performing well/ highly satisfactory
Yellow: Rated 2 to 3: Performing/ satisfactory needs considerable
improvements
Red: Rated less than 2: Unsatisfactory, needs major overhaul and immediate
attention by IDB
PROCESSING
Steps Comments and Signature Date
Project Officer
PIAR Team Leader
Division Manager
Clearance
1
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
2/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
ABBREVIATIONS
ADB : Asian Development BankBAPPENAS : National Development Planning Agency
CDD : Community Driven Development
CIO : Community Implementing Organization
EA : Executing Agency
GDP : Gross Domestic Product
GOI : Government of Indonesia
HDI : Human Development Index
ICDD : Integrated Community Driven Development
ID : Islamic Dinar
IDB : Islamic Development Bank
Kabupaten : District (Bahasa Indonesia)
Kecamatan : Sub-District (Bahasa Indonesia)
Kelurahan : Urban Village or Ward (Bahasa Indonesia)
KDP : Kecamatan Development Project (PNPM-Rural)
MDGs : Millennium Development Goals
M&E : Monitoring and Evaluation
MFIs : Micro-Finance Institutions
MIS : Management Information System
MOPW : Ministry of Public Works
MTPRP : Mid-term Poverty Reduction Plan
NCB : National Competitive BiddingNGO : Non-Governmental Organization
O&M : Operation and Maintenance
PIU : Project Implementation Unit
PMU : Project Management Unit
PNPM : National Program for Community Empowerment
RISP : Rural Infrastructure Support Project
SHG : Self Help Group
TOT : Training of Trainers
UPP : Urban Poverty Program (PNPM-Urban)
US$ : United States DollarVCC : Village Community Committee
WB : World Bank
2
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
3/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Overall status of implementation: achievements & issues/constraintsbeing faced
A project supervision mission for the Integrated Community Development Driven
(ICDD) Project was carried out from June 26 to July 07, 2010. The mission officially
began with a kick-off meeting in Jakarta on June 28, 2010. During the mission,
meetings and discussions were held with officials from the Ministry of Public Works
(MOPW) the Executing Agency (EA), the National Planning Agency (BAPPENAS),
Ministry of Finance (MOF), and the World Bank.
The Mission visited and met the local communities (VCCs, KSMs, Facilitators,volunteers, Local Government, etc.) in three Kelurahan (urban villages) in West Java(Bekasi and Bogor) on July 1, and three Kelurahan in Aceh on July 4, 2010, alongwith staff and experts of the Executing Agency (MOPW), BAPPENAS and MOF.
Table-1: Implementation Progress of Phase-II, as of July 2010
No.
Scope as per Financing Plan OverallCompleti
on To-date(% oftotal)
Expected Completion Dateand Comments
1.Capacity Building andInstitutional Development
(i) Socialization, awareness building
and empowerment activities forcommunities 95 To be Completed by JulyAugust.Implementation underway for
remaining Kelurahan(ii) formation of village committees,
community groups (InstitutionalDev.)
100
(iii) Training Program for capacitybuilding of facilitators,communities, and localgovernment official
75Basic level training almost
100% complete. Intermediate& advanced training to begin
with Phase-II(iv)Media Activities (posters, radio
shows, etc.)75 Ongoing throughout project
2. Communication and Advocacy 0 To commence by July 2010
3. Monitoring & Evaluation(related MDGs) 0 To commence by July 2010
4.Consultancy/ FacilitationServices(Recruitment and deployment ofNational, Provincial and City levelconsultants and over 2000 Facilitators)
97Procurement to be completed
by July 2010
5.Project Management Unit (PMU)(setting up and fielding of PMUs atDistrict level)
100PMUs established in all
locations
3
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
4/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
Overall, 82% (i.e. 4013 out of 4871) Kelurahan (Urban Villages) across the projectlocations have finalized the 'Open-Menu' and are eagerly awaiting the disbursementof funds to begin implementation, with the remaining expected to be completed by
July 2010.
Overall rating is Green due to the implementation process and the results both in
community level and local government level is satisfactory.
4
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
5/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
PART - 1: BASIC PROJECT DATA (basic project information inputted into the
system soon after appraisal remains constant.)
1. PROJECT KEYS
Country Indonesia
Project Identification Number/Code: 2-IND-131 and 2-IND-132
Project Title: IDB PNPM ICDD
Project Location(s): 14 Provinces across
Indonesia
Main Sector(s): CDD
Sub Sector(s): Multiple
Beneficiary: Government of Indonesia
Executing Agency: Ministry of Public Works
CO-FINANCIERS AND EXTERNALPARTNERSList all other sources and amounts of financing,technical assistance or other sources used inthis project.
Government of Indonesia
Address of the Executing Agency Directorate General of
Human Settlements,
Jl. Pattimura 20 KebayoranBaru
Jakarta Seletan 12110
Item/Mode Estimated at AppraisalMode -1 (Istisnaa) Mode -2 (Loan)
Amount (ID, $, etc) USD 68 million USD 15 millionService Fee/Mark-up 3.825 Not exceeding 1.25 %
Repayment period 15 years 18 years
Grace Period/Gestation Period 5 years 7 yearsGuarantee Sovereign Sovereign
5
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
6/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
3. KEY DATES AT APPRAISAL
Key Dates Modes
Loan Istisnaa
Identification Date 06/08 06/08
Concept Clearance Date 07/08 07/08
Preparation Date 17-27/08/08 17-27/08/08
Appraisal Date 09-20/11/08 09-20/11/08
Approval Date 10/01/09 10/01/09
Signature Date 16/03/09 TBC
Effectiveness Date 20/06/09 TBC
Project (physical) Commencement Date 01/09 01/09
Last Date for First Disbursement: 20/12/09 TBC
Last Date for Last Disbursement: 31/12/10 31/12/10
Project Closing Date 31/12/10 31/12/10
Actual Date of First Disbursement 07/11/09 TBC
Number of Extensions 0 0
Actual Date of Last Disbursement 0 0
Project (Physical) Completion Date n/a n/a
6
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
7/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
4. PROJECT COST AT APPRAISAL
All costs are local. Please see Financing Plan below.
Components
(Description)
Cost
US$ equivalent, millionForeign
currency
Local currency TOTALIDB GOB
A. Block Finance - 5.855 0.362 6.217B. Capacity Building and Institutional
Development
- 0.693 1.478 2.171
C. Communication and Advocacy - 0.985 0.033 1.018D. Monitoring and Evaluation - 0.239 - 0.239E. Consultancy Services (incl. Facilitators) - 0.051 - 0.051F. PMU - - 0.330 0.330G. Start Up Workshop - 0.030 - 0.030
H. Familiarization with IDB Procedures andGuidelines
- 0.009 - 0.009
I. Financial Auditing - 0.025 0.003 0.028Total Base Cost 7.887 2.206 10.093
Contingencies (Physical & Price) - 0.789 0.221 1.009Total Project Cost - 8.676 2.426 11.102
Exchange rate at Appraisal - 1 US$ Tk - 69.00
S#
A Block Fin
B Capacity
C Commun
D Monitorin7
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
8/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
- 1 ID Tk - 1.53
5. FINANCING PLAN AT APPRAISAL
Parties
Financing PlanUS$ equivalent, million
AmountTerms
Service Fee/Mark UpRepayment
periodGracePeriod
Guarantee
IDB 8.676 0.014 18 yrs 7 yrsGovernment 2.427 0.24
0.48Total 11.102 0.981 25 yrs -
8
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
9/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
6. TOTAL PROJECT COST AND DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNTS BY FINANCIERS
Sl
No
Items Cost million US$Total IDB GOB
A) Block FinanceB) Capacity Building and Institutional Development
C) Communication and AdvocacyD) Monitoring and EvaluationE) Consultancy Services (incl. Facilitators)F) PMUG) Start Up WorkshopH) Familiarization with IDB Procedures and GuidelinesI) Financial Auditing
Sub Total of (D+E+F+G+H+I)Total Base Cost
Physical & Price Contingencies (IDB 100%)Total Project Cost
9
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
10/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
6. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AT APPRAISAL
A
B Signing of the10
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
11/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
6. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CURRENTLY
No 2008
Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M June
A Project Appraisal
B Signing of the Financing Agreement
C Effe ctivene ss of the Fina ncing Agre eme nt
1 Setting up of PMUs
2 Procurement of Consultants
3 Training/Capacity Building
4 Consultancy & Facilitacion
5 Establihing Urban Village Committees (new location)
6 Finalizing or Review the Scope (PJM Pronangkis)
7 Release of Block Grant
8 Implementation of The Scope
9 M & E/Audi ting (by IDB)
10 Project Completion
11 Project Follow up & Completion Missions
LOAN
ISTISNA'A
Activities2009 2010 2011
NMCBaseline &
CommFacilitator & City
Coord.
OCs
11
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
12/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
7. DISBURSEMENT PLAN AT APPRAISAL
US$ equivalent, million
Item Loan
(USD)
Istisnaa
(USD)
Total Percentage
2009 5,116,822 46,154,357 51,271,179
2010 9,883,178 21,845,643 31,728,821
Total 15,000,000 68,000,000 83,000,000
12
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
13/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
PART-2: IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS
OBJECTIVES AND LOG FRAME SUMMARY
Project objectives:
The Integrated Community Driven Development (ICDD) Project, which is part of the
overall National Program for Community Empowerment (PNPM), aims to reducepoverty by empowering communities so that they will be effective development
players and partners through a comprehensive, integrated community-based
approach. The overall objectives of the project are to (i) improve the socio-economic
conditions of communities in the targeted areas, especially women and the poorest,
through (a) improving community infrastructure, both, physical and social; (b) social
activities aimed at the dependent/ vulnerable segments of the communities; (c)
facilitating economic growth and livelihood development, and (ii) build capacities &
skills of communities and their local institutions.
13
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
14/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
Narrative Summary Performance Target
Goal:
1. Reduction of poverty in 14
Provinces of Indonesia
1. 5-10% Increase in the Gross Income level of the 14
Provinces, 5 years after project completion (pc)Purpose:
1. Improve the socio-economic
conditions of the population of
111 districts within the project
area, especially women and the
poorest
1a. Improve the physical andsocial infrastructure in the
target areas
1.b Contribute to the social
security of the
vulnerable/dependant in the
communities
1.c Facilitate economic growth
and livelihood development
2. Build the capacity and skills of
the communities and local
institutions
1. At least 1/3 of 4,871 urban villages (Kelurahans)
targeted by the project graduate from the list of
'less-developed areas', 2 years after pc
1a. All 4,871 Kelurahans provided with at least 20%
of key necessary infrastructure (access roads,
water & sanitation, schools, health centres,markets, etc) , 1 year after pc
1b(i). At least 20% of the vulnerable/ dependant in
target villages have access to basic needs, and
percentage of orphans receiving scholarships
graduate from secondary school, 2 years after pc
1c(i). Direct employment for 2.4 million people (50%
women) and indirect employment for 5.0 million
people from the target population, 1 year after pc
1c(ii). Trade volume in the project area increases by
10%, 1 year after pc
1c(iii). Skilled jobs and micro-enterprises increases by
15%, 2 years after pc2(i). At least 3000 sustainable self-help groups
operating within the communities and at least USD
2.5 million worth of micro-credit provided to the
communities, 2 years after pc
2(ii) The Institutional Capacity of the MOPW and
Local Govt. is strengthened to manage and
implement Community Empowerment and
Development programs, after pcOutputs:
1. Communities mobilized and
empowered
2. Poverty assessments and Medium
Term Poverty Reduction Plans
(MTPRP) completed
3. Community needs identified and
prioritized in Open Menus
4. Block Finances disbursed to all
target Kelurahan s
5. All Kelurahan -level community
projects completed
6. Self-Help Groups formed andactive
7. Project well-coordinated,
recorded, monitored and
supervised
1. 2785 facilitators trained as 'Master trainers' by
month 6, and 4871 Village Community Committees
(VCC) formed and trained by the Facilitators by
month 4-5
2. All villages undertake self-poverty profiling &
assessment, and produce MTPRPs by month 5-6
3. All villages submit final 'Open menus', which are
accepted by the communities, by month 6-8
4. Block Finances released in three tranches of 30%
(upon final approval of Open Menus), 50% (upon
20% progress) and 20% (upon 60% progress) to bedisbursed completely by 2010
5. All villages implement and complete the activities
described in the Open Menus by 2011
6. 3000 SGHs (sustainable KSMs) established and
trained, 24 months after project start
7. Capable and efficient PMUs and Consultants
established and operational at National, Provincial
and District levels by month 2, Monitoring and
Evaluation (M&E) Specialist in place by month 2Component Activity:
Block Finance;B. Capacity Building and Instit. Dev.Communication and Advocacy;
Inputs/Resources:
Project cost (US$ millions)
A. Block Finance;B. Capacity Building and Instit.
Total
88.9115.599
IDB
56.9115.599
14
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
15/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR PROJECT LAUNCH
This table will apply for the first project launch mission; should remain same for
following PIARs.
Requirements Status
Ratings (1-4)1
Last
Report
(Date)
This
Report
Follow
up
actions
1 PIU/PMU
PIU location and structureagreed
Qualified manager andstaffs recruited/retained
PIU/PMU is integrated withtheexecuting/implementingagency
Yes
Completed
Yes
4 4
2 Planning documents
Annual work plan detailingactivity and budgetrequirements
Request in for counterpartfunds in annual budget
Done
Done
4 4
3 Implementation Systems
Agreed procurementarrangements are in place
Bidding documents for thefirst year program areready
Financial Managementand Disbursementarrangements are in place.
Yes
Yes
Yes
4 4
4 Monitoring systemavailable and updated
Base line data available In complete 3 3
Base linedate
shouldbe
updatedin 2009
Total Average 3.75 3.75
1Please refer to Annex I the Performance Rating Scale for definition of ratings
15
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
16/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
PHYSICAL PROGRESS
Overall physical progress is generally satisfactory with the procurement processes for certain consultancy
assignments to be expedited.Component Implementation Status Issues/Recommendation
1. Block Finance
2. Consultancy Services
3. Capacity Building andInstitutional Development
4. Communication andAdvocacy
5. Monitoring & Evaluation(MDGs)
6. PMU
7. Start Up Workshops
1. 78,2% of Block Finance has alreadybeen disbursed and utilized by thecommunity with 100% physicalcompletion by March 2010
2.a. Facilicators and city coordinatorshave established in May 2009
b. NMC will be established in July2010
c. OCs have been established in Jan2010
d. Baseline contract is waiting forselection consultants clearancesfor IDB
3.a. Awareness activities and Basicand intermediate Training atcommunity and local government
level have been implemented andare satisfactory
b. There is no no budget for printingmaterial for training modules andkits/media socialization.
4. TOR and Procurement processunder preparation
5. The Procurement is underway byIDB
6. PMUs and PIUs established at
1. 21,8% of Block Finances begandisbursing in April 2010 and 100%physical completion is expected by March2011
2. a.
b. NMC assignment awaiting clearance ofrevised Draft Contract by IDB. To bemobilized by July 2010
c.-
d. Awaiting clearance of 1st phase ofconsultant qualification evaluation by IDB.To be procured by August 2010
3. a.Advanced training for KSMstrengthening, Livelihood developmenthave not been completed since EA isawaiting for the NMC mobilization
b. there is a proposal to utilize balance ofcontingencies for printing material costs,once all major activities are completed.
4. To expedite the procurement, theconsultant to be procured throughConsultant Qualification method ofEvaluation
5.- IDB is facing delays in procurement andis seeking alternative ways of undertakingthe assignment.6. Increase the capacity of PIUs at locallevels to improve coordination and
16
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
17/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
8. Familiarization Visit to IDBHQ
9. Financial Auditing
10. Contingencies
national, provincial and city level
7. This Activities already included inNMC Contract and will be held aftermobilization of NMC
8. Already done
9. in the process audit by BPKP(national audit)
10. Some funds of the LoanContingencies have been utilized
facilitation
7. This start-up/ orientation workshop isintended to serve as awareness of the ICDDproject to national stakeholders
8. Already done
9. Report will be submitted by September2010
10. Used some of the contingencies forconsultancy
17
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
18/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
2.3. PHYSICAL PROGRESS
Adherence to Time
Components Target
(proportion of the works to
be completed under each
component as per
appraisal)
Actual
(works
completed
up to this
mission)
Variation/
Slippage
(%)
Rating
0 4
Recommendations to
improve the rating
This
mission
Rate
Follow-
up
actions
By when By
whom
Target Achievement
A. Block Finance 100 78.2 78.2 4 To becompleted
by 2011 PMU.Facilitato
& VCCs
B. Capacity Building and Institutional
Development
n/a
C. Communication and Advocacy n/aD. Monitoring and Evaluation n/aE. Consultancy Services (incl. Facilitators) n/aF. PMU n/aG. Start Up Workshop n/aH. Familiarization with IDB Procedures and
Guidelines
100 100 100 4
I. Financial Auditing 100 90 90 4 Report willbe
submitted
Sept 2010 PMU
Average scoreHighlights the main findings and issues thereof.
18
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
19/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
Adherence to Cost
Components Total Estimated Cost atAppraisal
Actual Cost (cumulative)up To This Mission
Variation(%)
Highlight the main findingsany issues and suggested
remedial actionsTotal IDB GOI Total IDB GOI Follow-up
actionsBy
whenBy
whomA. Block Finance 88.911 56.91
1
32.00
0
46.15 20.3 Completedby 2010
B. Capacity Building and InstitutionalDevelopment
5.599 5.599 -
C. Communication and Advocacy 0.100 0.100 - 0D. Monitoring and Evaluation 0.100 0.100 - 0E. Consultancy Services (incl.
Facilitators)
29.571 19.71
4
9.857 5.12 11.1
54
F. PMU 2.000 0.000 2.000 2.000G. Start Up Workshop 0.075 0.075 - 0H. Familiarization with IDB Procedures
and Guidelines
0.025 0.025 - 0
I. Financial Auditing 0.100 0.000 0.100 - 0.100Sub Total of (D+E+F+G+H+I)
Total Base Cost 126.48
1
82.52
4
43.95
7
Physical & Price Contingencies (IDB 10%,
GOB 2.50%)
0.476 0.476 -
Total Project Cost 126.95
7
83.00
0
43.95
7
19
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
20/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
CONTRACT AWARD STATUS
Contract Type
Total Planned Contracts Awarded Contracts Pending Comments
# ofcontracts
IDR(x10000)
US$
equiv.
value
# ofcontracts
IDR(x10000)
US$
equiv.
value
# ofcontracts
IDR(x10000)
US$ equiv.
value
Goods n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Works 88,911,0000
88.911
Services :
1.NMC 8.590,000 859 12.616.725 1.262 0 0 Cost of NMC
and OCs is also
partly covered
by the
Capacity
Building
activities
(training and
socialization)
component
Contract
facilitator and
CC for 1 year
2.OC S ( 1 4 ) 54.860,000 5,4
86
72.818.283 7.282 0 0
3.City
Coordinator
27.410,000 2,7
41
1.208.400 121 0 0
4.Facilitators 107.650,625 10,7
65
90.737.400 9.074 0 0
5.CommunityAdvocacy
1.000.000 100 1.000.000 100
6.M&E (MDG)
Exp.
1.000.000 100 1.000.000 100
Total 200.510.6
25
20,051 179.380.80
8
17,939 2.000.000 200
20
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
21/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
Summary/Issues need follow-up:
21
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
22/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
SUMMARY/ ISSUES NEED FOLLOW-UP:
2.4. b Compliance with the contracts
Review major products/ services/ works already delivered (contacts awarded as listed in the above table) between the last mission (or effectiven
date) and this mission matched with the contract in terms of time, cost and quality.Contracts
completed
Organization Rating Rating 0 4 Recommendations to Improve The RaCost
0 4
Time
0 4
Quality
0 4
This mission
Rate
Last mission
Rate
Follow up actions By when By w
GOODSn/a
TOTAL
WORKSOpen Menu 4 4 3 3.67
TOTAL
SERVICESconsultancy 4 2.75 3 3.25
TOTALGRAND TOTAL
Average Score 3.46Highlight the main findings and any issues thereof
22
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
23/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
COUNTERPART FUNDING
Partners Counterpart disbursements Rating 2
0 4
Recommendations to improve the
rating
Target
(proportion of
disbursements
made up to thismission)
Cumulative
Actual
(proportion of
disbursements
made up to
this mission)
Cumulative
Variation
/
Slippage
(%)
This
missio
n
Rate:
Last
missio
n
Rate:
Follow-up
actions
By when By
whom
Executing Agency 22.000 24.296 4
Average score 4
Highlight the main findings and any issues thereof.
2Please refer to Annex I the Performance Rating Scale for definition of ratings
23
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
24/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
CUMULATIVE DISBURSEMENTS STATUS
Year
Planned
Disbursem
ent
US$
million
Actual
Disbursemen
t
US$ million
%
Variance
2009 50 51,2 +2.4%
2010 33 - -100%
4
5
n50
60
Sample Graph showing Cumula
24
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
25/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
MONITORING SYSTEM
Please review and rate the monitoring system of
the project to date since the effectiveness date (or
last mission).
Rating 3
0 4
Recommendations to improve the
ratingThis
mission
Rate
Last
mission
Rate
Follow-up
actions
By whom and
when
M&E framework in place that outlines performance
indicators and methods of data collection for each
indicator, when and by whom
3 3
Improve M&E
framework,
strengthening
using new
applications for
data collection
By EA,
Advisory and
NMC
Base line data is available or defined 3 3
Need updated
information and
verification
By EA,
Advisory and
Baseline
Consultant
Dedicated staffs to run the system available 3.5 3
Need regular
training, esp. to
increase
competency on
running M&E
system
By EA, NMC,
OC and City
Coordinator
Regular reporting about the progress towards results and
the problems during implementation 2.75 3
Reporting and
updating of MISsystem needs
improvement
By EA and NMC
M&E system used by the executing agency, the Bank and
other stakeholders3.5 4
Not yet accessed
by IDB
Average score 3.15 3
Highlight the main findings and any issues thereof
3Please refer to Annex I the Performance Rating Scale for definition of ratings
25
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
26/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
PART 3. PROGRESS TOWARDS RESULTS
PROJECT RESULTS IMPACT AND OUTCOMES
(If a results framework was established at appraisal, fill in the table below, otherwise provide brief
narrative)
Results Key Performance
Indicators
Base
Line
Data
Target
at
Apprais
al
Actual Rating4
0 4
Recommendations to improve
the ratingThis
mission:
Rate
Last
missionRate
Follow-up
actions
By
when
By
whom
Outputs
1.Communities
mobilized and
empowered
1.Facilitators
trained by month 6,
and Village
Community
Committees (VCC)
formed and trained
by month 4-5
2785
Facilitat
ors
4871
VCCs
2844
Facilitator
s
4866
VCCs
4 4
1.Policy to
handle the
turn Over of
the facilitators
is almost 20%
2.After
clarified, 5
kelurahans are
double count
based on
NationalStatistic
bearau (BPS)
July
2010
July
2010
IDB &
PMU
PMU &
Bappe-
nas
2. Poverty
mapping &
Medium Term
Poverty
Reduction Plans
(MTPRP)
completed
2.All villages
undertake self-
poverty profiling &
assessment, and
produce MTPRPs by
month 5-6
4871
Villages
4866
Villages
(self-
pover-ty
Profiling)
4866
Villages
(MTPRP)
4 3
Expedite VCC
facilitation
contin
ues
4Please refer to Annex I the Performance Rating Scale for definition of ratings
26
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
27/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
3. Community
needs identified
and prioritized
in Open Menus
3.All villages submit
final 'Open menus',
which are accepted
by the
communities, by
month 6-8
4871
Villages
4866
Villages
4 3
Expedite VCC
facilitation
contin
ues
VCCs &
commu
-nities
4.Block
Finances
disbursed to
all target
Kelurahans
1.Block Finances
released in three
tranches of 30%
(upon final approval
of Open Menus),
50% (upon 20%
progress) and 20%
(upon 60%
progress) to be
disbursed
completely by 2010
4871
Villages
Partial
disbursem
ent made
to 4866
kelurahan
. 3805
kelurahan
have
100%
physical
completio
n
3 3
21,8% of Block
Finances will
be disbursed
and utilized by
the community
April
untill
Dec
2010
VCCs &
commu
-nities
5. All Kelurahan-
level
community
projects
completed
1.All villages
implement and
complete the
activities described
in the Open Menus
by 2012
4871
Villages
3805
kelurahan
have
complete
d 100%
open
menu
activities
3 -
21,8% of the
Open Menu will
be completed
April
untill
Dec
2010
VCCs &
commu
-nities
6. Self-Help
Groups
formed and
active
3000 SGHs
established and
trained, 36 months
after project start
3000
SGHs in
4871
Villages
Although
106.277
KSMs
have
been
establishe
d, the
number of
sustainabl
e,
KSMs/SHG
4 - only about
10.000 SGHs
have got the
on the job
training
related with
admi-nistration
for book
keeping .
Incresing
the SGHs
July
untill
Dec
2010
Advisor
NMC,
Nationa
l
Trainer
s, OCs
and
Facilita
rs
27
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
28/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
s is
17,575
economic
SGHs/KSM
with
99167
members
capacity about
livelihood,
economic
development
and syariah
system
7. Project well-
coordinated,
recorded,
monitored
and
supervised
Capable and
efficient PMUs and
Consultants
established and
operational at
National, Provincial
and District levels
by month 4,
Monitoring and
Evaluation (M&E)
Specialist in place
by month 10
Month
10
1.PMU
estabishe
d on Jan
09
2.Local
PIU
establishe
d on Jun
09
3.
Facilictrs
& city
cord.
establishe
d on May
09
4.NMC willbe esta-
blished on
July 2010
5.OCs
establishe
d on Jan
10
3 -
1.M & E will be
handle by
IDB team
2.Communicati
on &
Advocacy
will be
integreted in
NMC
Contract
July
2010
PMU &
IDB
8. Capacity
Building
4. Total
participants/
community training
14598
members
from 4866
VCCs
318831
3 3 Continuous
training and
need
strangthen the
moduls related
July
untill
Dec
2010
IDB,
PMU,
Advisor
y &
NMC
28
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
29/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
board of
106.277
SGHs
48660
volunteer
s
2844
facilitator
s
350
national
trainers &
OCs
with livelihood,
economic
development
and syariah
system
Outcomes
9.- Social Capital 5. Number of
volunteers
170310
volunteer
s
recruited
& 121650
volunteer
s trained
44
General and
basic training
need strengthen
with advanced
and specific
training
10. - Local
Governance
6. (a) Transparency
6. (b) Accountability
4 3
Continuous
facilitation,
increase local
government
awareness11. Preliminar
y impacts, if any
7. Neighborhood
development/
improvement
3 3
-Average score 3.5 3.3
Highlight the main findings and any issues thereof.
Guidance Note: This table is to be filled when applicable, e.g. when a project is at a stage when results
have started to emerge.
29
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
30/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
3.2. Risk Log
Assess potential risks and assumptions underlying the outputs and outcomes initially identified as in the project appraisal document.
Risks Rating
0 4
Recommendations to mitigate the
risks
State reasons, if any, if the
recommendations from the
last missions were not
implemented.
This mission
Rate
Last mission
Rate
Follow-up actions By
when
By
whom
OutputsLocal Govt. funding 2 Socialization to the
local govern. toallocate the
sharing fund.
Implementation of
sanctions to the
local government
who more than two
years do not
allocate co sharing
2011 GOI
Poor quality
facilitation by
Facilitator and CC
2 Conduct periodic
performance
evaluation of
facilitator. Apply
the sanction and
reward system for
the facilitator. Use
contingensi funds
for replacement
and training costs
of new facilitators.
2011 GOI
Lack of Printing
Material, Modul,
and Kits for Training
and socialization
2 Using the
contingency fund
to finance the
needs of printing
materials, modules
2011 GOI
30
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
31/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
and kits of training
and socialization
Delay in issuing
budget documents
2 Budget Financing
Block grants
through
Reimbursements
method should
improve
disbursements
performance in
2010. The GOI will
finance the block
grant component
through pre-
financing without
waiting loan
signing.
OutcomesOthers Cluster
Programs and
Sectoral programs
do not compensate
Coordinating the
delivery of various
sectoral poverty
alleviation
programs -channeling
though BKMs could
be a politically
sensitive issue and
may be at risk of
not receiving much
support from key
line
ministries/departm
ents in order to
operationalize it
31
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
32/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
under ICDD
phase2. The
project intends to
mitigate this risk
by piloting the
concept to poverty
programs
managed and
implemented by
the Ministry of
Public Works, since
it is the
implementing
agency under the
project
Lack of
Commitment and
Capacity of Local
Government to
support community
Programs
There is a risk that
the capacity of
local government
is not sufficient to
support PNPM
programs at the
Kelurahan level
and to ensure thatthey are aligned
with broader city
investment and
physical planning.
Under the
proposed project
funds will be
available to
provide capacity
building to local
governments.
32
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
33/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
Average score 2Rate 4 almost zero risk; Rate 3 low risk; Rate 2 risky; Rate 1 high risk; Rate 0 very high risk
33
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
34/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
PART 4.a) STATUS OF LAST REVIEW ACTION PLAN (Date: __ / __/_____)
34
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
35/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
Item Issue Follow-up Action Responsible Current Status
1. Block Finance(Istisnaa)Disbursement
In EA monitoringstatus, 4013 (82%)Kelurahan have nowfinished the openmenu, but its only(75.6%) that wereincluded forpreparation of firstIstisnaa disbursement.The Total amount ofIstisnaa to bedisbursed first is aboutRp 507,65 M or US$46,15 million
MOF and IDB to signAgreement and IDB todisburse
Review CommunityPlan based oninfrastructure, socialand econ. activities
Review CommunityPlan based onhandling of theimpact earthquake inWest Sumatera
Disburse Istisnaa toBKM account
Disburse and utilizeBlock Grant toCommunity (KSM)
IDB
MOPW
100% of Kelurahan have
finished the Open Menu
and 78.2% of block
finance has been
disbursed and these
78.2% kelurahan have
achieved 100% physical
completion
2. ConsultantServices (Incl.Facilitators)
a. Delay in NMCprocurement
o Submission Shortlist
of NMCo Submission technical
evaluation of NMCo Sub mission final
evaluation andcontract clearance ofNMC
o Mobilization of NMC
MOPW
Procurement is complete
and awaiting clearance of
draft contract for signing
of contract and
mobilization
b. Delay of OCsMobilization
Approval of RevisedNational Budget
Mobilization of OCs
MOFAll OCs have been
mobilized by January 2010
c. Mobilization offacilitators Team andCity Coordinator team
Done
done
3. Training andAwarenessProgram
a. Training ofLivelihood, Pro Poor,and Economic Growthfor Facilitators inIntermediate/ AdvancedLocations(KSMs will be activewhen the revolvingFund has beendisburshed to BKM, onMarch or April 2010)
Serial Discussions,workshops andstudies to understandand finalize thecurriculum content for Training of Livelihoodand Economic Growth
Training of Trainersfor NMC and OCsrelated withLivelihood
Training of City
Advisory & IDBTeam
Advisory & IDBteam
NMC and OCssupervised by
AdvisoryFacilitator & City
Cord.
Although a draft version
was prepared by EA &
advisory consultant, there
will be a completed
curriculum enhancement
during Phase-II of the
project.
35
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
36/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
PART 4.b) ACTION PLAN FOR THIS REVIEW
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS (Summarize below key findings and recommendations)
Key Findings Key Issues and
Challenges
Recommended Actions
Follow-up actions By when By whom1. Block Finance(Istisnaa)
Disbursement
In EA monitoring status,21,8% of Block Finances
will be disbursed andutilized by the community
Disburse Istisnaa to BKMaccount
Disburse and utilize BlockGrant to Community (KSM)
April-Dec 2010 MOPW
2. ConsultantServices (Incl.Facilitators)
a. Delay in NMCprocurement
o Mobilization of NMC Initial July 2010 MOPW
b.Mobilization of OCs Done Jan 2010 MOPW
c. Turn over of thefacilitators (10-20%)
Mapping the currentcondition of the facilitatorsteam
additional facilitatorsrecuritment and basictraining using thecontingencies cost
Mobilization of the subtitudefacilitators
July 2010
August 2010
Sept 2010
MOPW
3. Training andAwarenessProgram
a. Training of Livelihood,Pro Poor, and EconomicGrowth for Facilitators inIntermediate/ AdvancedLocations(KSMs will be active whenthe revolving Fund hasbeen disburshed to BKM,on March or April 2010)
Serial Discussions,workshops and studies tounderstand and finalize thecurriculum content for Training of Livelihood andEconomic Growth
Training of Trainers for NMCand OCs related withLivelihood
Training of City Coordinatorand Facilitator Teams
Training for BKM, KSM andvolunteers
July-August
Sept 2010
Oct 2010
Nov-Dec 2010
Advisory &IDB Team
Advisory &IDB teamNMC and
OCssupervisedby AdvisoryFacilitator &City Cord.
36
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
37/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
b. The Budget is only forTraining activities in Basicand Intermediate location,but there is no budget forprinting material ofmodules
Budget allocation for theprinting material of trainingmodules in basic andintermediate locations
July 2010 Advisory, CBNMC and &
IDB
c. The Budget is only forSocialization andawareness activities
Budget allocation for the Kitsand Media Socializations inbasic and intermediatelocations
August 2010 Advisory, CBNMC and &
IDB
4.Communicationand Advocacy
a. Communication andAdvocacy activities atcommunity and localgovernment level hasbeen done but with smallsupport of kits and media
The Procurement Process Willbe finalized
Sept 2010 MOPW & IDB
b. Maximize impactfulactivities at national level
Arrange the communicationand advocacy at national level(TV, national newspaper, etc)
Oct 2010 Advisory,NMC and &
IDB5. Monitoringand Evaluation(MDGs)
Procurement of Firm toHandle Baseline Studyand Mid Term Review isstill going on
Finalizing theprocurement process.
Using MIS existing asbasis of baseline data untilthe firm/ individualconsultant of M&E is
mobilized to verify/updatedata
August 2010 forprocurement
MOPW & IDB
6. ProjectManagementUnits (PMU)
The PMU was establishedat national, provincial andcity level since February2009 until now
Support the capacity of PMUat all level to provide socialand technical assistance tothe communities and localgovernment
May-July 2010 Advisory,MOPW
7. Start-upWorkshops
Plan the structure andscope of the Start-upWorkshops due to widecoverage. To be done inclose coordination withIDB FR
a. Workshop of Review anddevelop ICDD program design(Preparation of Program)
Sept 2010 Advisory,PMU, MOPW
& IDB
37
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
38/45
Project Implementation Assessment Report
b. Workshop of IslamicMicrofinance and implementpilot scheme within ICDDproject
Oct 2010 Advisory,NMC, & IDB
c. Workshop of Livelihood andeconomic growth forCommunity Groups
Nov 2010 Advisory,NMC, & IDB
8. FamiliarizationVisit to IDBHeadquarters
The activities is done involving the executingagency, other Ministries &PMU
June 2010 PMU,executingagency,
otherMinistries &
IDB9. FinancialAuditing
in the process audit byBPKP
Submit the Audit reporting Sept 2010 MOPW
10.Contingencies
There are clearly activitiesthat require additionalfinancing throughcontingencies
Propose the Budget allocatedare for: the city coordinatorteam cost, printing materialof training modules andkits/media of socialization,and special additional grants(infrastructure) for WestSumatera
Sept 2010 Advisory,MOPW and
IDB
38
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
39/45
SUGGESTED ANNEXES (As required)
1. Detailed project implementation schedule (Updated implementation bar chartand attached table)
2. Details of costs and financing plan (table attached)
3. Organizational structure
4. Detailed project log frame
5. Executing Agencys comments on the Banks last PIAR
6. List of progress and review reports
7. Map of the project location(s) as needed
8. Aide Memoire
9. Action Letter
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
40/45
SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST5
A Block Fin
C Communic
- S ecialist
S#
5 Add footnote for any component for which financing plan has been modified, e.g. additional financing, cancellation, projectscope changes, etc.
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
41/45
ANNEX I: PERFORMANCE RATING SCALE
General (applicable to most indicators) Rating Scoreif performance is highly satisfactory 4
if performance is satisfactory 3
if performance is partially satisfactory 2if performance is unsatisfactory 1if performance is highly unsatisfactory 0
Rating for Cost Variationif cost variation is within +/- 10 percent of the appraisal cost estimates 4if cost variation is within +/- 20 percent of the appraisal cost estimates 3
if cost variation is within +/- 30 percent of the appraisal cost estimates 2
if cost variation is within +/- 50 percent of the appraisal cost estimates 1if cost variation is more than +/- 50 percent of the appraisal costestimates
0
Rating for Adherence to Time scheduleDelay is defined as difference in months between original closing date
and actual closing dateif delay is less than 12 months 4
if delay is between 12 to 24 months 3if delay is between 24 to 36 months 2
if delay is between 36 to 48 months 1if delay is over 48 months 0
Overall AssessmentThe overall assessment would be the simple un-weighted average ofscores for all indicators, under each criteria/sub-criteria. This will bedetermined by adding all rating scores and dividing the total by thenumber of component indicators. The numerical average will then beconverted into descriptive ratings as follows:Highly Satisfactory (HS) 3< R 4
Satisfactory (S) 2
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
42/45
ANNEX 2
Amounts in USD Millions
Istisna'a Loan
A Block Finance 56.911 56.911 64% 32.000 36% 88.911
B Capacity Building and Institutional Development 5.599 5.599 100% 5.599
C Communication and Advocacy
- Specialist firm 0.050 0.050 0.050
- Documentation and Audio/Visual Expenses 0.050 0.050 0.050
Sub-Total 0.100 0.100 100% 0.100
D Monitoring and Evaluation (MDGs)
- Specialist 0.090 0.090
- Baseline Study (incl. socio-economic survey) 0.050 0.050 0.050
- Mid-TermEvaluation and Final Assessment 0.050 0.050 0.050
Sub-Total 0.100 0.100 100% 0.100
E Consultancy Services (incl. Facilitators)
- National Management Consultant 0.483 0.376 0.859 0.430 1.289
- Oversight Consultant (Provincial level Consultant) 3.086 2.400 5.486 2.743 8.229
- City Coordinators (District level Consulant) 1.713 1.028 2.741 1.371 4.112
- Facilitators 5.807 4.958 10.765 6.611 17.376
Sub-Total 11.089 8.762 19.851 64% 11.154 36% 31.005
F Project Management Unit (PMU) 2.000 100% 2.000
G Start-up Workshops 0.075 0.075 100% 0.075
H Familiarization with IDB procedures and guidelines 0.025 0.025 100% 0.025
I Financial Auditing 0.100 100% 0.100
Base Cost 68.000 14.661 82.661 65% 45.254 35% 127.915
J Contingencies (total 8% Physical & Price for all components except A and E) 0.339 0.339 0.339
Grand Total 68.000 15.000 83.000 65% 45.254 35% 128.254
The Block Finance will be utilized for Infrastructure, Social and Economic activities based on the priority needs of the communities reflected in the 'open menus'
Full-fledged modular-based training and awareness raising activities on social mobilization, community empowerment and building of pro-poor institutions
This specialist will be financed by IDB outside the project cost
TotalItemsS# IDB % IDB Total IDB % GOI GOI %
Detailed Financing PlanIDB PNPM - Integrated Community Driven Development Project, Indonesia
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
43/45
ANNEX 3: IDB Loan Fund Withdrawal Recapitulation - PNPM 2009 (as per first quartal ofF.y. 2010)
USD (Loan) USD (Istisna'a) IDR USD (Loan) USD (Istisna'a) IDR USD USD (Istisna'a)
1
1Block Finance 56.911.000,00 534.963.400.000 46.154.357,00 437.774.076.145 - 43.982.159,81
2Capacity Building 5.599.000,00 52.630.600.000 - - - - -
3Communication and Advocacy 100.000,00 940.000.000 - - - - -
4Monitoring and Evaluation 100.000,00 940.000.000 - - - - -
5Consultant Services 8.625.000,00 11.089.000,00 185.311.600.000 5.116.822,00 48.481.888.000 771.021,45 1.629.473,75
6Start-up Workshops 75.000,00 705.000.000 - - - - -
7Familiarization with IDB
procedures and guidelines25.000,00 235.000.000 - - - - -
8Contingencies 476.000,00 4.474.400.000 - - - - -
Jumlah 15.000.000,00 68.000.000,00 780.200.000.000 5.116.822,00 46.154.357,00 486.255.964.145 771.021,45 45.611.633,56
No Loan Ceiling Disburse Loan (RKBI) Expenditure RK Category
2 3 4
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
44/45
-
8/8/2019 100705 IDB PIAR-Icdd Supervisi June-July 2010v3
45/45
Photographs from the MissionMeetings with the Stakeholders (Ministries, Local Govt. Communities) and
Damage caused by the Earthquake