100614UPC Seminar1 1950205022 X2000 20 1 80 Y 40 ecoefficiencyecoefficiency 160 CULTURESTRUCTURE...

100614 UPC Seminar 1

1950 2050 22 X2000

20

1

80

Y

40

ecoeff

iciency

160

CULTURE STRUCTURE

TECHNO-LOGY

NEEDFUNCTION

?


Internationalinstability

Overexploitationresources

Green houseeffects

Distribution ofProsperity

Urbandevelopment

Biodiversity

Sustainable Development

SPEEDING UP TRANSITIONSPEEDING UP TRANSITION


Transitions manageable? NO !What than is Transitionmanagement?

TRANSITION MANAGEMENT

COMPLEX:Long termGreat uncertaintyMany actorsConflicting interestsMulti dimensualMulti sectoral

Oriëntation on desirable future

Create process conditions

Future oriëntationBackcasting

InteractiveWith stakeholdersIterative



20502000 TIME

EFF.

FACTOR

OPTIMALUSE

IMPROVEMENTOF PROCES

AND PRODUCT

20

5

1

RENEWAL BASED ON NEEDS AND FUNCTION



Culture – Structure - Technology

Involved Parties

Optimization - Improvement - Renewal

DIMENSIONS OF CHANGE



NEEDS

FUNCTIONS

CULT

URE

STRUCTU

RE

TECHNOLOGY



Transition at different scales (concurrent)Transition at different scales (concurrent)

Macro, landscape

Meso, regimes

Micro, niches


Jan Rotmans, 2003,


SocietySocietyNGO’sNGO’s

Science &Science &EducationEducation

CorporationsCorporations

Societies in Sustainable

Development

GovernmentsGovernments



HOW: Social learning

• Dialogue

• Exploiration

• Interaction

• Creation



CONDITIONS:Essential functions for innovation:• Entrepreneurial activities,• Knowledge development,• Knowledge dissipation, • Availability of means (manpower, money) • Guiding vision • Market stimulation• Break through resistance by lobbyingMarko Hekkert (2008),


21-04-09 12ICIS

Essential functions for innovation:• Entrepreneurial activities,• Knowledge development,• Knowledge dissipation, • Availability of means (manpower, money) • Guiding vision • Market stimulation• Break through resistance by lobbyingMarko Hekkert (2008),

SPEEDING UP ENERGY TRANSITIONSPEEDING UP ENERGY TRANSITION

09/ 05/ 2010 67

LevelsLevels of of transitiontransitionJ .Rotmans, 2003, Transitiemanagement p19

Macro, landscape

Meso, regimes

Micro, niches

10-06-14 2

1Establishcriteria forsustainable

future

Backcasting: The Natural Step

2ComparePresent

Situation,With

Criteria 1

3 Scenario analysis 4

1 Establishment sustainability principles

2 Compare present situation with criteria (1)

3 Envision future possibilities

4 Find strategies towards the future.


small

narrow

wide

broad Societal embedment

Inte

rdis

ciplin

ary

colla

pora

tion

Col lab

or a

t ion

wit

h p

r ivat e

en

t rep

rises

Colla

bora

tion

with

pu

blic

in

stitu

tion

s, c

ivic

movem

en

t an

d

priv

ate

partie

s

Transdisciplinary

Monodisciplinary

Sectoral (partial)System innovation

Company orientedproces innovation

Component innovation

Company orientedProduct innovation Strategic

System innovation



accountability

flexibility

education

research

transdisciplinary

monodisciplinary

Disciplinaryknowledge

Research forSystemsRenewal

Research forSystems

OptimisationImprovement

AttitudesSocial competences



R&D Design

Contextual Conditions

OutcomesSD ProgramsSD Projects



Science

Educatio

n Practice

Transitionlearning



Science

Educatio

n PracticeTransitionlearning

R&D Design

Contextual Conditions

Outcomes

Learning by doingLearning by doing

SD ProgramsSD Projects



Dutch Transition Policy: Priorities

“Persistent problems ”

• Energy• Agriculture

• Biodiversity

• Mobility




Nobody Nobody wants wants

energy !energy !As suchAs such Everybody Everybody

uses uses energy !energy !For functionsFor functions


• NUTRITION

• SHELTER

• MOBILITY, TRANSPORTATION

• WATERCYCLE

• CHEMISTRY

• CONSTRUCTION

• ICT

• ENERGY PROVISIONENERGY PROVISION

Energy for needs



Decentral

local

Central

(inter)national

Small scale

Deconcentrated

light demand

Large scale

Concentrated

heavy demand

X

FossilNuclear

WaterpowerBiomass

Sun Wind

WaterpowerBiomass

Sun Wind


XLong distance

Heavy Grid

People

PlanetProsperity

No or short distance

Light Grid

ProfitPlanetPeople


Dutch energy policy

• Access sources, International context

in EU , van de Linden advice

• Energy use

clean and efficient, E-market OK, Investmentclimate,

saving and sustainable, flexible en decentral, diversification scale

• E-infrastructure

regulation en supervision, innovation, common interest, spatial fit


TOP - DOWN


Sustainable Mobility VisiongroupsGreen raw materials Chainefficiency New Gas TransitionpathsSustainable Elektricity provision Build EnvironmentGreenhouse as Energy source Programs

Innovation for sustainable developmentEnergie transition


TOP - DOWN


Network Knowledge in Synergie for a Sustainable South-Holland

KISSZKISSZ• 6 LOCAL COUNCILS:

Province, Delft, Den Haag, Dordrecht, Leiden, Rotterdam

• 3 UNIVERSITIES:

Erasmus Univ. R’Dam, TU Delft , Univ. Leiden

• 3 VOCATIONAL HIGHSCHOOLS:

HS Den Haag, HS In Holland, HS Rotterdam

• Federation for the Environment South Holland


BOTTOM - UP


Network Knowledge in Synergie for a Sustainable South-Holland

KISSZ process:KISSZ process:

CONNECTCONNECTBRIDGE THE GAPBRIDGE THE GAP

Local administration Knowledge Local administration Knowledge InstitutesInstitutes

Identify, articulate policy problemsIdentify, articulate policy problems

Formulate programs, projectsFormulate programs, projects

Form AllianciesForm Alliancies

““Industry” etc.Industry” etc.

SPEEDING UP TRANSITIONSPEEDING UP TRANSITIONBOTTOM - UP


SYSTEMS RENEWAL OF STRUCTURES

Demands:Transparent and effective communication between

stakeholders.BUT

Communication appears to be poor:

• Between public authorities and knowledge institutes.• Within public authorities and within knowledge institutes.• More parties work on the same item without mutual info.

THUS• Failing of integral approaches and synergy.• Insufficient use of potential knowledge.

Initiative: network for sustainable development


BOTTOM - UP


SYNERGY IN KNOWLEDGESYNERGY IN KNOWLEDGEKnowledge network for sustainable development

Network Activities:

• Identify current problems and white spots.

• Identify failing coordination and cooperation.

• Formation of research and policy agenda’s

• Exchange of experience and knowledge.

• Initiate new initiatives and broking between initiatives.

Network Orientation:

• Long term perspectives.

• Initiation short term projects. (Backcasting)

• Central issues: scarcity of space and raw materials, climate and air quality.

• Planet, People, Prosperity approach.

• Integral and transdisciplinary perspective.

Multiple scale approach: EU, national, local.


BOTTOM - UP



Setting up network and operation

Strategic platform, conceptual work, no own projects.

Repetitive phases of conceptual work, bilateral interviews, adaptation of concepts and plenary sessions.

Involved: NGO’s, universities, colleges of vocational higher education, knowledge institutes and the (provincial) government.

Members deliver efforts in common interest in overview, coherence and corporation.

Three roles:

• Legitimatisers,

• Account holders,

• Interested actors (organisations)




Themes preliminary agenda (may ’07):

• Climate change and space,

• Energy and Mobility.

• Grand urban development,

Continuation:

Half open network.

Profile for (new) members

Extension: municipalities and private companies.



Recognise Callenge

Develop Shared View

Common Plan

Implementation

Financial, Organisational, missing business plan

Mistrust, Risk avoidance

Culture, short term thinking, competences, lack of SKILLS L

EA

DER

SH

IP


100614UPC Seminar1 1950205022 X2000 20 1 80 Y 40 ecoefficiencyecoefficiency 160 CULTURESTRUCTURE...

Documents

Transcript of 100614UPC Seminar1 1950205022 X2000 20 1 80 Y 40 ecoefficiencyecoefficiency 160 CULTURESTRUCTURE...