100111 Intro Swmp Overview Presentation (78)
description
Transcript of 100111 Intro Swmp Overview Presentation (78)
Global construction consultants
Site Waste Management Plan Regulations 2008Guidance for Local Authorities What do you want to gain
from today?
Objectives
Understand the SWMP Regulations 2008
Agree how your Authority can enforce the
Regulations
Align your approach with the Environment Agency
Identify ways to drive performance
Agenda
Introduction
SWMP Regulation 2008 Overview
Vinci Construction - ‘The SWMP Experience’
Break
Enforcement and Supporting Environment
EA Approach
Lunch
Working session –your approach?
Present outputs
Close
Why is construction waste important?
Waste in the UK
Why is construction waste important?
Impact on the environment:
• Depletion of resources
• Embodied carbon
• Pollution
• GHGs from landfill
Impact on productivity
• Financial
• Competitiveness
Shortage of landfill capacity (linked to Planning)
Fly-tipping
True Cost of Waste
Disposal costs and escalating landfill taxes
Value of materials wasted
Project programme
Lost revenue
Transport
Management
Trades’ time
Processing
What should the industry be doing?
Efficient material use
Sustainability goals
Energy Materials Water
Materials ‘In’
Materials ‘Out’
Maximise the reuse of reclaimed materials
Waste reduction
Materials recovery
What is a SWMP?
Document which contains:
A forecast of waste types/quantities;
Intended waste management & end destinations; and
Actual waste produced.
SWMP driving improvements
Site Waste Management Planning – managing waste and resources on a project to achieve reductions in waste to landfill
SWM Plan – document containing waste forecasts, action plans and actual waste types/quantities
Key Principles
Planning Implementation
Review Monitoring
Opportunity Curve
Outline Design
Detailed Design
Pre Construction
Construction Post Completion
Regulation versus Good practice
Outline Design
Detailed Design
Pre Construction
Construction Post Completion
Waste forecasts
Updating with actual
dataStorage
DesignOut
waste
Waste policy
Management Actions
Evidence of reduction & recycling
Completed plan
What is the industry doing?
Government Action
Government Policy
Legislation Taxation
Support
Policy Context
Strategy for Sustainable Construction
Strategic Forum
Construction Commitments: Halving Waste to Landfill
Code for Sustainable Homes
Waste crime strategy
Fly-tipping protocol
Waste Disposal Regulations
Duty of Care 1991
Registration of Carrier 1991
Waste Management Licensing 1994
Landfill 2002
Clean Neighbourhoods and
Environment Act 2005
Hazardous Waste 2005
List of Wastes 2005
Waste Electrical & Electronic Equipment
2006
Site Waste Management Plans 2008
Landfill Tax
Active waste rate for 2009/1010:
£40/tonne
Increase to £48/tonne in
2010/2011
Makes up about 60% of
construction waste
A lower rate of £2.50/tonne
applies to inactive waste
Makes up around 40% of construction waste
Difficulties arise, but….
Forecasting waste
Awareness levels still low
Issues of ownership often confused
Data collection
Support
WRAP
Envirowise
BRE
Constructing Excellence
NetRegs
Industry Action
SWMP Regulations 2008
Site Waste Management Plan
Regulations 2008
Came into force 6 April 2008
Legal requirement on all projects > £300K (increased requirements for >£500K)
Clients and Contractors have legal obligations
LA and Environment Agency enforcement powers
‘Soft’ enforcement for the first 2 years
Why Regulate?
1. Improvement in materials resource efficiency
2. Reduction in fly-tipping
Construction is a major waste producer
Concern with Duty of Care compliance
Fly-Tipping is a growing problem:
Cost to taxpayers = £50mpa20% of fly tipped waste is C&D waste
31% of worst incidents involve C&D waste
40% of all incidents involve C&D waste
How do Regulations help?
Tracking waste by ensuring that those responsible for construction
projects know:
The intended destination of waste removed from site;
That their waste is being managed by legitimate registered
waste carriers; and
That their waste is managed responsibly, in line with waste
management controls
Improving resource efficiency by:
Raising awareness
Considering waste early, to plan and mitigate
What are the benefits - LA?
Reduced fly-tipping and a cleaner,
safer, greener local environment
Savings in LA functions such as
cleaning-up fly-tipping
Helps to raise awareness and
compliance with existing legal
provisions, e.g. fly-tipping, waste duty of
care
Save investigations into illegal waste
activity
Less demand on landfill
‘Modern resource efficient industry’
What do the Regulations require?
Basic overview
SWMP should include:
• Headline information about the project, client & contractor;
• Name of person responsible for the plan;
• Forecast the quantity/type of waste to be generated;
• Identify clear actions for each waste type to reduce waste, and increase recycling;
• Record actual quantities and end destination for each waste stream;
• Provide declarations.
Scope
Any client intending to carry out a
construction project on one site with
an estimated cost greater than
£300,000 must, before work begins,
prepare a SWMP
Evidence of a ‘planned project’ may
include planning consent, building
regulations approval or relevant
contract documents
Applicability
Full range of projects
Buildings
Infrastructure
New-build
Refurbishment
SWMPs apply to all aspects of
construction work
Demolition
Excavation
Exemptions
Routine maintenance
Part A installations
Nuclear licensed site with an Integrated
Waste Strategy (IWS)
If a project is planned before 6 April
2008 and the construction work begins
before 1 July 2008 then the requirement
to prepare and implement a plan does
not apply
Level of Detail & Updating
For projects with value of £300- £500K
Identify roles
Forecast waste types (inert, non-hazardous or hazardous), volumes, recovery/disposal routes
Record quantity, type, carrier, license no., site waste taken to
Copy of or reference to WTN
Within three months of completion
• Confirm regularly monitored and updated
• Explain deviations from the plan
Failure to update is an offence
Level of Detail & Updating
For projects with value over £500K
As basic SWMP +
Whether site operator holds a permit or
is exempt
Update 6 monthly & within 3 months of
completion
Compare estimated versus actual
quantities
Estimate cost savings
The identity of the person removing
the waste
Failure to update is an offence
Availability of SWMP
Must be kept on site
All contractors must know where it is
kept and it must be available to any
contractor carrying out work included
in the plan
Keeping plans
Must be kept for two years after
completion of the project
Failure to comply is an offence
Additional Duties: Schedule 1
Principal Contractor
Coordination of the work
Cooperation among contractorsSite induction
Job specific information/training
Manage waste within the terms of the SWMP
Ensure, so far as reasonably practical, waste is reused, recycled and recovered
Client
Give reasonable directions to any contractor to enable PC to comply
Client & Principal Contractor
Review, revise & refine SWMP as necessary
Clearly communicate changes in roles & responsibilities
Ensure security to prevent illegal disposal of waste
A Contractors viewpoint on SWMPs
Victoria HillJade HuntRichard Smith
VINCI Construction UK
VINCI Construction UK Limited incorporates the heritage and experience
of major UK construction brands to provide a fully integrated service in
the following sectors:
� Building
� Civil Engineering
� Air
� Facilities
� Technology
The Group
VINCI Construction UK has an annual turnover exceeding £1 billion.
VINCI PLC is the parent company of VINCI Construction UK and forms
part of VINCI, the world’s leading concession and construction group.
VINCI has a turnover of €33.5 billion and 164,000 employees in 90
Countries around the world.
SWMPs – our experience
� Subsidiary companies using SWMPs since 2000
- Promotes waste reduction and recycling
- Reduces costs
- Improves overall site performance
- Increases control in accordance with Duty of Care Regulations
- But was generally reactive monitoring (e.g. Client requirement)
� Introduction of Regulations was welcome
- Encouraged proactive waste consideration
- Created a level playing field
- Elevated waste ‘up the agenda’
- Resulted in better resource management
- But focus of Regulation missed most significant opportunities
SWMP Stages
� Pre-Tender SWMP
- Often non-existent!
- Can be asked for in tender documentation by Client
� Pre-construction SWMP
- Developed by Principal Contractor
� Live SWMP
- Monitoring and measurement of actual verses predicted waste volumes
� Post-construction SWMP
- Rarely undertaken with Client, but can offer rewards.
- No obligation on Client
Pre-Tender SWMP
� Responsibility of CLIENT
� Document approximate waste types and volumes
� Design in reuse where possible
� Minimise waste through smart design
� Missed opportunity, rarely considered before design is near completion
� No push from clients to minimise waste
SWMP – Design Decisions Bath Hospital Project
Pre-construction SWMP
� Waste volumes predicted by Site Waste Manager or estimating team
� Can be difficult to estimate, but the main purpose is to improve the management of anticipated waste streams
� Encourages early communication with waste management contractors
� Develop resource management plan, prevent materials becoming ‘waste’
SWMP - Forecast Sheffield BSF School Project
Live SWMP
� Responsibility of Site Waste Manager
� Each transfer of waste is logged
� Waste volumes reviewed at intervals
� Assists contractors to monitor Duty of Care requirements
� Can identify anomalies and determine cause (only if predictions are sensible)
Live SWMP - Waste data logGatwick Airport Project
Post construction SWMP
� Review lessons learnt
� Review waste volumes – reasons for increase/decrease
� Client can benchmark contractors on repeat schemes
SWMP – Case StudyT4 CIP Lounge
� Good information relating to decisions made to reduce waste:
SWMP – Case StudyT4 CIP Lounge
� Variability between forecast and actual volumes:
Phase ‘effectiveness’
� Construction phase - limited influence
� Estimated that 30% of waste can be designed out
� Why are the regulations focussed on construction phase?
What do we expect from Regulators?
� Consistency and fairness but;
� What is the purpose of the Regulations to you?
� Reduce waste? Reduce fly tipping? Increase recycling?
� Regulations obligate the Client and Contractor
� Only the contractor is actually regulated
Reduce waste?
� LA enforcement should focus on CLIENTS- Planning stage ensure
- Fully predictive SWMP- Inclusive of design decisions to minimise waste- Add as a planning condition
� Addresses waste at the top of the hierarchy
� Few Clients embrace the spirit of the Regulations and pass their obligations onto the Contractor
� If waste reduction was paramount, Clients would challenge Designers
� Reduces the volume of waste that contractors have to manage
Reduce Fly tipping
� LA enforcement should focus on SMALL projects
- Defra announced fly-tipping had decreased by 9.8% in 2008-2009
- Local Authorities costs were £54.9million
- Large projects with major contractors are less likely to suffer from rogue waste activities
� Review Duty of Care controls and waste transfer notes not waste data.
Increase recycling
� LA enforcement should focus on LARGE projects
- Increased waste generation
- More opportunities for effective recycling
- Tie in with Contractors Halving Waste to Landfill Commitments
� Review waste data, are opportunities for recycling considered?
� Where is the waste going to – have opportunities been lost?
VINCI Experience and Needs
� Only aware of one planned Environment Agency visit and no Local Authority visits to date
� Checking that the SWMP exists is not enough (Fixed Penalty Notice)
- Informed officer visits
- Influence design
- Push the industry towards overall waste reduction
- Obligate client
� Minimise waste to landfill
- Increase recycling
- LA need to support infrastructure developments
Conclusions
� Are the Regulations working?
- Not as anticipated (threshold level)
- Missed a good opportunity to push Designers and Clients
- Little or no visible enforcement
� Can the regulations work?
- Yes! Large contractors are meeting requirements
- More Client involvement – they need to be regulated too!
� Focus of visits
- Dependant on LAs goals (reduce, recycle, minimise fly-tipping)
- Interrogate data, challenge the Site Waste Manager/Project Manager
Global construction consultants
Site Waste Management Plan Regulations 2008The Enforcement and Supporting Environment
Enforcement
Key Aim: Ensure that a compliant SWMP has been written and
implemented
Regulators
Environment Agency
Local Authorities
Enforcement
Power for regulators to check SWMPs
Defined types of offences
Schedules of Penalties
Offences
Fail to
Make a SWMP
Keep at site & make available
Record waste disposals
Review 6 monthly where > £500k
Confirm & analyse within 3 months of completion
Keep for 2 years after completion
Produce upon request by LA/EA
Produce supporting evidence
Obstruct or furnish false/misleading information
Fail to comply with Duty of Care
Penalties
Fixed Penalty notice for failing to produce SWMP
£300, to be paid within 14 days
On summary conviction
Fine up to £50,000
On conviction on indictment
Unlimited fine
Duty of Care at the core of SWMPs
Potential custodial sentences
How & who should enforce?
How & who should enforce?
Add to existing local enforcement
strategies, e.g. additional tool for dealing with fly-tipping?
Or…separate SWMP agenda?
Partnership with the Environment Agency?
When - Planning?
Outline Design
Detailed Design
Pre Construction
Construction Post Completion
Planning reqs.
When – Site Inspections?
Outline Design
Detailed Design
Pre Construction
Construction Post Completion
Planning reqs.
SWMP inspection
How do I determine an offence?
How do I determine an offence?
Who should I be
asking?
What should I be
looking for?
When should I be looking?
Recommended Initial Checks
Is there a need for a SWMP?
Is there a SWMP?
Are the key details correct?
Are you speaking with the person responsible for drafting the plan?
Recommended Initial Checks
Are there forecasted estimates of waste type and quantity?
Is the plan a good description of the activities on site?
Is there documentary evidence of all waste removed from site? E.g. waste carrier registration, waste transfer or hazardous waste consignment notes?
Have the types and quantities of waste produced been reconciled against the estimates in the plan?
Digging a little deeper…
Have waste minimisation techniques been employed during the design phase?
Can they explain how the plan has been implemented, down to subcontractor level?
Can they explain how the site is managed to accommodate waste storage and recovery?
Are all tasks being recorded and updated on the SWMP?
What action should I take?
What action should I take?
Is the offence intentional?
Is penalty due? High profile cases?
Who do I penalise? Client or contractor?
Should I liaise with the Environment Agency?
Should I encourage good practice through local support and signposts to guidance?
Site Waste Management Plans
Kay Champion Iain Regan
Project Manager Principal Waste Officer
Our aims - new corporate strategy
A better place for people & the environment
Reduce climate
change & its consequences
Protect & improve air, land & water
quality
Put people & communities at
the heart of what we do
Work with businesses &
public sector to
use resources wisely
Be the best we can
Our interest in the Construction Sector
Consultee on land use planning
Regulator of licenses, exemptions, permits & consents
Provide advice & guidance
Statutory duty for strategic water resources planning
New environmental planning role: infrastructure gaps
As a construction client
Our interest in SWMP Regulations
We will only intervene where non-compliance is linked to an incident such as fly tipping.
Construction Sector - The “hidden” costs……
37,5445,476,245Estimated cost of clearance (£)
42,147
1,281,145
7.1
All England & Wales
Estimated total fines (£)
Estimated cost of enforcement (£)
Proportion of fly-tipping incidents (%)
28.5
Dealt with by EA
6802
•A fifth of all fly tipping incidents are of construction and demolition waste
•A third of bigger and nastier fly tips include construction, demolition and excavation waste
•Removing fly tipped waste costs the taxpayer almost £74 million
2007/08
Site Waste Management Plans – A useful tool
Short-term:
Reduced environmental crime
Increased legal compliance
Decrease in pollution risks & incidents
Manage waste better
Longer term:
Higher standards on site
Reduced environmental crime
Resource efficiency
Increased Corporate Social Responsibility
Increased awareness of benefits of good practice
Stabilised market for recycling and recovery sector
Better trained workforce will skills for more sustainable construction
SWMP Campaign - NetRegs
Travis Perkins 2007/8:
160,000 leaflets to TP customers at road shows
824 sign ups to email updates
FMB survey Nov 2008:
51% unaware SWMPs are mandatory for projects > £300,000 in England
45% that used SWMPs reported money savings
25% that had used SWMPs say they have helped them to win new business.
Joint promotion with Envirowise & SW Regional Development Agency
Over 50,000 downloads of Simple Guide
Over 6,000 construction SMEs on email updates
SMEnvironment survey 2009
Low environmental awareness.Confused where to go for advice
Compared to the other sectors Construction SMEs were:least likely to introduce practical measures to prevent / reduce harm to the environment.
Of those 40% that had introduced practical measures, compared to the other sectors they were:
least likely to recycle their waste, 59% (20% less than Healthcare)second least likely to reduced waste, 37%least likely to have made energy efficiency or water reduction improvements, 19% second least likely to have assessed their impact on the environment, 12% (agriculture 23%) least likely to have carried out a programme of environmental improvements, 8% (agriculture 17%)one of the most likely to have made someone responsible for environment, 10%
94% have internet access
South East Intervention Campaign
Working with the Pathway to Zero Waste we aim to significantly reduce construction and demolition waste crime and by doing so stabilise the recycling and recovery markets.
An intelligence led approach to waste crime
Proactive approach
Prioritisation – hitting the big bad and nasty for maximum effect
Enables best utilisation of resource
Cradle to grave mapping - identifying the offender
Number of investigations and operations on-going
Variety of preventative measures
Obtaining intelligence from a range of sources (can someone else take care of the problem?)
Painting the picture – the size and scale of the problem – raise's profile and makes it a priority!
Intelligence gathering and analysis Identifying what we know – don’t know – and want to know
Identify why the crime is committed and where best to intervene for maximum effect…
South East Intervention Campaign
Problem Profile
Targets identifiedRepeat & Known Offenders
Geographical Hot spots
Crime Types
Intervention StrategyPrevention
Intelligence
Enforcement
Waste Flow MappingThe trial – Waste Flow Inspections
Tracking waste from cradle to grave / grave to cradle
Purpose to:
Prevent waste falling out of legal control
ensure producers describe their waste accurately
improve awareness and compliance with duty of care
Reduce the use of un-registered waste carriers
build intelligence on waste movements
increase presence on construction sites
increase risk of offenders being caught identify and enforce against illegal activities
Construction sites - SWMP Audits
Guidance & forms needed to help officers identify sites and conduct inspections
Developed in consultation with local authorities, contractors and CIRIA , WRAP & others
Being trialled in the South East
Available for use by local authority staff in the South East
SWMP Project - Inspection Pack
Understanding SWMP auditsProcedure for Preparing and Conducting the AuditGuidance for Completing the Audit Template
Best Practice Example
Heading
Experiences of construction sites & site waste management plans
Experience on construction sites & SWMPs
53 rejected load reports from one landfill since January
32 SWMP inspections
Experience on construction sites & SWMPs
level of understanding of duty of care legislation and SWMPs
waste segregation
ignorance on site of existence of SWMP
waste dispatch procedures
Mis-describing waste
SWMP not implemented by sub contractors / site workers.
lack of information on SWMP
SWMP not updated
Key findings - 20 construction site audits:
17 sites breached environmental legislation,
7 breached the SWMP regulations
4 had available & adequate waste transfer notes
5 of the sites had waste inadequate waste storage
3 had incomplete or inadequate duty of care documentation.
Duty of Care issues were identified on 17 of the sites:Inadequate documentation:
Missing paperwork:
Mis-description of waste was obvious on 4 sites
No SWMP were available on site 3 of the 6unannounced construction site visits.
SWMP quality was generally very poor.
Opportunities to work together
Sharing experience, research & information about the sector
Sharing lessons on what works best
Exchanging messages & contacts
Bringing our officers together
Joint literature & campaigns
Cross referral/ collaborative enforcement
Single point of contact / joint visits
Low level
High level
Global construction consultants
Site Waste Management Plan Regulations 2008Working Session – What is going to be your approach?
Working Session 1 – Developing an Approach
30 mins
Discuss in groups
1 person presents back
1. What can be done at the
Planning stage?
2. When and who can enforce
during the project timeline?
3. What is your influence as a
client?
4. What is the benefit case?
1. Planning Stage
What can be done at the Planning Stage?
Think about….
How could planning influence site waste management on projects?
How do you identify projects at this stage?
What are you asking for and/or communicating?
How do you do it?
What are the benefits and obstacles?
2. Enforcement during the project
When and who can enforce during the project timeline?
Think about….
How to identify relevant projects?
At what stage to intervene?
Who would be best placed?
What are you asking for?
What are the benefits and obstacles to these options?
Need for a coordinated approach?
Outline Design
Detailed Design
Pre Construction
Construction Post Completion
3. Influence as a Client
What is your influence as a client?
Think about…
What type of projects are applicable?
How can you influence a project?
What would you do?
What would you ask for/communicate?
How would you identify compliance and/or good practice?
4. Benefits Case
What is the benefit case for taking action?
Think about…
Whether your Local Authority has relevant sustainability or wider agendas and/or objectives?
How are these delivered?
How could the SWMP Regulations fit-in or enforce these agendas?
Where do you focus?
Are there benefits to a coordinated approach?
Working Session 2 – Making it happen
30 mins
Discuss in groups
1 person presents back
Who needs to drive the
agenda forward?
Is training needed?
What tools/resources are
required?
Who do you need to speak to?
Working Session 2 - Making it happen
Who can take Is training needed?
ownership?
What tools/resources are Who do you need to speak to
required? (internal/external) ?
Close out