Participants: Mattia Zecca Simona Calandrini Carlotta Pistocchi.
1 WISE TG Meeting, Ispra, September 2011 Direct and Inverse Chemical Fate Modeling based on...
-
Upload
dasia-anselm -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 WISE TG Meeting, Ispra, September 2011 Direct and Inverse Chemical Fate Modeling based on...
1
WISE TG Meeting, Ispra, September 2011
Direct and Inverse Chemical Fate Modeling based on pan-European Datasets
Dimitar MARINOV, Alberto PISTOCCHI, Robert LOOS, Bernd GAWLIK
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability
2
WISE TG Meeting, Ispra, September 2011
Concept for large scale chemical modeling:
Now-a-days the availability of pan-continental datasets allows the development of spatially explicit GIS models for assessment of fate and distribution of pollutants into different environmental media (atmosphere, soil, surface water and sea)
In principle, spatial models predict chemical concentrations when the emissions to the environmental compartments at continental scale are known. This is the "direct" formulation of fate problem aiming to answer the question “where do pollutants go?“
Vice versa, when the emissions of chemicals are unknown, but their concentrations are widely monitored, the "inverse" modeling approach answers the question "where do pollutants come from?" The inverse models tracing back chemical emissions from measured concentrations and identifying possible sources of discharges.
3
WISE TG Meeting, Ispra, September 2011
Emissions, E
Environmental removal rates, K
Concentration = E/K
4
WISE TG Meeting, Ispra, September 2011
Datasets used in contaminant modeling:
1.Atmosphere: temperature, OH concentration, Aerosol concentration, Organic carbon content in aerosol, 10 m height wind velocity, Atmospheric mixing height, Precipitation, Duration of the wet period, Atmospheric Source-receptor relations, and Atmospheric Source-receptor time of travel
2.Soil: top soil organic carbon content, soil texture, diffusion runoff, evapotranspiration, infiltration, erosion rate, and Leaf Area Index (LAI)
3.Surface water: river discharge, river slop, river water velocity, water depth, suspended sediment concentration, and surface water residence time
4.Sea: mixing depth, seawater velocity, seawater temperature, total suspended matter, wind speed at 10m height over ocean surface, and chlorophyll
5
Characteristics of MAPPE direct model
Main topic(s) Maps of chemical concentrations and pollutant fluxes
Useful tool for screening hot spots or hazard zones Potential key client: DG ENV, DG SANCO, EEA, JRC
Policy(-ies) Requirements & Application
•Water Framework Directive•Marine Strategy Framework Directive
•Framework Directive on Sustainable Use of Pesticides •Scenarios for horizon 2020
Scale (Time&Space) Temporal: one year Spatial: Europe
Output Maps; Indicators;
Model integration Other impact assessment models
Challenges & Next Steps
•To became a transient model (currently steady state)•To develop global version of the model •Further integration with socio-economic models
Multimedia Assessment of Pollutant Pathways in the Environment (MAPPE)
6
WISE TG Meeting, Ispra, September 2011
7
WISE TG Meeting, Ispra, September 2011
8
WISE TG Meeting, Ispra, September 2011
9
WISE TG Meeting, Ispra, September 2011
10
WISE TG Meeting, Ispra, September 2011
11
Inverse modeling approach
)50
2lnexp( i
catchmentii t
DTEQC
C [ML-3] concentration Q [L3T-1] river water discharge Ei [MT-1] chemical mass emitted at the i-th location ti [T] time spent in water from the i-th emission location to the river cross section of measurement DT50 [T] total removal half life in the stream network
At steady state conditions the chemical mass (equivalently called “load”) at a given cross section is assumed to be equal to the sum of all emissions upstream each reduced by the removal occurring along the stream network
12
Two-parameter inverse model
)50
2lnexp( i
catchmentii t
DTPconstantQC
DT50 = 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 50, 100 and 1000 days; DT50 = ∞ (no decay)
DT50 = 1 day DT50 = 100 days
13
Use of chemical monitoring data
27 countries; 122 sampling locations
16 Polar organic persistent pollutants
NAPROXEN
KETOPROFEN
BEZAFIBRATE
IBUPROFEN
DICLOFENAC
GEMFIBROZIL
BENZOTRIAZOLE
CAFFEINE
CARBAMAZEPINE
SULFAMETHOXAZOLE
METHYLBENZOTRIAZOLE
NPE1C
NONYLPHENOL
BISPHENOL A
ESTRONE
OP
14
Inverse model verification
15
Mapping chemical loads to river network
QC x
16
Disaggregated loads to European seas
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
kg/yAtlantic Baltic Black Mediterranean North
1. The average percentages of disaggregated load to European regional seas:
Atlantic 18.9%; Baltic 15%; Black Sea 8.6%; Mediterranean 26.3% ; North Sea 31.2%.
2. The European discharges more heavily affect North Sea and the system of Mediterranean and Black seas
17
PFOS modeling
PFOS
annual loadto sea
BAU scenario(baseline 2007)
[t/y] % of totalAtlantic ocean 1.240 21.2Baltic sea 1.117 19.1Black sea 1.597 27.4Mediterranean sea 0.853 14.6North sea 1.033 17.7
Total 5.840 N.A.
18
WISE TG Meeting, Ispra, September 2011
19
Aims
to test capabilities of the inverse modelling to perform back analysis of chemical emissions and half lives for pharmaceuticals, personal care products and substances widely used in households
to extend and improve the modelling approach by adding the further option for accounting the chemical decay in stream network
to map continuous continental spatial distribution of loads and concentrations in river network by generalisation of pan-European screening data from discrete points sampling campaign
to estimate the range of discharges of pharmaceuticals and personal care products to European seas
20
Estimation of model parameters
CAFFEINE DT 50 = 3 days
y = 0.0088xR2 = 0.5401
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06 1.E+07 1.E+08
Catchment Population (inhab.)
Computed load, ug/s
CAFFEINE DT 50 = 3 days
y = 0.0002x1.1897
R2 = 0.7023
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06 1.E+07 1.E+08
Catchment Population (inhab.)
Computed load, ug/s
)50,( x x DTPctoremisson faQC
Scatter diagrams were interpreted through best-fit linear trend line found by OLS method with zero intercept
Linear regression model
Measure of match: determination coefficient R2
QC x
Non-linear regression model
21
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
R2 DT 50 = 1 DT 50 = 3 DT 50 = 5 DT 50 = 7 DT 50 = 10 DT 50 = 50 DT 50 = 100 DT 50 = 1000 No decay Catchment area
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
R2 DT 50 = 1 DT 50 = 3 DT 50 = 5 DT 50 = 7 DT 50 = 10 DT 50 = 50 DT 50 = 100 DT 50 = 1000 No decay Catchment area
Identification of half lives and emission factors
The average R² correlation coefficients for all chemicals and half lives including ‘no decay’ case is 0.61 for the non-linear model versus 0.2 for the linear one
linear model
log-linear model
22
Estimates of total load to European seas
Total annual load to European seas
1.67 1.63
2.47
4.75
2.61
1.11
30.65
41.00
17.72
4.51
18.1016.00
1.03
2.02
0.46 0.47
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
NA
PR
OX
EN
KE
TO
PR
OF
EN
BE
ZA
FIB
RA
TE
IBU
PR
OF
EN
DIC
LO
FE
NA
C
GE
MF
IBR
OZ
IL
BE
NZ
OT
RIA
ZO
LE
CA
FF
EIN
E
CA
RB
AM
AZ
EP
INE
SU
LF
AM
ET
HO
XA
ZO
LE
ME
TH
YL
BE
NZ
OT
RIA
ZO
LE
NP
E1
C
NO
NY
LP
HE
NO
L
BIS
PH
EN
OL
A
ES
TR
ON
E
OP
t y-1
1. On average, the min extremes of total load to European seas count 40.1% less (range 23.1-91.5%) of the median estimates while the max values are 61.7% higher (range 18.6-127%)
2. Based on the median assessment for load coming from EU-27 plus Switzerland, Norway, Moldova, Ukraine, Belarus and part of Turkey, it was found that the total amount of all 16 polar compounds exported to European seas is about 146.2 tonnes per year
23
Conclusions
1. The study showed that for screening assessment at continental level the concentrations of polar chemicals in river waters can be interpreted through a simple two-parameter model that assumes emissions proportional to catchment population and constant chemical half life
2. Besides, it is not possible for a chemical to select univocally a couple of emission factor and half life values. Instead that, a set of non-dominated combinations could be identified. In order to obtain more accurate estimates prior expert knowledge about emission factors or half life values is needed
3. Chemical loads are relatively insensitive to combinations of emission factors and half lives. Therefore, they can be estimated with a reasonable range of uncertainty, typically a factor 2. In this way, it is possible to produce continuous maps of loads and concentrations at continental scale
4. More generally, the inverse modeling from monitoring data supports cost-effective emission inventory of river chemical pollutants at European scale. The method could serve in chemical risk assessment or decision making in river basin management, as required by the European Water Framework Directive or Marine Strategy.