1 Vienna 2014 The Altaids as seen by Eduard Suess, and ... · The Altaids as seen by Eduard Suess,...
Transcript of 1 Vienna 2014 The Altaids as seen by Eduard Suess, and ... · The Altaids as seen by Eduard Suess,...
Abstract
Eduard Suess recognized the unusual size and internal tectonic configuration of the mountainous terranes of Central Asia that he
termed Altaids and which differ considerably from curvi-linear foldbelts such as the Alps and Urals. However, he did not realize that
this orogenic domain or province evolved over a period of some 750 Ma from the late Mesoproterozoic (ca. 1000 Ma) to the late
Permian (ca. 260 Ma), contains large volumes of pre-orogenic crust as well as many synorgenic metamorphic complexes, and exhi-
bits many structures similar to modern thrust-and-fold belts. We therefore do not favour the name Altaids for this large orogenic
domain because it is associated with the concept of an essentially Palaeozoic evolution and certain features that have since been
shown to be incorrect. The non-genetic term Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) seems to be more appropriate and characterizes
one of the largest accretionary terranes on Earth whose evolution has many similarities with the tectonics of the Indonesian Archi-
pelago. In contrast to popular thinking, crustal growth in the CAOB during accretion was not anomalously high but was similar to
that in the Palaeozoic Tasmanides of Australia and the Jurassic to Present evolution in southeastern Asia.
Eduard Suess erkannte die außergewöhnliche Größe und den internen tektonischen Aufbau der von ihm als Altaiden bezeichneten
Gebirgsregionen Zentralasiens sowie deren wesentliche Unterschiede zu gebogenen Faltengebirgen wie Alpen und Ural. Allerdings
erfasste er nicht dass sich dieses orogene Gebiet bzw. Provinz über einen Zeitraum von etwa 750 Ma entwickelte, vom späten
Mesoproterozoikum (ca. 1000 Ma) bis ins späte Perm (ca. 260 Ma), dass es große Mengen an prä-orogener Kruste und viele syno-
rogenen metamorphe Komplexe beinhaltet, und vergleichbare Strukturen zu modernen Falten- und Überschiebungsgürteln aufweist.
Daher bevorzugen wir nicht den Namen Altaiden für diese große orogene Gebiet, einerseits da dieser Name mit dem Konzept eines
im wesentlichen im Paläozoikum entstandenen Gebirges verbunden ist, andererseits da sich auch andere abweichende Charakte-
ristika herausgestellt haben. Der nicht-genetische Begriff Zentralasiatischer Orogengürtel (Central Asian Orogenic Belt, CAOB)
scheint daher besser passend, und charakterisiert eines der größtes Akkretionsterrane der Welt, dessen Entwicklung viele Ähnlich-
keiten mit der tektonischen Geschichte des Indonesischen Archipels hat. Im Gegensatz zu gängigen Anschauungen ist das Krus-
tenwachstum durch Akkretion im CAOB nicht außergewöhnlich hoch sondern war gleich jenem der paläozoischen Tasmaniden
Australiens und der jurassisch bis heutigen Entwicklung im südöstlichen Asien.
____________________
__________________________________________
KEYWORDS
Central Asian Orogenic Beltaccretionary orogen
Eduard SuessAltaids
The Altaids as seen by Eduard Suess, and present thinking on the Late Mesoproterozoic to Palaeozoic evolution of Central Asia_______________________________
1)*) 1)2)Alfred KRÖNER & Yamirka ROJAS-AGRAMONTE1)
100037 Beijing, China, and Department of Geosciences, University of Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany;
2) Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas (ESPE) Av. Gral. Rumiñahui s/n Sangolquí, Ecuador;
*) Corresponding author, [email protected]
Beijing SHRIMP Centre, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 26 Baiwanzhuang Road,
1)
1. Introduction
The term Altaids, named after the Altai Mountains in north-
west China, western Mongolia, southern Siberia and north-
eastern Kazakhstan, was coined by Eduard Suess in 1901 to
describe the mountain ranges south of the Siberian craton
(platform) and east of the Ural Mountains (Fig. 1). Geological
aspects of the Altai Mountains and much of Central Asia were
earlier described by Alexander von Humboldt in his famous
“Fragments of the geology and climatology of Asia“ (1843, in
French) that resulted from a 16,000 km expedition from the
Urals to the Chinese border. Von Humboldt recognized an Al-
tai System, consisting of several mountain ranges in southern
Siberia and Mongolia, but he separated these ranges from
the Tianshan and other mountain chains in Central Asia and
the intervening steppe basins. He observed that low-grade
metasediments (“thonschiefer“) constitute the largest part of
the Altai Mountains, but that gneisses occur in the south, and
that eruptive rocks such as diorites, granites, and porphyries
only played a secondary role and intruded into the „thonschie-
fer“ causing contact metamorphism.
As pointed out by Sengör and Natalin (2007), Suess (1901)
noted that this wide mountain belt appeared different from the
classical orogenic belts, explained in those days by the geo-
synclinal theory. It was non-linear and, in Suess’ view, pre-
dominantly contained relatively low-grade Palaeozoic rocks
whereas “classical“ Alpine-type orogenic belts were relatively
narrow and contained large proportions of high-grade gneis-
ses. He also noted the ubiquitous steepness of bedding and
schistosity in many rocks that was different to the structures
in classical fold belts.
More than 100 years have passed since Suess noted this
fundamental difference in the tectonic evolution between Cen-
tral Asia and many other mountain belts and, in plate tectonic
terms, these differences can now be explained as the result
of two different orogenic processes, namely collisional oro-
geny and accretionary orogeny (Cawood et al., 2009). Suess
(1901, 1908), followed by Sengör et al. (1993), considered
_____________________
________________________________
Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences Vienna 2014Volume 107/1
that the Altaids primarily consisted of Palaeozoic rocks; how-
ever, we now know that the evolution of Central Asia begun
in the latest Mesoproterozoic as documented by the oldest
ophiolitic sequences in southern Siberia (Khain et al., 2002;
Rytsk et al., 2011).
Also contrary to the observations of Suess (1901, 1908) there
is a considerable volume of high-grade metamorphic rocks in
Central Asia. Most of these assemblages were previously con-
sidered to constitute a Precambrian basement (e.g., Badarch
et al., 2002; Dobretsov et al., 1995; Zonenshain et al., 1990),
but many have since been shown to be of early Palaeozoic
age, metamorphosed shortly after their formation (see below).
Good examples are the amphibolite- to granulite-facies gneis-
ses in the Lake Baikal region known as the Olkhon terrane
(Gladkochub et al., 2008), metamorphic core complexes such
as the Malkhan complex in the western Transbaikal region
(Rytsk et al., 2011), and a high-grade gneiss belt extending
from southwestern Mongolia to the Chinese Altai (Kozakov et
al., 2002a; Sun et al., 2008; Jiang et al., 2012). Rocks meta-
morphosed up to granulite-facies and previously considered
to be Archaean to Palaeoproterozoic in age also occur in se-
veral blocks in northeastern China and were shown to be de-
rived from early Palaeozoic granitoids and pelitic metasedi-
__________________________________
ments (see Wilde et al., 2010, for
discussion). Early Palaeozoic high-
pressure metamorphic rocks asso-
ciated with eclogites and subduction
complexes have been recognized in
southern Mongolia (Stipská et al.,
2013), and in the Kyrgyz Tienshan
(Kröner et al., 2012a; Rojas-Agra-
monte et al., 2013). Suess’ impres-
sion that bedding, schistosity and
foliation are generally steep can
also not be generalized because
there are numerous domains with
flat structures, and structural ana-
lysis showed these to be parts of
thrust-and-fold belts such as the
Olkhon terrane around Lake Baikal
(Gladkochub et al., 2008, 2010),
parts of southern Mongolia (Leh-
mann et al., 2010), the Beishan
orogen in northwestern China (Cle-
ven et al., 2014; see Fig. 2), parts
of central Kazakhstan (Degtyarev,
2011), and the spectacular thrusts
in the Kyrgyz South Tianshan (Biske
and Seltmann, 2010; see Fig. 3).
Safonova and Santosh (2014) listed
numerous locations in the Palaeo-
zoic domains of Central Asia con-
taining thrust packages, including
ocean island and ophiolitic compo-
nents, that they interpreted as Japan-
__
type accretionary complexes. Some of the original flat struc-
tures were later steepened towards the end of the Palaeozoic
orogeny, as shown by Guy et al. (2014) in several areas of
southwestern Mongolia (Fig. 4), when the last remnants of
the Palaeo-Asian Ocean were closed and the North China
and Tarim cratons collided with the large domain that had
accreted south of the Siberian craton.
When Sengör et al. (1993) published their benchmark paper
on the Palaeozoic evolution of Central Asia they adopted the
name Altaids, as originally proposed by Suess (1901), and
associated this name with two important features that have
been a matter of considerable discussion for the last 20 years.
The first is the proposal that the entire Palaeozoic domain of
Central Asia evolved from one single giant island arc, the
Kipchak-Tuva-Mongol arc, that formed outboard of a large
continental mass, the combined cratons of Siberia and Bal-
tica. When the paper by Sengör et al. (1993) was published,
palaeomagnetic data available for Siberia and Baltica were
inconclusive as to their precise Neoproterozoic to early Pa-
laeozoic palaeogeographic positions. By 2007 the palaeo-
magnetic database had improved considerably (Windley et
al., 2007) and showed that at 550–535 Ma the margins of
Baltica and Siberia were separated by a major ocean that
___________________
Alfred KRÖNER & Yamirka ROJAS-AGRAMONTE
Figure 1: Schematic map of the Central Asian Orogenic belt showing the domains with predo-
minantly Neoproterozoic rocks (light brown; Baikalides in much of the Russian literature) and Palaeo-
zoic as well as younger assemblages (yellow; Caledonian and Hercynian in much of the Russian and
Chinese literature). Reproduced from Jahn (2004). SKC = Sino-Korean Craton. The approximate lo-
cations of Figs. 2 to 4 are indicated.____________________________________________________
The Altaids as seen by Eduard Suess, and present thinking on the Late Mesoproterozoic to Palaeozoic evolution of Central Asia
Figure 2: Schematic cross section of the early Permian Hongliuhe fold-and-thrust belt in the Beishan orogen of Gansu Province, NW China
(Cleven et al., 2014), resulting from collision of the Tarim craton with the southern accretionary margin of the CAOB. Colour code: Brown = sandstone;
olive = laminated sandy siltstone; purple = silty mudstone; yellow = thrust faults with movement direction, stippled parts inferred. Lower cartoon not to
scale but several km long.___________________________________________________________________________________________________
occupied 20–30° of palaeolatitude or more (see Cocks and
Torsvik, 2005). In discussing this palaeogeography, Windley et
al. (2007) included palaeontological data from which McKerrow
et al. (1992) had already concluded that Siberia and Baltica
were separated in the early Cambrian by a ca. 1500 km wide
ocean. Pisarevsky et al. (2008) confirmed this view, and in
their reconstruction Baltica and Siberia were far apart at this
time, as also shown in the compilations of Meert and Lieber-
man (2008) and Fedorova et al. (2013). Thus it appears very
unlikely that an arc system could have evolved as envisioned
by Sengör et al. (1993).
The second assumption of Sengör et al. (1993) was that
most Palaeozoic magmatic rocks of Central Asia, having evol-
ved from an intraoceanic arc system, are the result of sub-
duction processes and are thus primitive in origin, leading to
the conclusion that Central Asia was the location of anoma-
lously high crust-production. This idea was taken up by Jahn
et al. (2000a, b) and Jahn (2004), who concluded on the ba-
sis of Nd and Sr isotopic data of late Palaeozoic and Meso-
zoic granitoids that Central Asia reflected the highest crustal
growth rate on Earth in the Phanerozoic. Thus, the name
Altaids is closely associated with the concept of the Kipchak
arc and unusually high crustal growth.
However, these two ideas of Sengör et al. (1993) have since
been shown to be incorrect or have now be superseded on
the basis of new data. First, it is now clear from field mapping
and a large number of reliable geochronological data that
there was no single arc system but that many Neoproterozoic
to Palaeozoic terranes of Central Asia are individual arc ter-
ranes ranging in age from early Neoproterozoic to the late
Carbonifereous (see Windley et al., 2007; Kröner et al., 2014
and references therein). Second, the idea of unusually high
crustal growth is in conflict with increasing evidence for the
existence of considerable volumes of pre-orogenic continental
crust (basement blocks) and the generation of many arc rocks
______________________________
___________________
involved melting of this older basement (see Kovach et al.,
2011; Kröner et al., 2014 and references therein). In view of
the above we feel that the name Altaids is too strongly asso-
ciated with the previous considerations that have now been
shown to be incorrect, and we therefore favour the name
Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB). This term goes back to
Yanshin (1965) and the Tectonic Map of Eurasia, including
the explanatory notes (Yanshin, 1966). Since then the term
CAOB has been widely used because it is not model-oriented
or model-dependent and encompasses the entire evolution of
this large accretionary orogenic system from the latest Meso-
proterozoic to the late Palaeozoic. In the following we show
that several of the original assumptions of Suess (1901) and
Sengör et al. (1993) were incorrect and that the CAOB has
ist best modern analogue in the evolution of the Indonesian
archipelago.
Following Suess (1901, 1908) and many other authors in
later years, the Altaids were interpreted as a Palaeozoic oro-
genic belt, subdivided into an early Palaeozoic part (Caledo-
nian in the Russian literature; e.g., Degtyarev, 2011; Kozakov
et al., 2011) and late Palaeozoic part (Hercynian in the Russi-
an literature; e.g., Pavlovasky, 1948; Kovalenko et al., 1995).
This subdivision is still in use today (e.g., Kozakov et al., 2013).
The earlier, predominantly Neoproterozoic (Fig. 1), evolution
was interpreted as a separate orogenic event, named Baika-
lian by Shatsky (1932). However, Obruchev (1949) had shown
that there was not only one main orogenic event in the Neo-
proterozoic but several events that extended into the early
Palaeozoic as revealed in the Saian-Baikal area. This obser-
vation led Zonenshain (1972) to consider the “Baikalides“ as
part of what was then widely described in the Russian litera-
2. Early evolution of the CAOB in the la-
test Mesoproterozoic and Neoprotero-
zoic
Alfred KRÖNER & Yamirka ROJAS-AGRAMONTE
Figure 3: Structural profiles across the Bukantau–Kokshaal branch of the South Tianshan collisional fold-and-thrust belt in Kyrgyzstan. A—Kyzyl-
kum, B—Turkestan–Alai, C—Ferghana Range, and D—Halyktau. 1—Turbidites and molasse in (a) foreland and (b) rear basins; 2—Ophiolites, mainly
in mélanges; 3–7—Thrust units (mainly Silurian–Carboniferous): 3—greenschist; 4—volcanic rocks (a) mixed or (b) basaltic; 5 – deep sea shales,
cherts, calcarenites; 6—(a) carbonates in Kyzylkum with (b) clastic lower Palaeozoic sediments; 7—(a) clastic, mainly passive margin turbidites, and
(b) basin shales of Carboniferous age; 8—Continental crust in Tarim and Kazakhstan: (a) basement and (b) cover. 9—Collisional granites. 10—Thrusts.
Profiles are oriented south to north, scale about 1:1,000,000. From Biske and Seltmann (2010).____________________________________________
ture as the Ural-Mongolian fold belt. Berlichenko (1977) also
considered the Baikalides as part of an orogenic system that
continued into the Palaeozoic, and Khain (1979) followed this
view, suggesting that geosynclines in Central Asia began to
evolve in the middle and late Riphean. Dergunov (1989) also
considered the Neoproterozoic rocks of Central Asia to be
part of the Ural-Mongol belt and mainly used extensive car-
bonate sequences for this correlation. Kuzmichev (2004) and
Rytsk et al. (2007a, 2011) provided detailed evidence for what
they named early and late Baikalian events, including several
island arc systems, and also interpreted these as part of the
orogenic evolution in the evolving Palaeo-Asian Ocean (PAO).
Finally, Yarmolyuk et al. (2013) again emphasized the con-
tinuous Vendian to Cambrian evolution in their summary of
the geology of Central Asia It is surprising that Sengör et al.
(1993) and Wilhem et al. (2012) did not discuss this issue but
reverted back to Suess‘ definition of the Altaids.
Khain et al. (2002) were the first to provide geochronological
evidence for latest Mesoproterozoic ocean opening of the
PAO on the southern margin of the Siberian craton (present
coordinates) in describing and dating the tectonically dismem-
bered Dunzhugur ophiolite in East Sayan at 1020±0.7 Ma.
This ophiolite is associated with an island arc of the same
name whose antiquity was recently confirmed by zircon ages
of 1048±12 and 1034±9 Ma (Kuzmichev and Larionov, 2013).
___________
Another ophiolitic complex, the Nurundukan suite in the Baikal-
Muya fold belt at the northeastern end of Lake Baikal (Fig. 5),
has an imprecise Sm-Nd isochron age of 1035±92 Ma (Rytsk
et al., 1999). These two ophiolite sequences show that the
southern margin of Siberia was already bordered by an open
ocean in the latest Mesoproterozoic, and this was followed, in
the early Neoproterozoic, by accretion of the first island arc
assemblages onto the then active margin of the Siberian cra-
ton (Khain et al., 2002; Rytsk et al., 2011; Gordienko et al.,
2010; Kuzmichev and Larionov, 2013). A well developed ac-
cretionary prism, compared with the Shimanto belt in Japan
(Kuzmichev et al., 2007), is associated with the Shishkid is-
land arc that is exposed in the border area between northern
Mongolia and East Sayan in Russian Siberia (Fig. 5) and was
dated at 775–819 Ma (Kuzmichev and Larionov, 2013). Fur-
ther evidence for successive accretion onto the Siberian mar-
gin, from south to north, of island arc assemblages and ophi-
olitic complexes is provided by detailed mapping and geo-
chronology (Rytsk et al., 2007b, 2013; Kozakov et al., 2013;
Kovach et al., 2013; Gladkochub et al., 2013; Kuzmichev et
al., 2001, 2005, 2007; Kröner et al., 2007). For example, Glad-
kochub et al. (2008, 2010, 2013) have shown that the Neo-
proterozoic island arcs and microcontinental fragments along
the southern margin of the Siberian craton had already been
amalgamated and collided with the Siberian craton during the
The Altaids as seen by Eduard Suess, and present thinking on the Late Mesoproterozoic to Palaeozoic evolution of Central Asia
Figure 4: Structural maps and interpretative structural cross-sections of the area around Sevrey village, southwestern Mongolia. Structural trends
indicate extrapolations of major orientations of structural foliations measured in the field. Red lines are the locations of the cross-sections. Reproduced
from Guy et al. (2014).
early Palaeozoic, producing high-grade metamorphic assem-
blages in what these authors named the Baikal collisional
belt. Such a scenario is supported by palaeomagnetic data
that suggest that the active margin of southern Siberia in the
Neoproterozoic to Cambrian was similar to the present SW
Pacific (Metelkin, 2013).
There is a considerable volume of mostly metamorphic, ex-
posed pre-orogenic Precambrian basement in the CAOB much
of which was not recognized in the early years of exploration
in Central Asia. Large fragments are the Tuva-Mongolian,
Dzabkhan, Tarbagatai, and Gargan Blocks in northwestern
Mongolia and neighbouring Tuva (Kozakov et al., 2007; 2011),
the Ishim-Middle Tianshan block extending from the Kokche-
tav area in northern Kazakhstan (Letnikov et al., 2007; Turki-
na et al., 2011; Glorie et al., 2014) to the Middle Tianshan in
Kyrgyzstan (Windley et al., 2007), the Aktau-Dzhungar Massif
in central Kazakhstan (Degtyarev et al., 2008), and the Aktau-
Junggar block in eastern Kazakhstan and northwestern Xin-
jiang Province of China where it is considered as part of the
Chinese North Tianshan (Wang et al., 2012). In addition,
there are numerous smaller fragments that are sandwiched
between the Palaeozoic arc terranes and often became refo-
______________________________
3. Presence of pre-orogenic (pre-1000 ma)
continental crust
liated and retrogressed during the accretionary history, ma-
king them difficult to identify in the field (e.g., Demoux et al.,
2009a; Kröner et al., 2013).
Further evidence for the presence of pre-orogenic basement
beneath many of the early Palaeozoic arc terranes in the CAOB
is provided by isotopic data, in particular whole-rock Nd and
Hf-in-zircon isotopic systematics, reflected by negative ε Nd(t)
and ε values in arc volcanic rocks. This is particularly evi-Hf(t)
dent in the Tianshan of Kyrgyzstan and NW China. Most of
the Kyrgyz North and Middle Tianshan are underlain by late
Mesoproterozoic (Grenville-age) to Palaeoproterozoic base-
ment from which early Palaeozoic granitoids were derived
through custal melting (Kröner et al., 2012a, 2013). A similar
conclusion was reached for the Chinese Central Tianshan
(Ma et al., 2012a, b), and for granitoid rocks in the northeas-
tern CAOB (Wu et al., 2000). Melting of Mesoproterozoic
crust has also been inferred from Nd isotopes in the Chinese
Altai (Wang et al., 2009). The presence of Archaean to Nepro-
terozoic components in parts of the CAOB subcrustal mantle
lithosphere as evidenced by Os isotopic data from mantle
xenoliths in Quaternary basalts provides further evidence for
old material in the region (Wang et al., 2013). Kröner et al.
(2014) concluded from the growing evidence for the existence
of pre-orogenic basement in the CAOB that crustal growth in
the early Palaeozoic was not as high as previously estimated.
___________________________
Alfred KRÖNER & Yamirka ROJAS-AGRAMONTE
Figure 5: Simplified geological map of the northeastern part of the CAOB, reproduced from Kröner et al. (2014) and based on Kovach et al.
(2013). Red heavy lines encircle fields of predominantly juvenile crust, blue lines denote predominant areas of crustal reworking, green lines denote
areas of mixed crust. Precambrian microcontinental terranes are cross-hatched. For detailed explanation see Kröner et al. (2014). Areas showing
strong early to late Palaeozoic deformation and metamorphism are designated as “mobile belts“.___________________________________________
4. Synorogenic metamorphic assemblages
in the CAOB
Modern geochronology has shown that many metamorphic
rocks of low to high metamorphic grade, previously interpre-
ted as Archaean to Palaeoproterozoic, were generated during
distinct Neoproterozoic to early Palaeozoic events related to
accretion and collision. Well documented examples are the
Lake Zone in Mongolia (see Fig. 5) (Kozakov et al., 2002a, b;
Volkova and Sklyarov, 2007; Demoux et al., 2009b; Stipska
et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2012; Burenjargal et al., 2012), the
Chinese Altai (Sun et al., 2008), southern and eastern Siberia
(Gladkochub et al., 2010; Kovach et al., 2013; see “mobile
belts” in Fig. 5), the Kyrgyz Tianshan (Kröner et al., 2012a;
Rojas-Agramonte et al., 2013) and eastern Kazakhstan (Vol-
kova and Sklyarov, 2007). Some authors have attributed this
metamorphism to ocean-ridge subduction (e.g., Jian et al.,
2008; Sun et al., 2009; Wilhem et al., 2012), but this cannot
be verified through field relationships. There is little doubt that
early Palaeozoic high-pressure metamorphic assemblages in-
cluding eclogites, blueschists as well as diamond- and coe-
site-bearing gneisses are the result of tectonically emplaced
components of subduction zones, possible marking sutures
and terrane boundaries (Hacker et al., 2003; Volkova and
Sklyarov, 2007; Stipská et al., 2010; Klemd et al., 2011; Rojas-
Agramonte et al., 2013). The relatively large region (several
hundred square kilometres) of high-grade early Palaeozoic
gneisses in the Lake Baikal area was interpreted to have re-
sulted from accretion and collision of arc assemblages with
the margin of the Siberian craton (Gladkochub et al., 2010).
Thus, the observation of Suess (1901, 1908) that the mountain
ranges east of the West Siberian plains were mostly composed
of low-grade sedimentary rocks and granites is not supported
by modern investigations (Buslov et al., 2001; Kuzmichev and
Larionov, 2013).
Analytical equipment such as high-resolution ion microprobes
and laser-ablation inductively-coupled plasma mass spectro-
meters have made it possible to date grain domains in zircon
and other U-bearing minerals, and this has led to an ever gro-
wing number of reliable ages for rocks of the CAOB. In parti-
cular there are now thousands of detrital zircon ages that add
significantly to our understanding of geodynamic processes in
Central Asia. In addition, the combination of zircon U-Pb dating
with Sm-Nd and Lu-Hf isotopic characteristics makes it possi-
ble to reconstruct the petrogenetic history of many magmatic
rocks, in particular granitoids, and this has provided new data
on the nature of rocks that were involved in the melting (e.g.,
Sun et al., 2008; Kovach et al., 2011; Kröner et al., 2014).
In the intra-oceanic, single-arc model for the Palaeozoic evo-
lution of Central Asia of Sengör et al. (1993), most magmatic
rocks were inferred to be juvenile in nature, having been for-
med by partial melting of mantle sources during subduction
_____________________________________
___
5. Interpretation of zircon ages and the
Nd-Hf isotopic record
The Altaids as seen by Eduard Suess, and present thinking on the Late Mesoproterozoic to Palaeozoic evolution of Central Asia
processes. This has resulted in the widespread and often
cited belief that Central Asia represents the region with the
highest global crust-production rate in the Phanerozoic (e.g.,
Jahn, 2004). However, zircon geochronology, in-situ Hf, and
whole-rock Nd isotopic data for Neoproterozoic to early Pa-
laeozoic granitoid rocks in the CAOB show that much of this
growth did not occur during the accretionary history of this
belt. As discussed in Kröner et al. (2014), many Mesoprotero-
zoic to Archaean detrital zircons in metasediments and xeno-
crystic zircons in early Palaeozoic magmatic rocks of Mongo-
lia and many other parts of the central and western CAOB
indicate significant melting of older continental crust in the
generation of these assemblages. Zhou et al. (2012, 2013)
reported similar data for the northeastern CAOB. The age
patterns shown by these data are unlike those for rocks of the
Siberian craton, in particular a persistent age peak suggesting
a Grenville-age source is evident. This led Rojas-Agramonte
et al. (2011, 2014), Han et al. (2011) and Ma et al. (2012b) to
suggest the Tarim craton as the most likely source for many
of the Precambrian crustal fragments and detrital zircons.
These authors suggested a tectonic scenario for the PAO
where fragments of continental material were rifted off the
northeastern margin of Gondwana (present coordinates, see
Metcalfe, 2011; Burrett et al., 2014) and became incorporated
in an evolving archipelago that may have looked similar to the
islands in the present southwestern Pacific Ocean. The simi-
larity of this model with the Mesozoic to present-day evolution
of Indonesia is discussed below.
There is no doubt that several terranes in the CAOB seem
to reflect an intra-oceanic evolution such as shown by isotopic
data for rocks in central and eastern Kazakhstan, southern
and western Mongolia, and the western Chinese Altai (see
Kröner et al., 2014 for discussion). However, many Neopro-
terozoic and Palaeozoic arc complexes in the CAOB were
built on older continental crust as shown by their Nd and Hf
isotopic signatures, implying Andean- or Japan-type settings
(e.g., Jahn, 2010). This is in line with the suggestion of Con-
die and Kröner (2013) that such arcs played a major role in
continental evolution through geologic time. Subduction and
ocean closure eventually led to arc and microcontinent amal-
gamation in Central Asia that ended when the oceanic domains
vanished in the early Permian through collision of the accre-
ted terranes with the North China and Tarim cratons to form a
broad orogenic belt (Dobretsov and Buslov, 2007; Windley et
al., 2007, Kröner et al., 2007, 2014). In summary, the isotopic
record does not support an unusually high crust-production
rate in the CAOB. Its evolution may have been similar to the
southern Tasmanides of Australia where growth of this classi-
cal series of accretionary orogens, adding ~30 % of the area
of Australia from 830 until 340 Ma, proceeded largely without
the addition of new juvenile material (Glen, 2013).
There have been many comparisons of the CAOB evolution
_______________________
_________
6. Comparison with the Indonesian archi-
pelago
with the southwest Pacific, specifically the Indonesian Archi-
pelago, and this was discussed extensively during a recent
Penrose Conference (Schulmann and Paterson, 2011; Kröner
et al., 2012b). The similarity is particularly striking in view of
new findings that most of Indonesia is underlain by crustal
fragments rifted off northern Gondwana, in particular northern
Australia since the Jurassic, and there are only few areas that
have no continental crust at depth (Hall and Sevastjanova,
2012).
As summarized above, much of Central Asia is also under-
lain by crust rifted off the northern margin of Gondwana, in
particular the Tarim craton, and there are only few areas such
as central and northeastern Kazakhstan and the Chinese Altai
where the isotopic data suggest substantial volumes of early
Palaeozoic juvenile crust (Kröner et al., 2014).
Some terranes in the CAOB seem to record significant chan-
ges in their tectonic setting during evolution of the CAOB, i.e.
they contain magmatic assemblages recording both crustal
reworking and juvenile additions, probably as a result of chan-
ging palaeogeography and plate geometry, similar to the evo-
lution of the SW Pacific as shown in the computer-based re-
constructions of Hall (2002). The field and isotopic data are
therefore compatible with evolution of the CAOB in an archi-
pelago-type Palaeo-Asian Ocean in which magmatic rocks were
generated in intra-oceanic as well as continental margin tec-
tonic settings, and where “soft” collisions occurred between
arc and microcontinental terranes. Much of the original palaeo-
geography and structural configuration in Central Asia in the
Neoproterozoic to early Palaeozoic cannot be reconstructed
with confidence, in particular because of ubiquitous terrane
rotations as documented by palaeomagnetic data (Alexjutin et
al., 2005; Van der Voo et al., 2006) and the final collisional
event in the Permian, ending orogeny and causing most struc-
tures to become overprinted and rotated in an E-W direction,
accompanied by extensive strike-slip deformation. The same
can be expected when Australia finally collides with SE Asia.
In a long essay to support the name “Altaids“, Sengör and
Natalin (2007) wrote: “In the name Altaids, an entire manner
of looking at tectonic evolution is encapsulated. That has
been our sole reason for insisting that the Altaids are called
by their proper name, first given to them by Eduard Suess in
1901“. However, we disagree with this conclusion since Suess
did not recognize many of the distinctive features of the CAOB
such as its unusually long evolution, the presence of significant
volumes of pre-orogenic crust and synorogenic metamorphic
assemblages, flat structures resulting from thrust stacking,
and obvious younging of rocks from north to south, suppor-
ting successive accretion of terranes onto the Siberian craton
margin throughout the Neoproterozoic and Palaeozoic. How-
ever, we agree with Sengör and Natalin (2007) that Suess
was the first to recognize that only when viewed in its entirety
does the structural evolution of the many mountain ranges
making up the vast orogenic domain of Central Asia make
____________
7. Conclusions
Alfred KRÖNER & Yamirka ROJAS-AGRAMONTE
sense. Thus, in recognizing that this was different from the ge-
nerally long and linear fold belts such as the Alps and Urals,
he was the first to describe an accretionary orogen but in
terms of the prevailing geosynclinal concept of his time he
could not fully understand ist evolution.
We thank our Mongolian, Russian, Chinese and Kyrgyz col-
leagues for stimulating discussions and logistic support during
field work. This research was primarily funded by the German
Research Council (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, grants
KR590/69-1, KR590/90-1 and RO4174/1-2), and we also ack-
nowledge financial support through the Hong Kong-Germany
Research Scheme via DAAD and the Beijing SHRIMP Centre,
Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences. We appreciate
thoughtful reviews by Richard Glen and two anonymous re-
viewers, and we particularly thank Brian Windley for pointing
out the pioneering observations made by A. von Humboldt.
Palaeomagnetism of Ordovician and Silurian rocks from
the Chu-Yili and Kendyktas Mountains, south Kazakhstan.
Geophysical Journal International, 16, 321–331.
A
new terrane subdivision for Mongolia: implications for the
Phanerozoic crustal growth of Central Asia. Journal of Asian
Earth Sciences, 21, 87–110.
Caledonides of the Baikal moun-
tainous area. Nauka Publishing House, Novosibirsk, 132 p.
(in Russian).
Paleozoic Tian-Shan as
a transitional region between the Rheic and Urals-Turkestan
oceans. Gondwana Research, 17, 602-613.
An exhumation pressure–temperature path and fluid
activities during metamorphism in the Tseel terrane, SW
Mongolia: Constraints from aluminosilicate-bearing quartz
veins and garnet zonings in metapelites. Journal of Asian
Earth Sciences, 54-55, 214-229.
The configuration of Greater Gondwana—Evidence
from LA ICPMS, U–Pb geochronology of detrital zircons from
the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic of Southeast Asia and China.
Gondwana Research, in press, doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2013.05.020.
__________________
__
___________
___________________________
______________
_______________________
Acknowledgements
References
Alexyutin, M., Bachtadse, V., Alexeiev, D. and Nikitina, O.,
2005.
Badarch, G., Cunningham, W.D. and Windley, B.F., 2002.
Berlichenko, V.G., 1977.
Biske, Yu.S. and Seltmann, R., 2010.
Burenjargal, U., Okamoto, A., Meguro, Y. and Tsuchiya, N.,
2012.
Burrett, C., Zaw, K., Meffre, S., Lai, C.K., Khositanont, S.,
Chaodumrong, P., Udchachon, M., Ekins, S. and Halpin, J.,
2014.
Buslov, M.M., Saphonova, I.Yu., Watanabe, T., Obut, O.T.,
Fujiwara, Y., Iwata, K., Semakov, N.N., Sugai, Y., Smirnova,
L.V., Kazansky, A.Yu., Itaya, T., , 2001.
Cawood, P.A., Kröner, A., Collins, W.J., Kusky, T.M., Mooney,
W.D. and Windley, B.F., 2009.
Cleven, N.R., Lin, S. and Xiao, W., 2014.
Cocks, L.R.M. and Torsvik, T.H., 2005.
Condie, K.C. and Kröner, A., 2013.
Degtyarev, K.E., 2011.
Degtyarev, K.E., Shatagin, K.N., Kotov, A.B., Sal’nikova, E.B.,
Luchitskaya, M.V., Tret‘yakov, A.A. and Yakovieva, S.Z., 2008.
Demoux, A., Kröner, A., Liu D., and Badarch, G., 2009a.
Demoux, A., Kröner, A., Hegner, E. and Badarch, G., 2009b.
Dergunov, A. B., 1989.
Dobretsov, N.L., Berzin, N.A., Buslov, M.M., 1995.
Dobretsov, N.L. and Buslov, M.M., 2007.
Evolution of the Paleo-
Asian Ocean (Altai-Sayan Region, Central Asia) and collision
of possible Gondwana derived terranes with the southern
marginal part of the Siberian continent. Geoscience Journal,
5, 203-224.
Accretionary orogens through
Earth history. In: Cawood, P.A. and Kröner, A. (eds.) Earth
accretionary systems in space and time. Geological Society
of London, Special Publications, 318, 1-36.
The Hongliuhe fold-
and-thrust belt: Evidence of terminal collision and suture-reac-
tivation after the early Permian in the Beishan orogenic col-
lage, northwest China. Gondwana Research, in press, doi:
10.1016/j.gr.2013.12.004.
Baltica from the late
Precambrian to mid-Palaeozoic times: The gain and loss of a
terrane's identity. Earth-Science Reviews, 72, 39–66.
The building blocks of
continental crust: evidence for a major change in the tectonic
setting of continental growth at the end of the Archean. Gond-
wana Research, 23, 394–402.
Tectonic evolution of early Paleozoic
island arc systems and continental crust formation in the Cale-
donides of Kazakhstan and the North Tien Shan. Geotecto-
nics, 45, 23–50.
Late Precambrian volcanoplutonic association of the Aktau–
Dzhungar Massif, central Kazakhstan: Structural position and
age. Doklady Earth Sciences, 421A, 879-883.
Pre-
cambrian crystalline basement in southern Mongolia as revea-
led by SHRIMP zircon dating. International Journal of Earth
Sciences, 98, 1365–1380.
Devonian arc-related magmatism in the Tseel terrane of SW
Mongolia: chronological and geochemical evidence. Journal
of the Geological Society of London, 166, 1–13.
Caledonides of Central Asia. Nauka
Press, Moscow, 192 p. (in Russian).
Opening
and tectonic evolution of the Paleo-Asian Ocean. International
Geology Review 35, 335–360.
Late Cambrian–Ordo-
vician tectonics and geodynamics of Central Asia. Russian
Geology and Geophysics, 48, 1–12.
_______________
_______
_____________
__________
____________________
_________________________
_____________________
The Altaids as seen by Eduard Suess, and present thinking on the Late Mesoproterozoic to Palaeozoic evolution of Central Asia
Fedorova, N.M., Levashova, N.M., Bazhenov, M.L., Meert,
J.G., Sergeeva, N.D., Golovanova, I.V., Danukalov, K.N.,
Kuznetsov, N.B., Kadyrov, A.F. and Khidiyatov, M.M., 2013.
Gladkochub, D.P., Donskaya, T.V., Wingate, M.T.D., Poller,
U., Kröner, A., Fedorovsky, V.S., Mazukabzov, A.M., Todt, W.
and Pisarevsky, S.A., 2008.
Gladkochub, D.P., Donskaya, T.V., Fedorovsky, V.S., Mazu-
kabzov, A.M., Larionov, A.N. and Sergeev, S.A., 2010.
Gladkochub, D.P., Stanevich, A.M., Mazukabzov, A.M., Dons-
kaya, T.V., Pisarevsky, S.A., Nicoll, G., Motova, Z.L. and Kor-
nilova, Z.A., 2013.
Glen, R., 2013.
Glorie, S., Zhimulev, F.I., Buslov, M.M., Andersen, T., Plavsa,
D., Izmer, A., Vanhaecke, F. and De Grave, J., 2014.
Gordienko, I.,V., Bulgatov, A.N., Ruzhentsev, S.V., Minina, O.R.,
Klimuk, V.S., Vetluzhskikh, L.I., Nekrasov, G.E., Lastochkin, N.I.,
Sitniokova, V.S., Metelkin, D.V., Goneger, T.A. and Lepekhina,
E.N., 2010.
Guy, A., Schulmann, K., Clauer, N., Hasalová, P., Seltmann,
R., Armstrong, R., Lexa, O. and Benedicto, A., 2014.
Hacker, B.R., Calvert, A., Zhang, R.Y., Ernst, W.G. and Liou,
J.G., 2003.
The East European Platform in the late Ediacaran: new paleo-
magnetic and geochronological data. Russian Geology and
Geophysics, 54, 1392–1401.
Petrology, geochronology, and
tectonic implications of c. 500 Mya metamorphic and igneous
rocks along the northern margin of the Central-Asian Orogen
(Olkhon terrane, Lake Baikal, Siberia). Journal of the Geolo-
gical Society of London, 165, 235–246.
The
Olkhon metamorphic terrane in the Baikal region: An Early
Paleozoic collage of Neoproterozoic active margin fragments.
Russian Geology and Geophysics, 51, 447–460.
Early evolution of the Paleoasian ocean:
LA-ICP-MS dating of detrital zircon from Late Precambrian
sequences of the southern margin of the Siberian craton.
Russian Geology and Geophysics, 54, 1150–1163.
Refining accretionary orogen models for the
Tasmanides of eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Earth
Sciences, 60, 315–370.
Forma-
tion of the Kokchetav subduction–collision zone (northern
Kazakhstan): Insights from zircon U–Pb and Lu–Hf isotope
systematics. Gondwana Research, in press, doi: org/10.1016/
j.gr.2013.10.012.
The Late Riphean–Paleozoic history of the Uda–
Vitim island arc system in the Transbaikalian sector of the Pa-
leoasian ocean. Russian Geology and Geophysics, 51, 461–481.
Late
Paleozoic–Mesozoic tectonic evolution of the Trans-Altai and
South Gobi Zones in southern Mongolia based on structural
and geochronological data. Gondwana Research, 25, 309–337.
Ultrarapid exhumation of ultrahigh-pressure dia-
mond-bearing metasedimentary rocks of the Kokchetav Mas-
sif, Kazakhstan? Lithos, 70, 61–75.
__________________
__________
________
_____________________
Hall, R., 2002.
Hall, R. and Sevastjanova, I., 2012.
Han, B.-F., He, G.-Q., Wang, X.-C., Guo, Z.-J., 2011.
Jahn, B.-M., 2004.
Jahn, B.-M., 2010.
Jahn, B.-M., Wu, F. and Chen, B., 2000a.
Jahn, B.M., Wu, F.Y. and Chen, B., 2000b.
Jahn, B.-M., 2010.
Jian, P., Liu, D., Kröner, A., Windley, B.F., Shi, Y., Zhang, F.,
Shi, G., Miao, L., Zhang, W., Zhang, Q., Zhang, L. and Ren, J.,
2008.
Jiang, Y., Sun, M., Kröner, A., Tumurkhuu, D., Long, Xiaoping,
Zhao, Guochun, Yuan, C. and Xiao, W., 2012.
Khain, V.Ye., 1979.
Khain, E.V., Bibikova, E.V., Kröner, A., Zhuravlev, D.Z., Skly-
arov, E.V., Fedetova, A.A. and Kravchenko-Berezhnoy, I.R.,
2002.
Cenozoic geological and plate tectonic evolu-
tion of SE Asia and the SW Pacific: computer-based recon-
structions, model and animations. Journal of Asian Earth Sci-
ences, 20, 353–434.
Australian crust in Indo-
nesia. Journal of Australian Earth Sciences, 59, 827–844.
Late
Carboniferous collision between the Tarim and Kazakhstan–
Yili terranes in the western segment of the South Tian Shan
Orogen, Central Asia, and implications for the Northern Xin-
jiang, western China. Earth-Science Reviews 109, 74–93.
The Central Asian Orogenic Belt and growth
of the continental crust in the Phanerozoic. Geological Society
of Lpondon, Special Publications, 226, 73–100.
Accretionary orogen and evolution of the
Japanese islands – Implications from a Sr-Nd- isotopic study
of the Phanerozoic granitoids from SW Japan. American Jour-
nal of Science, 310, 1210–1249.
Granitoids of the
Central Asian Orogenic Belt and continental growth in the
Phanerozoic. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh,
Earth Sciences, 91, 181–193.
Massive granitoid
generation in Central Asia: Nd isotope evidence and implica-
tion for continental growth in the Phanerozoic. Episodes, 23,
82–92.
Accretionary orogen and evolution of the
Japanese islands – Implications from a Sr-Nd- isotopic study
of the Phanerozoic granitoids from SW Japan. American Jour-
nal of Science, 310, 1210–1249.
Time scale of an early to mid-Paleozoic orogenic cycle
of the long-lived Central Asian Orogenic Belt, Inner Mongolia of
China: implications for continental growth. Lithos, 101, 233–259.
The high-grade
Tseel Terrane in SW Mongolia: An Early Paleozoic arc system
or a Precambrian sliver? Lithos, 142–143, 95–115.
Regional Geotectonics. Asia outside the
Alpine belt and Australia. Nedra Publishing House, Moscow,
356 p. (in Russian).
The most ancient ophiolites of the Central Asian fold
belt: U–Pb and Pb-Pb zircon ages for the Dunzhugur comp-
lex, Eastern Sayan, Siberia, and geodynamic implications.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 199, 311–325.
___
___
____________
_______________________
_________________________
_________
________
Alfred KRÖNER & Yamirka ROJAS-AGRAMONTE
Klemd, R., John, T., Scherer, T.T., Rondenay, S. and Gao, J.,
2011.
Kovach, V., Salnikova, E., Wang, K.-L., Jahn, B.-M., Chiu, H.-
Y., Reznitskiy, L., Kotov, A., Iizuka, Y., Chung, S.-L., 2013.
Kovalenko, V.I., Yarmolyuk, V.V. and Bogatikov, O.A., 1995.
Kozakov, I.K., Sal’nikova, E.B., Khain, E.V., Kovach, V.P., Be-
rezhnaya, N.G., Yakovleva, S.Z. and Plotkina, Yu. V., 2002a.
Kozakov, I.K., Glebovitsky, V.A., Bibikova, E.V., Azimov, P.Ya.
and Kirnozova, T.I., 2002b.
Kozakov, I.K., Sal’nikova, E.B., Wang, T., Didenko, A.N., Plot-
kina, Yu.V. and Podkovyrov, V.N., 2007.
Kozakov, I.K., Kozlovsky, A.M., Yarmolyuk, V.V., Kovach, V.P.,
Bibikova, E.V., Kirnozova, T.I., Plotkina, Yu. V., Zagornaya,
N. Yu., Fuzgan, M.M., Erdenejargal, Ch., Lebedev, V.I. and
Eenjin, G., 2011.
Kozakov, I.K., Sal’nikova, E.B., Yarmolyuk, V.V., Kovach, V.P.,
Kozlovskii, A.M., Anisimova, I.V., Plotkina, Yu.V., Fedoseenko,
A.M., Yakovleva, S.Z. and Erdenezhargal, Ch., 2013.
Changes in dip of subducted slabs at depth: Petrologi-
cal and geochronological evidence from HP–UHP rocks (Tian-
shan, NW-China). Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 310,
9–20.
Composition, sour-
ces, and mechanisms of formation of the continental crust of
the Lake Zone of the Central Asian Caledonides. II. Geoche-
mical and Nd isotope data. Petrology, 19, 399–425.
Zircon ages and Hf isotopic constraints on sources of clastic
metasediments of the Slyudyansky high-grade complex,
southeastern Siberia: Implication for continental growth and
evolution of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Journal of Asian
Earth Sciences, 62, 18–36.
Magmatism, geodynamics and metallogeny of Central Asia,
Mico Publishing House, Moscow, 272 p.
Early Caledonian crystalline rocks oft he Lake Zone in Mon-
golia: Formation history and tectonic settings as deduced from
U-Pb and Sm-Nd datings. Geotectonics, 36, 156–166.
Hercynian granulites of Mongolian
and Gobian Altai: Geodynamic setting and formation condi-
tions. Doklady Earth Sciences, 386, 781–785.
Early Precambrian
crystalline complexes of the Central Asian microcontinent:
Age, sources, tectonic position. Stratigraphy and Geological
Correlation, 15, 121–140.
Crystalline complexes of the Tarbagatai
block of the early Caledonian superterrane of Central Asia.
Petrology, 19, 426–444.
Crustal
growth stages in the Songino Block of the Early Caledonian
Superterrane in Central Asia: I. Geological and geochronolo-
gical data. Petrology, 21, 203–220.
Kovach, V.P., Yarmolyuk, V.V., Kovalenko, V.I., Kozlovskyi, A.
M., Kotov, A.B. and Terent'eva, L.B., 2011.
________
_________________
______
_____________
_____________________
Kröner, A.,Windley, B.F., Badarch, G., Tomurtogoo, O., Hegner,
E., Jahn, B.M., Gruschka, S., Khain, E.V., Demoux, A. and
Wingate, M.T.D., 2007.
Kröner, A., Alexeiev, D.V., Hegner, E., Rojas-Agramonte, Y.,
Corsini, M., Chao, Y., Wong, J., Windley, B.F., Liu, D. and
Tretyakov, A.A., 2012a.
Kröner, A., Stern, R.J., Jahn, B.-M., Xiao, W., Zhang, L., Hall,
R., Kotov, A., Seltmann, R., 2012b.
Kröner, A., Alexeiev, D.V., Rojas-Agramonte, Y., Hegner, E.,
Wong, J., Xia, X., Belousova, E., Mikolaichuk, A., Seltmann,
R., Liu, D., Kisilev, V., 2013.
Kröner, A., Kovach, V., Belousova, E., Hegner, E., Armstrong,
R., Dolgopolova, A., Seltmann, R., Alexeiev, D.V., Hoffmann,
J.E., Wong, J., Sun, M., Cai, K., Wang, T., Tong, Y., Wilde,
S.A., Degtyarev, K.E. and Rytsk, E., 2014.
Kuzmichev, A.B., 2004.
Kuzmichev, A.B., Bibikova, E.V. and Zhuravlev, D.Z., 2001.
Kuzmichev, A., Kröner, A., Hegner, E., Liu, D. and Wan, Y.,
2005.
Kuzmichev, A., Sklyarov, E., Postnikov, A. and Bibikova, E.,
2007.
Accretionary growth and crust forma-
tion in the Central Asian orogenic belt and comparison with
the Arabian-Nubian shield. In: Hatcher, R.D., Carlson, M.P.,
McBride, J.H. and Martínez Catalán, J.R. (eds.), 4-D Frame-
work of Continental Crust. Geological Society of America
Memoir, 200, 181–209.
Zircon and muscovite ages, geoche-
mistry, and Nd–Hf isotopes for the Aktyuz metamorphic ter-
rane: evidence for an Early Ordovician collisional belt in the
northern Tianshan of Kyrgyzstan. Gondwana Research, 21,
901–927.
Penrose Conference Re-
port: Comparative evolution of past and present accretionary
orogens: Central Asia and the Circum-Pacific. GSA Today,
March 2012, 16–18.
Mesoproterozoic (Grenville-age)
terranes in the Kyrgyz North Tianshan: Zircon ages and Nd-
Hf isotopic constraints on the origin and evolution of basement
blocks in the southern Central Asian Orogen. Gondwana Re-
search, 23, 272–295.
Reassessment of
continental growth during the accretionary history of the Cen-
tral Asian Orogenic Belt. Gondwana Research, 25, 103–125.
The tectonic history of the Tuva–Mon-
golian Massif: Early Baikalian, late Baikalian, and early Cale-
donian Stages. Probel Publishing House, Moscow, 192 pp. (in
Russian).
Neoproterozoic (800 Ma) orogeny in the Tuva–Mongolian Mas-
sif (Siberia): island arc–continent collision at the northeast
Rodinia margin. Precambrian Research, 110, 109–126.
The Shishkhid ophiolite, northern Mongolia: a key to
the reconstruction of a Neoproterozoic island-arc system in
central Asia. Precambrian Research, 138, 125–150.
The Oka Belt (southern Siberia and northern Mongolia):
a Neoproterozoic analog of the Japanese Shimanto Belt? The
Island Arc, 16, 224–242.
______________________________
_____
_______
The Altaids as seen by Eduard Suess, and present thinking on the Late Mesoproterozoic to Palaeozoic evolution of Central Asia
Kuzmichev, A.B. and Larionov, A.N., 2013.
Lehmann, J., Schulmann, K., Lexa, O., Corsini, M., Kröner, A.,
Stípská, P., Tomurhuu, D. and Otgonbator, D., 2010.
Letnikov, F.A., Kotov, A.B., Sal’nikova, E-B., Shershakova,
M.M., Shershakov, A.V., Rizvanova, N.G. and Makeev, A.F.,
2007.
Ma, X., Shu, L., Jahn, B.-M., Zhu, W. and Faure, M., 2012a.
Ma, X., Shu, L., Santosh, M. and Li, J., 2012b.
McKerrow, W.S., Scotese, C.R. and Brasier, M.D. 1992.
Meert, J.G. and Lieberman, B.S., 2008.
Metelkin, D.V., 2013.
Metcalfe, I., 2011.
Obruchev S.V., 1949.
Pavlovsky, E.V., 1948.
Pisarevsky, S.A., Murphy, J.B., Cawood, P.A. and Collins, A.S.,
2008.
Neoproterozoic
island arcs in East Sayan: duration of magmatism (from U-Pb
zircon dating of volcano clastics). Russian Geology and Geo-
physics, 54, 34–43.
Structu-
ral constraints on the evolution of the Central Asian Orogenic
Belt in southern Mongolia. American Journal of Science, 310,
575–628.
Granodiorites of the Grenvilla phase in the Kokchetav
Block, northern Kazakhstan. Doklady Earth Sciences, 417,
1195–1197.
Precambrian tectonic evolution of Central Tianshan, NW
China: constraints from U–Pb dating and in situ Hf isotopic
analysis of detrital zircons. Precambrian Research, 222–223,
450–473.
Detrital zircon
U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope data from Central Tian-
shan suggesting a link with the Tarim Block: implications on
Proterozoic supercontinent history. Precambrian Research,
206–207, 1–16.
Early
Cambrian continental reconstructions. Journal of the Geologi-
cal Society of London, 149, 599–606.
The Neoproterozoic
assembly of Gondwana and its relationship to the Ediacaran–
Cambrian radiation. Gondwana Research, 14, 4–21.
Kinematic reconstruction of the early
Caledonian accretion in the southwest of the Siberian paleo-
continent based on paleomagnetic results. Russian Geology
and Geophysics, 54, 381–398.
Tectonic framework and Phanerozoic evo-
lution of Sundaland. Gondwana Research, 19, 3–21.
Tectonics of the eastern part of the
Sayan-Baikal Caledonian folded zone. Proceedings of the
USSR Academy of Sciences, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR
LXVIII, 905–908 (in Russian).
Geological history and geological struc-
ture of the Baikal mountain area. Reports of the Geological
Institute of the Academy of Science, USSR, 99, 174 pp.
Late Neoproterozoic and Early Cambrian palaeogeo-
graphy: models and problems. In: Pankhurst, R. J., Trouw, R.
A. J., Brito Neves, B. B., De Wit, M. J. (eds.), West Gondwana:
Pre-Cenozoic correlations across the South Atlantic region.
Geological Society of London, Special Publications, 294, 9–31.
___________________
_______
_________________________
_______
____
Rojas-Agramonte, Y., Kröner, A., Demoux, A., Xia, X., Wang,
W., Donskaya, T., Liu, D., Sun, M., 2011.
Rojas-Agramonte, Y., Herwartz, D., García-Casco, A., Kröner,
A., Alexeiev, D.V., Klemd, R., Buhre, S. and Barth, M., 2013.
Rojas-Agramonte, Y., Kröner, A., Alexeiev, D.V., Jeffreys, T.,
Khudoley, A.K., Wong, J., Geng, H., Shu, L., Semiletkin, S.A.,
Mikolaichuk, A.V., Kiselev, V.V., Yang, J., Seltmann, R., 2014.
Rytsk, E. Yu., Amelin, Yu. V., Krymski, R. Sh., Shalaev, V.S.
and Rizvanova, N.G., 1999.
Rytsk, E. Yu., Kobvach, V.P., Kovalenko, V.I. and Yarmolyuk,
V.V., 2007a.
Rytsk, E. Yu., Makeev, A.F., Glebovistsky, V.A. and Fedoseen-
ko, A.M., 2007b.
Rytsk, E.Yu., Kovach, V.P., Yarmolyuk, V.V., Kovalenko, V.I.,
Bogomolov, E.S. and Kotov, A.B., 2011.
Rytsk, E.Yu., Salnikova, E.B., Kovach, V.P., Kotov, A.B., Yar-
molyuk, V.V., Anisimova, I.V., Yakovleva, S.Z., Fedoseenko,
A.M. and Plotkina, Yu. V., 2013.
Safonova, I.Yu. and Santosh, M., 2014.
Detrital and xeno-
crystic zircon ages from Neoproterozoic to Palaeozoic arc
terranes of Mongolia: Significance for the origin of crustal
fragments in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Gondwana
Research, 19, 751–763.
Early Palaeozoic deep subduction of continental crust in the
Kyrgyz North Tianshan: evidence from Lu–Hf garnet geochro-
nology and petrology of mafic dikes. Contributions to Minera-
logy and Petrology, 166, 525–543.
Detrital and igneous zircon ages for supracrustal rocks of the
Kyrgyz Tianshan and palaeogeographic implications. Gond-
wana Research, in press, doi: org/10.1016/j.gr.2013.09.005.
On the age of the Nyurundyukan
sequence (Kichera Zone, Baikal-Muya foldbelt): New U-Pb and
Sm-Nd isotope data. In: I.K. Kozakov (ed.), Geologicheskoe
razvitie proterozoiskikh perikratonnykh paleookeanicheskikh
struktur Severnoi Evrazii (Geologic evolution of Proterozoic
marginal palaeo-oceanic structures of northern Eurasia). Tema
Publishing House, Leningrad, pp. 130–132 (in Russian).
Structure and evolution of the continental crust in
the Baikal fold region. Geotectonics, 41, 440–464.
Early Vendian age of multiple gabbro–granite
complexes of the Karalon–Mamakan zone, Baikal–Muya belt:
New U–Pb zircon data. Doklady Earth Sciences, 415A, 911–914.
Isotopic structure and
evolution of the continental crust in the East Transbaikalian
segment of the Central Asian Foldbelt. Geotectonics, 45,
349–377.
Timing of accretion of the
Malkhan–Konda terrane (western Transbaikal Region) to the
Siberian Paleocontinent: Results of U–Pb geochronological
studies of the granitoids of the Malkhan Complex. Doklady
Earth Sciences, 448, 12–16.
Accretionary com-
plexes in the Asia-Pacific region: Tracing archives of ocean
plate stratigraphy and tracking mantle plumes. Gondwana
Research, 25, 126–158.
______________________
____
_________
__________________________
Alfred KRÖNER & Yamirka ROJAS-AGRAMONTE
Schulmann, K. and Paterson, S., 2011.
Şengör, A. M. C., Natal’in, B. A. and Burtman, V. S., 1993.
Sengör, A.M.C. and Natal’in, 2007.
Shatsky N.S., 1932.
Stipská, P., Schulmann, K., Lehmann, J., Corsini, M., Lexa,
O. and Tomurhuu, D., 2010.
Suess, E., 1901.
Suess, E., 1908.
Sun, M., Yuan, C., Xiao,W., Long, X., Xia, X., Zhao, G., Lin,
S., Wu, F. and Kröner, A., 2008.
Sun, M., Long, X.P., Cai, K.D., Jiang, Y.D., Wong, P.W., Yuan,
C., Zhao, G.C., Xiao, W.J. and Wu, F.Y., 2009.
Turkina, O.M., Letnikov, F.A. and Levin, A.V., 2011.
Van der Voo, R., Levashova, N., Skrinnik, L., Kara, T. and
Bazhenov, M., 2006.
Volkova, N.I. and Sklyarov, E.V., 2007.
von Humboldt, A., 1843.
Asian continental
growth. Nature Geoscience, 4, 827–829.
Evolution of the Altaid tectonic collage and Palaeozoic crustal
growth in Eurasia. Nature, 364, 299–307.
Eduard Suess and the
Altaids: What is in a name? In: Seltmann, R., Borisenko, A.,
Fedoseev, G. (eds.) Magmatism and metallogeny of the Altai
and adjacent large igneous provinces with an introductory es-
say on the Altaids. IAGOD Guidebook Series, 16, CERCAMS/
NHM, London, 187-294.
The principal features of tectonics of the
Siberian platform. Bulletin of Moscow Society of the Natura-
lists. Section Geology, 10, 476–509 (in Russian).
Early Cambrian eclogites in SW
Mongolia: evidence that the Palaeo-Asian Ocean suture ex-
tends further east than expected. Journal of Metamorphic
Geology, 28, 915–933.
Das Antlitz der Erde, vol. III (Dritter Band.
Erste Hälfte). F. Tempsky, Prag and Wien, and G. Freytag,
Leipzig, IV + 508 pp.
The Face of the Earth, vol. III. Clarendon
Press, Oxford, viii + 400 pp.
Zircon U–Pb and Hf isotopic
study of gneissic rocks from the Chinese Altai: progressive
accretionary history in the early to middle Palaeozoic. Chemi-
cal Geology, 247, 352–383.
Early Paleo-
zoic ridge subduction in the Chinese Altai: insight from the
abrupt change in zircon Hf isotopic compositions. Science in
China Series D, 39, 1–14.
Mesopro-
terozoic granitoids of the Kokchetav microcontinent base-
ment. Doklady Earth nSciences, 436, 176–180.
Late orogenic, large-scale rotations in
the Tien Shan and adjacent mobile belts in Kyrgyzstan and
Kazakhstan. Tectonophysics, 426, 335–360.
High-pressure com-
plexes of Central Asian Fold Belt: geologic setting, geoche-
mistry, and geodynamic implications. Russian Geology and
Geophysics, 48, 83–90.
Asie Centrale. Recherches sur les
chaines de montagnes et la climatologie comparée. Vol. 1,
Gide, Libraire-Editeur, Paris, 570 pp.
________________
________________
__________
___________
______________
____________________
Wang, B., Jahn, B.-M., Shu, L., Li, K., Chung, S.-L. and Liu,
D., 2012.
Wang, K.-L., O'Reilly, S.Y., Kovach, V., Griffin, W.L., Pearson,
N., Yarmolyuk, V., Kuzmin, M.I., Chieh, C.-J., Shellnutt, J.G.
and Iizuka, Y., 2013.
Wang, T., Jahn, B.M., Kovach, Victor P., Tong, Y., Hong, D.W.
and Han, B.F., 2009.
Wilde, S.A., Wu F.-Y., Zhao, G., 2010.
Wilhem, C., Windley, B.F. and Stampfli, G.M., 2012.
Windley, B.F., Alexeiev, D.V., Xiao, W., Kröner, A. and Bad-
arch, G., 2007.
Wu, F.-Y., Jahn, B.-M., Wilde, S., Sun, D.-Y., 2000.
Yanshin, A.L., 1965.
Yanshin, A.L. (Chief Editor.), 1966.
Yarmolyuk, V.V., Kuz’min and Vorontsov, A.A., 2013.
Zhou, J.-B., Wilde, S.A., Zhang, X.-Z., Liu, F.-L., Liu, J.-H.,
2012.
Zhou, J.-B., Wilde, S., 2013.
Middle-Late Ordovician arc-type plutonism in the
NW Chinese Tianshan: Implication for the accretion of the
Kazakhstan continent in Central Asia. Journal of Asian Earth
Sciences, 49, 40–53.
Microcontinents among the accretionary
complexes of the Central Asia Orogenic Belt: in situ Re–Os
evidence. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 62, 526–530.
Nd–Sr isotopic mapping of the Chinese
Altai and implications for continental growth in the Central
Asian Orogenic Belt. Lithos, 110, 359–372.
The Khanka Block, NE
China, and its significance for the evolution of the Central
Asian Orogenic Belt and continental accretion. Geological
Society of London, Special Publications 338, 117-137.
The Alta-
ids of Central Asia: A tectonic and evolutionary innovative re-
view. Earth-Science Reviews, 113, 303–341.
Tectonic models for accretion of the Central
Asian Orogenic Belt. Journal of the Geological Society of
London, 164, 31–47.
Phanero-
zoic crustal growth: U-Pb and Sr-Nd isotopic evidence from the
granites in northeastern China. Tectonophysics, 328, 89–113.
Tectonic structure of Eurasia. Geotekto-
nika 5, 7–35 (in Russian).
Tectonics of Eurasia
(Explanatory notes to the Tectonic Map of Eurasia, scale
1:5,000,000) and map. Geological Institute, Academy of
Sciences of the USSR. Moscow, Nauka Publishing House,
22 pp.
West
Pacific-type convergent boundaries and their role in the for-
mation of the Central Asian Fold Belt. Russian Geology and
Geophysics, 54, 1427–1441.
Detrital zircons from Phanerozoic rocks of the Songliao
Block, NE China: Evidence and tectonic implications. Journal
of Asian Earth Sciences, 47, 21–34.
The crustal accretion history and
tectonic evolution of the NE China segment of the Central
Asian Orogenic Belt. Gondwana Research, 23, 1365–1377.
____
_______________
_____
______________
_________________________
____________________
_
The Altaids as seen by Eduard Suess, and present thinking on the Late Mesoproterozoic to Palaeozoic evolution of Central Asia
Received: 10 January 2014
Accepted: 23 May 2014
1)*) 1)2)Alfred KRÖNER & Yamirka ROJAS-AGRAMONTE1)
2)
*)
Beijing SHRIMP Centre, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences,
26 Baiwanzhuang Road, 100037 Beijing, China, and Department of
Geosciences, University of Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany;
Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas (ESPE) Av. Gral. Rumiñahui s/n
Sangolquí, Ecuador;
Corresponding author, [email protected]
________
Zonenshain L.P., 1972.
Zonenshain, L.P., Kuzmin, M.I. and Natapov, L.M., 1990.
Doctrine of geosynclines and its ap-
plication to the Central Asian folded belt. Nedra Publishing
House, Moscow, 239 pp. (in Russian).
Geo-
logy of the U.S.S.R.: A plate tectonic synthesis. American
Geophysical Union, Geodynamics Series, 21, 1–242.
__________________
______