1) This classroom has _______. A)Too much lighting B)Not enough lighting C)About the right amount of...

29
1) This classroom has _______. A) Too much lighting B) Not enough lighting C) About the right amount of lighting

Transcript of 1) This classroom has _______. A)Too much lighting B)Not enough lighting C)About the right amount of...

  • Slide 1
  • 1) This classroom has _______. A)Too much lighting B)Not enough lighting C)About the right amount of lighting
  • Slide 2
  • 2) For which of the following conditions would you increase the weighting factor by +1 in a lighting design? A)A room used exclusively by high school students B)A circular room with mirrors for walls C)A room used exclusively by government employees (i.e. speed/accuracy of task not important) D)A room used for cutting dark stone
  • Slide 3
  • Objective Use room geometry to calculate coefficient of utilization (CU)
  • Slide 4
  • Now what? We now know how much light we need. How do we get it? Zonal cavity method Calculate CU How much light makes it from the fixture to the work surface of interest Graphical methods (similar to stress strain) Ray tracing Computationally intensive
  • Slide 5
  • Illumination Calculation I ws = N LPL LOF CU / A N = number of fixtures LPL = rated lumens per fixture LOF = lamp operating factor Ballast, voltage, temperature, position (HID) CU = coefficient of utilization Fraction of light that meets the work surface A = room area
  • Slide 6
  • Lamps are Not the only thing Fixtures (luminaires) Lamp type and number Power requirements Ballast Application requirements Mounting Fixture control Special features Distribution
  • Slide 7
  • Ref: Tao and Janis (2001)
  • Slide 8
  • S/MH Fixture height to have even illumination
  • Slide 9
  • 3) In lighting design, the coefficient of utilization __________. A)Determines the fraction of light fixtures in a room that are actually used. B)Measures the fraction of emitted light that reaches a working surface. C)Is lower in a room with light-colored walls than in one with dark walls. D)Depends on the type of task performed, accuracy required by the task, and on the ages of occupants in a room.
  • Slide 10
  • Zonal Cavity Method Purpose is to get CU fixture efficiency What parameters do you need?
  • Slide 11
  • Figure 16-1 Ref: Tao and Janis (2001)
  • Slide 12
  • Calculate Cavity Ratios CR = 2.5 PAR h PAR = perimeter to area ratio = P/A PAR = 2 (L+ W)/(L W) h = height of cavity What about CR for non-rectangular rooms? CR = 5 (L+ W)/(L W) h
  • Slide 13
  • Reflectance Experience White ceiling, R c = 70 80 % = c White walls, R w = 60 - 70 % = w Medium to light colored walls, R w = 50 % = w Dark wood paneling, R w = 25 % = w Floor, R f = 10-30 % = f Convert to effective reflectances ( cc, w, fc ) Tables in Tao and Janis (pg 92-93, 102-107) or from manufacturer
  • Slide 14
  • Calculation Procedure Goal is to get CU (how much light from the fixture gets to the work surface) 1.Data collection Room geometry Surface reflectances Fixture tables 2.Preliminary calculations CR for room, floor, and ceiling
  • Slide 15
  • Calculations (continued) 3.Table 16.8 cc and fc (assume fc = 20% if no other information given) 4.Table 16.9 CU Multiplier if fc 20% 5.Fixture table CU based on cc, R w, RCR 6.Use CU by multiplier from step 4.
  • Slide 16
  • Example Classroom (30 30 9) White ceiling, blackboards on 2 sides, light floor Students working on desks Fluorescent fixtures at ceiling level Use standard tables
  • Slide 17
  • Data So Far PAR = 2 (L+ W)/(L W) = 120ft/900ft 2 CCR = 2.5 PAR h c = 0 RCR = 2.5 PAR h r = 2.17 FCR = 2.5 PAR h f = 0.83 cc = R c = 70% (b/c CCR = 0) rc = R w = 30% fc = 20% (assumption)
  • Slide 18
  • Variations Fixture 2 (pg 92), 1 ft from ceiling Actual fixture, original height Original fixture, 30% reflective floor
  • Slide 19
  • Fixture 2 PAR = 2 (L+ W)/(L W) = 120ft/900ft 2 CCR = 2.5 PAR h c = 0.33 RCR = 2.5 PAR h r = 1.83 FCR = 2.5 PAR h f = 0.83 cc = 64% (Table 16-8) rc = R w = 30% fc = 20% (assumption, could use Table 16-8)
  • Slide 20
  • Ref: Tao and Janis (2001)
  • Slide 21
  • Actual Fixture PAR = 2 (L+ W)/(L W) = 120ft/900ft 2 CCR = 2.5 PAR h c = 0 RCR = 2.5 PAR h r = 2.17 FCR = 2.5 PAR h f = 0.83 cc = R c = 70% (b/c CCR = 0) rc = R w = 30% fc = 20% (assumption)
  • Slide 22
  • More Reflective Floor PAR = 2 (L+ W)/(L W) = 120ft/900ft 2 CCR = 2.5 PAR h c = 0 RCR = 2.5 PAR h r = 2.17 FCR = 2.5 PAR h f = 0.83 cc = R c = 70% (b/c CCR = 0) rc = R w = 30% fc = 30% (given, could use Table 16-8 Tao and Janis)
  • Slide 23
  • 4) If a building owner hires Persephone to determine the amount of lighting in an existing building, Persephone would need to know which parameters? A)Type of activity performed, age of occupants, speed needed to perform activities in the building B) Shape of the rooms, distance from light fixtures to work surfaces, reflectance of surfaces, types of light fixtures in the building C)Color rendering index, evenness of lighting, thermal properties of lighting in the building
  • Slide 24
  • 5) If a developer hires Francisco to determine the required lighting levels for a new building, Francisco would need to know which parameters? A)Type of activity performed, age of occupants, speed needed to perform activities in the building B) Shape of the rooms, distance from light fixtures to work surfaces, reflectance of surfaces, types of light fixtures in the building C)Color rendering index, evenness of lighting, thermal properties of lighting in the building
  • Slide 25
  • Illumination Calculation I ws = N LPL LOF CU / A N = number of fixtures LPL = rated lamp lumens per fixture LOF = lamp operating factor Ballast, voltage, temperature, position (HID) CU = coefficient of utilization Fraction of light that meets the work surface N = I ws A / (LPL LOF CU)
  • Slide 26
  • Distribution Direct 90 100 % downward Semi-direct 60-90% down, rest upward Direct-indirect/general diffuse Semi-indirect Indirect
  • Slide 27
  • Ref: Tao and Janis (2001)
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Summary Calculate number of fixtures need for a specific space Calculate CU Tuesday Accent lighting Daylighting Lighting quality Thursday Review