1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

38
1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW

Transcript of 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

Page 1: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

1

The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW

Page 2: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

M7.6 Padang Earthquake,30 September 2009, 05:16 PM88 km depth 1.2 M People Affected 1,120 Deaths (est.) 3,000 Serious Injuries 140,000 Damaged Structures 2,100 School Damaged or Destroyed No tsunami (too deep)

1,400 Large Hotels or Office Buildings Seriously Damaged

Page 3: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

M7.6 Padang Earthquake,30 September 2009

OutlineRegional tectonicsRegional quake historyThis quakeSimilar quakes in the Pac NWFuture predictions for the Pac NW

Page 4: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

4

Sept. 30, 2009, first Samoa M8 (with tsunami)Sept. 30, 2009, first Samoa M8 (with tsunami)then,then, M7.6, PadangM7.6, Padang

LEMPENG PASIFIK

LEMPENG FILIPINA

LEMPENG EURASIA

LEMPENG INDO-AUSTRALIA

LEMPENG COCOS

LEMPENG AMERIKA UTARA

LEMPENG NAZCA

LEMPENG ANTARTIKA

LEMPENG AMERIKASELATAN

LEMPENG CARIBIA

LEMPENG SCOTIA

BMKG

Page 5: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

INDONESIA BMGBMG

SOURCE : BPPT

Page 6: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.
Page 7: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

PLATE TECTONIC MODELNORTH-SOUTH GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTION THROUGH SOUTH OF JAWA

Page 8: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

Background seismicity

Background seismicity w/ aftershocks

Page 9: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

M7.6 mainshock

M6.6 aftershock on Sumatra fault

Page 10: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.
Page 11: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

2004 Earthquake and Tsunami

Page 12: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

1797

1833

18611907

1822

1926 (~7)

1984 (6.4(

1935

1987 (6.6)

19211916198419871892

1822

1943190919951952

1926

1942

18931900

193319941908

19901997

1936

19641967

1893

1892 (7.7)

1900

1908

1916

1933 (7.5)

1942 (7.3)

1936 (7.2)

1952 (6.8)

1979 (6.6)

1943 (7.3)

1990 (6.5)

1997 (6.5)

1964 (6.5)

1921 ( >7)

1994 (6.9)

1995 (7.0)

1909 (7.6)

1967 (6.1)

Historical Earthquakes

1797 (8.2)

1833 (8.7 – 9)

1861 (~8.5)

1907

1935 (7.7)

2000 (7.8)

2002 (7.4)

2004 (9.2)

2005 (8.7)

Subduction ZoneSumatran fault

2000

2005

2004

2002

???

Fig. 6 : Map of damaging earthquake in Sumatera (Hilman, 2004)

Page 13: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

13

PDSI*

PPI

SDSI

Page 14: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

Acceleration

Page 15: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

15

Velocity

Page 16: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

Landslides• Causes

– steep mountain slopes– triggered by heavy rain

combined with earthquake shaking

• Mud and debris flow• 5+ villages reported buried• 600+ casualties• Inaccessible

– damage to roads– lack of communication

AP News

Page 17: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

17

September Rainfall – Met. Station

Tabing, Pandang

Sept. 1 – 1.0 mmSept. 2 – 2.8 mmSept. 4 – 0.6 mmSept. 8 – 53.0 mmSept. 14 – 123.3 mmSept. 15 – 66.5 mmSept. 16 – 0.7 mmSept. 17 – 19.6 mmSept. 24 – 3.7 mmSept. 27 – 44.1 mmSept. 28 – 2.7 mmSept. 30 – 20.4 mm

Page 18: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.
Page 19: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

Local Areas with Very High Levels of Damage (MMI 8-9).

Evidence of Strong Localized Site Effects.Near-surface geologyheight of the water tabledepth to bedrock

• Massive Triggered Liquefaction/Debris Flow Killed 100’s of People.

Conclusions I

Page 20: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

Not the Anticipated M8+ Earthquake on the Sunda Megathrust - no tsunami.

Damage was greater than would be expected for a comparable magnitude earthquake on the subduction interface

• closer to land

• Strong need remains in region for earthquake preparedness.

• About 1 such earthquake of M>=7 per year

Conclusions II

Page 21: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

M7.6 Intraplate event at 80 km depth.Unusual focal mechanism.Usually normal faulting - this was oblique thrustOnly 4 aftershocks that could be located - typical for large intermediate depth quakes

• Normal faulting would unload shallow thrusts, but this event may load thrust and render future big events more likely.

• Strong need remains in region for earthquake preparedness.

Conclusions III

Page 22: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.
Page 23: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

Complicated controls on subduction earthquakes

23Audet et al., 2009

Page 24: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

ETS & subduction cross-section

24

Abers et al, 2009

Page 25: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

Intraplate quakes in cross-section

Page 26: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

Nisqually strong shaking

• Nothing is red• Radiation pattern is visible• Deep is milder than shallow

Page 27: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.
Page 28: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

28

Low Potential for Large Intraslab Earthquakes in the Central Cascadia

Subduction ZoneBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 95, No. 5, pp. 1880–1902, October 2005

by Ivan G. Wong

28

4 types of slab earthquakes

Page 29: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

Three zones along

Cascadia

Page 30: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

Hexagons are earthquakes

below megathrust

Note a-d profile latitudes

Page 31: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

31

• Source Investigation and Comparison of the 1939, 1946, 1949 and 1965 Earthquakes, Cascadia Subduction

Zone, Western Washington Pure appl. geophys. 164 (2007) 1905–1919

Katy Wiest, Diane Doser, Aaron Velasco, & James Zollweg

31

Page 32: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

32

Puget Sound intermediate depth earthquakes

11/13/1939 5.8 63 S. Puget Sound02/15/1946 6.3 26 Puget Sound04/13/1949 7.1 55 Olympia04/29/1965 6.6 63 Sea-Tac07/03/1999 5.7 40 Satsop02/28/2001 6.8 55 Nisqually

Page 33: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

33

Detailed conclusions

Our results suggest that the 1946 earthquake is not an intraslab eventthe 1939 event closely resembles the 1965 eventthe 1949 event is similar to the 2001 Nisqually earthquakealthough the 1949 event appears to have ruptured toward the south, causing significantly more damage than the Nisqually event.

33

Page 34: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

34

Less seismogenesissouth of Puget Sound

young plate age

slower convergence rate

contributes to heating

the insulating effect of the Siletz terrane above the plate

contributes to heat

less stress concentration

slab contortions, perhaps tears, are visible under Puget Sound

34

Page 35: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

Four profiles

Note paucity of events east

of 124° W, except in top

profile

Page 36: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

1873 M7.3 earthquakeBrookings, ORNo reported aftershocks

Perhaps deep earthquake,Wong claims likely shallow

Plenty of lower plates earthquakes south of OR-CA border

Page 37: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

Analogs:Japan

MexicoNankai

a few M6.5-7 events,

mainly at bends

Page 38: 1 The Padang quake and Seattle implications - J. Vidale, UW.

38

Implications

The Padang M7.6 earthquake in the same setting is a reminder that such activity is not exceedingly rare.

Usually we think in terms of Gutenberg-Richter distributions of earthquakes, but intermediate-depth events may be different, thus odds are difficult to judge.

Current estimate is 85% chance of M6.5+ intraplate event, similar to Nisqually, in next 50 years.

38