1 TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06 Electron capture branching ratios for the nuclear matrix elements in...
-
Upload
herbert-chandler -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
2
Transcript of 1 TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06 Electron capture branching ratios for the nuclear matrix elements in...
1TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
Electron capture branching ratios for the nuclear matrix elements in double-beta decay
using TITAN
◆ Nuclear matrix elements in double-beta decay.◆ Present uncertainties◆ Measurement of electron-capture branching ratios.◆ A new method using TITAN
D. Frekers, J. Dilling, I. Tanihata
and TITANEC collaboration
2TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
Double Beta Decay
◆ Two-neutrino decay (2) This decay is allowed by the standard model and has been observe
d. Calculations of the nuclear matrix elements are the main issues to
understanding the decay rates.◆ Zero-neutrino decay (0)
This mode of decay is forbidden by the standard model. Requires the neutrino to be a Majorana particle with a mass. Recent observations of the neutrino oscillation suggest the non-zero
mass of the neutrino and thus this decay mode may exist. New generation experiments for detecting this mode of decay are in
progress. Majorana neutrino mass would be determined if this mode of decay
is observed and reliable estimation of the nuclear matrix elements are available.
3TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
Rate of a 2 decay
€
A Z →A (Z + 2)+ 2e− + 2ν e
€
Γ2ν = G2ν (Q,Z ) M DGT2ν 2
where G2ν (Q,Z ) = CGF
2cosΘc
⎡ ⎣ ⎢
⎤ ⎦ ⎥
4
F−2 f (Q)
Q: decay Q value
GF: Fermi coupling constant
Qc: Cabibbo angle
F-: Coulomb factor for - decay
f(Q): phase space factor
C: Relativistic correction
€
M DGT2ν 2
: Nuclear matrix element
[Allowed by the standard model]
4TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
Nuclear matrix element for 2 decays
€
M DGT2ν =
0gsf σ kτ k
−k∑ 1m
+ 1m+ σ kτ k
−k∑ 0gs
i
12Q + E(1m
+ ) − E0m∑
=M m (GT +)M m (GT − )
Emm∑
Gamow-Teller transitions to all available states.
Fermi-type transitions are negligible due to the isospin conservation.
AZ
A(Z+1)
A(Z+2)
.
.
....
2
1+1+
1+1+
0+ i
0+ f
5TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
Rate of 0 decay (Neutrinoless decay)
€
A Z →A (Z + 2)+ 2e−[Forbidden by the standard model]
€
Γ
€
Γ0ν = G0ν (Q,Z ) M DGT0ν −
gV
gAM DF
0ν2
mν e
Both Gamow-Teller and Fermi transitions are involved.
€
mν e is the effective Majorane neutrino mass
= Uei2 mi
i∑
Uei: mixing matrixmi: mass eigenvalues of neutrinos
6TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
Matrix elements of 0 decay
€
M DGT0ν = f σ lσ kτ l
−τ k−HGT (rlk ,Ea ) i
lk∑
M DF0ν = f τ l
−τ k−HF (rlk ,Ea ) i
lk∑
Rlk: proton neutron distance in the nucleus
Ea: energy parameter related to the excitation energy
7TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
Theoretical approaches to the matrix elements
◆ Weak-coupling shell model based on G-matrix nucleon-nucleon interactions W.C Haxton and G.J. Stephenson, Jr., Part. Nucl. Phys 12 (1984)
409. E. Caurier et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 1954. But not available for all double beta-decay candidates.
◆ Quasiparticle Random phase approximation (QRPA) J. A. Halbleib and R. A. Solensen, Nucl. Phys. A 98 (1967) 542. J. Suhonen, Phys. Lett. B 607 (2006) 87.
8TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
◆ One can test the precession of calculations by comparing calculations to measured two-neutrino decay rate. The operator involved in the 2 decay mode is the Gamow-Teller operator that connects the initial and final states via virtual transitions to J=1+ states in the intermediate nucleus, only.
◆ The neutrinoless mode, on the other hand connect to all states in the intermediate nucleus.
◆ For this reason, comparison in 2 is not a direct test of the precision of the 0 rate calculation, but can be taken as a necessary condition for the reliability of the calculation.
M. Bhattacharya et al., Phys. Rev. C 58 (1998) 1247.
9TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
Theoretical situation (QRPA)
◆ Both decay modes can be described with ONE parameter, gpp, that is the particle-particle coupling part of the proton-neutron two-body interaction.
◆ gpp is fixed by the experimental 2 decay half life (gpp~1)
◆ 0 decay is insensitive to gpp.
◆ So just trust us!!
gpp = 0.89 gpp = 0.96gpp = 1.00 gpp = 1.05
1+ 2+3+ 4+ 5+6+7+ 8+ 1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7-0-
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
-10.0
Decomposition of MGT
Only 1+ is sensitive to gpp
However…
10TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
The case of A=116
J. Suhonen, Phys. Lett. B 607 (2005) 87.
116Cd
Single state dominance
One can obtain the transition strength of MEC and M separately.
Exp. -
Exp. EC (direct mea.)
Exp. EC (3He,t)
M. Bhattacharya et al. Phys. Rev. C 58 (1998) 1247.
H. Akimune et al., Phys. Lett. B 394 (1997) 23.
11TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
Experimental data also show inconsistency
◆ Direct measurement of Electron capture (MEC=0.69) Extremely small branching compared with - decay. (~0.023%)
◆ Nucleon transfer reactions (MEC=0.18) Uncertainty between the proportionality of between B(GT) and the
(3He,t) charge exchange cross section.
12TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
Difficulty in electron capture branching ratio
◆ Measurement should be made by detecting Kx-rays after capture of electrons under the back ground of x-rays and rays associated with - decays.
◆ Neutron activation method,… Reaction with accelerated beam and tape transport system. Kx-rays after shake off by electrons. Bremsstrahlung from electrons. Beta delayed gamma emission. Impurity of decay sample.
13TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
A New Method at TITAN
◆ Observation of x-ray from decays of trapped ions. No material around the decaying nuclei. All electrons are swept away by the magnetic field. No impurity
14TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
ISAC Facility at TRIUMF
M. Bhattacharya et al., PRC 58 (1998)1247.
TITAN
15TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
TITAN Mass measurement mode
1
2
3
4
TITAN EC measurement mode
2
1
3
16TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
EBIT (Electron Beam Ion Trap)
◆ Use it without the electron gun.
(Penning trap mode)◆ 7 ports for X-ray detection
port for X-raydetector
trap center
E-gun(can be retracted)
distance from trap center [mm]-600 -400 -200 0 200 400
B[T]2
4
6
0
17TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
100Tc case as an example
◆ Optimization High detection effici
ency of 17.5 keV X-rays
Low efficiency for rays.
High rejection of e-
■ Detector thickness■ Be window thicknes
s■ Magnetic field stren
gth
0.01% branch
beta: 10000gamma: 44 500 700
For 1 EC
T1/2=15.8 s
18TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
Simulated spectra (100Tc)X-ray spectrum by a Si detector (2mm thick)
8x108 decays @0.002% branching ratio with -ray anticoincidence with 90% rejection rate.
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BBB
B
B
B
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
BB
BB
B
BB
B
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BBBB
B
B
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BBB
B
BBB
BB
B
B
B
B
B
BBB
B
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
BBB
B
BB
B
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
BBB
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BB
B
BB
B
B
B
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Detected energy [keV]
B Counts/0.5keV
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BB
B
BB
B
B
BB
B
BB
B
BBB
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
BBB
B
B
B
BBB
B
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BBBB
B
BBBBB
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
BB
BB
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
B
BB
B
BB
B
B
B
B
B
BB
B
BBB
BBB
B
BBB
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
BBB
B
B
B
B
BB
BBB
BB
B
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
BBB
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Detected energy [keV]
B Counts
Additional background for 1.5x108 decays.
19TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
Simulated spectra (100Tc)
BB
BBB
BB
BB
BBB
B
BB
B
BB
B
BB
BBB
BBBB
B
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
BBB
BBBBBB
BB
B
B
B
BBB
BB
B
BB
BBB
B
BBBBBBB
B
BB
BBBB
BB
B
B
BBBBB
B
BBBBBB
B
BBB
BBBB
B
BBBB
B
BBBBBBBBBB
BBBB
BB
BBBBB
BBBBBB
B
BBB
BBBBB
B
BBB
B
B
BB
BBB
BB
BBBBB
BB
BBBBB
BBB
B
BBBB
B
BB
B
BB
BBBB
B
BBBBBBB
BBB
BBB
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Detected energy [keV]
B Counts/0.5keV
X-ray spectrum by a Si detector (2mm thick)
8x107 decays @0.1% branching ratio and no -ray anti-coincidence rejection, or
8x108 decays @0.01% branching ratio with -ray anticoincidence with 90% rejection rate.
20TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06
Summary
◆ Radioactive beam facilities and ion traps provides a new possibility for a precise determination of an extremely small branching ratio of electron capture.
◆ It will give the best test ground for nuclear models of double beta decay. It thus provides information on the matrix elements of 0 decays.
◆ Please refer to the paper by D. Frekers, J. Dilling, and I. Tanihata submitted to publication for detailed discussion of other cases of double beta decays.
Thank you