1 S. Davis, April 2004 A Beta-Viscosity Model for the Evolving Solar Nebula Sanford S Davis Workshop...
-
Upload
gloria-horton -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of 1 S. Davis, April 2004 A Beta-Viscosity Model for the Evolving Solar Nebula Sanford S Davis Workshop...
1S. Davis, April 2004
A Beta-Viscosity Model for the
Evolving Solar Nebula
Sanford S Davis
Workshop on Modeling the Structure,Chemistry, and Appearance of Protoplanetary Disks
13-17 April, 2004Ringberg, Baveria, Germany
2S. Davis, April 2004
Outline of Talk
Review of the viscosity model
Global behavior of and turbulence models
Unsteady surface density model applied to a Solar Nebula
Condensation front migration in an early Solar Nebula
3S. Davis, April 2004
Hot Nebula (t ~ 102 yrs)
Cool Nebula (t ~ 106 yrs)
The Gaseous Nebula Evolves and Cools
4S. Davis, April 2004
Thin disk nebula model Keplerian rotation curve with r,t) to be determined from the evolution equation
T(r,t) found from energy equation
Generally coupled to one another in viscosity model
r
T
5S. Davis, April 2004
Turbulence Model Characteristics
is proportional to the product of a length and velocity scale (H,c) or (H,Uk)
H and r related: H ~ 5% r
c and Uk are problematic
c: random energy; Uk directed energy; turbulence velocity scale is in between
The factors and reflect choice of scales. model used since 1970s. model based on scaling of hydrodynamic sources of turbulence (Richard & Zahn 1999)
6S. Davis, April 2004
Why use a β model?
Exclude thermodynamics from the evolution equation (opacity model is not a factor)
Turbulence modeling is historically an incompressible hydrodynamic problem
Temperature follows from radiation transfer (energy equations)
As a vehicle for moving to multiphysics problems
Described in Davis (2003, ApJ)
7S. Davis, April 2004
The Basic Dynamic equation
Evolution depends on choice of kinematic viscosity
1/ 21/ 2( , ) 3 ( , )
( ) 0r t r t r
rt r r r
2 /cH c Conventional viscosity model:
1/ 2kU r GM r viscosity model
8S. Davis, April 2004
Comparison with Ruden-Lin (1986) Numerical Simulation
•Analytical formulas for surface density compared with numerical soln (coupled momentum, energy)•Central plane temperature is not smooth using both approaches
= 6.3 10-6
(r,t) T(r,t)
=.01
Match M0 andJ0 at t = 0
9S. Davis, April 2004
5 10 50 100 500radius, AU
10
100
1000
10000
ecafruS
ytisneD
,mgmc2
5 10 50 100 500radius, AU
40
20
0
20
40
laidaR
yticoleV
,mcces 104
107
104
107 r-1/2
r,t) Vradr,t)
Outflow
Inflow Stagnationradius
Viscosity Disk EvolutionM0 = .23 Msun, J0 = 5 Jsun
• Analytical formulas for surface density and radial accretion,• Independent of opacity
10S. Davis, April 2004
Global Mass Accretion Rates
M0=.111 Msun
J0= 49.8 Jsun
Data fromCalvet et al.(2000)Excess IR emissions fromClassical T Tauri stars (cTTS)
11S. Davis, April 2004
Viscosity Mass Accretion Rates
Ruden & Pollack (1991)=.01
1 / 4
0
1/ 3
0 0 0
0( ) (1 / )
( ) (1 3 / )
M t M t t
M t M M t M
Accretion startsat 1000 yrs
Heavy Disk
Light Disk
Analytical
ConventionalPower Law Model
12S. Davis, April 2004
What is an appropriate M0, J0, and ? How well can it predict the early evolution of our Solar System?
Procedure: Fit an analytical curve (tan-1) to the total mass vs r distribution. This is the monotonic cumulative mass distribution, M(r). Divide the incremental mass M = dM/dr r by the incremental area A = 2r r to obtain (r) for the ground-up planets
Application of the Evolution Equation
13S. Davis, April 2004
Application of the Evolution Equation
Convert current-day planetary masses to a smooth nebula of dust and gas
r, AU
Mass, Earth
masses
CumMass, Earth
masses
Gas/Dust Mass,
Earth masses
CumGas/Dust Mass,
Earth masses Mercury 0.3871 0.0553 0.0553 27 27. Venus 0.7233 0.815 0.8703 235 262. Earth 1 1 1.8702 320 582. Mars 1.5327 0.1074 1.9776 27 609. Jupiter 5.2028 317.894 319.87 12000 12609. Saturn 9.5388 95.185 415.05 6000 18609. Uranus 19.1914 14.537 429.59 2000 20609. Neptune 30.0611 17.132 446.72 2000 22609. Pluto 39.5294 0.0022 446.72 0.129 22609.
14S. Davis, April 2004
Nebula Surface Density total lifetime ~ 106-7 years
Note: slope ~ -1/2
15S. Davis, April 2004
Evolution of a Condensation Front
Recent work shows that radial drift across H2O condensation front at 5 AU may enhance water vapor content and contribute to Jupiter’s growth.
Sweep of condensation front across the nebula may help in solidifying moderately volatile species for subsequent planetary formation.
The viscosity formulation can be a useful tool in this interdisciplinary field
Use a quasi steady model with Mdot variable
Includes viscous heating and central star luminosity so that T = (Tv
4 + Tcs4 )1/4
16S. Davis, April 2004
Application of the Evolution Equation:Gas/Solid Sublimation Fronts
Rate of increase of a solid species (Water ice, Ammonia ice, Carbon Dioxide ice) is governed by the Hertz-Knudsen relation
pXgas is the partial pressure of species X at a given and T (from eqn)
pXvap is the vapor pressure of species X at a given T (from tables)
At equilibrium, pXgas = pX
vap, solve for eqTeq and the corresponding radius req.
gas vapX X
d Ice(X)=C (p -p )
dt
17S. Davis, April 2004
Phase Equilibrium Nomograph
XH2O = 10-4
18S. Davis, April 2004
Condensation Front Evolution
19S. Davis, April 2004
Conclusions
Characterization of the dynamic field is important forChemistry: outer region hot at early timesInter-radial transfer processes: space-time regime of inflow/outflow
The viscosity can be a useful tool in addressing multiphysics problems