1. reema harrison
-
Upload
vinhvd12 -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
110 -
download
2
Transcript of 1. reema harrison
Coping with medical error: the case of the health professional
Dr Reema Harrison1, Professor Rebecca Lawton2, Professor Gerry Armitage3, Dr Peter Gardner2, Dr Jo Shapiro4, Jessica Perlo5
1 University of Sydney, Australia2 University of Leeds, UK
3 University of Bradford, UK4 Brigham and Women’s Hospital, USA
5 Institute for Healthcare Improvement, USA
School of Public Health | Sydney Medical School
Patient harm from medical care
Adverse events: patient harm from medical care.
Medical errors cause over 50%1.
28% of errors from negligence.
Many unintentional mistakes.
1 Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG, Localio AR, Barnes B, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized
patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. New England journal of medicine 1991; 324(6): 377-384.
Psychological origins of error
Large proportion of errors have psychological
origins
e.g. attentional lapses in highly
routinized procedures
requiring close attention
Tendency to blame
Human tendency to blame others’ mistakes on their personal characteristics (ability, personality, attitudes).
Tendency stronger when the outcome of the mistake is more severe (i.e. greater patient harm).
Would most HP’s in the same situation make the same mistake – situation not person to blame?
Difficult to move away from blame even when we know ‘person-centred’ strategies reduce error rates.
Making an error
Error
Guilt
Shame
Depression
Anxiety
Lose confidence
Incompetent
Systematic
reviews2
demonstrate
consistent effects
of making a
medical error:
2Sirriyeh et al (2010); Seys et al (2012)
Gaps in Knowledge
Lack of large scale studies
Absence of control/comparison
group
Lack of cross-country data– small
scale studies
Limited data on coping strategies
health professionals use
Lack of knowledge about supporting
health professionals who
make errors
Present Study
Cross-sectional survey of
health professionals in
2 academic hospitals in the UK and USA.
WE INVESTIGATED:
• the professional or personal disruption that result from making an error;
• professionals’ emotional responses and the coping strategies they use;
• the relationship between the emotions they experience and the coping strategy that is used;
• perceptions of organisational support.
Sample & settings
› UK: 1 large teaching hospital Trust in northern England
› USA: 1 large academic hospital in Boston, MA
› Doctors and nurses at level of seniority in any department/ward
› Recruitment via:
• Organisational newsletters
• E-mail distribution lists
• Organisational intranet
• Paper copies in training sessions/wards.
Method
Survey tool created and validated in
the UK
Ethics approval obtained
each hospital.
Study invitations &
survey distributed
265 respondents: 120 doctors; 145 nurses
Data analysis - SPSS & framework analysis
HPEEQ Survey Tool
5 components:
• Demographic information
• Error characteristics – severity, time since
• Emotional responses (PANAS)
• Coping strategies (FDCS)
• Free text items - org. support
Findings
Professional and personal disruption prevalent - negative
emotions common
Positive feelings of determination, attentiveness and alertness.
Emotional response and coping strategy selection did not differ between countries or level of pt
harm
Nurses in both locations reported stronger negative feelings.
Findings cont.
Problem-focused coping strategies favoured.
Associations between coping strategy used and particular
emotional responses.
Peers were most valued support.
Fears over confidentiality prohibit staff from accessing formal org.
support.
What does this mean for nurses?
› Making a medical error = detrimental to health professionals’ well-being
& safe patient care.
› Nurses particularly vulnerable - greater exposure to punitive action -
may require additional support.
› Building psychological resilience - an individual's ability to adapt to
stress and adversity; to be positive, optimistic & to learn from mistakes.
› Not everyone is equally resilient – importance of being part of a team/
being able to access social support.
› Peers support - promote psychological resilience & protect patients.