1 PLAGIARISM The OIA’s experience Ruth Deech & Michael Reddy.
-
Upload
buck-bailey -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
1
Transcript of 1 PLAGIARISM The OIA’s experience Ruth Deech & Michael Reddy.
11
PLAGIARISMPLAGIARISM
The OIA’s experienceThe OIA’s experience
Ruth Deech & Michael ReddyRuth Deech & Michael Reddy
55
Complaints about plagiarism & Complaints about plagiarism & disciplinary offencesdisciplinary offences
Over 100 cases since April 2004Over 100 cases since April 2004
About one third involve plagiarismAbout one third involve plagiarism
1313
The plagiarism caseThe plagiarism case
Student was withdrawn from course after Student was withdrawn from course after being accused of plagiarismbeing accused of plagiarism
He alleged it was scientific collaboration He alleged it was scientific collaboration and he had misunderstood the permitted and he had misunderstood the permitted amountamount
He alleged the penalty was too harshHe alleged the penalty was too harsh
1414
Plagiarism decisionPlagiarism decision
Students had been specifically warned Students had been specifically warned against plagiarism but he had not read the against plagiarism but he had not read the HandbookHandbook
Student had not raised queries with his Student had not raised queries with his professorprofessor
There was no evidence of collaborationThere was no evidence of collaboration The penalty was within the university’s The penalty was within the university’s
guidelinesguidelines Complaint not justifiedComplaint not justified
1515
OIA & PlagiarismOIA & Plagiarism
Impact of plagiarism and determination are Impact of plagiarism and determination are issues of academic judgmentissues of academic judgment
Has the university applied its regulations Has the university applied its regulations and followed its procedures?and followed its procedures?
Is the decision by the university Is the decision by the university reasonable in all the circumstances?reasonable in all the circumstances?
1616
What is academic judgement?What is academic judgement?
““A decision about scholarship that only a suitably A decision about scholarship that only a suitably experienced academic can make” experienced academic can make”
So decisions about whether plagiarism has So decisions about whether plagiarism has occurred and the assessment of plagiarised occurred and the assessment of plagiarised
work are matters of academic judgementwork are matters of academic judgement
But the OIA But the OIA willwill look at questions about fairness look at questions about fairness and procedural irregularityand procedural irregularity
1717
Academic offencesAcademic offences
OIA will look at complaints about the university’s OIA will look at complaints about the university’s academic offences proceduresacademic offences procedures
Have they been followed properly, no material Have they been followed properly, no material breaches?breaches?
The more severe the punishment, the more The more severe the punishment, the more closely the procedures will be checkedclosely the procedures will be checked
Have they been applied fairly, not arbitrarily?Have they been applied fairly, not arbitrarily? Do procedures comply with natural justice, Do procedures comply with natural justice,
human rights and general consideration of human rights and general consideration of equity?equity?
1818
The forgery caseThe forgery case
Student is achieving well in the third year Student is achieving well in the third year of his medical courseof his medical course
The university discovers that he entered The university discovers that he entered with a forged degree certificate showing with a forged degree certificate showing better results than in truth he had achievedbetter results than in truth he had achieved
Following procedures, he is expelled Following procedures, he is expelled immediatelyimmediately
He claims mitigating circumstances, that He claims mitigating circumstances, that the forgery was by his motherthe forgery was by his mother
1919
Forgery decisionForgery decision
The procedures were properly followedThe procedures were properly followed The offence was serious enough to merit The offence was serious enough to merit
instant expulsioninstant expulsion Another student with better marks might Another student with better marks might
have taken the place; honesty is have taken the place; honesty is paramount for doctorsparamount for doctors
The mitigating circumstances were rightly The mitigating circumstances were rightly judged by the university to make no judged by the university to make no differencedifference
2020
Fairness and penaltiesFairness and penalties
Provision for mitigating circumstancesProvision for mitigating circumstances Inconsistent application of penaltiesInconsistent application of penalties Reasons must be given by the universityReasons must be given by the university There must be provision for an appealThere must be provision for an appeal
2121
Mitigating circumstancesMitigating circumstances
OIA unlikely to interfere if they have been OIA unlikely to interfere if they have been properly consideredproperly considered
Special care needs to be taken over Special care needs to be taken over disability, mental health, misrepresentation disability, mental health, misrepresentation by university official, failure to explain by university official, failure to explain plagiarism to students, foreign students’ plagiarism to students, foreign students’ cultural issuescultural issues
Bereavement, health, stress, financial Bereavement, health, stress, financial problems, computer failure very common!problems, computer failure very common!
2222
Mitigating circumstancesMitigating circumstances
Are any mitigating circumstances acceptable in Are any mitigating circumstances acceptable in deciding (a) whether the student has committed deciding (a) whether the student has committed the offence (b) the penalty?the offence (b) the penalty?
Poor health?Poor health? Mental health?Mental health? Death of a relative?Death of a relative? Computer mishaps?Computer mishaps? Financial difficulties?Financial difficulties? Time pressures?Time pressures? Cultural issues?Cultural issues?
2323
Procedural issuesProcedural issues
Natural justice – no bias, charge to be Natural justice – no bias, charge to be known, both sides to be heardknown, both sides to be heard
Bias is not prejudice, it is objectiveBias is not prejudice, it is objective No financial conflictsNo financial conflicts No interested parties with previous No interested parties with previous
involvementinvolvement Parity of representationParity of representation Panel’s legal advice available to both Panel’s legal advice available to both
sidessides
2424
Principles of fairnessPrinciples of fairness
University must give adequate notice of University must give adequate notice of allegationallegation
Adequate hearing of both sidesAdequate hearing of both sides Appeal body must be and appear to be Appeal body must be and appear to be
unbiasedunbiased Procedures should not be unreasonably Procedures should not be unreasonably
delayeddelayed Reasons for the decision necessaryReasons for the decision necessary
2525
Was the university’s decision fair?Was the university’s decision fair?
• Did the disciplinary panel consider the appropriate evidence?Did the disciplinary panel consider the appropriate evidence?
• What burden of proof is applicable?What burden of proof is applicable?
• Did the university observe natural justice?Did the university observe natural justice?
• Were the grounds of appeal reasonable?Were the grounds of appeal reasonable?
• Did the university properly consider Did the university properly consider mitigating circumstances?mitigating circumstances?
• Was the penalty proportionate to the offence?Was the penalty proportionate to the offence?
• Was the penalty consistent with other cases?Was the penalty consistent with other cases?
2626
Relevance of other factors? Relevance of other factors?
Extent of plagiarism?Extent of plagiarism? Student “lulled to sleep” by inaction of universityStudent “lulled to sleep” by inaction of university Poor academic practices, such as failure to explain Poor academic practices, such as failure to explain
what plagiarism is and/or the consequenceswhat plagiarism is and/or the consequences First year or final year?First year or final year? First offence?First offence? Deliberate, reckless, negligent or innocent?Deliberate, reckless, negligent or innocent? Consequences of punishment?Consequences of punishment?
2727
OIA remediesOIA remedies
Reconsider the complaintReconsider the complaint Hold a new hearingHold a new hearing Change the penaltyChange the penalty Offer an apologyOffer an apology Expunge charge from the recordExpunge charge from the record Allow resubmissionAllow resubmission Pay compensationPay compensation Reform university proceduresReform university procedures
2828
Learning from complaints about Learning from complaints about disciplinary mattersdisciplinary matters
MonitorMonitor – should have a reliable system of tracking complaints, – should have a reliable system of tracking complaints, including time taken for each stage and equal opportunities info. including time taken for each stage and equal opportunities info. (QAA)(QAA)
Review and evaluateReview and evaluate – effectiveness of procedures, adequacy – effectiveness of procedures, adequacy of guidance & support, training of staff, deal with common of guidance & support, training of staff, deal with common causes causes (QAA)(QAA)
ReportReport regularly to governing body about complaints regularly to governing body about complaints(QAA)(QAA)
Seek feedbackSeek feedback from students from students (BS ISO)(BS ISO)
PublishPublish information about complaints information about complaints (OIA)(OIA)
2929
New issuesNew issues
Are we looking after our overseas Are we looking after our overseas students?students?
Language difficulties and cultural Language difficulties and cultural backgroundbackground
Relevance of mitigating circumstances Relevance of mitigating circumstances and their proofand their proof
Previous similar casesPrevious similar cases