1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant...

13
1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R.12-06-013 Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B. Mandelman Customer Energy Solutions Research and Evaluation Pacific Gas & Electric Co. “TVP Load and Bill Impacts, Role of Technology, and Operational Considerations” 1:00 – 2:45pm July 30, 2014

Transcript of 1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant...

Page 1: 1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R.12-06-013 Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.

1

PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP RatesBest Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant PricingR.12-06-013 Residential Rate Workshop

Gregory B. MandelmanCustomer Energy SolutionsResearch and EvaluationPacific Gas & Electric Co.

“TVP Load and Bill Impacts, Role of Technology, and Operational Considerations”

1:00 – 2:45pmJuly 30, 2014

Page 2: 1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R.12-06-013 Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.

2

PG&E Has Multiple Years of Experience Operating Opt-In Residential TVP Rates

• SmartRate™ (Opt-In CPP) has grown from 8,800 customers at the end of 2008 to 130,000 today

• Average annual aggregate load impacts increased from 3.5 MW to 44 MW between 2008 and 2013 due to targeted marketing

• Load impacts are persistent year-over-year and within a given season when weather and customer mix are taken into account

• Between 2012 to 2014, enrollments grew by 110,000 customers by leveraging lessons learned on SmartRate targeted direct mail marketing techniques

• On average, SmartRate customers save up to $73 (CARE) and $75 (Non-CARE) on their summer bill, compared to the standard tiered rate

• PG&E’s Opt-In TOU Rates have grown to about 112,000 customers*• Most recent load impact conducted for Schedules E-6 and E-7 include 59,000 non-NEM customers

• Average annual aggregate load impacts ranged between 5.8 MW to 7 MW between 2012 and 2013

• Enrollments, peaking at 130,000 customers in 1995 for E-7, have been largely driven by rate design, low pre-AMI meter charges and rate availability

• Net Energy Metering participation, evaluation methods and changing enrollment options complicate research on PG&E’s opt-in TOU rates

• On average, E-6 and E-7 customers save up to $236 on their annual bill compared to the standard tiered rate

* PG&E has three residential TOU rates that are open to new enrollments: E-6, EV-A and EV-B. E-6 is a tiered TOU rate, with 80% solar participation. EV-A and EV-B are electric vehicle rates.There are three TOU rates that are closed to new enrollments: E-7, E-9A and E-9B. E-7 is a tiered TOU rate, with 20% solar participation. E-9A and E-9B are electric vehicle rates.

Page 3: 1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R.12-06-013 Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.

3

2013 SmartRate Research Insights – Part 1

1. Performance by Climate and Geography: Temperature Matters

• Average customer load impacts were 21%• Reductions across the PG&E service territory ranged from

15% in coolest area up to 28% in the hotter regions

2. SmartRate + SmartAC = Nearly Twice the Load Impacts

• On average, dually enrolled customers provide a 29% drop in demand

• This is almost twice as much load reduction as SmartRate-only customers, who reduce by 16%

3. Low-Income Customers: Perform Better with Direct Load Control

• CARE customers enrolled in both SmartRate + SmartAC provide roughly the same percentage load reductions, 27%, as dually enrolled non-CARE customers, 29%

• SmartRate-only CARE customers provide an average of 7% load reduction, compared to a 19% reduction for SmartRate-only Non-CARE customers

PG&E Service Area = 70,000 sq. miles

Residential Population = 4.6 million

Baseline Territories = 10

Page 4: 1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R.12-06-013 Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.

4

4. Targeting Marketing: Enrolling High Performing Customers in the Bay Area• Overall targeting focuses on those with greatest load to shed (hot areas) and high propensity to enroll• Carefully target marketing within hotter micro climates of the Bay Area increased average per

customer load reduction between 2012 and 2013• SmartRate-only customers increased by roughly 80%, from 0.10 kW in 2012 to 0.18 kW in 2013• SmartRate + SmartAC customers increased reductions by 75%, from 0.28 kW to 0.49 kW

between 2012 and 2013

5. Structural Winners: More Likely to Enroll and Perform Well • Structural winners who are told that they will do well on SmartRate are more likely to enroll compared

to winners that are not told (5% enrollment vs. 4%)• Importantly, their percentage load reductions are right in line with average SmartRate customers

(21%)

6. Event Day Notification: Greater Engagement Leads to Better Impacts• SmartRate-only customers who receive four successful notifications provide 31% reductions,

compared to 4% for those who do not sign-up for any form of notification• Dually enrolled customers who were successfully notified four times generated 37% reduction, verses

19% for dually enrolled participants who received no notifications

2013 SmartRate Research Insights – Part 2

Page 5: 1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R.12-06-013 Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.

5

Questions

Greg [email protected]

415-973-4778

Page 6: 1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R.12-06-013 Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.

6

1. “2009 Load Impact Evaluation for Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s Residential SmartRate-Peak Day Pricing and TOU Tariffs and SmartAC Program: Volume 1: Ex Post Load Impacts”

• Freeman, Sullivan & Company, April 1, 2010, R.13-09-011• https://www.pge.com/regulation/DemandResponseOIR/Other-Docs/PGE/2010/DemandResponseOIR_Other-Doc_PGE_20100401-01.zip• https://www.pge.com/regulation/DemandResponseOIR/Other-Docs/PGE/2010/DemandResponseOIR_Other-Doc_PGE_20100401-02.zip

2. “2010 Load Impact Evaluation of Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s Time-Based Pricing Tariffs”• Freeman, Sullivan & Company, April 1, 2011, R.13-09-011• https://www.pge.com/regulation/DemandResponseOIR/Other-Docs/PGE/2011/DemandResponseOIR_Other-Doc_PGE_20110401_208487.zip

3. “2011 Ex Post Load Impact Evaluation of Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s Residential Time-based Pricing”• Freeman, Sullivan & Company, March 29, 2012, R.13-09-011• https://www.pge.com/regulation/DemandResponseOIR/Other-Docs/PGE/2012/DemandResponseOIR_Other-Doc_PGE_20120601_239253.zip

4. “2012 Load Impact Evaluation of Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s Residential Time-based Pricing Programs”• Freeman, Sullivan & Company, April 1, 2013, R.13-09-011• https://www.pge.com/regulation/DemandResponseOIR/Other-Docs/PGE/2013/DemandResponseOIR_Other-Doc_PGE_20130402_269622.zip

5. “2013 Load Impact Evaluation of Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s Residential Time-based Pricing Programs”• Nexant, April, 1, 2014, R.13-09-011• https://www.pge.com/regulation/DemandResponseOIR-2013/Pleadings/PGE/2014/DemandResponseOIR-2013_Plea_PGE_20140401_300478.zip

6. “Report on SmartRate™ and TOU Tariffs,” PG&E Rate Design Window 2012, Appendix A, Volume 1, Report in Compliance with D.11-11-003 OP 3

• PG&E, February 29, 2012, A.12-02-020• https://www.pge.com/regulation/RateDesignWindow2012/Testimony/PGE/2012/RateDesignWindow2012_Test_PGE_20120229_230078.pdf

References

Page 7: 1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R.12-06-013 Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.

7

Appendix

Page 8: 1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R.12-06-013 Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.

8

PG&E’s Residential TOU RatesE-7 and E-7

E-7Opened: 1986Closed: 2008Summer Periods: 2Summer Peak: 12pm – 6pm Rev. Neutral: No

E-6Opened: 2006Closed: NoSummer Periods: 3Summer Peak: 1pm – 7pmRev. Neutral: Yes

Page 9: 1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R.12-06-013 Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.

9

PG&E’s Residential CPP RatesSmartRate™

SmartRate™Opened: 2008Closed: NoPeak Period: 2pm – 7pm Peak Adder: ¢60/kWhRev. Neutral: No

Page 10: 1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R.12-06-013 Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.

10

Load Impact Persistence? Yes.Year-Over-Year: SmartRate impacts are steady and driven by temperature and customer mix

Between 2008 and 2011, impact track

very close to reduce event

season temperature

During 2012 and 2013, PG&E began

actively target marketing to high

performing customers, which led to increased percentage load

reductions despite cooler

temperatures

Page 11: 1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R.12-06-013 Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.

11

Load Impact Persistence? Yes.Within Season: SmartRate impacts remain steady when called back-to-back over three days

Decline associated

with a significant 7

degree reduction in temperature between the

last two event days

Page 12: 1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R.12-06-013 Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.

12

SmartRate: Snap Back? Not Really.All SmartRate Customers exhibit minimal Snap Back

Local Capacity Area All Event Start 2 PMDate Average Event Day Event End 7 PM

Result Type Aggregate Average Temp. for Event Window 90

Group Both Mean17 77

Enrolled Customers 118,144 Load Reduction for Event Window 44.21

% Load Reduction for Event Window 21%

12131415161718192021222324

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324

Te

mp

era

ture

(�F

)

(MW

)

Hour Ending

Avg. Temp Load w/o DR Load w/ DR

Page 13: 1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R.12-06-013 Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.

13

Greater Bay AreaN = 52,034% LI = 22% kW LI = 0.27 kW

HumboldtN = 1,128% LI = 15%kW LI = 0.25 kW

SierraN = 9,718% LI = 28%MW LI = 0.68 kW

StocktonN = 9,264% LI = 20%kW LI = 0.49 kW

KernN = 8,701% LI = 16%kW LI = 0.42 kW

North CoastN = 5,248% LI = 19%kW LI = 0.22 kW

Greater FresnoN = 9,582% LI = 20% kW LI = 0.56 kWOther*

N = 22,470% LI = 21%kW LI = 0.40 kW

How Do Different Groups Perform? Look here.Six Years of Data: Explores load impacts, bill impacts, low-income, climate, technology, structural winners