1 Performance Planning and Commitment Performance Monitoring and Coaching Performance Review and...
52
1 Performance Management System (PMS) Cycle Performance Planning and Commitment Performance Monitoring and Coaching Performance Review and Evaluation
-
Upload
garey-mckinney -
Category
Documents
-
view
227 -
download
4
Transcript of 1 Performance Planning and Commitment Performance Monitoring and Coaching Performance Review and...
- Slide 1
- 1 Performance Planning and Commitment Performance Monitoring and Coaching Performance Review and Evaluation
- Slide 2
- 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- ConsolidateConsolidate ReviewReview ValidateValidate EvaluateEvaluate
- Slide 7
- Determines Final Rating CalibratesRecommends Results of the Assessment OPCR
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Sample SPMS RATING SCALE for Efficiency N umerical AdjectivalDescription 5Outstanding 130% & above of the targeted quantity acted 4 Very Satisfactory 115% to 129.99% of the targeted quantity acted 3Satisfactory 100% to 114.99% of the targeted quantity acted 2Unsatisfactory 51% to 99.99% of the targeted quantity acted 1Poor 50% & Below of the targeted quantity acted
- Slide 25
- Sample SPMS RATING SCALE for Timeliness NumericalAdjectivalDescription 5Outstanding Task completed ahead of the planned time by 30% 4 Very Satisfactory Task completed ahead of the planned time by 15% to 29.99% 3Satisfactory Task completed on deadline or planned time or earlier but not more than 14.99% of the planned time. 2Unsatisfactory Task completed after the deadline or planned time by 51% to 99.99% 1Poor Task not completed fater the deadline or planned time by 50.99% or more
- Slide 26
- How to compute the final rating of the office/individual performances? Example: If the agency adopts the following weight allocation: Strategic Priorities 45% Core Functions 45% Support Functions 10%
- Slide 27
- Sample Computation 45% Strategic Priorities (Roadmap & PGS), 45% Core Functions, and 10% Support Functions CategoryMFORating SP4 1+1+1+2 = 5/4 = 1.25 x 45% =.56 Core Function 2 1 + 3 = 4/2 = 2 x 45% =.9 Support Function 1 4 x 10% =.4 Total/Final Overall Rating.56 +.9 +.4 = 1.86 Final Average Rating N/A Adjectival Rating Unsatisfactory
- Slide 28
- 28 Performance Rewarding and Development Planning Performance Planning and Commitment Performance Monitoring and Coaching Performance Review and Evaluation
- Slide 29
- 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- 38
- Slide 39
- 39
- Slide 40
- 40
- Slide 41
- 41
- Slide 42
- 42
- Slide 43
- 43
- Slide 44
- 44
- Slide 45
- 45
- Slide 46
- 46
- Slide 47
- 47
- Slide 48
- 48
- Slide 49
- 49
- Slide 50
- 50
- Slide 51
- 51
- Slide 52
- 52