1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 12 Illusions.

13
1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 12 Illusions

Transcript of 1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 12 Illusions.

Page 1: 1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 12 Illusions.

1

Perception and VR

MONT 104S, Fall 2008Lecture 12Illusions

Page 2: 1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 12 Illusions.

2

Visual Illusions

Visual illusions are cases where the perception of an object or drawing is not consistent with its physical reality.

Illusions can give us some insight into how the brain processes image information and what assumptions the brain makes to determine the 3D scene from a 2D image.

Gregory describes 4 categories of illusion:• Ambiguities• Distortions• Paradoxes• Fictions

Page 3: 1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 12 Illusions.

3

Ambiguous Figures

Ambiguous figures can be seen in one of two ways.Often the perception will flip back and forth between the two interpretations.

Example: The Necker Cube

Page 4: 1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 12 Illusions.

4

Who do you see?

Page 5: 1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 12 Illusions.

5

What is this?

With ambiguous figures, we see one interpretation or the other, but not both at the same time.

This probably helps us see the world unambiguously.

Page 6: 1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 12 Illusions.

6

Distortions

In some illusions, what we see appears to be a distortion of the actual image.

There is some controversy as to the cause of these illusions. Explanations include:

• "Bottom up": The distortion arises because of the way the brain processes the image information to determine basic features such as edges, orientation, motion, etc.• "Top down": The distortion occurs because the brain uses knowledge about the world (e.g. faces are convex) to interpret the image.

Page 7: 1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 12 Illusions.

7

Orientation Illusions

The Zollner Illusion The Poggendorf IllusionBottom up explanation:•Orientations that are close to one another tend to repel each other.•This is thought to be caused by "lateral inhibition" by neurons processing similar orientations.•This makes acute angles appear wider than they are.• It is uncertain exactly what causes these illusions.

Page 8: 1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 12 Illusions.

8

Perspective Distortions

Perspective distortions are caused by an adjustment of size according to our estimation of depth.

The Muller-Lyer illusionThe Ponzo illusion

Which line appears longer?

Page 9: 1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 12 Illusions.

9

Size Constancy and Emmert's Law

Our perception of size relates to the perceived distance to an object.

Emmert's Law states that the perceived size of a constant retinal image is proportional to its perceived distance.

Perspective cues can give us a sense of perceived distance, that then causes the brain to interpret the size of images based on this distance.

Page 10: 1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 12 Illusions.

10

Relative Size

Our estimate of size is dependent on the context of the surrounding features.

This relates to one possible explanation of the moon illusion.

The Ebbinghaus illusion

Page 11: 1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 12 Illusions.

11

Paradoxes

We tend to see surfaces that are touching as being at the same depth.

The Impossible Triangle

Also recall the impossible trident and M.C. Escher paintings from the last lecture.

Page 12: 1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 12 Illusions.

12

FictionsThe brain fills in gaps according to the context around them.

The Kanisza Triangle

The illusory contours forming the triangle do not exist.

Page 13: 1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 12 Illusions.

13

Discussion topicThe existence of visual illusions shows us that what we see is not always a true representation of physical reality.

The brain misinterprets orientations, assumes configurations and creates features that are not present in the image.

Gregory makes the provocative statement that: "perceptions are not essentially different from hallucinations."

Do you agree with this statement?If you agree, how can we determine what is "real"?If you do not agree, why not? How does this affect your sense of yourself?