1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications...

43
1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer

Transcript of 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications...

Page 1: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

1 of 42

Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level

By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer

Page 2: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

2 of 42

EMI – RFI

EMI – Electromagnetic Interference

RFI – Radio frequency Interference

Why are EMI and RFI a concern?

• RF Spectrum pollution

• Compatibility within circuits

• System disturbance or malfunction

• Damage and liability

• Regulation conformance

EMI/RFI Unintended Radiators and Receptors

Page 3: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

3 of 42

EMI or RFI?

Both are sources of radio frequency (RF) disturbance

• EMI – electromagnetic interference

– Often a broadband RF source

• RFI – radio frequency interference

– Often a narrowband RF source

• Terms are often used interchangeably

Page 4: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

4 of 42

Fields – EMI can propagate by one or more types

• Electric Field (E) – Force created by uneven charge distribution

• Magnetic Induction Field (H) – Force created by moving charges

• Electromagnetic Field – Created whenever charges are accelerated

Source http://www.w8ji.com/radiation_and_fields.htm

i.e. DC Current in a Wire

i.e. AC Current in a Wire

i.e. Capacitive Coupling

Fields fall of rapidly with distance proportional to 1/d

Page 5: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

5 of 42

The necessary elements for EMI

Coupling medium

Source of electromagnetic energy

1

0

+

_

Receptor of

ElectromagneticEnergy

1

2

3

Page 6: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

6 of 42

Source of Electromagnetic Energy

RF generating sources

Intentional radiators

• cell phones

• transmitters & transceivers

• wireless routers, peripherals

Unintentional radiators

• System clocks & oscillators

• Processors & logic circuits

• Switching power supplies

• Switching amplifiers (class

D)

• Electromechanical devices

• Electrical power line services

Electromagnetic waverepresentation

E

H

t

f = 1/ t (per cycle)

Page 7: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

7 of 42

How radio frequency energy comes about in circuitry

22 )Im(fRe(f)X(f)

T

Time (s)

0 25n 50n 75n 100n

Vol

tage

(V

)

0

250m

500m

750m

1

20ns pulseT

Frequency (Hz)

0 50M 100M 150M 200M 250M

Am

plitu

de [V

/Hz]

0

5n

10n

15n

20n

sin xx

1/T0 2/T0 3/T0 4/T0

T0

Complex frequency domain in Polar form

Edge rates of logic signals produce range of RF frequencies

Page 8: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

8 of 42

It’s all about edge rates

A rule of thumb fordigital signals andtransients

f = 10MHzsquare wave

1

max )( risetf

T

Frequency (Hz)

0 10M 20M 30M 40M 50M 60M 70M 80M 90M 100M

Am

pli

tud

e [V

/Hz]

0

100n

200n

300n

400n

500n

31.8MHz

10ns edge rise and fall times

a

T

Frequency (Hz)

0 10M 20M 30M 40M 50M 60M 70M 80M 90M 100M

Am

pli

tud

e [V

/Hz]

0

100n

200n

300n

400n

500n

1ns edge riseand fall times

Harmonics →significant to≈ 300MHz

10MHz Square Wave Spectrums

fmax = frequency extent of harmonics

Page 9: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

9 of 42

Coupling Medium: Conducted Emissions

+

VG1

-

+ +

OP1 !OPAMPN1

N2

M1

C1 2p

R1 10k

R2 10k

V1 5

C2 10n

VF1

+

VG2+

VG3

+

VG4

Connection wirePCB traceInterconnect cableSignal

Switching supply EMI100kHz - 1MHz

EMI sourceelectrostaticcoupling

EMI sourcemagneticcoupling

Conductor

Medium

Page 10: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

10 of 42

Coupling Medium: Radiated Emissions

+

VG1

-

+ +

OP1 !OPAMP

R1 10k

R2 10k

V1 5

C2 10n

VF1

+

VRF

Connection wirePCB traceInterconnect cable

Signal

Electromagnetic Radiation

Receptor Antenna

SourceAntenna

Surrounding Medium

l proportional to 1/fAntenna element coupling optimal at multiples of 1/4l

Page 11: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

11 of 42

Analog receptors: electromagnetic energy

Op-ampsLow-speed: offset shift, RF noiseHigh-speed: linear and non-linear

amplification

ConvertersEMI aliased into passband

offset shift

Regulatorsoffset shift in output voltage

Page 12: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

12 of 42

Conducted EMI and its effect on an op-amp’s voltage offset

TLE2071 input voltage offset shift vs. conducted RFI frequency

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1 10 100 1000

frequency (MHz)

inp

ut

Vo

s (

mV

) d

elt

a

-20 dBm

-10 dBm

0 dBm

TLE2071GBW = 10MHzAv = +1000V/V

Tested with RF Generator – Direct injection into Op Amp inputs

0.224Vrms

0.071Vrms

0.022Vrms

Page 13: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

13 of 42

Radiated RFI and its effect on an ECG simulator

ECG Full Scale 1Vp-p 0.5V/div

Transmitterkeyed 6 sec.

+2.5V offset normal

+4.0V offset RF present

1.5VDue to RFI

Single SupplyCMOSINA326

OPA335(s)

Fly wire Proto board

(Vin ≈ 1mVp-p G = 2500V/V)

Transmitter470MHzPout 0.5W

d ≈1.5 ft (46cm)Significant DC Offset

when RF present

RF noiseOn ECG

EMI slideInformation

by John Brown

0.5W UHF Transceiver keyed with antenna 1.5 feet away

Page 14: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

14 of 42

Electric-Field Strength, Power Density

EMI - electric-field strength units Communications - power density units

Isotropic sources

Pd = Pt / 4π∙r2 (W/m2 or mW/cm2)E (V/m) = 61.4 [P(mW) / cm2 ]1/2

For free space Z =377Ω

100V/m = 2.65mW/cm² 10mW/cm² = 194V/m

10V/m = 26uW/cm² 1mW/cm² = 61V/m

1V/m = 0.26uW/cm² 0.1mW/cm² =1.9V/m

Page 15: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

15 of 42

Emission Source Limits

Freq (MHz) Class A dBuV

Class B dBuV

0.45 - 1.6 60 48

1.6 - 30 69.5 48

Conducted Emissions - 10kHz to 30MHz Radiated Emissions - 30MHz to 1GHzmeasurement distance 10m

Freq (MHz) Class A dBuV/m Class B dBuV/m

30 - 80 39 29.5

88 - 216 43.5 33

216 - 960 46.4 35.6

960 - 1000 49.5 43.5Sources: SynQor app. note 00-08-02 Rev. 04 & www.cclab.com/engnotes/eng290.htm

FCC Regulates USA, CISPRA regulates Europe

FCC Class A – Commercial, Industrial, BusinessFCC Class B – Residential Environment (close to TV, Radio Receivers)

Page 16: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

16 of 42

Typical RF field levels

0.1 1.0 10 100 1000 log V/m

Military

Industrial

Commercial

Medical

AutomotiveEMI electric field strength

Unprotectedsensitive analog circuits

Less sensitive analog circuits

Digital circuitsCircuit Sensitivity

Page 17: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

17 of 42

Differential and Common-mode EMI

-

+

-

+

VDM

emi

VCM

emi

VCM

emi

Differential-mode EMI produces a voltage difference between the inputs

Common-mode EMI produces the same voltage on each input with respect to ground

IDM

IDM

ICM/2

ICM/2

ICM

Differential-modeEMI dominates

f < 1MHzOften results

through conduction

Common-modeEMI dominates

f > 1MHzOften originates

as radiation

Common-mode interference is most frequently encountered

Page 18: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

18 of 42

Taming the EMI environment

• Minimize EMI radiation at source

• Minimize coupling medium’s effectiveness

• Minimize receptor susceptibility to EMI

Page 19: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

19 of 42

An AC line filter for conducted EMI

RD

M 1

00

-

+ VM3

+

VS

C4 5n

C3 5n

R1 1

M

C2 1

00n

L2 600u

L1 600u

C1 1

00n

L1L 5u

L2L 5u

RCM 1k

RCM 1k

+VCM

+

VCM

L

S

G

50/60HZ AC Line Filter Load

Common-mode inductor

Mode 150kHz 500kHz 1MHz 5MHz 10MHz 20MHz 30MHz

Common 6 20 28 42 45 45 48 dB

Differential 10 13 30 50 50 40 40 dB

Attenuation characteristics for AC line filter (SAE GA1B-10)

Page 20: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

20 of 42

The common-mode transformer

Differential Mode Flux Cancellation Low Impedance from mismatch windingsCommon Mode Flux Addition Full Impedance of both windings

Page 21: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

21 of 42

An AC line filter for conducted EMI

Common mode inductor Torroid coil for DM inductor

Examples from CWS - Coil Winding Services

+

VCM

1/2 L1L 2.5u

C3+C4 10n -

+ VM1

RCM/2 500

L1 600u

Common mode model+

VDM

2x L1L 10u

1/2 C3 2.5n

-

+ VM1

C1 100n C2 100n

RDM 100

2x RCM 2k

LDM 0

Differential mode modelDM inductor(per design)

CM Filter uses 2 windings in phase + CM Cap + CM ResDiff Filter uses CM leakage Inductance + Diff Caps + Diff Res

Page 22: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

22 of 42

Input RC filtering as applied to an instrumentation amplifier

Differential Mode

f-3dB = [2π(RA+ RB)(CA+ CB/2)]-1

let RB = RA and CC = CB

f-3dB = 343Hz

Common Mode

f-3dB = [2π∙RA∙ CB)]-1

let RB = RA and CC = CB

f-3dB = 7.2kHz

++

-R1

R1

R2

U1 INA326

R3 400k

V1 5

C4

100n R5 400k

Vo

R4 400k

CB 4.7n

CC 4.7n

R2 1M

R1 1M

CA 47n

RB 4.7k

RA 4.7k

+VDM/2

+

VDM/2

+

VCM

First-orderLow pass filter

Set CB=CC for symmetrical Common Mode FilterSet CA = 10*CB so any common mode mismatch filtering that results in differential mode noise will be attenuated

Page 23: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

23 of 42

Adding a common-mode transformer at low frequencies

++

-R1

R1

R2

U1 INA326

R3 400k

V1 5

C4 100n

R5 400k

Vo

R4 400k

CB 4.7n

CC 4.7n

R2 1M

R1 1M

CA 47n

RB 4.7k

RA 4.7k

+VDM/2

+

VDM/2

+

VCM

N1

N2

M1

R6 100

C1 1u

C2 500p

First-orderLow pass filter

Common mode transformer

1kHz, 2nd order output filter

CM Transformer added to lower CM cut-off frequency

Page 24: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

24 of 42

Newer Op-amps have EMI filtering

Page 25: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

25 of 42

Ferrites for EMI suppression

Impedance of wire passing throughFerriShield® ribbon cable ferrite

30MHz

Ferrite surrounding the cable actually forms a common-mode transformer

Clamp-On Ferrites concentrate magnetic field in wire to multiply wire’s self inductance at high frequencies

Page 26: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

26 of 42

X2Y Capacitor Architecture

The X2Y capacitor: 1 “X” capacitor, 2 “Y” capacitors

Simultaneous common-mode anddifferential-mode filtering

A B

G1

G2

terminations

Cx = ½ Cy

From Yageo.comwebsite

Page 27: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

27 of 42

The X2Y® Capacitor

++

-R1

R1

R2

U1 INA326

R1 4k

R2 400k

R3 400k

RA* 4.7k

RB* 4.7k

+

VDM/2

+

VDM/2

+VCM

V1 5

C1 500p

R4 100

C2

1n

VoX2Y10n

X2Y100n

RA, RB optional

X2Y® Filter & Decoupling Capacitors

10nF

Input filtering s21Signal-to-Ground

X2Y provides CM + Diff Filter, CM & Diff cutoff Freq about same

Ceramic Cap vs X2Y

Page 28: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

28 of 42

Shielding & Screening Minimizing the medium’s effectiveness

Shielding Effectiveness (S.E.)

of enclosed material

Emission Suppression

S.EdB (Em. Supp.) ≈ AdB

Susceptibility

S.EdB (Sus.) ≈ AdB + RdB (appropriate)

where: A: absorption loss in dBR: reflection loss in dB

From: COTS Journal, January 2004 – “Design ConsiderationsIn Building Shielded Enclosures.”

Derived from: EDN – The Designer’s Guideto Electromagnetic Compatibility

Page 29: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

29 of 42

Shielding & Screening Minimizing medium’s effectiveness

Metal Shielding

Magnetic field f < 20kHz

Ferrous metals• steel• Mu-metal – nickel, iron

RF fields 10kHz < f < 1GHz

Non-ferrous metals• Al foil ILoss > 90dB• Cu, Ni ILoss 40-60dB• Vacuum plating

ILoss > 80dB• Electroless deposition

ILoss > 80dB

From: EDN EMI/EMC guide

Ferrite shield

RF absorber shield

Magnetic Fields Low Impedance Source & Magnetic Energy creates Eddy currents in ferrous materialsRF Fields High Impedance Source & Continuity of Shielding is critical (slot antenna)

Page 30: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

30 of 42

Frequency spreading of the system clock

From: PulseCore, Reliance Semiconductor

FCC peak EMI limitClass B digital devices

with d = 10meters

dBuV/m

Lowers Peak EMI but creates lower amplitude, broader spectrum EMI

Page 31: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

31 of 42

a Loop – the path current follows

Loops• Introduces unintended

inductance in the current path where:

VL = L di/dt

• May result in multiple AC signals sharing a current path

• May become a loop antenna that couples EMI/RFI

The common-mode return loopmay be difficult to predict

Page 32: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

32 of 42

The ground return environment may be very complex

Current paths must be carefully considered to avoid long loops

Page 33: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

33 of 42

Non-ideal passive componentsin the RF and EMI realms

T

100pF

1nF

10nF

Frequency (Hz)

1M 10M 100M 1G

Imp

edan

ce (

oh

ms)

10m

1

100

10k

Capacitor impedance with 5nH total lead L and 0.1 Ohm R

10nF

1nF

100pF

Ideal10nF

capacitive inductive

Other passives at RF

Conductors• skin effect• inductance• capacitance

Inductors

• resonance at fr

• XC above fr

PC board traces• ground loops• traces and planes

become monopole or

loop antennas

Non-idealCapacitor

model

Page 34: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

34 of 42

Use the correct capacitor to help minimize EMI

Capacitors• Decoupling capacitors serve

as charge reservoirs supplying transient current demands

• Decoupling capacitors must have low self-inductance and have low inductance circuit paths

• Distribute decoupling capacitors among pins having the same function; +Vdd, etc

• Use the correct capacitor type for the frequency range

Capacitor type

Maximum useablefrequency*

aluminum 100kHz

tantalum 1MHz

plastic film 10MHz

silvered mica 500MHz

leaded ceramic > 500MHz

surface mount ceramic > 1GHz

surface mount glass, porcelain

>1GHz

PCB embedded ceramic

1GHz +

*much dependent on total inductance

Page 35: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

35 of 42

Balance helps limit CM EMI response

Prevent induced CM signals from becoming Diff signals

Page 36: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

36 of 42

Balanced analog and digital circuit(common-mode signals not welcome!)

Low voltage digital protocols use less current to charge parasitic capsLess current implies lower EMI.

Page 37: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

37 of 42

Circuit techniques to minimize EMI• Strive for a zero

impedance ground

• Design for a differential signal environment, both logic and analog

• Minimize PCB loops that act as EMI antennas

• Use X2Y capacitors for filtering and decoupling

• Make use of common-mode transformers

• Use balanced lines and traces

Page 38: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

38 of 42

PCB layout tips to minimize EMI

• Minimize path inductance - especially ground

• Use a continuous ground plane - without slots!

• Partition potential EMI sources on one end of board, receptors on the other end

• Utilize true differential signals and paths when possible

• Use microstrip and stripline traces between circuits

• Use terminated transmission lines for high-speed and wide-band signals

• Fill open areas on signal plane with ground

Page 39: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

39 of 42

Electronic Control Box w/o Proper EMI/RFI Filtering

1nF

10nF

1nF

+5VA

+

-

+5VA +5VA +5VD

+5VD

MicrocontrollerADCInst

Amp

CCM

CDIFF

CCM

RFILT

RFILT 1k

1k

BridgeSensor

X1DAC

VOUT

+5VD+5VA

VEMI

1nF

COUT

CPARASITICCPARASITIC

Electronic Control Box

Large Loop Areas

Undefined EMI Current Paths

EMI Current Through ICs Upset

Page 40: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

40 of 42

Electronic Control Box w/ Proper EMI/RFI Filtering

Small Loop Areas

Defined EMI Current Paths

NO EMI Current Through ICs

NO Upset

EMI Currents seek path of least impedance.Analyze EMI path relative to chassis ground.

1nF

10nF

1nF

0.01F1kV

CX3

0.01F1kV

CX2

0.01F1kV

CX1

+5VA

+

-

+5VA +5VA +5VD

+5VD

MicrocontrollerADC

InstAmp

CCM

CDIFF

CCM

RFILT

RFILT 1k

1k

BridgeSensor

0.01F1kV

1M1kV

CX4

RX

X1DAC

VOUT

+5VD+5VA

VEMI

1nF

COUT

Electronic Control Box

Page 41: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

41 of 42

Electronic Control Box w/ Proper EMI/RFI FilteringRecommended PCB Connections

C

RX

CX1

CX2

CX3

ChassisGround

Ring

DigitalGround

AnalogGround

Split Ground Plane

0.01F1kV

0.01F1kV

0.01F1kV

1M1kV

CX40.01F1kV

Page 42: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

42 of 42

Easy Check for “Relative” EMI/RFI Susceptibility

FRS (Family Radio Service) Radio (0.5 Watt Transmit Power)

Channel Frequencies:Channel 1: 462.5625MHzChannel 2: 462.5875MHzChannel 3: 462.6125MHzChannel 4: 462.6375MHzChannel 5: 462.6635MHzChannel 6: 462.6875MHzChannel 7: 462.7152MHzChannel 8: 467.5625MHzChannel 9: 467.5875MHzChannel 10: 467.6125MHzChannel 11: 467.6375MHzChannel 12: 467.6625MHzChannel 13: 467.6875MHzChannel 14: 467.7125MHz

Use FRS Radio to check “relative” susceptibility of circuits by keying transmitter and moving antenna towards PCB traces, wires, etc.

Typical distance 0.5 Meter to 1 Meter.

Compare effects of circuitry output before and after modifications to minimize circuit susceptibility.

Lower cost than repeated CE Compliance Testing!

Page 43: 1 of 42 Tackling EMI and RFI at the Board and System Level By Thomas Kuehl – Senior Applications Engineer.

43 of 42

In Conclusion EMI/RFI

• May constitute an operational, liability or regulatory concern

• Is best confronted at the onset of a design• Requires a source, medium and receptor• Propagates by conduction and/or radiation• May require one or more reduction techniques

– striving for a near-zero impedance ground– effective decoupling– minimizing circuit loops and loop areas– shielding > cables and metal cabinets– filtering > RC, LC and CM/DM transformers– balanced logic and/or analog circuits

A Happy IC - EMI Free!