E-Tourism Nicos Rodosthenous PhD 14/03/2013 6 14/3/20131Dr Nicos Rodosthenous.
1 National Strategies for Sustainable Development (NSSD) nicos georgiades.
-
Upload
anissa-norris -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 National Strategies for Sustainable Development (NSSD) nicos georgiades.
1
National Strategies for Sustainable Development (NSSD)
nicos georgiades
2000 - strategic review of SD in the region
the “sustainable development fashion” exerted limited influence on policies
sectoral visions and priorities still predominate
3
2010 +
the situation not much different
2009 review- (W.G. 358.8)
5
strengths
regional processes- MSSD?; MDGs; EU (SDS, enlargement, Western Balkans, neighbourhood; union for the Med; horizon 2020, water initiative)
all countries NSSD (or other) strong (?) political commitment
strengths
responsibilities to units or committeessteps in institutions, legislation,
investments foster multi stakeholder participationawareness raising, information measures in the hundreds
6
7
weaknesses
inequalities in level of information reporting erratic, selective, numerical,
snapshot in time monitoring and review (biased?)elusive how to reconcile economic
growth with economic development
weaknesses
usually environmental issues overshadow other two
bulk of strategies short to mid-term no overall objectives, list a lot unrelated lack of integrated approach
8
9
weaknesses
regulatory instruments overriding toolsweak incorporation of new actors governance structures weak, slow, no
central node lack of capacity building lack of implementation
weaknesses
influence of NSSD– impossible to isolate impacts– policy formulation not clear if guided
by a NSSD– many initiatives would be taken
anyway – multitude of measures rarely interact
10
other processes
assessment of MSSD
(WG 358.4)many findings at the regional level
coincide with those at the national
11
other processes
2010 SG review 106 countries implementing a NSSD,
rarely the principal vehiclemechanisms used in parallel differences in what sd means slippage in terms of commitments national councils ceased to function
12
2010 study of 22 countries
9 - strategic processes with linkages6- responsibility for NSSD with PM- P5 - attempted to coordinate national
action with local 4- legal mandate1 - integrated with p&b
13
proposals for NSSD- regional context/ dimension indispensable
14
link with changing wider context (W.G.358.5)
shifts towards MDGs global governancecontribution of local to global new strategies incorporating SD goals-
CBD, WB, FAO, UNDP, UNFCC, CSD Barcelona- ‘ecosystems approach’
15
link with an MSSD looking to the future
accommodate global issues (poverty) introduce new challenges (integration
of vulnerable groups)provide guidance for agencies-
synergies
16
scope of the MCSD
after almost 2 decades still debate role!- WG 358.5
initial idea of a think tank did not catch up
advisory council it can never bereturn to original scope - forum for
review, dialogue, identification of issues
17
scope of the MCSD
improve way decisions are made – choosy on participation– reps act outside the box – not expert dominated
not a bit of everythingno focus on environmental issues
18
CoP
ministerial meetings, review, political guidance
agree on broader regional goals, priorities
gaps between north and south - “regional solidarity”
upgrade principles into protocols, e.g precautionary
19
MEDU
more resources leadership, cooperation, synergies,
coordination of centers interagency coordination pressure on partners unit for sustainable development
20
centers
delivery, implementation facilitate technical assistancemobilize financing
21
proposals for NSSD- national
22
broader strategic aspects
influence norms and valuesstimulate actionshared vision of the futuresecure clarity of goalshigh ambition, no what is possibleaddress all 3 pillars
23
broader strategic aspects
integrate short and long term economic, social and environmental objectives
ensure synergies, coherence, connections with other strategies/ policies
induce institutional change/ make institutions effective and functional
bottom-up as well as top down process24
broader strategic aspects
broaden debate beyond environment move incrementally build on what works/ remove barriers unifying tools-
– impact assessment – integration – correlation with budget – economic instruments
25
governance
“good governance, …is perhaps the single most important factor in promoting development and advancing the cause of peace” (UN)
design and execution of policy; process by which society is governed; ways (principles, rules, procedures) through which an agency exercises powers vested by the public
26
governance
five principles– transparency– participation– accountability/ responsibility– effectiveness– coherence
27
governance
strong governance intervention, political ownership, who does what, how, with what, when
national councils upgraded, made relevant- follow up, report on progress, legally mandated, unambiguous responsibility (empowerment, legitimacy)
28
governance
critical evaluation of institutions- strengthen (financial stability, authority, dependability, mechanisms)
conflict resolution mechanismsenhance cross-sectoral approach
29
local government
multilevel governancesubsidiarity principleempower local authorities, e.g.
devolutionstrengthen capacity to respond support to local initiatives
30
stakeholder involvement/ participation
citizen concerns/ perceptionschannels of interaction outreach programs/ understandablesystematic dialogue, early targeted consultations
31
stakeholder involvement/ participation
representativeness of groups support to NGOs evaluate influence agree on roles access to information prepare institutions to absorb the shock
32
multi stakeholder entities
forums for debate across lines rendering advice, ideas establishing options and prioritiespreparing/ advising on NSSD reviewing results of monitoring raising public awareness
33
process review / future revision
open from the beginning to societywidely devolved reviews- including peer onesmonitoring/ evaluationensure relevancy to contemporary
concerns
34
a model of a potentially broadly relevant structure of a NSSD
(W.G. 358.9)
35
process for the NSSD preparation
necessity information utilized problems encountered key strengths/constraints preparation process participation legitimacy- endorsement, constitution
36
major strategic frameworks and concepts
national political commitment long-term vision/ time perspective major challenges balancing different dimensions and priorities goals for the three pillars core strategic objectives policy guiding principles
37
global solidarity(national commitments)
regional and international context international and equity considerations how to help meet the MDGs helping to improve international
environmental governanceworking with others
38
key priority themes and sectors
priority areas/ sectors and themes comprising action programmes
progress and good practices in priority areas, sectors/ themes
39
key priority themes and sectors
for each one-vision issues; “hot topics”; challengespriorities; choices; policy approaches institutions to steer the processmajor programmes and action plansactors
40
processes and mechanisms (cross - cutting issues)
ensuring linkages integration and coherence of goals and
objectives tools and instruments financing deconcentration communication and awareness-raising knowledge management
41
stakeholders
key stakeholder groups and involvement
partnerships and networks for stakeholder participation
measures to build up knowledge and participation capacity
42
implementation, co-ordination and management
governance structures, mechanisms, procedures
role of other branches of stateconflict resolution and risk managementdevelopment of critical capacities
43
monitoring, review, evaluation
indicators for monitoring implementation, progress, change
monitoring and review processes evaluating effectivenessrevision and adaptation
44
remember
sustainable development- a bridge, a promise, a reasoned basis, a perspective, a means, a way
strategy- an interactive process, evolving, flexible, integrating umbrella, a focus for other policies
NO “MASTER PLAN”
45