1 Mobile County Public School System 2008 Accountability Report September 18, 2008.

11

Mobile County Public School Mobile County Public School SystemSystem20082008

Accountability ReportAccountability Report

September 18, 2008September 18, 2008

22

22008 MCPSS Annual Report008 MCPSS Annual Report

AYP Summary Graph AYP Summary Graph Page 3Page 3 AYP Accountability Overview AYP Accountability Overview Page 4 – 4a/4bPage 4 – 4a/4b

AYP System Introduction Page AYP System Introduction Page Page 5Page 5 Grade Span Summary Report Grade Span Summary Report Page 6Page 6 5 Year APY Status Comparison 5 Year APY Status Comparison Pages 7- 10Pages 7- 10 2008-2009 Status Year Report 2008-2009 Status Year Report Page 11Page 11 AYP Information AYP Information Pages 12-17Pages 12-17 Additional Academic Indicator Information Page 18Additional Academic Indicator Information Page 18 Graduation Rate Graduation Rate Page 19Page 19 Annual Measurable Objectives Chart 0Annual Measurable Objectives Chart Page 20 Assessment Information Assessment Information Pages 21-22Pages 21-22 Alabama Direct Writing Assessment Chart Page 23Alabama Direct Writing Assessment Chart Page 23

33

2008 MCPSS Annual Report2008 MCPSS Annual Report

Alabama H. S. Grad Exam Reports Alabama H. S. Grad Exam Reports Pages 24-36 Pages 24-36 ARMT Report Introduction PageARMT Report Introduction Page 7 Page 37 Annual Measurable Objectives Chart Page 38Annual Measurable Objectives Chart Page 38 Alabama Reading and Math Test Reports Pages Alabama Reading and Math Test Reports Pages

39-4039-40 44thth Quarter CRT Reports Pages 4-48 Quarter CRT Reports Pages 4-48 DIBELS Report DIBELS Report Page 49–50 Page 49–50 SAT 10 Reports SAT 10 Reports Pages 51–53 Pages 51–53 Next Steps Next Steps Pages 54–59 Pages 54–59 Balanced Scorecard Balanced Scorecard Page Page

60–60a/60b60–60a/60b Additional InformationAdditional Information Pages 61-65 Pages 61-65

55

Mobile County Public Mobile County Public SchoolsSchools

Accountability ComparisonAccountability Comparison

66

MCPSS- System Level AYP MCPSS- System Level AYP StatusStatus

77

Grade Span Summary AYP Report Grade Span Summary AYP Report Special Education Subgroup Special Education Subgroup Proficiency Index (Goal is 0.00) Proficiency Index (Goal is 0.00)

Status Status Year Year

School School Year Year

ReadingReading

3-5 Grade3-5 Grade 6-8 Grade6-8 Grade 11 Grade11 Grade

2008-092008-09 2007-082007-08 -6.31-6.31 Yes (SH)Yes (SH) -7.95-7.95 Yes(2%)Yes(2%) -40.28 No-40.28 No

2007-082007-08 2006-072006-07 -7.83 -7.83 Yes ( 2% )Yes ( 2% ) -4.44-4.44 Yes ( 2%)Yes ( 2%) -31.12 No-31.12 No

2006-072006-07 2005-062005-06 -6.25-6.25 Yes (SH)Yes (SH) -4.39-4.39 Yes (SH)Yes (SH) -33.30-33.30 Yes (SH)Yes (SH)

2005-062005-06 2004-052004-05 -29.72-29.72 Yes (SH)Yes (SH) -32.25-32.25 Yes (SH)Yes (SH) -43.11-43.11 NoNo

Status Status Year Year

School School Year Year

Math Math

3-5 Grade3-5 Grade 6-8 Grade6-8 Grade 11 Grade11 Grade

2008-092008-09 2007-082007-08 -0.04-0.04 Yes (CI)Yes (CI) 8.87 Yes8.87 Yes -25.54 No-25.54 No

2007-082007-08 2006-072006-07 -1.16-1.16 Yes ( 2% )Yes ( 2% ) 11.94 Yes11.94 Yes -13.89-13.89 (SH)(SH)

2006-072006-07 2005-062005-06 7.557.55 YesYes 19.02 Yes19.02 Yes -20.59-20.59 Yes (SH)Yes (SH)

2005-062005-06 2004-052004-05 -15.02-15.02 Yes (SH)Yes (SH) -23.92-23.92 NoNo -38.51-38.51 NoNo

1212

MCPSS 2008 AYP Information 82 schools met AYP = 90%82 schools met AYP = 90% All middle schools met AYP = 21 out of 21All middle schools met AYP = 21 out of 21 54 Elementary schools met AYP = 54 out 54 Elementary schools met AYP = 54 out

of 57of 57

The 3 elementary schools The 3 elementary schools did notdid not meet meet AYP:AYP: HamiltonHamilton

ReadingReading – Participation 90% - White Students – Participation 90% - White Students MathMath – Participation 85% - White – Participation 85% - White StudentsStudents

John WillJohn Will ReadingReading – Proficiency -22.83 – Special Ed. – Proficiency -22.83 – Special Ed. Students Students

Orchard Orchard ReadingReading – Participation 77% - Special Ed. – Participation 77% - Special Ed. Students Students MathMath – Participation 88% - – Participation 88% - Special Ed. StudentsSpecial Ed. Students

1313

MCPSS 2008 AYP Information 7 high schools met AYP = 7 out 7 high schools met AYP = 7 out

of 13of 13 6 high schools 6 high schools did notdid not meet AYP meet AYP

BlountBlount Grad rate 74% (goal = 90%)Grad rate 74% (goal = 90%) Reading Proficiency -3.12 - All studentsReading Proficiency -3.12 - All students Reading Proficiency -53.78 – Special Ed. studentsReading Proficiency -53.78 – Special Ed. students Reading Proficiency -2.84 – Black studentsReading Proficiency -2.84 – Black students Reading Proficiency -4.86 – Free/Reduced MealReading Proficiency -4.86 – Free/Reduced Meal Math Proficiency -32.56 – Special Ed. studentsMath Proficiency -32.56 – Special Ed. students

Baker Baker Grad rate 86% (goal = 90%)Grad rate 86% (goal = 90%)

1414

MCPSS 2008 AYP Information Bryant Bryant Grad rate 87% (goal = 90%)Grad rate 87% (goal = 90%)

Murphy Murphy Grad rate 87% (goal = 90%)Grad rate 87% (goal = 90%) Reading Participation 89% - Special Ed. StudentsReading Participation 89% - Special Ed. Students Reading Proficiency -41.43 – Special Ed. StudentsReading Proficiency -41.43 – Special Ed. Students Math Participation 91% - Special Ed. StudentsMath Participation 91% - Special Ed. Students Math Proficiency -27.00 – Special Ed. StudentsMath Proficiency -27.00 – Special Ed. Students

LeFloreLeFlore Grad rate 88% (goal = 90%)Grad rate 88% (goal = 90%)

WilliamsonWilliamson Grad rate 86% (goal = 90%) Grad rate 86% (goal = 90%) IM =Improvement made IM =Improvement made

Reading Proficiency -5.46 - All studentsReading Proficiency -5.46 - All students Reading Proficiency -5.46 – Black studentsReading Proficiency -5.46 – Black students Reading Proficiency -6.40 – Free/Reduced MealReading Proficiency -6.40 – Free/Reduced Meal

1515

High School Special Ed.Reading ProficiencyReading Proficiency Baker Baker -36.00-36.00 Blount Blount -53.78-53.78 Alma Bryant Alma Bryant -38.86-38.86 CitronelleCitronelle -49.33-49.33 DavidsonDavidson -45.38-45.38 LeFloreLeFlore -49.89-49.89 MGMMGM -23.50-23.50 MurphyMurphy -41.43-41.43 RainRain -31.45-31.45 SatsumaSatsuma -43.89-43.89 TheodoreTheodore -28.42-28.42 VigorVigor --N/AN/A WilliamsonWilliamson -56.31-56.31

1616

High School Special Ed.Math ProficiencyMath Proficiency Baker Baker -27.00-27.00 Blount Blount -32.56-32.56 Alma BryantAlma Bryant -20.06-20.06 CitronelleCitronelle -37.00-37.00 DavidsonDavidson -27.00-27.00 LeFloreLeFlore -29.78-29.78 MGMMGM -19.86-19.86 MurphyMurphy -27.00-27.00 B.C. RainB.C. Rain -22.45-22.45 SatsumaSatsuma -11.21-11.21 TheodoreTheodore -8.82-8.82 VigorVigor -N/A-N/A WilliamsonWilliamson -39.90-39.90

1717

MCPSS 2008 AYP Information

No schoolsNo schools enteredentered School School ImprovementImprovement oror advancedadvanced in the in the school improvement cycleschool improvement cycle

Four schoolsFour schools delayeddelayed their statustheir status GilliardGilliard School Improvement Year 1 (Delay) School Improvement Year 1 (Delay) ChastangChastang School Improvement Year 4 School Improvement Year 4

(Delay)(Delay) DentonDenton School Improvement Year 3 (Delay) School Improvement Year 3 (Delay) Eanes Eanes School Improvement Year 8 (Delay)School Improvement Year 8 (Delay)

1818

ALSDE ALSDE

Additional Academic Indicator Additional Academic Indicator (AAI) (AAI)

AAI for Grades K-8AAI for Grades K-8Average Daily Attendance (ADA) Target 95%Average Daily Attendance (ADA) Target 95%

based on the attendance rates for the 20 school based on the attendance rates for the 20 school days after Labor Daydays after Labor Day

AAI for High SchoolsAAI for High SchoolsGraduation Rate Target 90%Graduation Rate Target 90%

based on the previous school year’s graduating based on the previous school year’s graduating classclass

2020

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Grade 3 73 73 77 77 81 85 88 92 96 100Grade 4 68 68 73 73 77 77 82 86 91 95 100Grade 5 73 73 77 77 81 85 88 92 96 100Grade 6 74 74 78 78 81 81 85 89 93 96 100Grade 7 63 63 68 68 74 79 84 89 95 100Grade 8 43 43 51 51 59 59 67 76 84 92 100

Grade 11 81 81 84 84 86 86 89 92 95 97 100

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Grade 3 63 63 68 68 74 79 84 89 95 100Grade 4 61 61 67 67 72 72 78 83 89 94 100Grade 5 59 59 65 65 71 77 82 88 94 100Grade 6 39 39 48 48 56 56 65 74 83 91 100Grade 7 40 40 49 49 57 66 74 83 91 100Grade 8 48 48 55 55 63 70 78 85 93 100

Grade 11 68 68 73 73 77 77 82 86 91 95 100

Found in the 2005 Interpretive Guide, page 7, on the Alabama State Department website, www.alsde.edu

STATE OF ALABAMAMOBILE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM

ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES

Annual Measurable Objectives

www.alsde.edu

Percentage of Proficient Students

ReadingAnnual Measurable Objectives


Mathematics

2121

Assessment ReportsAssessment Reports ADAWADAW--Alabama Direct Assessment of Alabama Direct Assessment of

WritingWriting AHSGEAHSGE--Alabama High School Alabama High School

Graduation ExamGraduation Exam CRTCRT--CriterionCriterion--Referenced TestReferenced Test DIBELSDIBELS--Dynamic Indicators of Basic Dynamic Indicators of Basic

Early Literacy SkillsEarly Literacy Skills ARMTARMT--Alabama Reading and Math Alabama Reading and Math

TestTest SAT-10SAT-10--Standford Achievement Test, Standford Achievement Test,

1010thth Ed. Ed.

2222

Proficiency DefinitionsProficiency Definitions

ADAWADAW--Students scoring Levels III & IVStudents scoring Levels III & IV AHSGEAHSGE--Students scoring Levels III & IVStudents scoring Levels III & IV ARMTARMT--Students scoring Levels III & IVStudents scoring Levels III & IV CRTCRT--Students scoring 70% correctStudents scoring 70% correct DIBELSDIBELS--Students “Established,” “Low Students “Established,” “Low

Risk,” or “Benchmarked”Risk,” or “Benchmarked” SAT-10SAT-10--Students scoring Stanines 5-9Students scoring Stanines 5-9

2424

AHSGEAHSGE - - Reports include:Reports include:

Spring 2008 State Report Spring 2008 State Report 1111thth Grade 5-Year School Level Grade 5-Year School Level

Comparison by Subject Reading, Math, Comparison by Subject Reading, Math, Language, Science & Social StudiesLanguage, Science & Social Studies

6-Year View of 116-Year View of 11thth Grade System Level Grade System Level Objective Deficiencies Objective Deficiencies

(Baseline Spring 2003)(Baseline Spring 2003)

2525

AHSGE Spring 2008 AdministrationAHSGE Spring 2008 Administration

3030

MCPSS - AHSGE 11th Grade Language5-Year Comparison - Spring 2004,2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008

Percentage of Students Passed

90

62

55

75

8084

8690

64

59

64

73

8683

90

78

64

87

8184

8990

7876

8581

8582

88

7268 67

75 7477

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Baker BC Rain Blount Bryant Citronelle Davidson LeFlore

Per

cen

tag

e o

f S

tud

ents

Pas

sed

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

3737

ARMTARMT Alabama Reading and Mathematics Alabama Reading and Mathematics

TestTest

Reports Include:Reports Include:

5-Year System Level Percentage of 5-Year System Level Percentage of

Proficient Students ComparisonProficient Students Comparison

3838

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Grade 3 73 73 77 77 81 85 88 92 96 100Grade 4 68 68 73 73 77 77 82 86 91 95 100Grade 5 73 73 77 77 81 85 88 92 96 100Grade 6 74 74 78 78 81 81 85 89 93 96 100Grade 7 63 63 68 68 74 79 84 89 95 100Grade 8 43 43 51 51 59 59 67 76 84 92 100

Grade 11 81 81 84 84 86 86 89 92 95 97 100

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Grade 3 63 63 68 68 74 79 84 89 95 100Grade 4 61 61 67 67 72 72 78 83 89 94 100Grade 5 59 59 65 65 71 77 82 88 94 100Grade 6 39 39 48 48 56 56 65 74 83 91 100Grade 7 40 40 49 49 57 66 74 83 91 100Grade 8 48 48 55 55 63 70 78 85 93 100

Grade 11 68 68 73 73 77 77 82 86 91 95 100

Found in the 2005 Interpretive Guide, page 7, on the Alabama State Department website, www.alsde.edu

STATE OF ALABAMAMOBILE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM

ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES

Annual Measurable Objectives

www.alsde.edu


ReadingAnnual Measurable Objectives


Mathematics

4141

CRTCRT Reports Reports

Reports Include: Reports Include: - - 4-Year 44-Year 4thth Quarter Grade Level Quarter Grade Level

ComparisonsComparisons

4949

DIBELSDIBELS Dynamic Indicator of Basic Early Dynamic Indicator of Basic Early

Learning SkillsLearning Skills

Report IncludesReport Includes

- 5-Year System Level End of Year - 5-Year System Level End of Year (EOY) (EOY) Measure of Percentage of Measure of Percentage of Proficient Proficient Students Students

5151

SAT 10SAT 10Stanford Achievement TestStanford Achievement Test

Report Includes Report Includes - 5-Year - 5-Year System Level Percentage of System Level Percentage of Proficient StudentsProficient Students

5454

Next StepsNext Steps

Data Driven School ImprovementData Driven School Improvement SAE Plans - Quarterly ReviewsSAE Plans - Quarterly Reviews

Data Driven InstructionData Driven Instruction Data Meetings - Grade Level –Department - Content AreasData Meetings - Grade Level –Department - Content Areas

Special Education FocusSpecial Education Focus Inclusion – Intervention – Second Delivery ofInclusion – Intervention – Second Delivery of

Instruction – Targeted Services & Support – Progress Instruction – Targeted Services & Support – Progress MonitoringMonitoring

▼▼ ▼▼

5555

Next StepsNext StepsElementary FocusElementary Focus

Full Implementation of New Reading ProgramFull Implementation of New Reading Program

Continue Alabama Reading Initiatives (ARI & ARFI)Continue Alabama Reading Initiatives (ARI & ARFI)

Continue Expansion of Alabama Math/ Science/Technology Continue Expansion of Alabama Math/ Science/Technology

Initiative (AMSTI)Initiative (AMSTI)

Math Curriculum Mapping and AlignmentMath Curriculum Mapping and Alignment

Career Awareness Career Awareness Fifth Grade PortfoliosFifth Grade Portfolios

▼▼ ▼▼

5656

▼ ▼ Next StepsNext Steps ▼▼Middle FocusMiddle Focus

Making Middle Grades Work Making Middle Grades Work Expand 12 to 21 Middle SchoolsExpand 12 to 21 Middle Schools

Continuous Program ImprovementContinuous Program Improvement

Data Driven Planning and Decision Making Data Driven Planning and Decision Making Climate & Culture for LearningClimate & Culture for Learning

Delivery of InstructionDelivery of Instruction

Student Engagement in LearningStudent Engagement in Learning

Instructional LeadershipInstructional Leadership Professional DevelopmentProfessional Development Leadership Development & OpportunitiesLeadership Development & Opportunities Recognition of SuccessRecognition of Success

5757

Next StepsNext Steps

Middle FocusMiddle Focus

Literacy TrainingLiteracy Training Vocabulary Vocabulary

Summarization Summarization Cooperative LearningCooperative Learning

Career ExplorationCareer Exploration Career PortfolioCareer Portfolio Career/College ReadinessCareer/College Readiness ACT Readiness/Career Planning – Explore ACT AssessmentACT Readiness/Career Planning – Explore ACT Assessment

Counseling ProgramCounseling Program

▼▼ ▼▼

5858

▼ ▼ Next StepsNext Steps ▼▼ High School FocusHigh School Focus Graduation RateGraduation Rate Sp. Ed. Proficiency – Reading & MathSp. Ed. Proficiency – Reading & Math Reading & Math ProficiencyReading & Math Proficiency Math & Reading Strategies TeachersMath & Reading Strategies Teachers SAE Implementation & Data DrivenSAE Implementation & Data Driven Programs and InstructionPrograms and Instruction Targeted Academic Affairs Services & SupportTargeted Academic Affairs Services & Support Feeder Pattern Professional Learning CommunitiesFeeder Pattern Professional Learning Communities Ninth Grade AcademiesNinth Grade Academies Small Learning Communities – Theme ProgramsSmall Learning Communities – Theme Programs Distance and On-Line LearningDistance and On-Line Learning Staffing ReviewsStaffing Reviews

5959

NextNext Steps StepsHigh School FocusHigh School Focus Professional Development Professional Development

Delivery of Instruction - Student Engagement in Learning - Delivery of Instruction - Student Engagement in Learning -

InterventionIntervention Data Driven Instruction – Data MeetingsData Driven Instruction – Data Meetings Workforce Development – Career Technical Education Workforce Development – Career Technical Education Career/College ReadinessCareer/College Readiness

ACT Readiness– Career Planning Plan/ACT/SAT Assessments ACT Readiness– Career Planning Plan/ACT/SAT Assessments

Counseling ProgramCounseling Program Small Learning CommunitiesSmall Learning Communities Review of Block Scheduling and Early ReleaseReview of Block Scheduling and Early Release Alabama First Choice High School PlanAlabama First Choice High School Plan

▼▼ ▼▼

6060

Mobile County Public Mobile County Public SchoolsSchools

Balanced Score CardBalanced Score Card

6262

►►InformationInformation ◄◄ Accountability DefinitionsAccountability Definitions

AYP Comparison OverviewAYP Comparison Overview

Academic Overview – 221Academic Overview – 221stst Century Century LearningLearning

6363

▼▼Accountability Definitions Accountability Definitions ▼▼

AYP – Annual Year ProgressAYP – Annual Year Progress Reported in 4 Categories Reported in 4 Categories Reading – Mathematics – Additional Academic Indicator – OverallReading – Mathematics – Additional Academic Indicator – Overall

““N” Count – A subgroup must have an “N” Count of N” Count – A subgroup must have an “N” Count of 40 or more students for AYP measurement40 or more students for AYP measurement

School Improvement – Schools not making AYP for two School Improvement – Schools not making AYP for two years enter School Improvement Status –years enter School Improvement Status – To exit School Improvement Status schoolsTo exit School Improvement Status schools must make AYP for two yearsmust make AYP for two years

Annual Measurable Objectives – Term used to describe the establishedAnnual Measurable Objectives – Term used to describe the established yearly target for the percentage of studentsyearly target for the percentage of students scoring proficient scoring proficient

Participation Rate – Number of students Participation Rate – Number of students taking the testtaking the test – 95% required on all tests – 95% required on all tests

Additional Academic Indicators – Additional Academic Indicators – Daily Attendance RateDaily Attendance Rate – Grades 3-8 – 95% Required – Grades 3-8 – 95% Required Graduation Rate – Grades 9-12 – 90% Graduation Rate – Grades 9-12 – 90%

6464

▼▼Accountability DefinitionsAccountability Definitions▼▼Five Ways to Make AYPFive Ways to Make AYP

1. 1. Meet ProficiencyMeet Proficiency

If proficiency isn’t met the following calculations take place.If proficiency isn’t met the following calculations take place.

2. 2. Confidence Interval (CI)Confidence Interval (CI) – calculations used to determine if the – calculations used to determine if the

proficiency index is statistically different from the AMO goalproficiency index is statistically different from the AMO goal

3. 3. Uniform Averaging (UAUniform Averaging (UA) – calculated using the most recent three ) – calculated using the most recent three

years of datayears of data

4. 4. Safe Harbor (SH)Safe Harbor (SH) – schools make SH if made 95% participation goal, – schools make SH if made 95% participation goal,

reduced non proficient from previous year by 10%, met or improvedreduced non proficient from previous year by 10%, met or improved

additional academic indicatoradditional academic indicator

5. 5. 2%2% - interim 2% flexibility option that is calculated for Special Education - interim 2% flexibility option that is calculated for Special Education

1 Mobile County Public School System 2008 Accountability Report September 18, 2008.

Documents

Transcript of 1 Mobile County Public School System 2008 Accountability Report September 18, 2008.