1 Managing for Results and Aid Effectiveness: Experience of JBIC ODA Operations December 2002 Japan...

8
1 Managing for Results and Aid Managing for Results and Aid Effectiveness: Effectiveness: Experience of JBIC ODA Experience of JBIC ODA Operations Operations December 2002 December 2002 Japan Bank for International Japan Bank for International Cooperation Cooperation

Transcript of 1 Managing for Results and Aid Effectiveness: Experience of JBIC ODA Operations December 2002 Japan...

Page 1: 1 Managing for Results and Aid Effectiveness: Experience of JBIC ODA Operations December 2002 Japan Bank for International Cooperation.

1

Managing for Results and Aid Effectiveness:Managing for Results and Aid Effectiveness:Experience of JBIC ODA OperationsExperience of JBIC ODA Operations

December 2002December 2002

Japan Bank for International CooperationJapan Bank for International Cooperation

Page 2: 1 Managing for Results and Aid Effectiveness: Experience of JBIC ODA Operations December 2002 Japan Bank for International Cooperation.

2

Three Levels of JBIC’s Results-Based Management

I. Project Level• Ex-ante Project Evaluation

→Performance Monitoring Indicators

• Implementation Monitoring & Portfolio Review

• Ex-post Evaluation• Evaluation Feedback

Project Level

II. Policy Level

III. Agency Level

Page 3: 1 Managing for Results and Aid Effectiveness: Experience of JBIC ODA Operations December 2002 Japan Bank for International Cooperation.

3

Example: Irrigation System Rehabilitation ProjectObjectives : To rehabilitate and improve the aged existing irrigation system, and to strengthen Irrigators’ Associations (IAs) for ensuring appropriate water management and operational maintenance of the facilities, thereby increasing agricultural production and raising income level of farmers.

Indicators 2001 2015

Irrigated Area (ha) Rainy Season 6,893 13,227

Collection ratio of Water Charge (%) 40 80

Production Volume (ton/year)

Rice 57,809 111,160

Annual Gross Farm Income (peso/ha/year) 41,779 80,940

Page 4: 1 Managing for Results and Aid Effectiveness: Experience of JBIC ODA Operations December 2002 Japan Bank for International Cooperation.

4

II. Policy Level :JBIC Mid-Term ODA Strategy

Agency Policy Government Policy

Policy Measurement

for Strategic

Management

Mid-Term ODA Strategy

Thematic

Strategy

paper

Thematic

Strategy

paper

Country

Strategy

paper

Country

Strategy

paper

ODA Mid-Term Policy

ODA Country Policy

Page 5: 1 Managing for Results and Aid Effectiveness: Experience of JBIC ODA Operations December 2002 Japan Bank for International Cooperation.

5

Monitoring and Evaluation Cycle

Feedback of findings

See

・ Monitoring & Evaluation・ Find lessons learned

Plan (Every year)

・ Establish Annual Operation Plan

Do

・ Promote Operation based on the Annual plan

JBIC Mid-Term ODA Strategy

Country

Strategy

paper

Country

Strategy

paper

Thematic

Strategy

paper

Thematic

Strategy

paper

Page 6: 1 Managing for Results and Aid Effectiveness: Experience of JBIC ODA Operations December 2002 Japan Bank for International Cooperation.

6

III. Agency Level

MissionStatement

Guiding 

Principles

Reference Indicators

OperationalPolicies

Operational Strategies

Annual Business Plan

Individual

Thematic

Areas

Tasks 

Targets

IndicatorsJBIC

Law

Overall Bank

StrategiesPerformance Measurement for Strategic Management

Page 7: 1 Managing for Results and Aid Effectiveness: Experience of JBIC ODA Operations December 2002 Japan Bank for International Cooperation.

7

  (Indicator )Proportion of projects where poor people participated in the project formation stageto total number of Poverty Reduction Projects.

       Reference Indicator

1999 2000 2001 2002

(plan)29% 23% 29% 43%

Example: Support for greater participation of the poor in the development process

Page 8: 1 Managing for Results and Aid Effectiveness: Experience of JBIC ODA Operations December 2002 Japan Bank for International Cooperation.

8

Lessons Learned & Challenges Ahead Medium- & Long-term Development Objectives vs. (Short-t

erm) Result-based Management Necessity of Progress Monitoring Indicators and Intermediate Ind

icators Necessity of intermediaries between MDGs and operations Danger to focus only on what we can measure

Balance between Aggregation & Attribution Attribution matters as a bilateral agency Use Results-based Country Strategy Paper/Thematic Strategy Pa

per Difficulty in comparing the results

Necessity of comparable or standard indicators Are performance-based allocations for MDBs use?