1. IntroductIon and Scope - Hospitals · 11 M anage M ent S u MM ary ManageMent SuMMary This...
Transcript of 1. IntroductIon and Scope - Hospitals · 11 M anage M ent S u MM ary ManageMent SuMMary This...
11
Ma
nag
eMen
t Su
MM
ary
ManageMent SuMMary
This management summary outlines the main conclusions of the project “Medical Tourism”.
1. IntroductIon and Scope
The objective of this report was to produce 1) a price benchmarking of the treatment in the top medical facili-ties in selected countries as well as 2) a map showing the inbound and outbound medical tourist flows. This was achieved by researching, identifying and analysing the aforementioned flows.
The lack of a source that gives a concise overview of the industry was the main concern while working on this proj-ect. For this report, the term medical tourism is defined as: travelling abroad, outside of one’s natural health care jurisdiction, with the intent of undergoing a medical procedure, whether it be necessary or elec-tive. This report focuses on the industry from all main target groups’ view points, i.e. providers and consumers, in order to evaluate the demand and supply impact in the market. Facilitating companies were also considered, al-though not examined in detail.
Issues underlying the validity and reliability of this explorative project are complicating the accuracy of this young industry:
• Duetothefactthatthereisalimitedavailabilityofdatawithinthefieldofmedicaltourism.Organisationswith an interest in the industry tend to keep information to themselves in order to maintain a competitive ad-vantage and some countries tend not to record medical tourism data.
• Patientconfidentialitymakesitdifficulttoobtaininformationonmedicaltouristsduetorestrictionsenforcedto maintain privacy.
• Amissinguniformaccreditationsystem.
• Knowledgegapsamongstdifferentplayersinthemarket:ministriesofhealthandtourism,medicalprofession-als, legal experts and travel suppliers as well as other specific services involved in the medical tourism indus-try. Therefore, the medical aspects are described in general, instead of providing details.
Country SelectionThe main reason why the studied countries were chosen as being major destinations for medical tourism, were the number of medical tourists visiting the country. Moreover, in order to have an overview that is as global as possible, countries were also chosen to be spread over the globe, covering each continent / region famous for medical tourism.
Fouroutboundcountrieshavebeenstudied:theUnitedKingdom,USA,theNetherlandsandRussia.TheUKandUSarethecountriesfromwhichpeoplemostfrequentlyleaveinordertoseekmedicaltreatmentelsewhere.DuetogeographicalproximitytoGermanytheNetherlandsareincluded.Russiawaschosen,asitisanemergingmar-ket with the potential to grow hugely in the field of medical tourism.
12
Ma
nag
eMen
t Su
MM
ary
Selection Criteria for Top FacilitiesFive top medical facilities were chosen and described for each inbound country. In some countries less than five facilitieswereavailable,accordingtoourcriteria.Aspecificprocedurewasadoptedinordertoselectatopmedi-cal facility (according to project defined guidelines). The criteria to select a top medical facility, were
1) JCI accreditation: Joint Commission International– the largest international hospital accreditation system.
2) IfacountrylackedJCIaccreditation,otherrecognisedinternationalornationalaccreditationorqualitysys-tems were taken into account.
3) Aninternationalorientation,i.e.internationaldepartmentwithinthehospital.
The inbound country analysis details the consumption phase of the medical tourists’ stay abroad. It covers only the tangible aspects (e.g. services offered and capacity of medical facilities) and not the intangible factors (e.g. thepersonalexperiencesandqualityofservice).Thisisduetoproblemsfindingobjectiveinformationandconfi-dentiality of ex-medical tourists’ data.
TreatmentThe chosen medical treatments represent those most often sought abroad based on our preliminary research. The division between necessary and elective procedures allows all country specialties to be embodied and also en-compasses more expensive treatments as well as cheaper ones.
The report is divided into four chapters covering general background information of the market, analyses of the selected inbound countries, analyses of the selected outbound countries and a general conclusion of the research. The main findings are described below.
Inbound Countries
•Brazil •Dubai •Malaysia •SouthAfrica
•Belgium •Germany •Mexico •SouthKorea
•CostaRica •India •Philippines •Thailand
•Czechrepublic •Jordan •Singapore •Turkey
Outbound Countries
•TheNetherlands
•Russia
•UnitedKingdom
•UnitedStates
Necessary Treatment
•Cardiacbypass •Kneereplacement
•Gastricbypass •Hipresurfacing
•Hipreplacement
Elective Treatment
•Facelift •Rhinoplasty
•Botox •Liposuction
•Lasikeyesurgery •Dentalimplant
•Breastaugmentation
13
Ma
nag
eMen
t Su
MM
ary
2. IntroductIon to MedIcal tourISM
“Medical tourism” has been a recognised market since the 1980’s and is now a rapidly developing. The increase in technological and medical research and developments, augmented product consciousness and globalisation are among the most influential trends that affect the industry.
Consumer behaviour can be summarised in four main reasons why patients travel abroad for medical care: a)availabilityoftreatments,b)qualityofhealthcare,c)reducedwaitingtimesandd)costsavings.Allthesefac-tors together could result in even more countries taking initial steps to attract foreign patients as well as a surge in medical tourism products, which will allow the industry to flourish.
Current issues lie in the fact that there is a global deficit of information about medical tourism which could hinder the industry’s potential. This is often due to countries wishing to maintain a competitive advantage or a result of limited information having been collected or recorded. Medical tourism often provokes ethical and legal discus-sionscausingconcernfortheindustry.Nevertheless,measuresarebeingtakentominimisethesefactorswithnewlaws,suchastheproposedEUDirectiveforCross-BorderHealthCare,andthirdpartiesbeingestablished.Eventhough there is currently a large number of accreditation bodies, other issues are rooted in the absence of a uni-forminternationalhospitalaccreditationsystemandthevaryingqualityofmedicalservicesprovided.
To conclude, medical tourism has the capacity to become a highly lucrative market, which can be seen in the in-creasing countries showing interest. This could be especially beneficial for developing countries to boost their econ-omies by generating extra income. Many opportunities can be taken advantage of, and the majority of threats have thepotentialtobeovercome.WiththerevenueofthemedicaltourismmarketpredictedtogrowtoUSD100billion(€67billion)by2010fromUSD60billion(€40billion)in2007*,itisclearthatinterestinthemarketisgrowing.
3. Inbound MedIcal tourISM deStInatIonS
The countries are mentioned in alphabetical order.
BelgiumBelgiumattracts35,000medicaltouristsannuallywhomostlycomeforcosmeticandplasticsurgeryaswellasoncology and cardio treatment despite no governmental promotion as a medical tourism destination and the cur-rent lack of a national accreditation system (alongside no JCI accredited facilities). The reason why many choose togotoBelgiumfortheirtreatmentaremainlytheshortwaitingtimes,thelowcosts,thehighqualityandlan-guageability.VirtuallyallmedicalstaffspeakDutch,FrenchandEnglish.Foreignpatientscanexpecttosave56%(whencomparedtotheUS)or26%(whencomparedtotheUK).However,themajoritycomefromtheNether-lands(60%)andsurroundingEuropeancountries(19%)thankstoacentrallocationwithinEurope.Britishpatientsaccountfor21%asmanyclinicsinBelgiumhaveagreementsandco-operationswithBritishbasedfacilities.Bel-giumhasthecapacitytomeettheneedsof50,000moremedicaltouristseachyear.
* Medical Tourism. Consumers in Search of Value. Deloitte Center for Health Solutions, 2008
14
Ma
nag
eMen
t Su
MM
ary
BrazilBrazilattractsmanymedicaltouristseachyear,withUScitizensaccountingfor95%ofthem,eventhoughthecountryisrelativelyunsafeandhasapoorpublichealthcaresystem.Thiscouldbeduetothecostsavingsof60%comparedtotheUS.Manymedicaltouristscombinetheirtreatmentswithaholiday,sinceBrazilasarenownedholiday destination. Moreover, the country’s 20 JCI accredited hospitals are a pulling factor as well as the proxim-itytotheUS.Moreovertherearenovisarequirements.Thosewhocomeformedicalreasonswishtotakeadvan-tageofBrazil’sreputationforcosmeticandplasticsurgery.WiththeMinistryofTourism’spromotioncampaigns,the country aims to maintain its position in medical tourism.
Costa RicaCostaRicaattracts150,000medicaltouristsannually,thankstobeingasafe,establishedholidaydestinationanditsproximitytotheUS.Themajorityofthese(95%)arefromtheUSandcometotakeadvantageofthe25%costsav-ings.Currently,CostaRicaspecialisesindentalandplasticsurgeryyetitisarelativelyunknowndestinationwithintheindustry.Promotionhasrecentlystartedinordertoincreasethenumberofmedicaltouristsby8-9%during2010.
Czech RepublicTheCzechRepublicisapotentialcompetitorwithintheEuropeanmedicaltourismindustryasitoffers17%costsavingtoUKcitizensandisalreadyattractingforeignpatientsfromtheUK,AustriaandGermany.Thecountryisknownforprovidingqualitydentalcareandisapopulartouristdestination,withPraguebeingthemajorattrac-tion.TheCzechRepublicisasafecountrythatoffersadevelopedinfrastructureandisapartoftheEU.Currently,9,000 medical tourists are being attracted annually by its reputation for cosmetic surgery, although recent promo-tion has been implemented to welcome those seeking assisted reproduction which, however, has been met with problems due to national laws.
DubaiDubaiboastsasafe,wealthylocationwhereArabicandEnglisharebothspoken.Itcurrentlyattractsmedicaltour-istsmainlyfromGermany(45%),UK(27.8%)andSingapore(10.3%).ThesemedicaltouristsselectDubaiduetoitslowerwaitingtimesandthehighqualityofmedicalcare.TheworkforceisinternationallytrainedalthoughthisresultsinalackofnationalworkforceandmedicalteachingfacilitiesthatarerecognisedoutsideoftheUAE.Dubai’sspecialisationsfocusoncardiology,orthopaedics,oncology,cosmeticandplasticsurgeryanddermatolo-gy.PromotionofmedicaltourismisincreasingwiththeconstructionoftheDubaiHealthcareCityanditishopedthatthemedicaltourismrevenuewillincreaseUSD1.9billion(€1.27billion)eachyearby2010,withanannualgrowthof15%.Giventhecurrenteconomiccrisis,thismaybetoooptimistic.
GermanyGermanyattracts59,000medicaltouristsfrom163countriesannuallythankstoacentrallocationinEuropeandbeingamemberoftheEU.Despiteminimalcostsavingsandnopromotionwithinthemedicaltourismindustry,GermanyisapopularmedicaltourismdestinationforpatientsfromtheNetherlands(11.4%),France(10%),Aus-tria(8%),Poland(8%)andBelgium(5.7%).Thesemedicaltravellersseekcardiology,oncologyandorthopaedicstreatment. It is hoped that by continuing to offer experimental treatments, such as stem cell therapy, medical tour-isminGermanycanincreaseinthecomingyears.Inaddition,highquality,shorterwaitingtimesandapossibilityto combine a treatment with a holiday are offered.
15
Ma
nag
eMen
t Su
MM
ary
IndiaBeingapioneerinthemedicaltourismindustry,Indiaoffersnewtechnology,alternativeandexperimentaltreat-ment alongside an internationally trained workforce who speaks English. Thanks to these reasons, India has a broad spectrum of specialisations including cardiology, cosmetic surgery, dentistry, ophthalmology, orthopaedics, transplantsandassistedreproduction.Nowadays,Indiaremainsaleadingmedicaltourismcountrythatpromoteswidelyatagovernmentalandprivatesectorlevelaswellasofferingmedicalvisas.DuetothesefactorsIndiaat-tractsaround450,000medicaltouristsayear(mostlyfromtheUK,USandSouthKorea)despitebeingacountrythat is often perceived by many to be underdeveloped and unsafe. Cost savings are prominent as one can expect tosave58%whencomparedtotheUSor47%fortheUK.Otherdrivingfactorsarehighqualityofmedicalcare,availabilityoftreatmentsandreducedwaitingtimes.By2012,Indiaaimstoattractonemillionmedicaltourists.
JordanJordanisthelargestmedicaltourismhubintheMiddleEastandattractsaround250,000medicaltourists,mostlyfromthesurroundingcountries(38%Iraqis,30%Palestine,31%Sudan)despitetargetingtheirpromotiontotheUSmarket.Thesemedicaltouristsareattractedthankstotheexcellentlanguageskillsoftheworkforceandthehighqualityofcare.Thecountryspecialisesincardiology,orthopaedics,cosmeticsurgeryanddentistry.Theper-ception among Western patients of the strict religious rules that exist means that Jordan’s reputation is underde-velopedasaglobalmedicaltourismdestination.However,Jordan’spotentialincludescostsavingsof66%whencomparedtotheUSand57%whencomparedtothepricesintheUK.By2012,thecountryisaimingtoreceiverevenueof€668millionfrommedicaltourismcomparedto€4.34millionin2009.
MalaysiaMalaysia has already established itself as a holiday destination but has now expanded facilities to cope with the annual341,288medicaltourists(2007)thatitreceivesfromIndonesia(70%),Singapore(10%),Japan(6%),Eu-rope(5%)andIndia(3%).ThesemedicaltouristsareattractedtoMalaysiathankstoEnglishbeingawidelyspo-kenlanguageandMalaybeingunderstoodbyIndonesiansaswellasthepromotionfromtheMalaysiaHealthTrav-el Council. The main treatments that the country offers are assisted reproduction, orthopaedics, cosmetic surgery andstemcelltherapy.Bydevelopingitspositioninmedicaltourism,andcontinuingpromotion,Malaysiahopestoincreaserevenuesby23%resultingin€394millionby2010.
MexicoMexicoattractsbetween150,000and500,000medicaltouristsannuallybutthisnumbercannotbeexactlyquan-tified,asAmericans(accountingforanestimated95%ofinboundmedicaltourists)donotneedavisatoenterthecountry.AmericansareattractedbyMexico’sproximitytotheUSandcostsavingsofaround63%.Despitepro-motion only from the private sector, Mexico has built a reputation for offering dentistry treatment, cosmetic and plastic surgeries, orthopaedics and cardiology procedures.
PhilippinesThePhilippineshasestablisheditselfasamedicaltourismdestinationandreceives200,000medicaltouristsan-nuallyfromtheUSandCanada(40%),JapanandKorea(20%),Europe(17%),MiddleEast(7%)andMicronesia(6%).Theseforeignpatientsmostlyseekcosmeticsurgery,ophthalmology,cardiologyorcardiovascularsurgeryoroncologytreatment.Ontopofthespecialities,medicaltouristsaredrawninbythegovernmentalpromotion
16
Ma
nag
eMen
t Su
MM
ary
alongsidewiththequalityofmedicalstaffthatincorporatetheFilipino’snaturalsenseofhospitalityandlanguageskills.Foreignpatientscanalsoexpectcostsavingsof68%oftheUSand54%oftheUK.Allofthesereasonsto-gethermeanthatthereishopethatthePhilippineswillreceive700,000medicaltouristsinthecomingyears.Thismay be unrealistic due to the weak infrastructure and the current brain drain among medical staff.
SingaporeSingaporereceives600,000medicaltouristsannually,fromtheMiddleEast(50%),Asia(45%)andEurope(5%).ThesemedicaltouristscouldbeattractedbySingapore’sreputationasoneofthewealthiestandcleanestcoun-triesintheworldwithawell-developedinfrastructureasthesefactorsarereflectedinthehighqualityofitshealthcaresystem.Singaporespecialisesincosmeticsurgeries,cardiology,orthopaedicandneurologytreatmentalong-sidestemcelltherapiesandgastroenterologyandoncologyprocedures.Thiswidespecialisation,andgoodqualityof health care counterbalances the minimal cost savings. Thanks to the existing extensive promotion, it is expected that medical tourists will reach the amount of one million in 2012 producing a revenue of € 2 billion.
South AfricaSouthAfricaisalreadyestablishedasaholidaydestinationandisnowstartinginitiativestoattractmedicaltour-iststhankstothewell-developeduniquesellingpointof‘surgerysafari’packages.Despitebeinganunsafe,cor-ruptcountrywithaweakinfrastructureandnoJCIaccreditation,SouthAfricaattractsmedicaltouristsfromlessdevelopedneighbouringcountries(32%Mozambique,28%Lesotho,13%Botswana,12%Swaziland).SouthAf-rica offers specialisations in the areas of ophthalmology, orthopaedic, cardiology, rehabilitation and cosmetic sur-geryalthoughthetwolatterareaimedmoreattheWesternworld.SouthAfricaoffers30%costsavingscomparedtotheUS.Promotioncomesmostlyfromtheprivatesectoralthoughthegovernmenthasrecentlyplannedanini-tiative to increase the number of medical tourists.
South KoreaSouthKoreacurrentlyattracts40,000medicaltouristsmainlyfromJapanandChina,followedbytheUSandCan-ada thanks to the cutting edge technology, which is reflected in specialisations focussing on the areas of oncolo-gy, cardiology, ophthalmology, orthopaedics and dentistry. The introduction of medical visas and construction of a medicaltourismhubonJejuIslandalongsidepromotionbytheCouncilforKoreanMedicineOverseasPromotionarehopedtoincreaseSouthKorea’sreputationasamedicaltourismdestinationforWesternersandincreasein-boundmedicaltouristsupto100,000annually.SouthKoreadoesnotofferanycostsavingsandsoitisunlikelythatthetypicalAmericanmedicaltouristswillbeattracted.
ThailandThailand was one of the pioneering countries who first saw the potential in the medical tourism market and now-adays it remains a leading medical tourism destination. Thanks to a wide variety of specialisations ranging from alternative treatment to bariatric surgery and including areas such as cardiology, neurology and ophthalmology as well as the world famous cosmetic and plastic surgery, Thailand has one of the best reputations in the medi-cal tourism market. This is also due to the confidentiality that Thailand offers and the fact that medical treatment can be combined with holidays. The relatively low level of safety in Thailand does not seem to deter tourists as 1.4millionarestillattractedeachyearfromtheUS(33%),China(29%),Japan(18%),UK(14%)andMiddleEast
17
Ma
nag
eMen
t Su
MM
ary
andAustralia(6%).FutureprojectionsforThailandarethatrevenueswillincreasefromUSD2billion(€1.3bil-lion)toUSD3billion(€2billion).
TurkeyTurkeyattracts165,000medicaltouristsayear,mostlyfromEuropeandAsia,whoareattractedbythenaturalthermalbathsandspasaswellasthe35JCIaccreditedmedicalfacilitiesthatTurkeyhastooffer.Costsavingsof58%and40%whencomparedtotheUSandtheUKrespectivelyalsohelp.SpecialisationsinTurkeycoverthefields of cardiology, orthopaedics, assisted reproduction, cosmetic and plastic surgery and oncology. Through thor-oughpromotionofTurkeyasamedicaltourismdestination,itishopedthat36%ofitstotaltourismrevenuewillbe from medical tourism by the end of 2010 despite the fact that the private health sector is relatively small and the public sector is weak.
4. outbound countrIeS
The NetherlandsThemostpopulardestinationsforDutchmedicaltouristsareBelgium,GermanyandTurkey,althoughexactper-centages are not known. The reasons why these people opt for treatment in these countries are cost savings, a possibility to combine a treatment with a holiday, reduced waiting times, proximity of the countries and language skills(mainlyapplicableintheFlemish-speakingpartofBelgium).DespiteallDutchcitizensbeingcoveredbyonecompulsorylevelofbasicinsurance,theaforementionedreasonscausethemtostillseektreatmentabroad.Dueto its growth, the national medical tourism market has an increased number of medical tourism facilitators, as well as specialists performing treatment in countries such as Germany in order to profit from the outbound pa-tientflows.AlthoughDutchpatientsspend€80millionabroadannually,thisstillonlymakesupasmallpercent-age of the global market for outbound medical tourism.
RussiaRussianmedicaltouriststraditionallytraveltoIsraelandGermany,accountingfor45%and20%ofpatientsrespec-tively.Currently,otherdestinations,suchasTurkey,Singapore,Switzerland,FranceandEasternEuropeancountriesareexperiencinganincreaseinpopularity.ThetreatmentmostsoughtafterbyRussiansincludecardiosurgery,or-gantransplantation,eyesurgery,oncologyandotherchronicdiseasesthatrequireadvancedmedicalequipmentandspecialisedaftercare.ThemostimportantreasonswhyRussianpatientsoptfortreatmentabroadarehigherquality,availabilityoftreatmentandlanguageskills,asRussiansoftendonotspeakforeignlanguages.Ingener-al,theydonotseekcostsavingssinceonlythewealthycitizenscanaffordtogoabroad.AsthequalityofhealthcareoutsideofRussiaisregardedashigher,itisprestigiousforpatientstoundergotreatmentabroad.Overall,thecountryrepresentsasmalleroutboundstreamasonlyaround1%ofthepopulationiscurrentlyoptingformedicaltourism but has large potential to become a major player in the outbound medical tourism market.
United KingdomThemostpopulardestinationforBritishmedicaltouristsisIndiaduetotheCommonwealth.Forfertilitytreatment,theCzechRepublicisapopularchoiceandforcombiningtreatmentwithaholidaystay,Turkeyisfrequentlyse-lected.ThemostcommonreasonswhyBritishpeoplegoabroadfortreatmentarereducedwaitingtimes,higher
18
Ma
nag
eMen
t Su
MM
ary
quality,costsavingsandavailabilityoftreatment.ThelongwaitingtimesandtheinfectionratesinhospitalsarethelargestproblemsfacingtheUKpopulation.Therefore,manyBritishpatientsarelookingtotravelfortreatment.ThismakestheBritishpopulationthesecondlargestoutboundmedicaltourismflow.ThesignificanceofmedicaltourismhasbeenreflectedintheintroductionofthemedicaltourisminsurancefromPJHayman,andtheincreaseininternationalcooperationbetweenUKbasedcompaniesandforeignmedicalfacilities.
United States of AmericaAmericanmedicaltouriststraveltoLatinAmerica(38%),Thailand(44%)andothercountries,suchasIndia,insmallerproportions(18%).ThemainreasonsforAmericancitizensoptingfortreatmentinaforeigncountryarecostsavings,higherquality,availabilityoftreatmentandreducedwaitingtimes.Costsavingisthemostimpor-tantreasonas,outofthe370millionUSresidents,14%areuninsuredand7%areunderinsured.Inaddition,themothertongueofaround34millioninhabitantsisSpanish.ThesereasonscombinedleadtomanyAmericansseek-ingtreatmentsinLatinAmerica,accountingfor500,000-750,000medicaltravellersannually.Americansarenowthelargestoutboundflowwiththenumberofmedicaltouristsbeingexpectedtodoubleannually.Asaresultofthisgrowingmarket,insuranceplanscoveringmedicaltourismhavebeenintroducedandtheUSbased‘MedicalTourismAssociation’wasestablished.
19
Ma
nag
eMen
t Su
MM
ary
5. general concluSIon
5.1 prIce benchMarkIng and MaIn FlowS analySIS
The research has been concluded in a medical tourism flows analysis as well as a price benchmark of the select-edmedicaltreatment,whereallinboundcountrieshavebeencomparedsequentiallytoeachoutboundcountry.The results below visually express the cumulative average price difference for all treatment per country by means of bar charts. The percentages indicate how much cheaper/more expensive the average medical treatment is com-pared to the country indicated.
The United StatesThecheapestcountriesforUSmedicaltouristsareMalaysia,PhilippinesandJordanwhooffer69%,66%and63%costsavingsrespectively.Nevertheless,AmericansdonotnormallyfrequentMalaysiaformedicaltourismandthereisstilllessthan1%ofUScitizensgoingfortreatmenttoJordandespiteitspromotionalefforts.Theydo,ontheotherhand,makeup40%ofmedicaltouristsinthePhilippines,togetherwithCanada.However,ma-jorcostsavingsofferedbyMexicoseemtobeadrivingfactorforUSmedicaltouristsastheyaccountfor95%oftheinboundmedicaltourists.OthercountriesthatAmericansoptforareBrazil(95%)andCostaRica(95%)with60%and25%ofcostsavingscorrespondingly.EventhoughCostaRica’spricedifferenceisconsiderablylow,itssuccessisprobablyduetoitsproximitytotheUS.
The United KingdomBritishmedicaltouristsmostfrequentlyoptforIndia(offering44%costsavings),Turkey(40%),Belgium(26%)andCzechRepublic(17%).EachofthesecountrieshasauniquesellingpointthatcatersforthevaryingdemandsofUKcitizens,suchasshorterwaitingtimes,availabilityoftreatmentandquality.Inparticular,Belgium’scompet-itiveadvantagefortheBritishmedicaltouristsisitsspecialisationincosmeticanddentaltreatmentsatalowercost as well as its proximity, especially thanks to the Eurostar and Thalys trains. In the future, countries that offer significantcostsavings,suchasJordan,MalaysiaandPhilippines(57%,57%and54%respectively)couldserveaspotentialmarketsfortheUK.Atthemoment,however,theybarelyattractanyBritishmedicaltourists.
United Kingdom 20%
Russia 79%
Netherlands 21%
Turkey 58%
Thailand 56%
South Africa 30%
Singapore 27%
Philippines 68%
Mexico 63%
Malaysia 69%
Jordania 66%
India 58%
Germany 56%
Dubai (UAE) 53%
Czech Republic 48%
Costa Rica 25%
Brazil 60%
Belgium 56%
South Korea -1%
US Price Comparision
20
Ma
nag
eMen
t Su
MM
ary
USA -57%
Russia 80%
Turkey 40%
Thailand 34%
Philippines 54%
Mexico 44%
Malaysia 57%
Jordania 57%
India 47%
Germany 26%
Dubai (UAE) -67%
Czech Republic 17%
Brazil 49%
Belgium 26%
South Korea -29 %
Singapore 0%
Costa Rica 4%
Netherlands 3%
UK Price Comparision
South Africa 9%
The NetherlandsThemostattractivemedicaltourismdestinationsforDutchcitizensareEuropean,mostlyneighbouringcountries,suchasGermanyandBelgium,butalsoTurkeyduetocostsavingsof29%,29%and34%,respectively.AnotherresearchedEuropeanmedicaltourismhub,theCzechRepublic,offerssavingsofonly10%.Thelargestcostsavingnon-EuropeanmedicaldestinationsfortheDutchcouldbeMalaysia(60%costsavings),thePhilippines(53%),Jordan(50%)andBrazil(47%).
RussiaEventhoughonly1%ofRussiansseekmedicaltreatmentabroadand,thus,donotcontributemuchtothetotalglobal outbound medical tourists, they are considered to be a potential market due to a high spending power. The Russianmedicaltouristsusuallyoptfordestinations,suchasGermanyandIsrael,thankstomanyRussian-speak-ingimmigrantsinthesecountries.However,Germanyistwelvetimes(12,11%)moreexpensivewhencomparedtoRussia.Generally,RussiahasthecheapestmedicalcareoutofallthecountriesstudiedandtheleastexpensivedestinationforRussianscouldbeJordandespitepricesbeingalmosttriple(178%).
United Kingdom -22%
Costa Rica -27%
Russia 69%
USA -53%
Turkey 34%
Thailand 32%
Philippines 53%
Mexico 45%
Malaysia 60%
Jordania 50%
India 31%
Germany 29%
Brazil 47%
Belgium 29%
Dubai (UAE) 29%
South Korea -43%
Singapore -22%
South Africa -1%
Czech Republic 10%
NL Price Comparision
21
Ma
nag
eMen
t Su
MM
ary
United Kingdom -1532%
USA -2791%
Netherlands -751%
Turkey -980%
South Korea -1358%
Thailand -1029%
South Africa -1200%
Singapore -1488%
Philippines -921%
Mexico -922%
Malaysia -846%
India -866%
Germany -1211%
Dubai (UAE) -1253%
Czech Republic -1177%
Costa Rica -1314%
Brazil -1085%
Belgium -1211%
Russia Price Comparision
Jordania -178%
5.2 Map concluSIonS
Conclusions from the main flows analysis have been converted into a digital map (see next page) which visually represents the most important inbound and outbound medical tourism flows within the scope of the research. It detailsthemostimportantreasonswhymedicaltouristsoptforcertaindestinationsaswellastheuniquesellingpoints of each selected inbound country and their areas of specialisation.
5.3 general concluSIon
Basedontheconductedresearch,itbecomesclearthattheindustryofmedicaltourismisadevelopingmarketwithvastpotential.However,variousissuesofprejudicesanduncertaintyontheconsumers’partalongsideunclearre-strictions and laws as well as growing ethical concerns have a negative impact on the industry and perception of themedicaltourismmarket.Atthemoment,besidesThailandandIndia,therearerelativelyfewwell-establisheddestinationsthathavealreadyseenthepotentialofthisindustry.Nevertheless,moreandmorecountriessuchas Malaysia are augmenting their promotional efforts and there is an increasing number of newcomers in the in-dustry, especially among European countries, who profit from attracting neighbouring populations. The growing demand for medical treatment for which people travel has resulted in a development of various medical tourism products and the emergence of facilitators.
PotentialoutboundmarketsarealsobeingidentifiedwithcountriessuchasRussiaandtheMiddleEastofferingthe medical tourism industry new target groups to attract. In general, the demand for medical tourism among outbound countries will be maintained as long as major problems with the national health care provision exist.
In conclusion, the prospects of medical tourism are positive and it has been forecast that the industry will grow.
Ma
nag
eMen
t Su
MM
ary
USA
•
USA
• M
exic
o
Co
sta R
ica •
• B
razi
l
•So
uth
Afr
ica
UK •
Belg
ium
••
Germ
an
y•
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
•Tu
rkey
UK •
Neth
erl
an
ds
•B
elg
ium
••
Germ
an
y•
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
• Tu
rkey
• Jo
rdan
Isra
el
•
•D
ub
ai
•In
dia
•Th
ail
an
d
• M
ala
ysi
a•
Sin
gap
ore
•So
uth
Ko
rea
• R
uss
ia
Iraq
ue
Sud
an
Ch
ina
Jap
an
Fran
krei
ch
Pola
nd
Au
stri
a
Can
ada
Phili
pp
ines
Ind
on
esia
Mo
zam
biq
ue
Leso
tho
Bo
tsw
ana
Swaz
ilan
d
Gre
enla
nd
An
tarc
tica
Au
stra
lia
Neth
erl
an
ds
•
• in
com
ing
coun
tries
:•
outg
oing
cou
ntrie
s:
Ma
nag
eMen
t Su
MM
ary
Qu
alit
y
Lan
gu
age
Skill
s
Ava
ilab
ility
Co
st S
avin
g
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
inco
min
g):
35.
000
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
Net
her
lan
ds
60%
, UK
21%
, Fr
ance
17%
, Oth
ers
2% (
Swed
en, I
taly
G
reec
e, U
S)
Rea
son
s fo
r co
min
g:
Spec
ialis
atio
ns:
USA
Belg
ium
Belg
ium
Belg
ium
USA
Belg
ium
USA
Belg
ium
USA
Belg
ium
USA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
inco
min
g):
200
.000
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
US
and
Can
ada
40%
, Jap
an
and
Ko
rea
20%
, Eu
rop
e 17
%, M
idd
le E
ast
7%,
Mic
ron
esia
6%
, Oth
ers
10%
(Ch
ina,
Ind
ia)
Rea
son
s fo
r co
min
g:
Spec
ialis
atio
ns:
USA
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Ph
ilip
pin
es
USA
Ph
ilip
pin
es
USA
Ph
ilip
pin
es
USA
Ph
ilip
pin
es
USA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
inco
min
g):
341
.288
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
Ind
on
esia
70%
, Sin
gap
ore
10%
, Jap
an 6
%, E
uro
pe
5%, I
nd
ia 3
%,
Oth
ers
6% (
Mid
dle
Eas
t)
Rea
son
s fo
r co
min
g:
Spec
ialis
atio
ns:
USA
Mala
ysi
aM
ala
ysi
aM
ala
ysi
aU
SA
Mala
ysi
aU
SA
Mala
ysi
aU
SA
Mala
ysi
aU
SA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
inco
min
g):
150
.000
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
US
95%
, Oth
ers
5%
(Can
ada,
Lat
in A
mer
ica)
Rea
son
s fo
r co
min
g:
Spec
ialis
atio
ns:
USA
Mexic
oM
exic
oM
exic
oU
SA
Mexic
oU
SA
Mexic
oU
SA
Mexic
oU
SA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
inco
min
g):
59.
000
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
Net
her
lan
ds
11%
, Fra
nce
10
%, A
ust
ria
8%, P
ola
nd
8%
, Oth
ers
63%
(S
wit
zerl
and
, Ru
ssia
, Mid
dle
Eas
t, U
K, U
S)
Rea
son
s fo
r co
min
g:
Spec
ialis
atio
ns:
USA
Germ
an
yG
erm
an
yG
erm
an
yU
SA
Germ
an
yU
SA
Germ
an
yU
SA
Germ
an
yU
SA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
inco
min
g):
250
.000
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
Iraq
38%
, Su
dan
31%
, Pa
lest
ine
30%
, Oth
ers
1% (
UK
, US,
Can
ada)
Rea
son
s fo
r co
min
g:
Spec
ialis
atio
ns:
USA
Jord
an
Jord
an
Jord
an
USA
Jord
an
USA
Jord
an
USA
Jord
an
USA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
inco
min
g):
1.4
00.0
00
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
US
33%
, Ch
ina
29%
, Jap
an
18%
, UK
14%
, Oth
ers
6% (
Mid
dle
Eas
t,
Au
stra
lia)
Rea
son
s fo
r co
min
g:
Spec
ialis
atio
ns:
USA
Thail
an
dTh
ail
an
dTh
ail
an
dU
SA
Thail
an
dU
SA
Thail
an
dU
SA
Thail
an
dU
SA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
inco
min
g):
150
.000
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
US
95%
, Oth
ers
5% (
Lati
n
Am
eric
a, E
uro
pe)
Rea
son
s fo
r co
min
g:
Spec
ialis
atio
ns:
USA
Co
sta R
ica
Co
sta R
ica
Co
sta R
ica
USA
Co
sta R
ica
USA
Co
sta R
ica
USA
Co
sta R
ica
USA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
inco
min
g):
N/A
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
US
95%
, Oth
ers
5%
(Lat
in A
mer
ica,
Can
ada)
Rea
son
s fo
r co
min
g:
Spec
ialis
atio
ns:
USA
Bra
zil
Bra
zil
Bra
zil
USA
Bra
zil
USA
Bra
zil
USA
Bra
zil
USA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
inco
min
g):
9.0
00
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
Ger
man
y, A
ust
ria,
UK
, Oth
ers
(US
and
nei
gh
bo
uri
ng
co
un
trie
s)
Rea
son
s fo
r co
min
g:
Spec
ialis
atio
ns:
USA
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
USA
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
USA
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
USA
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
USA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
inco
min
g):
165
.000
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
UK
30%
, Mid
dle
Eas
t,G
erm
any,
Oth
ers
(Bal
kan
, US,
Can
ada,
N
eth
erla
nd
s, C
auca
sus)
Rea
son
s fo
r co
min
g:
Spec
ialis
atio
ns:
USA
Turk
ey
Turk
ey
Turk
ey
USA
Turk
ey
USA
Turk
ey
USA
Turk
ey
USA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
inco
min
g):
450
.000
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
US
30%
, UK
, So
uth
Ko
rea,
O
ther
s (S
ou
th A
sia,
Mid
dle
Eas
t, A
fric
a,
Du
bai
)
Rea
son
s fo
r co
min
g:
Spec
ialis
atio
ns:
USA
Ind
iaIn
dia
Ind
iaU
SA
Ind
iaU
SA
Ind
iaU
SA
Ind
iaU
SA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
inco
min
g):
410
.000
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
Mo
zam
biq
ue
32%
, Les
oth
o
28%
, Bo
tsw
ana
13%
, Sw
azila
nd
12%
, Oth
ers
15%
(U
S an
d n
eig
hb
ou
rin
g c
ou
ntr
ies)
Rea
son
s fo
r co
min
g:
Spec
ialis
atio
ns:
USA
So
uth
Afr
ica
So
uth
Afr
ica
So
uth
Afr
ica
USA
So
uth
Afr
ica
USA
So
uth
Afr
ica
USA
So
uth
Afr
ica
USA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
inco
min
g):
40.
000
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
Jap
an, C
hin
a, U
S, C
anad
a,
Euro
pe,
Ru
ssia
Rea
son
s fo
r co
min
g:
Spec
ialis
atio
ns:
USA
So
uth
Ko
rea
So
uth
Ko
rea
So
uth
Ko
rea
USA
So
uth
Ko
rea
USA
So
uth
Ko
rea
USA
So
uth
Ko
rea
USA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
inco
min
g):
2.1
56
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
Ger
man
y 45
%, U
K 2
8%,
Sin
gap
ore
10%
, Oth
ers
17%
(Th
aila
nd
, US,
In
dia
)
Rea
son
s fo
r co
min
g:
Spec
ialis
atio
ns:
USA
Du
bai
Du
bai
Du
bai
USA
Du
bai
USA
Du
bai
USA
Du
bai
USA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
inco
min
g):
600
.000
Mai
n St
ream
s: In
done
sia,
Mal
aysi
a, P
hilip
pi-
nes,
UA
E, C
hina
, Oth
ers
(Cam
bodi
a, V
ietn
am,
Bang
lade
sh, P
akis
tan,
Pap
au N
ew G
uine
a, U
K)
Rea
son
s fo
r co
min
g:
Spec
ialis
atio
ns:
USA
Sin
gap
ore
Sin
gap
ore
Sin
gap
ore
USA
Sin
gap
ore
USA
Sin
gap
ore
USA
Sin
gap
ore
USA
USA
Bo
xes
for
inco
min
g c
ou
ntr
ies:
Bo
xes
for
ou
tgo
ing
co
un
trie
s:
No
Wai
tin
g T
imes
Ho
liday
Des
tin
atio
n
Pro
xim
ity
Co
nfi
den
tial
ity
Car
dio
log
y
On
colo
gy
Ort
ho
pae
dic
s
Reh
abili
tati
on
Op
hth
alm
olo
gy
Co
smet
ic S
urg
ery
Den
tist
ry
Tran
spla
nts
Plas
tic
Surg
ery
Bar
iatr
ic S
urg
ery
Der
mat
olo
gy
Ass
iste
d R
epro
du
ctio
n
Stem
Cel
l Th
erap
y
Neu
rolo
gy
Alt
ern
ativ
e
Safe
ty
Infr
astr
uct
ure
Ico
n 1
Insu
ran
ce
Ico
ns
for
the r
easo
ns
for
com
ing
/leavin
g:
Ico
ns
for
speci
ali
sati
on
tre
atm
en
ts:
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
ou
tgo
ing
): 1
5.00
0
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
Isra
el 4
5%, G
erm
any
20%
, O
ther
s 35
%
Rea
son
s fo
r le
avin
g:
USA
Ru
ssia
Ru
ssia
Ru
ssia
USA
Ru
ssia
USA
Ru
ssia
USA
Ru
ssia
USA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
ou
tgo
ing
): N
/A
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
Ger
man
y, B
elg
ium
, Tu
rkey
Rea
son
s fo
r le
avin
g:
USA
Neth
erl
an
ds
Neth
erl
an
ds
Neth
erl
an
ds
USA
Neth
erl
an
ds
USA
Neth
erl
an
ds
USA
Neth
erl
an
ds
USA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
ou
tgo
ing
): 7
0.00
0
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
Ind
ia, T
urk
ey, B
elg
ium
, Cze
ch
Rep
ub
lic, O
ther
s (I
taly
, Gre
ece,
Th
aila
nd
, M
alay
sia)
Rea
son
s fo
r le
avin
g:
USA
UK
UK
UK
USA
UK
USA
UK
USA
UK
USA
USA
USA
Med
ical
To
uri
sm (
ou
tgo
ing
): 7
50.0
00
Mai
n S
trea
ms:
Th
aila
nd
44%
, Lat
in A
mer
ica
38%
, Oth
ers
18%
(In
dia
)
Rea
son
s fo
r le
avin
g:
USA
US
US
US
USA
US
USA
US
USA
US
USA
USA
24
Ma
nag
eMen
t Su
MM
ary
5.4 outlook For Further developMent and reSearch
Duetotimerestrictionsofthisproject,severalareasrelatedtomedicaltourismhavenotbeenconsidered.Oneofthe suggested topics of further research would be
• Thetransferabilityofhospitalityratingsystemstohospitalssincethereisalackofoneuniforminternationalaccreditation system that is used by every medical facility and trusted by medical tourists.
• Atthelevelofmedicalfacilities,itisinterestingtoproduceabenchmarkingofwaitingtimesinsteadofpric-es as this is an important reason to seek treatment abroad.
• Atthelegallevel,theeffectoftheEuropeanCommission’sproposedDirectiveforCross-BorderHealthCareand the influences this may have on the operations within the industry at a medical tourism facilitator level as well as the governmental implications of this directive.
• Atapatientlevel,theintangibleaspects(suchaspersonalexperiences)ofmedicaltourismshouldbestud-iedalthoughthisispotentiallyadifficultareaduetopatientconfidentiality.Referralpanelsareatrustworthysource to share experiences.
• Theinternetisthemostimportantsourceofinformation.Developmentandefficiencyofsearchmachinessuchas www.hospitalscout.com is of key importance.
Asthismarketisexpectedtogrowexponentially,itispredictedthatmanynewareasandtopicswillberevealedthat will also be of interest and importance.