1

I256

Applied Natural Language Processing

Fall 2009

Sentence Structure

Barbara Rosario

2

Resources for IR

• Excellent resources for IR:– Course syllabus of Stanford course:

Information Retrieval and Web Search (CS 276 / LING 286)• http://www.stanford.edu/class/cs276/cs276-2009-

syllabus.html

– Book: Introduction to Information Retrieval (http://informationretrieval.org/)

3

Outline• Sentence Structure• Constituency• Syntactic Ambiguities• Context Free Grammars (CFG)• Probabilistic CFG (PCFG)• Main issues

– Designing grammars– Learning grammars– Inference (automatic parsing)

• Lexicalized Trees• Review

Acknowledgments: Some slides are adapted and/or taken from Klein’s CS 288 course

4

Analyzing Sentence Structure

• Key motivation is natural language understanding. – How much more of the meaning of a text can

we access when we can reliably recognize the linguistic structures it contains?

– With the help of the sentence structure, can we answer simple questions about "what happened" or "who did what to whom"?

5

Phrase Structure Parsing

• Phrase structure parsing organizes syntax into constituents or brackets

new art critics write reviews with computers

PP

NP

NP

N’

NP

VP

S

6

Example Parse

Hurricane Emily howled toward Mexico 's Caribbean coast on Sunday packing 135 mph winds and

torrential rain and causing panic in Cancun , where frightened tourists squeezed into musty shelters .

7

Analyzing Sentence Structure

• How can we use a formal grammar to describe the structure of an unlimited set of sentences?

• How can we “discover” / design such a grammar?

8

Constituency Tests

• Words combine with other words to form units. • How do we know what nodes go in the tree?

– What is the evidence of being a unit?

• Classic constituency tests:– Substitution– Question answers– Semantic grounds

• Coherence• Reference• Idioms

– Dislocation– Conjunction

9

Constituent structure: Substitution

• Substitutability: a sequence of words in a well-formed sentence can be replaced by a shorter sequence without rendering the sentence ill-formed.– The little bear saw the fine fat trout in the brook.

10

Constituent structure

11

Constituent structure

• Each node in this tree (including the words) is called a constituent. – The immediate constituents of S are NP and VP.

12

Conflicting Tests

• Constituency isn’t always clear– Units of transfer:

• think about ~ penser à• talk about ~ hablar de

– Phonological reduction:• I will go I’ll go• I want to go I wanna go

– Coordination• He went to and came from the store.

La vélocité des ondes sismiques

13

PP Attachment

I cleaned the dishes from dinnerI cleaned the dishes with detergentI cleaned the dishes in my pajamasI cleaned the dishes in the sink

14

PP Attachment

15

Syntactic Ambiguities• Prepositional phrases:

They cooked the beans in the pot on the stove with handles.

• Particle vs. preposition:The puppy tore up the staircase.

• Gerund vs. participial adjectiveVisiting relatives can be boring.Changing schedules frequently confused passengers.

• Modifier scope within NPsimpractical design requirementsplastic cup holder

• Coordination scope:Small rats and mice can squeeze into holes or cracks in the wall.

• And others…

16

Context Free Grammar (CFG)

• Write symbolic or logical rules:

Grammar (CFG) Lexicon

ROOT S

S NP VP

NP DT NN

NP NN NNS

NN interest

NNS raises

VBP interest

VBZ raises

…

NP NP PP

VP VBP NP

VP VBP NP PP

PP IN NP

17

Context Free Grammar (CFG)

• NLTK, context-free grammars are defined in the nltk.grammar module.

• Define a grammar (you can write your own grammars)

18

CFG: formal definition

• A context-free grammar is a tuple <N, T, S, R>– N : the set of non-terminals

• Phrasal categories: S, NP, VP, ADJP, etc.• Parts-of-speech (pre-terminals): NN, JJ, DT, VB

– T : the set of terminals (the words)– S : the start symbol

• Often written as ROOT or TOP

– R : the set of rules• Of the form X Y1 Y2 … Yk, with X, Yi N

• Examples: S NP VP, VP VP CC VP• Also called rewrites, productions, or local trees

19

CFG: parsing

• Parse a sentence admitted by the grammar

• Use deduction systems to prove parses from words– Simple 10-rule grammar: 592 parses– Real-size grammar: many millions of parses!

• This scales very badly, didn’t yield broad-coverage tools

20

Treebank

• Access Treebank to develop broad-coverage grammars.

21

PLURAL NOUN

NOUNDETDET

ADJ

NOUN

NP NP

CONJ

NP PP

Treebank Grammar Scale• Treebank grammars can be enormous

– The raw grammar has ~10K states, excluding the lexicon– Better parsers usually make the grammars larger, not smaller

• Solution?

22

Probabilistic Context Free Grammar (PCFG)

• Context free grammar that associates a probability with each of its productions.

– P(Y1 Y2 … Yk | X)

• The probability of a parse generated by a PCFG is simply the product of the probabilities of the productions used to generate it.

23

Outline• Sentence Structure• Constituency• Syntactic Ambiguities• Context Free Grammars (CFG)• Probabilistic CFG (PCFG)• Main issues

– Designing grammars– Learning grammars (learn the set of rules

automatically)– Parsing (inference: analyze a sentence and

automatically build a syntax tree)

• Lexicalized Trees

24

The Game of Designing a Grammar

Annotation refines base treebank symbols to improve statistical fit of the grammar Parent annotation [Johnson ’98]

25

Annotation refines base treebank symbols to improve statistical fit of the grammar Parent annotation [Johnson ’98] Head lexicalization [Collins ’99, Charniak ’00]

The Game of Designing a Grammar

26

Annotation refines base treebank symbols to improve statistical fit of the grammar Parent annotation [Johnson ’98] Head lexicalization [Collins ’99, Charniak ’00] Automatic clustering

The Game of Designing a Grammar

27

Learning

• Many complicated learning algorithms…– Another time )-;– Or take CS 288 spring 2010 (recommended!)

28

Parsing with Context Free Grammar

• A parser processes input sentences according to the productions of a grammar, and builds one or more constituent structures that conform to the grammar. (Inference)– It is a procedural interpretation of the

grammar. – It searches through the space of trees

licensed by a grammar to find one that has the required sentence along its fringe.

29

Parsing algorithms

• Top-down method (aka recursive descent parsing)

• Bottom-up method (aka shift-reduce parsing)

• Left-corner parsing

• Dynamic programming technique called chart parsing.

• Etc…

30

• Bottom up parser: Begins with a tree consisting of the node S• At each stage it consults the grammar to find a production that can be used

to enlarge the tree• When a lexical production is encountered, its word is compared against the

input• After a complete parse has been found, the parser backtracks to look for

more parses.

31

Issues

• Memory requirements

• Computation time

32

Runtime: Practice

• Parsing with the vanilla treebank grammar:

• Why’s it worse in practice?– Longer sentences “unlock” more of the grammar– All kinds of systems issues don’t scale

~ 20K Rules

(not an optimized parser!)

Observed exponent:

3.6

33

Problems with PCFGs

• If we do no annotation, these trees differ only in one rule:– VP VP PP– NP NP PP

• Parse will go one way or the other, regardless of words• Lexicalization allows us to be sensitive to specific words

34

Lexicalized Trees

• Add “headwords” to each phrasal node– Syntactic vs. semantic

heads– Headship not in (most)

treebanks– Usually use head rules,

e.g.:• NP:

– Take leftmost NP– Take rightmost N*– Take rightmost JJ– Take right child

• VP:– Take leftmost VB*– Take leftmost VP– Take left child

35

Lexicalized PCFGs?

• Problem: we now have to estimate probabilities like

• Never going to get these atomically off of a treebank

• Solution: break up derivation into smaller steps

36

Resources

• Foundation of Stat NLP (chapter 12) • Dan Klein’s group (and his class cs 288)

– http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~klein– http://nlp.cs.berkeley.edu/Main.html#Parsing

• Speech and Language processing. Jurafsky and Martin (chapters 12, 13, 14)

• Software:– Berkeley parser (Klein group) http://

code.google.com/p/berkeleyparser/– Michael Collins parser:

http://people.csail.mit.edu/mcollins/code.html

37

Dependency grammars

• Phrase structure grammar is concerned with how words and sequences of words combine to form constituents.

• A distinct and complementary approach, dependency grammar, focuses instead on how words relate to other words

• Dependency is a binary asymmetric relation that holds between a head and its dependents.

38

Dependency grammars

• Dependency graph: labeled directed graph– nodes are the lexical items– labeled arcs represent dependency relations

from heads to dependents

• Can be used to directly express grammatical functions as a type of dependency.

39

Dependency grammars

• Dependency structure gives attachments.

• In principle, can express any kind of dependency

• How to find the dependencies?

Shaw Publishing acquired 30 % of American City in March

WHAT

WHEN

WHO

40

• Link up pairs with high mutual information– Mutual information measures how much one word

tells us about another. – The doesn’t tell us much about what follows

• I.e. “the” and “red” have small mutual information– United ?

Idea: Lexical Affinity Models

congress narrowly passed the amended bill

41

Problem: Non-Syntactic Affinity

• Words select other words (also) on syntactic grounds

• Mutual information between words does not necessarily indicate syntactic selection.

a new year begins in new york

expect brushbacks but no beanballs

congress narrowly passed the amended bill

42

Idea: Word Classes

• Individual words like congress are entwined with semantic facts about the world.

• Syntactic classes, like NOUN and ADVERB are bleached of word-specific semantics.

• Automatic word classes more likely to look like DAYS-OF-WEEK or PERSON-NAME.

• We could build dependency models over word classes. [cf. Carroll and Charniak, 1992]

congress narrowly passed the amended bill

NOUN ADVERB VERB DET PARTICIPLE NOUN

43

Review• Python and NLTK• Lower level text processing (stemming

segmentation…)

• Grammar– Morphology– Part-of-speech (POS)– Phrase level syntax (PCFG, parsing)

• Semantics– Word sense disambiguation (WSD)– Lexical acquisition

44

Review• “Higher level” apps

– Information extraction– Machine translation– Summarization– Question answering– Information retrieval

• Intro to probability theory and graphical models (GM)– Example for WSD– Language Models (LM) and smoothing

• Corpus-based statistical approaches to tackle NLP problems– Data (corpora, labels, linguistic resources)– Feature extractions – Statistical models: Classification and clustering

45

Review• What I hope we achieved:• Given a language problem, know how to frame it in

NLP language, and use the appropriate algorithms to tackle it

• Overall idea of linguistic problems • Overall understanding of NLP tasks, both lower

level and higher level application• Basic understanding of Stat NLP

– Corpora & annotation– Classification, clustering – Sparsity problem

• Familiarity with Python and NLTK