URL: 16. Abstract Many freeways and arterials in major cities in ...
1 I MPROVING ROAD SAFETY AND OPERATIONS OF URBAN ARTERIALS: The study-case of Viale Ariosto in Sesto...
-
Upload
preston-reed -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
1
Transcript of 1 I MPROVING ROAD SAFETY AND OPERATIONS OF URBAN ARTERIALS: The study-case of Viale Ariosto in Sesto...
1
IMPROVING ROAD SAFETY AND OPERATIONS OF URBAN ARTERIALS:The study-case of Viale Ariosto in Sesto
Fiorentino, Florence (Italy)
Antonio PratelliDepartment of Civil Engineering “Vie e Trasporti”
University of Pisa (Italy)
CE552 Highway Safety Meeting7th April 2009
2
Tuscany Tuscany (Central Italy)(Central Italy)L
ectu
res
at th
e IO
WA
ST
AT
E U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y –
Apr
il 2
009
3
Sesto Fiorentino Sesto Fiorentino (“Florence Belt”)(“Florence Belt”)L
ectu
res
at th
e IO
WA
ST
AT
E U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y –
Apr
il 2
009
4
Urban street: Park Avenue
Length: 1700 mt (1,06 miles)
Main intersections: 5 (2 roundabouts + 3 signals)
Traffic: 1900-2100 vph (AM peak flow rates)
Passing trough vehicles (Master Plan forecasts): 67%
VIALE ARIOSTOVIALE ARIOSTOL
ectu
res
at th
e IO
WA
ST
AT
E U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y –
Apr
il 2
009
5
• Reducing traffic congestion
44 MAIN GOALS MAIN GOALS
Traffic negative impacts mitigation (pollutions, noise, delays and queues)
Enhancing and improving roadway environment and urban landscape
• Increasing road safety for all road users (vehicles + pedestrians + bicyclists)
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9
6
• Construction divided into two different lots (due to both functional and economic matters):
Lot 1) from Via Querciola to Via Rimaggio (950 m);
Lot 2) from Via Pavese to Via Neruda (750 m).
THETHE “ARIOSTO” “ARIOSTO” PROJECTPROJECT System approach design: the project has been extended
to the arterial in its whole.
We show some interesting design items, such as: - Querciola and Pavese (roundabout functional improvement); - Gavine and Oca Bianca (traffic calming device);
- Neruda (conversion from signal to roundabout);
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9
7
THE THE “ARIOSTO”“ARIOSTO”PROJECTPROJECT (2)(2)
We show some interesting design items, such as:
Querciola and Pavese (roundabout functional
improvement);
Gavine and Oca Bianca (traffic calming devices);
Neruda (conversion from signal to roundabout).
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9
9
VIA QUERCIOLAVIA QUERCIOLADESIGN CATEGORY:Improving the present roundabout via geometrical corrections related to the European standards.
NEW GEOMETRY FEATURES:
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9
10
VIA QUERCIOLAVIA QUERCIOLA (before)(before)L
ectu
res
at th
e IO
WA
ST
AT
E U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y –
Apr
il 2
009
11
VIA QUERCIOLAVIA QUERCIOLA (after)(after)L
ectu
res
at th
e IO
WA
ST
AT
E U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y –
Apr
il 2
009
12
VIA QUERCIOLAVIA QUERCIOLA (superimposed)(superimposed)L
ectu
res
at th
e IO
WA
ST
AT
E U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y –
Apr
il 2
009
WHITE = actual
RED = design
13
VIA QUERCIOLAVIA QUERCIOLA
EXPECTED RESULTS* (AM peak scenario):Entry direction: Present state Design state Difference %
1) VIA TOGLIATTI Average delay = 51 sec/v Average delay = 6,5 sec/v 87 %
99%Queues > 180 m 99%Queues 42 m 77 % (min.)
Entry capacity = 983 vph Entry capacity = 1549 vph + 58 %
2) VIA QUERCIOLA (sud) Average delay = 6 sec/v Average delay = 3,5 sec 42 %
99%Queues = 12 m 99%Queues = 12 m 0 %
Entry Capacity = 615 vph Capacità = 1048 veic/h + 70 %
3) VIALE ARIOSTO Average delay > 60 sec/v Average delay = 19 sec 68 % (min.)
99%Queues > 180 mt 99%Queues = 150 mt 17 % (min.)
Entry capacity = 1329 vph Entry capacity = 1658 vph + 25 %
4) VIA QUERCIOLA (nord) Average delay = 42 sec/v Attesa media = 5,5 sec/v 87 %
99%Queues = 84 m 99%Queues = 30 m 64 %
Entry capacity = 582 vph Entry capacity = 1040 vph + 79 %
(*) Values obtained by SETRA model for large roundabouts.
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9
14
VIA QUERCIOLA VIA QUERCIOLA (3D simulation)(3D simulation)
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9
15
VIA QUERCIOLA VIA QUERCIOLA (yesterday)(yesterday)
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9
16
VIA QUERCIOLA VIA QUERCIOLA (today)(today)
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9
17
GAVINE & “OCA BIANCA”GAVINE & “OCA BIANCA”L
ectu
res
at th
e IO
WA
ST
AT
E U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y –
Apr
il 2
009
18
GAVINEGAVINEDESIGN CATEGORY:Traffic calming features obtained by insertion of a median traffic island to carry out: 1) safe island for pedestrians crossing the road; 2) left turns elimination; 3) make a severe obstacle to bikers overpassing the bus where the bus stop is placed.
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9
19
GAVINEGAVINE
EXPECTED RESULTS:Accidents reduction due to:
• Suppression of all the left turn conflict points.
• Better protection offered to pedestrians at the zebra-crossing.
• Impeding dangerous overpasses, especially for mopeds and bikes, of the bus stopped at the bus stop.
Global increase of road safety (with low costs).Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9
21
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9
““Oca Bianca” - GiardiniOca Bianca” - Giardini
DESIGN CATEGORY:
1. Removal of the pedestrian actuated signal (due to the actual poor pedestrians rate of flows).
2. Insertion of a new median traffic island to carry out: • safe island for pedestrians crossing the road;• left turns conflicts elimination; • make a severe obstacle to bikers overpassing
the bus where the bus stop is placed.
22
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9
““Oca Bianca” - GiardiniOca Bianca” - Giardini
Previous layout
Design layout
23
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9
““Oca Bianca” - GiardiniOca Bianca” - Giardini
Via
Laz
zeri
ni
Via
Laz
zeri
ni
Via C
orsinu
ovi
Via C
orsinu
ovi
Viale Ariosto
Viale Ariosto
25
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9
VIA PAVESEVIA PAVESE
DESIGN CATEGORY:Improving the present roundabout via geometrical corrections related to the European standards.
NEW GEOMETRY FEATURES:
26
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9
Via PaveseVia Pavese
Via Via OsmannoroOsmannoro
Viale Viale AriostoAriosto
Viale Viale AriostoAriosto Aerial view of the situation before works.
27
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9
VIA PAVESE VIA PAVESE (design layout)(design layout)
28
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9VIA PAVESE VIA PAVESE (superimposed)(superimposed)
WHITE = actual
RED = design
29
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9VIA PAVESEVIA PAVESE
EXPECTED RESULTS*: DELAYS (weekday AM peak scenario ):
Entry E[t] before E[t] design (sec/veic)
% LoSBefore LoSDesign
1) Viale Ariosto (Ovest)
14 5 - 9 - 64% B A
2) Via Osmannoro
4 3 - 1 - 25% A A
3) Viale Ariosto (Est)
8 3,5 - 4,5 - 56% A A
4) Via Pavese
> 60 9 > - 50 > - 90% F A
(*) Values obtained by SETRA model for large roundabouts.
30
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9VIA PAVESEVIA PAVESE
EXPECTED RESULTS*: QUEUES (weekday AM peak scenario ):
(*) Values obtained by SETRA model for large roundabouts.
Entry L99 before
L99
design
(vehicles)
(metres)%
1) Viale Ariosto (Ovest)
12 6 - 6 - 36 - 50%
2) Via Osmannoro
4 3 - 1 - 6 - 25%
3) Viale Ariosto (Est)
7 4 - 3 - 18 - 43%
4) Via Pavese > 30 8 > - 20 > - 120 > - 90%
31
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9VIA PAVESE VIA PAVESE (under (under
construction)construction)
33
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9VIA NERUDA VIA NERUDA (under (under
construction)construction)
DESIGN CATEGORY:The signal controlled intersection is replaced with a large roundabout.
GEOMETRY FEATURES:
34
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9VIA NERUDA VIA NERUDA (before)(before)
Viale dei Mille
Viale dei Mille
Via Neruda
Via Neruda
Viale
Viale
Ari
osto
Arios
to
35
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9VIA NERUDA VIA NERUDA (design layout)(design layout)
36
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9VIA NERUDAVIA NERUDA
COMPARISON BETWEEN DELAYS* (weekday AM peak scenario):
Entry E[t] signal
E[t] roundabout
(sec/veic)
% LoSsignal LoSround
1) Viale Ariosto (Ovest)
44,1 2,5 - 41,6 - 94% D A
2) Via Neruda 27,6 2,5 - 25,1 - 91% C A
3) Viale Ariosto (Est)
10,3 3 - 7,3 - 71% B A
4) Viale dei Mille
19,6 2,5 - 17,1 - 87% B A
(*) Values obtained by SETRA model (roundabout) and by HCS 5.2 (signalized intersection).
37
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9VIA NERUDAVIA NERUDA
COMPARISON BETWEEN QUEUES* (weekday AM peak scenario):
(*) Values obtained by SETRA model (roundabout) and by HCS 5.2 (signalized intersection).
Entry L98 signal
L99
roundabout
(cars)
(metres)%
1) Viale Ariosto (Ovest)
26 3 - 23 - 138 - 88%
2) Via Neruda
11 3 - 8 - 48 - 73%
3) Viale Ariosto (Est)
3 2 - 1 - 6 - 33%
4) Viale dei Mille
8 3 - 5 - 30 - 62%
38
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9VIA NERUDA VIA NERUDA (the road yard (the road yard
wallpaper)wallpaper)
39
Lec
ture
s at
the
IOW
A S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
– A
pril
200
9VIA NERUDA VIA NERUDA (work in progress, April-July (work in progress, April-July
2008)2008)