1 HOT TOPICS FOR PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICTS By Jim Fredman May 4, 2006 Association of Washington...
-
Upload
norman-sims -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 HOT TOPICS FOR PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICTS By Jim Fredman May 4, 2006 Association of Washington...
1
HOT TOPICS FOR PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICTS
By Jim FredmanMay 4, 2006
Association of Washington Public Hospital DistrictsRetreat for CEOs and Administrators
“Leading Wisely, Living Well”
Cave B Inn at SageCliffe,Quincy, Washington
May 2-4, 2006
2
ACTION ITEMS
Public Records Act Confidential Information Medical malpractice reform Patient financial agreements Bills Charity care Deficit Reduction Act Privacy complaints Medical staff issues
3
Medicare enrollment
State Medicaid audits
Patient Safety and Quality ImprovementAct of 2005
ISSUES TO WATCH
4
Beginning July 1, 2006, RCW 42.17.250 to .348 will be recodified under Chapter 42.56 RCW, entitled the “Public Records Act”
Exemptions reorganized into categories such as “health care” as RCW 42.56.360
Conversion chart attached
RECODIFICATION OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
5
PUBLIC RECORDS ACT – 2005 AMENDMENTS (2SHB 1758)
1. Eliminates “overbroad” exemption2. Requires large requests be filled on
an installment basis3. Allows agencies to require deposit if
copies are requested4. Allows agencies to stop fulfilling
request if installment not claimed or reviewed
6
PUBLIC RECORDS ACT – 2005 AMENDMENTS (2SHB 1758)
5. Designate and publicly identify public disclosure officer to whom all requests should be directed
6. Shortens the statute of limitations to one year from when the last document was produced or exemption asserted
7
PUBLIC RECORDS ACT – 2005 AMENDMENTS (2SHB 1758)
7. Requires the attorney general to adopt advisory model rules addressing
– “fullest assistance” requirement– large requests– electronic records– any other topic
8
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S MODEL RULES
Chapter 44-14 WAC
Optional model rules and best practices
Roadmap for public hospital district policy
9
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S MODEL RULES, cont.
Topics– Agency description, contact information,
public records officer– Availability of public records– Processing requests– Exemptions– Cost of providing copies– Review of denials
PHD can adopt the model rules but would be bound to attorney general comments
suggest PHD draft own policy
10
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
Keeping confidential information confidential when subject to
Public Records Act Open Pubic Meetings Act
11
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE EXEMPTIONS
Agency’s burden to show exemption applies (RCW 42.17.251)
All exemptions construed narrowly(RCW 42.17.340(1))
12
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE EXEMPTIONS, cont.
Most common exemptions include: Medical records (RCW 42.17.312) Quality improvement (RCW 42.17.310(1)
(hh)) Privacy (RCW 42.17.330) Deliberative process (RCW 42.17.310(1)(i)) Work product (RCW 42.17.310(1)(j)) Attorney-client privilege Commercial purposes Certain employment records
13
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE EXEMPTIONS, cont.
If an exemption applies, an attempt should be made to label documents accordingly– quality improvement (RCW4.24.250
and 70.41.200)– attorney-client communication/
attorney work product– draft/deliberative process
Limit who has access within the facility
14
OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT
Meetings open and public unless executive session permitted
Executive session (RCW 42.30.110)– negotiations of publicly bid contracts
– real estate
– national security
– complaints against public officers/employees
– qualifications of or review public employee/elective office
15
OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT, cont.
Executive session (RCW 42.30.110)
–discuss claims with legal counsel
• existing or reasonably expected litigation
• litigation or legal risks expected to result in adverse legal or financial consequences
• presence of legal counsel alone does not justify executive session
16
OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT, cont.
Executive session (RCW 70.44.062(2))
– QI/peer review committee documents and discussions
Final action must be in open meeting
Matters disclosed in open meeting lose privilege and confidentiality
17
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT/PEER REVIEW PRIVILEGE
Relatively broad scope– peer review, risk management,
credentialing, complaints relating to health care(RCW 70.41.200, RCW 4.24.250)
If not a hospital, consider a coordinated quality improvement program(RCW 43.70.510)
18
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT/PEER REVIEW PRIVILEGE, cont.
Important to have plan and policies that identify– QI/peer review committees and responsibilities– committees that obtain/maintain documents on
behalf of peer review/QI committee– documents collected and maintained on behalf
of peer review/QI committees (complaints, medical staff credentials information, etc.)
Exempt from disclosure Appropriate for executive session
19
CORPORATE COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS
Corporate compliance documents– hotline complaints?– routine audits?– audits that arise from complaint?– issues found during an audit?
Exemptions?– attorney work product/attorney-client
communication (rendering legal advice is at core of both)
– quality improvement
20
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE REFORM (EFFECTIVE June 1, 2006)
Provider statements made within 30 days of discovery of incident not admissible at trial– promise to pay or write off hospital bills– related to discomfort pain, suffering,
injury or death– apology, fault or sympathy – remedial actions regarding conduct
Consider policy providing guidance to medical staff and employees regarding such statements
21
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE REFORM, cont.
Requires any drug orders or prescriptions to be hand printed, typed or electronic
Voluntary arbitration Mandatory mediation Expands immunity for reporting
unprofessional conduct
22
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING
Expands reportable events to 27 in the following categories:– surgical – environmental– patient protection – care management– product or device– criminal List of reportable events attached
23
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING, cont.
Requires DOH notification within two days of event confirmation
Within 45 days after confirming event, hospital must:– conduct a root cause analysis – develop an action plan for
implementing any necessary changes DOH will develop rules to implement PHD should update policies
24
PATIENT FINANCIAL AGREEMENT
Class actions – charity care– outpatient billing
25
PATIENT FINANCIAL AGREEMENT
Consider revising financial agreements to inform patient that– hospital rates are set forth in
hospital’s chargemaster and available for review
– hospital charges may differ from amounts others are obligated to pay based on each person’s private insurance, Medicare/ Medicaid coverage or lack of coverage
26
PATIENT FINANCIAL AGREEMENT, cont.
– the hospital has a charity care program and patient may request that information
– patient may incur liability to the hospital for outpatient services that patient would not incur if services were provided in a physician office rather than hospital-based facility
– estimate of such additional liability will be provided and actual liability will depend on the services rendered
27
HOSPITAL BILLS
ESSB 6189 New section to RCW 70.41 Before discharge a hospital must furnish each
patient receiving inpatient services with •name of physician groups or other
professional partners who commonly provide care in the hospital and from whom patient may receive a bill
•provider telephone number for questions regarding bills
28
CHARITY CARE
SSHB 2574 proposed to increase charity care level and address billing practices– was not adopted
Hospital association is drafting policy to address most items in SSHB 2574
29
CHARITY CARE, cont.
Draft policy:
– written notification of availability of charity care
– written policies regarding collection practices and annual summary to board of collection actions
30
CHARITY CARE, cont.
Charity care provided:
– 100% of federal poverty guidelines (FPG) receive free care
– 200% of FPG pay up to 100% of estimated cost of care
– 300% of FPG pay up to 130% of estimated cost of care
31
DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT
Facilities that receive over $5 million in Medicaid payments must:
establish written policies for employees with detailed information about
– federal False Claims Act –administrative remedies for false
statements under federal law
32
DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT, cont.
– applicable state laws establishing civil or criminal penalties for fraud
– whistleblower protections– the role of federal and state laws in
preventing and detecting fraud, waste and abuse
33
DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT, cont.
Include in such policies detailed provisions about the entity’s own policies and procedures for detecting and preventing fraud, waste and abuse
Include in employee handbook specific information on applicable laws, rights of employees to be protected as whistleblowers, and the entity’s policies and procedures for detecting and preventing fraud, waste and abuse
34
DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT, cont.
If fail to implement will lose Medicaid payments
Increases focus on Medicaid fraud
Increases documentation requirements for aliens seeking Medicaid coverage
35
MEDICAL STAFF
Quality patient care is paramount, followed closely by fairness and process
Poliner $366 million verdict for 60-day summary suspension of cardiac cath lab privileges
Lessons–diligently follow own processes and procedures
–try to keep competitors out of the process–be fair to the practitioner under review
36
MEDICAL STAFF, cont.
Responding to requests for information– Washington hospitals have duty to
respond (RCW 70.41.230)
Kadlec Medical Center v. Lakeview Medical Center LLC Anesthesia Associates, E.D. La.– received a detailed request for information– responded only with employment dates
and staff appointment, stated nothing more would be provided due to large number of requests
37
MEDICAL STAFF, cont.
– did not inform Kadlec about serious allegations of misconduct
(diversion of drugs)
– Lakeview omitted the information based on fear of suit by physician
38
MEDICAL STAFF, cont.
Recommendations
Respond to requests for–dates of association, type of
association, clinical privileges held– reasons for termination of association–adverse actions and proposed
adverse actions and basis for the actions or proposed actions
39
MEDICAL STAFF, cont.
Questionable but likely- current investigation, but no proposed adverse action
No duty to - respond to hypothetical questions - provide opinions about abilities - but if choose to, make sure you have a good release
Communications should be peer review/QI committee to peer review/QI committee
40
PRIVACY COMPLAINTS
Patients have the right under HIPAA to file complaint with OCR
To minimize sanctions, investigate complaints or issues that PHD becomes aware of– Violation?– Revise policy/remedial actions?– Sanctions for staff involved?– Mitigation of damages?
Document No duty to self-report
41
MEDICARE PROVIDER ENROLLMENT
Final rule published April 21, 2006
Amends 42 CFR Part 424– providers must complete CMS 855
enrollment application and resubmit same every five years
– resubmit within 90 days of notice from CMS
– notify CMS of changes within 90 days of change (i.e., board, managing employees)
42
MEDICARE PROVIDER ENROLLMENT, cont.
– 855 contains certification regarding compliance with all Medicare laws
– failure to submit may result in termination of agreement
43
NATIONAL PATIENT SAFETY AND QUALITY ACT OF 2005
National Peer Review Protection? Patient safety organizations to which
providers can voluntarily report patient safety work product (medical errors and patient safety information)
PSO to analyze and provide feedback Patient safety work product is privileged
and confidential Requires HHS adopt implementing
regulations
44
FEDERAL AUDITS OF DSHS
Overpayments discovered– DSH payments ($44 million in
excess of hospital specific limits)
– undocumented aliens ($75 million?) DSHS to negotiate with HHS If DSHS must refund money, it may
seek overpayments from hospitals
45
Questions?
46
CONTACT INFORMATION
James J. Fredman, IIITelephone: 206-447-2909Email: [email protected]
Foster Pepper PLLC1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3400Seattle, WA 98101www.foster.com