1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

download 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

of 18

Transcript of 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    1/18

    UCL RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEE

    IMPORTANT: ALL FIELDS MUST BE COMPLETED. THE FORM SHOULD BE COMPLETED IN PLAINENGLISH UNDERSTANDABLE TO LAY COMMITTEE MEMBERS.

    SEE NOTES IN STATUS BAR FOR ADVICE ON COMPLETING EACH FIELD. YOU SHOULD READ THEETHICS APPLICATION GUIDELINES AND HAVE THEM AVAILABLE AS YOU COMPLETE THIS FORM.

    APPLICATION FORM

    SECTION A APPLICATION DETAILS

    A1Project Title: Interpreting The urban revolution: Segregative production of space in Santiago through acomparative study

    Date of Submission: 15 September 2014 Proposed Start Date: 1st November 2014

    UCL Ethics Project ID Number: 6168/001

    Proposed End Date: 1st August 2015If this is an application for classroom research as distinct from independent study courses, please providethe following additional details:

    Course Title: Mphil/PhD Development and Planning Course Number: RRDDEVSING01

    A2Principal ResearcherPlease note that a student undergraduate, postgraduate or research postgraduate cannot be the PrincipalResearcher for Ethics purposes.

    Full Name: Dr Camillo Boano Position Held: Senior Lecturer

    Address: 34 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9EZ, UK Email: [email protected]

    Telephone: + 44 (0)20 679 1111

    Fax:

    Declaration To be Signed by the Principal Researcher

    ! I have met with and advised the student on the ethical aspects of this project design (applicable only if thePrincipal Researcher is not also the Applicant).

    ! I understand that it is a UCL requirement for both students & staff researchers to undergo Disclosure andBarring Service (DBS) Checks when working in controlled or regulated activity with children, young people orvulnerable adults. The required DBS Check Disclosure Number(s) is:

    ! I have obtained approval from the UCL Data Protection Officer stating that the research project is compliantwith the Data Protection Act 1998. My Data Protection Registration Number is:

    ! I am satisfied that the research complies with current professional, departmental and university guidelinesincluding UCLs Risk Assessment Procedures and insurance arrangements.

    ! I undertake to complete and submit the Continuing Review Approval Form on an annual basis to the UCLResearch Ethics Committee.

    ! I will ensure that changes in approved research protocols are reported promptly and are not initiated withoutapproval by the UCL Research Ethics Committee, except when necessary to eliminate apparent immediatehazards to the participant.

    ! I will ensure that all adverse or unforeseen problems arising from the research project are reported in a timelyfashion to the UCL Research Ethics Committee.

    ! I will undertake to provide notification when the study is complete and if it fails to start or is abandoned.

    SIGNATURE: DATE:12/09/2014

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    2/18

    A3Applicant(s) Details (if Applicant is not the Principal Researcher e.g. student details):

    Full Name: Jose Francisco Vergara Perucich

    Position Held: MPhil/PhD Student Development and Planning

    Address: 34 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9EZ,UK

    Email: [email protected]

    Telephone: +447745968713Fax:

    A4Sponsor/ Other Organisations Involved and Funding

    a) Sponsor: UCL Other institutionIf your project is sponsored by an institution other than UCL please provide details:

    b) Other Organisations: If your study involves another organisation, please provide details. Evidence that the relevant authority hasgiven permission should be attached or confirmation provided that this will be available upon request.

    c) Funding: What are the sources of funding for this study and will the study result in financial payment or payment in kind to thedepartment or College? If study is funded solely by UCL this should be stated, the section should not be left blank. The source

    of funding is the Chilean Government through Becas Chile Scholarship

    A5Signature of Head of Department or Chair of the Departmental Ethics Committee(This must not be the same signature as the Principal Researcher)

    I have discussed this project with the principal researcher who is suitably qualified to carry out thisresearch and I approve it. The project is registered with the UCL Data Protection Officer, a formalsigned risk assessment form has been completed, and appropriate insurance arrangements are inplace. Links to details of UCL's policies on data protection, risk assessment, and insurance arrangements can be found at:http://ethics.grad.ucl.ac.uk/procedures.php

    UCL is required by law to ensure that researchers undergo a Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS)Check if their research project puts them in a position of trust with children under 18 or vulnerableadults.

    *HEAD OF DEPARTMENT TO DELETE BELOW AS APPLICABLE*

    I am satisfied that checks: ( 1 ) have been satisfactorily completed

    ( 2 ) have been initiated

    ( 3 ) are not required

    If checks are notrequired please clarify why below.

    Chairs Action Recommended: Yes No

    A recommendation for Chairs action can be based only on the criteria of minimal risk as defined in the Terms of Reference of the UCL

    Research Ethics Committee.

    PRINT NAME:

    SIGNATURE:

    DATE:

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    3/18

    SECTION B DETAILS OF THE PROJECT

    B1Please provide a brief summary of the project in simple prose outlining the intended value of the project, giving necessaryscientific background (max 500 words).This research addresses the methodological proposals of Henri Lefebvre in his work named "The urbanrevolution." In this book, he establishes critical perspectives of urbanism in neoliberal societies.The urban society expresses its class struggle through spatial distribution. Santiago is the most segregatedcity among the OECD members. For Henri Lefebvre, the space is a social and political construction.However, in Chile this concept contrasts with the last 25 years, where every realm of the society has beenaiming towards the creation of a more inclusive and equitable nation with the exception of urbanism. Thissocial project has not transformed how urbanism has been producing the city. Considering that Chile wasan experimental field to implement the neoliberal ideals developed by Milton Friedman, separating thetransformation of society from urban design is a mistake and it deserves a critical reflection. In order toguide this analysis, The urban revolution written by Lefebvre in 1970 provides an appropriated frameworkto understand the gaps and to build interpretations of the reasons behind the segregation of Santiago.To narrow down this theoretical approach there is a case study analysis developed through a fieldwork.This process will analyse the differences between an urban design projects built in a rich district comparedwith a project developed in a poor district. The presentation of wide differences based on spatialsegregation expressed through the quality of the urban life will provide critical insights. The hypothesis is

    that this situation implies a catastrophic fail of urbanism in Santiago, reinforcing one of the main argumentsof "The urban revolution": The urbanism conceived like so, aims towards spatial segregation and towardsthe lost of an urban experience where the whole society receive benefits.The research question is:What contradictions can be detected in the spatial production of scarce resource districts of Santiago thatdemonstrate a crisis of urbanism, based on "The urban revolution" as an analytical framework?Using "The urban Revolution" as a methodological instrument to understand the manner how municipalitiesproduce urban projects may offer several reflections about the problem of segregation in Santiago, andalso provide a fruitful field to test Lefebvre's arguments. The application of this book as a methodologicalapproach to understanding urban design failure is an unprecedented approach in Latin America, whichwould provide new interpretations to redefine the role of urbanists in the pursuit of just cities. Accordinglywith the methodology proposed by "The Urban Revolution," this research aims to produce a dialecticalanalysis of urbanism in Chile, which currently have become a blind field.

    The objectives of this research are:! Produce a methodological tool to analyse the urban life critically, based on "The urban revolution" asmain theoretical resource.! Advance in the understanding of the spatial segregation of Santiago, following a neo-marxistapproach based on Lefebvre's thought.! Unveil the logic behind the spatial production leaded by local authorities, mapping the procedures toimplement urban projects.

    ! Contest the disciplinary division between planning, urban design, architecture, economy, andsociology; in order to produce a comprehensive reflection of the urban production processes in localscales.

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    4/18

    4

    B2Briefly characterise in simple prose the research protocol, type of procedure and/or research methodology (e.g.observational, survey research, experimental). Give details of any samples or measurements to be taken (max 500 words).

    This research starts with literature review, which aims to build a theoretical framework in order to set atheory of "The urban revolution" as a source of critical analysis and then apply this analysis in thefieldwork, then contrasting theory with reality.

    The research protocol in the fieldwork has four different stages:1. Meeting authorities and specialists:These authorities are urban designers, planners, mayors, NGO heads, and community leaders.1.1. Semi-structured interview with specialists and authorities30 minutesThe aim is to present trigger questions that will commit the specialist to talk about some topics that arerelevant to guide the research in the field.1.2. Questionnaires to specialists20 minutesThis questionnaire is with alternatives, and the goal is to receive comparable data from authorities aboutthe problematic in question.2. Debriefing the data collectedOne of the most important concerns of this research is the use the possibility of share the informationcollected, discussing it with people that know the study cases.

    2.1. Workshop with urbanism studentsIt aims to present the collected data and preliminary reflections to develop a process of argumentations ina dialectical manner, getting some direct feedback of the research process and outcomes so far.2.2. Publishing a reflection of this two first experiencesIt attempts to present the reflections of the segregation problem in Santiago after discussing it withspecialists and in the workshop. The idea is published it in Spanish in order to receive feedback anddiscussions from the actors involved in the field.3. Qualifying the study casesThe aim is to produce a bank of data based on primary source collections of the study cases.3.1. Collecting information:

    This is the first process of hard data collection based on pictures, maps, sketches, documentation, news,newspapers, existent surveys of the area, plans, programmes, and projects.3.2. Survey to users of study cases:

    A short questionnaire of no more than 10 minutes per interviewed. The aim is to create a qualitativeordination about opinion of users of these spaces, and how they perceive the urban life there.

    4. Socializing the results before return to LondonAs stated above, it will be important to share the information collected, and the preliminary ideas presentedin the field. This is the last part of the fieldwork.4.1. Lecture of the preliminary outcomes of the research to receive feedback in the fieldwork.The researcher will develop this lecture, and it will have two anchor discussants, to question the advancesand trigger public discussions of the preliminary outcomes.4.2. Publishing a reflection of the process as a contestation of the publication made in the stage 2.

    The aim of this publication is left a discussion in the field, which remains open after my return to London.

    Once in London back, the process will be do data analysis and write the thesis based on the theory and inthe experiences and data collected in the fieldwork.

    Attach any questionnaires, psychological tests, etc.(a standardised questionnaire does not need to be attached, but please providethe name and details of the questionnaire together with a published reference to its prior usage).

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    5/18

    5

    B3Where will the study take place (please provide name of institution/department)?If the study is to be carried out overseas, what steps have been taken to secure research and ethical permission in the study country?Is the research compliant with Data Protection legislation in the country concerned or is it compliant with the UK Data Protection Act1998?

    This research will take place in Santiago, Chile. As Chilean citizen, I do not have legal restrictions or VISAissues that could impede my research in this country.

    Data protection measures are:

    -Informed consent: All the interviewees will be previously informed via e-mail and with a printed copy in theday of the interview. The interviewees will receive information about the use of collected data, and abouttheir right to withdraw the information provided if they decide it. The consent will be printed, writing by handof the interviewee and signed by them too.

    -Confidentiality: All the interviewees will be if they prefer to appear anonymously. The collecteddocumentation and information will be stored in UCL servers, erasing all the material in the recordingdevice.

    - Devolution of transcription and processed data: The processed information will be send to interviewees intheir language; offering them the option to edit, rephrase, include new information or erase.

    Data will be collected from public resources. Under the current transparency law it will be possible to obtaindocumentation not available in official websites. In case to find confidential documents, it will be requestformally to the authors (person or institutions) about the possibility to use it and how. The approval must bein writing and signed in a form to agree with the authors.

    B4Have collaborating departments whose resources will be needed been informed and agreed to participate?

    Attach any relevant correspondence.

    No

    B5How will the results be disseminated, including communication of results with research participants?

    The results of the research will be disseminated through publications in Spanish in order to permit thatevery involved participant could read and understand the outcomes. In addition, every participant of thisresearch will receive an e-mail (or regular mail in case of don't have an e-mail) with these publications.

    B6Please outline any ethical issues that might arise from the proposed study and how they are be addressed. Please note thatall research projects have some ethical considerations so do not leave this section blank.

    An ethical issue might arise if the interviewee feels threatened with the questionnaire or with the presenceof the researcher. In that case, the informed consent will be the way to address that issues, preventing it.

    - Informed consent: The interviewed will receive a document that clearly and easily explains what is thisresearch about, which are the goals and scopes of the same.

    Every interviewee will receive one copy of this form and the researcher will retain a signed copy too inorder to index it to the research file.

    In this form, the interviewee will have the choice to preserve the anonymity if it is desired. Also, in the formwill be clearly stated the right to withdraw his/her contributions of the research, providing the contactnumber and e-mail of the researcher.

    SECTION C DETAILS OF PARTICIPANTS

    C1Participants to be studied

    C1a. Number of volunteers: 100

    Upper age limit: 75

    Lower age limit: 21

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    6/18

    6

    C1b. Please justify the age range and sample size:

    75 years old maximum as the elderly specialist to interview is 74 right now. 21 years old minimum as thestudents to be part of the workshop are 21 and 22. In Chile, people attains the age of majority at 18 years.

    The sample size considers: 35 Specialists to interview (15 at Global Level, 20 at Local level); 15 Studentsto participate in the workshop;50 Users of the urban spaces to participate in the survey.

    C2If you are using data or information held by a third party, please explain how you will obtain this. You should confirm thatthe information has been obtained in accordance with the UK Data Protection Act 1998.

    The process of data collection will be through public libraries, public entities, and through specialists andauthorities. The whole data will be developed mainly collected from public resources. Maps, pictures, andsketches will be developed by the researcher.

    The data and information collected will be held accordingly with the data protection policies stated on DataProtection Act UK 1998.

    C3

    Will the research include children or vulnerable adults such as individuals with

    a learning disability or cognitive impairment or individuals in a dependent or unequal relationship? Yes No

    How will you ensure that participants in these groups are competent to give consent to take part in this study? If you have relevantcorrespondence, please attach it.

    4Will payment or any other incentive, such as gift service or free services, be made to any research participant?

    Yes No

    If yes, please specify the level of payment to be made and/or the source of the funds/gift/free service to be used.

    Please justify the payment/other incentive you intend to offer.

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    7/18

    7

    C5Recruitment

    (i) Describe how potential participants will be identified:Most of participants are people that know me and that I've met before due to my professional experience.The other participants are emergent actors that have been developing research or work recently, relatedwith the case study.

    People to be surveyed in the case study locations will be stratified and randomly selected, taking care tobuild a diverse sample composed equally by woman and men, and also attempting to gather experiencesfrom young, middle age, and elderly people.

    (ii) Describe how potential participants will be approached:

    For interviewees via e-mail and phone call. For surveyed, following the next protocol: Kindly approaching tothem and request some minutes, the researcher identifies himself, he shows the questionnaire in order toknow if person want to participate, if accepts then complete the questionnaire, otherwise the researcherthanks and retires to find another person.

    (iii) Describe how participants will be recruited:

    Attach recruitment emails/adverts/webpages. A data protection disclaimer should be included in the text of such literature.

    C6Will the participants participate on a fully voluntary basis? Yes No

    Will UCL students be involved as participants in the research project? Yes No

    If yes, care must be taken to ensure that they are recruited in such a way that they do not feel any obligation

    to a teacher or member of staff to participate.

    Please state how you will bring to the attention of the participants their right to withdraw from the study without penalty?

    If any participant wants to withdraw their participation in the study, it will be stated in the informed consentform.

    C7CONSENT

    Please describe the process you will use when seeking and obtaining consent.

    - Informed consent: The interviewed will receive a document that clearly and easily explains what is thisresearch about, which are the goals and scopes of the same.Every interviewee will receive one copy of this form and the researcher will retain a signed copy too inorder to index it to the research file.

    In this form, the interviewee will have the choice to preserve the anonymity if it is desired. Also, in the formwill be clearly stated the right to withdraw his/her contributions of the research, providing the contactnumber and e-mail of the researcher.

    A copy of the participant information sheet and consent form must be attached to this application. For your convenience proformasare provided in C10 below. These should be filled in and modified as necessary.

    In cases where it is not proposed to obtain the participants informed consent, please explain why below.

    If this occurs, might be only in case of a relevant discussion about a vital topic of the research is tackledthrough an informal chat between the researcher and an actor. In this case, if that occurs, the research willneed to contact the actor after the chat in order to complete the consent form.

    C8Will any form of deception be used that raises ethical issues? If so, please explain.

    No.

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    8/18

    8

    C9Will you provide a full debriefing at the end of the data collection phase? Yes No

    If No, please explain why below.

    C10 Information Sheets And Consent Forms

    A poorly written Information Sheet(s) and Consent Form(s) that lack clarity and simplicity frequently delay ethics approval ofresearch projects. The wording and content of the Information Sheet and Consent Form must be appropriate to the age andeducational level of the research participants and clearly state in simple non-technical language what the participant is agreeing to.Use the active voice e.g. we will book rather than bookings will be made. Refer to participants as you and yourself as I or we.

    An appropriate translation of the Forms should be provided where the first language of the participants is not English. If you havedifferent participant groups you should provide Information Sheets and Consent Forms as appropriate (e.g. one for children and one

    for parents/guardians) using the templates below. Where children are of a reading age, a written Information Sheet should beprovided. When participants cannot read or the use of forms would be inappropriate, a description of the verbal information to beprovided should be given. Please ensure that you trial the forms on an age-appropriate person before you submit your application.

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    9/18

    9

    Participant Information Sheet for Phd Development and Planningin Research StudiesENGLISH VERSION

    You will be given a copy of this information sheet.

    THIS COPY WILL BE IN SPANISH.

    Title of Project: Interpreting The urban revolution: Segregative production of space in Santiago through a comparative study

    This study has been approved by the UCL Research Ethics Committee (Project ID Number): 6168/001

    Name Dr Camillo Boano, Jose Francisco Vergara Perucich

    Work Address 34 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9EZ, UK

    Contact Details [email protected]; [email protected].

    Phone of Jose Francisco in the field: +56997421086.

    We would like to invite _____________________________________________________ (name of participant) to participate in thisresearch project.

    Details of Study: The study that you are involving on, aims to develop a critical perspective of the reasons of urban segregation inSantiago, in order to contrast your perspectives with the theoretical framework of this research. Your opinion for us is vital to build acoherent approach, and anchored to reality.

    This is the abstract of this research:

    The research addresses the methodological proposals of Henri Lefebvre in his work named "The urban revolution." In this book, heestablishes critical perspectives of urbanism within neoliberal societies. The urban society expresses its class struggle through spatialdistribution, and Santiago is the most segregated city among the OECD members. Considering that Chile was an experimental field to

    implement the neoliberal ideals, detach the transformation of society from urban design is a mistake and it deserves a critical reflection.The urban revolution provides an appropriated framework to understand the gaps, and understand the reasons behind the segregationof Santiago. To narrow down this theoretical approach there is a case study analysis developed through a fieldwork. This process willanalyse the differences between an urban design project built in a rich district compared with a project developed in a poor district. Theapplication of this book as a methodological approach to understanding urban design failure is an unprecedented approach in Latin

    America. Accordingly with the methodology proposed by "The urban revolution," this research aims to produce a dialectical analysis ofurbanism in Chile, which currently have become a blind field.

    If you agree to record your interview, you need to know that the records will be transcribed and translated. You will have full access forboth: Transcriptions and Translations. Just request it to Jose Francisco via the contact details provided above.

    Please discuss the information above with others if you wish or ask us if there is anything that is not clear or if you would like more

    information.

    It is up to you to decide whether to take part or not; choosing not to take part will not disadvantage you in any way. If you do decide totake part you are still free to withdraw at any time and without giving a reason.

    In case you decide to withdraw your participation, please contact Jose Francisco to the e-mail: [email protected] or to the

    phone number: +56997421086.

    If you require anonymous participation it will not be possible for us to withdraw your data once you have returned your questionnaire.

    If you decide to take part you will be given this information sheet to keep and be asked to sign a consent form.

    All data will be collected and stored in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998.

    THIS FORM WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE PARTICIPANT IN SPANISH, IN ORDER TO ENSURE THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE

    CONSENT FORM.

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    10/18

    10

    Ficha de informacin para el participante sobre la Investigacin Doctoral en Desarrollo yPlanificacinSPANISH VERSION

    Usted recibir una copia de este documento.

    Titulo del Proyecto: Interpretando "La revolucin urbana": Comprendiendo la produccin segregativa del espacio en Santiago a travs deun caso comparativo.

    Este estudio ha sido aprobado por el Comit de tica en Investigacin de la University College London, bajo el numeral (ID Number):6168/001

    Investigadores Dr Camillo Boano, Jose Francisco Vergara Perucich

    Direccin 34 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9EZ, UK

    Contacto [email protected]; [email protected].

    Telefono de Jose Francisco en Chile: +56997421086.

    Nos gustara invitar a _____________________________________________________ a participar de este proyecto de investigacin.

    Detalles del estudio: El estudio en el que se est involucrando pretender desarrollar una perspectiva critica de las razones que hacen deSantiago una ciudad segregada. Su visin especialista es fundamental para discutir la construccin terica desarrollada previamente enesta investigacin. Con su visin, se avanzar hacia un enfoque coherente y anclado en la realidad.

    Este es el resumen ejecutivo de la investigacin:

    La investigacin utiliza las propuestas metodolgicas desarrolladas por Henri Lefebvre en su obra llamada "La revolucin urbana." En

    este libro, el establece perspectivas criticas acerca del urbanismo que se esta desarrollando en sociedades capitalistas. La sociedadurbana expresa su lucha de clases en la distribucin espacial y Santiago es la ciudad mas segregada dentro de los miembros de laOCDE. Considerando que Chile fue un campo experimental para implementar las economa neoliberal, separar la transformacionessociales que eso conlleva del diseo urbano constituye un error y merece una reflexin critica. "La revolucin urbana" ofrece un marcoapropiado para comprender los vacos en este mbito, acotando la discusin hacia entender las razones detrs de la segregacin enSantiago.Para aterrizar esta discusin terica, se realiza un estudio de casos en terreno. Este proceso analizar la diferencia entre un proyecto dediseo urbano desarrollado en una comuna de altos ingresos con una comuna de bajos ingresos dentro del rea metropolitana deSantiago. La aplicacin de este libro como un enfoque metodolgico en Latino-Amrica para comprender la segregacin espacialconstituye un aporte nico al conocimiento regional.Siguiendo lo propuesto en "La revolucin urbana", esta investigacin apunta a producir un anlisis dialectico del urbanismo en Chile, queactualmente cuenta con campos ciegos que merecen ser develados.

    Si usted esta de acuerdo con ser grabado en la entrevista, debe saber que las grabaciones sern transcritas y traducidas al ingles.Usted tendr acceso completo a las transcripciones y traducciones, solo debe solicitarlas a Jos Francisco Vergara, mediante los datosentregados anteriormente.

    Por favor, si tiene dudas discuta esta informacin con otros si desea o pregntenos si todo esta claro o si requiere mayor informacin.

    Depende de usted participar o no en este estudio, no ser parte de l no le generar ningn perjurio. Si decide participar y en el procesodecide cambiar de parecer, sintase libre de exigir la anulacin de sus contribuciones sin dar razones, si as lo desea. En tal caso, porfavor contctese con Jos Francisco al e-mail: [email protected] o al telfono: +56997421086.

    Si usted desea participar de forma completamente annima en este estudio, no ser posible para nosotros anular su participacinposteriormente, puesto que las respuestas y grabaciones no tendrn asociadas su nombre al momento de realizar la transcripcin.

    Si decide participar, usted recibir una copia de esta ficha para que tenga claro lo que ha consentido.

    Todos los datos recogidos y guardados se guan por el Acta de Proteccin de Datos de 1998, emitida por el Reino Unido.

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    11/18

    11

    Ficha de Consentimiento Informado para la Investigacin Doctoral en Desarrollo y PlanificacinSpanish version.

    Por favor complete esta ficha despus de leer la "Ficha de informacin para el participante" y luego de haber escuchado la

    explicacin sobre la investigacin.

    Titulo del Proyecto: Interpretando "La revolucin urbana": Comprendiendo la produccin segregativa del espacio en Santiago a travs deun caso comparativo.

    Este estudio ha sido aprobado por el Comit de tica en Investigacin de la University College London, bajo el numeral (ID Number):6168/001

    Gracias por interesarse en ser parte de esta investigacin. Antes de aceptar a ser parte de ella, la persona organizando el evento lesdebe explicar el proyecto a usted.

    Si usted tiene preguntas de la "Ficha de informacin para el participante", pregunte al investigador antes decidir de unirse a este procesode estudio. Usted recibir una copia de esta ficha para que pueda consultarla cuando desee.

    Declaracin del participante:

    Yo_______________________________________________________ (Nombre)

    He ledo las notas escritas en la "Ficha de informacin" , y comprendo lo que el estudio conlleva.

    Comprendo que si lo decido puedo dejar de ser parte del estudio, lo cual debe ser notificado al investigador de manerainmediata.

    Consiento de procesar mi informacin entregada nicamente para los propsitos de esta investigacin.

    Comprendo que dicha informacin ser tratada de manera estrictamente confidencial y ser manejada de acuerdo a lasregulaciones del Acta de Proteccin de Datos de 1998 emitida por el Reino Unido.

    Declaro que el proyecto de investigacin se me ha explicado de manera satisfactoria y estoy de acuerdo de participar en el.

    Yo entiendo que mi participacin en esta investigacin ser grabada y consiento que dicho material sea utilizado como partede este proyecto.

    Yo estoy de acuerdo con ser contactado por los investigadores para invitarme a participar en otras instancias de este estudio.

    Yo comprendo que la informacin entregada ser parte de un reporte del cual recibir una copia. Confidencialidad yanonimato ser mantenida y no ser posible identificarme en ninguna publicacin.

    Comprendo que mis aportes pueden ser utilizados por otros en futuras investigaciones. Me he asegurado que mis datospersonales permanezcan confidenciales, exigiendo que sea borrado mi nombre de toda nota si es necesario.

    Firma: Fecha:

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    12/18

    12

    Informed Consent Form for PhD in Development and Planning in Research StudiesENGLISH VERSION

    Please complete this form after you have read the Information Sheet and/or listened to an explanation about the research.

    Title of Project: Interpreting The urban revolution: Segregative production of space in Santiago through a comparative study

    This study has been approved by the UCL Research Ethics Committee (Project ID Number): 6168/001

    Thank you for your interest in taking part in this research. Before you agree to take part, the person organising the research must explainthe project to you.

    If you have any questions arising from the Information Sheet or explanation already given to you, please ask the researcher before you todecide whether to join in. You will be given a copy of this Consent Form to keep and refer to at any time.

    Participants Statement

    I_______________________________________________________ (Name of participant)

    have read the notes written above and the Information Sheet, and understand what the study involves. understand that if I decide at any time that I no longer wish to take part in this project, I can notify the researchers involved and

    withdraw immediately.

    consent to the processing of my personal information for the purposes of this research study.

    understand that such information will be treated as strictly confidential and handled in accordance with the provisions of theData Protection Act 1998.

    agree that the research project named above has been explained to me to my satisfaction and I agree to take part in this study.

    I understand that my participation will be taped recorded and I consent to use of this material as part of the project.

    I agree to be contacted in the future by UCL researchers who would like to invite me to participate in follow-up studies.

    I understand that the information I have submitted will be published as a report and I will be sent a copy. Confidentiality andanonymity will be maintained and it will not be possible to identify me from any publications.

    I agree that my non-personal research data may be used by others for future research. I am assured that the confidentiality ofmy personal data will be upheld through the removal of identifiers.

    Signed: Date:

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    13/18

    13

    SECTION D DETAILS OF RISKS AND BENEFITS TO THE RESEARCHER AND THE RESEARCHED

    D1Have UCLs Risk Assessment Procedures been followed? Yes No

    If No, please explain.

    D2Does UCLs insurer need to be notified about your project before insurance cover can be provided? Yes No

    The insurance for all UCL studies is provided by a commercial insurer. For the majority of studies the cover is automatic. However, fora minority of studies, in certain categories, the insurer requires prior notification of the project before cover can be provided.

    IfYes, please provide confirmation that the appropriate insurance cover has been agreed. Please attach your UCL insuranceregistration form and any related correspondence.

    D3Please state briefly any precautions being taken to protect the health and safety of researchers and others associated withthe project (as distinct from the research participants).

    Researchers will have advice of behaviour in public spaces of Santiago. Santiago is a safe city but it is

    important to take care of belongings in order to avoid robberies. Hence, the surveys must be developedwithout any valuable objects. Also, to take pictures the researcher will be aware of the safe use of thecamera, taking care of always use the strap on the shoulder. The whole fieldwork will be developed indaylights, between 09.00 AM and 19.30 PM.

    D4Will these participants participate in any activities that may be potentially stressful or harmful in connection with this

    research? Yes No

    IfYes, please describe the nature of the risk or stress and how you will minimise and monitor it.

    D5Will group or individual interviews/questionnaires raise any topics or issues that might be sensitive, embarrassing orupsetting for participants?

    IfYes,please explain how you will deal with this.

    No

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    14/18

    14

    D6Please describe any expected benefits to the participant.

    To engage into an interesting possibility to expose their issues about topics that are relevant to improvetheir everyday life in their city.

    D7Specify whether the following procedures are involved:

    Any invasive procedure(s) Yes No

    Physical contact Yes No

    Any procedure(s) that may cause mental distress Yes No

    Please state briefly any precautions being taken to protect the health and safety of the research participants.

    D8

    Does the research involve the use of drugs? Yes No

    IfYes, please name the drug/product and its intended use in the research and then complete Appendix I

    Does the project involve the use of genetically modified materials? Yes No

    IfYes, has approval from the Genetic Modification Safety Committee been obtained for work? Yes No

    IfYes, please quote the Genetic Modification Reference Number:

    D9 Will any non-ionising radiation be used on the research participant(s)? Yes No

    IfYes, please complete Appendix II.

    D10 Are you using a medical device in the UK that is CE-marked and is being used within its product indication? Yes No

    IfYes, please complete Appendix III.

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    15/18

    15

    CHECKLIST

    Please submit ether 12 copies (1 original + 11 double sided photocopies) of your completed application form for fullcommittee review or 3 copies (1 original + 2 double sided copies) for chairs action, together with the appropriate supportingdocumentation from the list below to the UCL Research Ethics Committee Administrator. You should also submit yourapplication form electronically to the Administrator at: [email protected]

    Documents to be Attached to Application Form (if applicable) Ticked if Tick ifattached not relevant

    Section B: Details of the Project

    Questionnaire(s) / Psychological Tests

    Relevant correspondence relating to involvement of collaboratingdepartment/s and agreed participation in the research.

    Section C: Details of Participants

    Parental/guardian consent form for research involving participants under 18

    Participant/s information sheet Participant/s consent form/s

    Advertisement

    Section D: Details of Risks and Benefits to the Researcher and the Researched

    Insurance registration form and related correspondence

    Appendix I: Research Involving the Use of Drugs

    Relevant correspondence relating to agreed arrangements for dispensing

    with the pharmacy

    Written confirmation from the manufacturer that the drug/substance hashas been manufactured to GMP

    Proposed volunteer contract

    Full declaration of financial or direct interest

    Copies of certificates: CTA etc"

    Appendix II: Use of Non-Ionising Radiation

    Appendix III: Use Medical Devices

    Please note that correspondence regarding the application will normally be sent to the Principal Researcher and copied to

    other named individuals.

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    16/18

    16

    Questionnaire for Specialists

    Guide for Semi-structured interviews

    1. Recently Santiago was called as the most segregated city among OECD countries. Based on your expertise, what is your main

    reflection about this declaration from the urbanists role in the production of space?

    1. Recientemente Santiago fue nombrado como la ciudad mas segregada entre los pases de la OCDE. Basado en tu experiencia

    profesional, Cual es tu principal reflexin en relacin a esta declaracin, referido al rol de los urbanistas en la produccin del espacio?

    2. Lefebvre talks about blind fields in the urbanism, meaning that there are systematized phases in urbanism that lack critical reflection.

    Instead, these phases make that you just need to strictly follow the steps in order to deliver an urban project, which excludes the whole

    complexity that should involve the urban production.

    Let's land this idea, what is your point of view of this statement of Lefebvre? How can we interpret this affirmation in the production of

    space segregated in Santiago?

    2. Lefebvre habla sobre campos ciegos en el urbanismo, queriendo decir que existen fases sistematizadas en los procesos propios del

    urbanismo que carecen de reflexin critica. Por el contrario, estas fases hacen que urbanistas sigan un estricto paso a paso para lograr

    desarrollar un proyecto urbano, lo que deja de lado toda la riqueza y complejidad que debera involucrar un proceso de produccin

    urbana.

    Aterricemos esta idea, Cual es su punto de vista en relacin a esta declaracin de Lefebvre?

    Como podemos interpretar esta afirmacin en la segregada produccin espacial de Santiago?

    3. In "The urban revolution" appear three levels of analysis of the urban: Global, focused on the power structures and the centralized

    institutions that decide about the future of the city (Ministries, State Buildings, The congress, Cathedrals); Mixed, referring to public

    spaces such as streets, roads, pavements, schools, parks; and finally, a private level referring to the dwelling, which also is

    subordinated with the other levels.

    In your specialist opinion, how these three levels express the segregation in the city as Santiago?

    3. En "La revolucin urbana" aparecen tres niveles de analisis de lo urbano: lo Global, enfocado en las estructuras de poder e

    instituciones centralizadas que deciden el futuro de la ciudad, tales como ministerios, edificios estatales, el congreso, las catedrales.

    Luego propone un nivel Mixto, referido a los espacios publicos tales como calles, caminos, veredas, escuelas y parques. Finalmente,

    plantea un nivel Privado, relacionado al habitar propiamente, el cual ademas se encentra subordinado a los otros niveles.

    En tu opinion especializada, Como estos tres niveles expresan la segregacion en la ciudad de Santiago?

    4. Let's explore a problematic urban situation linked with the mixed level mentioned before, which is the wide difference of quality

    between a public space in a rich district with the quality in a poor district.

    Please elaborate an explanation why is this happening in Santiago.

    4. Exploremos una problematica urbana vinculada en el nivel mixto antes mencionado, especificamente la enorme diferencia de

    calidad que existe entre un espacio publico en una comuna rica con un espacio publico en una comuna pobre.

    Elabore una posible explicacion de porque esto ocurre en Santiago?

    5. This question has two parts. "The urban revolution" claims for a new urban society as consequence of a disciplinary revolution, where

    instead of specialization of disciplines, there is a crosscutting approach to the urban phenomena, where the multidisciplinary reflection

    and projection, he says, results to be a better way towards the real urban life, or the good city production. The first question is: How you

    think that the urban production in Santiago poses a multidisciplinary approach to develop public spaces?So secondly: Do you think that this multidisciplinary reflection would be positive or negative and why?

    5. Esta pregunta tiene dos partes. "La revolucin urbana" demanda una nueva sociedad urbana como consecuencia de una revolucion

    disciplinar, donde en vez de la especializacion disicplinaria, existe un enfoque transversal al fenomeno urbano, donde es la reflexion

    multidisciplinaria y su consecuente proyeccion resultan en la creacion una nueva y mejor manera de lograr una verdadera vida urbana,

    es decir, una buena ciudad. La primera pregunta es:

    Cmo cree usted que la multidisciplinariedad de los procesos de desarrollo de espacios publicos se ve reflejado en Santiago?

    Y una segunda pregunta: Cree usted que estos potenciales procesos multidisciplinarios son positivos o negativos?, Por qu?

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    17/18

    17

    Questionnaire for Local actors

    Guide for Semi-structured Interviews

    1. Recently Santiago was called as the most segregated city among OECD countries. Based on your local expertise, what is your main

    reflection about this declaration from the urbanists role in the production of space? How is this perceived from your local community?

    1. Recientemente Santiago fue nombrado como la ciudad mas segregada entre los pases de la OCDE. Basado en tu experiencia

    profesional a nivel local, Cual es tu principal reflexin en relacin a esta declaracin, referido al rol de los urbanistas en la produccin

    del espacio? Como esto es percibido desde su comunidad local?

    2. Lefebvre talks about blind fields in the urbanism, meaning that there are systematized phases in urbanism that lack critical reflection.

    Instead, these phases make that you just need to strictly follow the steps in order to deliver an urban project, which excludes the whole

    complexity that should involve the urban production.

    Let's land this idea, what is your point of view of this statement of Lefebvre? How these blind fields are manifested in the everyday work

    that you need to develop in your local dimension?

    2. Lefebvre habla sobre campos ciegos en el urbanismo, queriendo decir que existen fases sistematizadas en los procesos propios del

    urbanismo que carecen de reflexin critica. Por el contrario, estas fases hacen que urbanistas sigan un estricto paso a paso para lograr

    desarrollar un proyecto urbano, lo que deja de lado toda la riqueza y complejidad que debera involucrar un proceso de produccin

    urbana.

    Aterricemos esta idea, Cual es su punto de vista en relacin a esta declaracin de Lefebvre?

    Como se manifiestan estos campos ciegos en su trabajo diario en la dimensin local?

    3. In "The urban revolution" appear three levels of analysis of the urban: Global, focused on the power structures and the centralized

    institutions that decide about the future of the city (Ministries, State Buildings, The congress, Cathedrals); Mixed, referring to public

    spaces such as streets, roads, pavements, schools, parks; and finally, a private level referring to the dwelling, which also is

    subordinated with the other levels.

    In your specialist opinion, how these three levels express the segregation in the city as Santiago?

    3. En "La revolucin urbana" aparecen tres niveles de anlisis de lo urbano: lo Global, enfocado en las estructuras de poder e

    instituciones centralizadas que deciden el futuro de la ciudad, tales como ministerios, edificios estatales, el congreso, las catedrales.

    Luego propone un nivel Mixto, referido a los espacios pblicos tales como calles, caminos, veredas, escuelas y parques. Finalmente,

    plantea un nivel Privado, relacionado al habitar propiamente, el cual adems se encentra subordinado a los otros niveles.

    En tu opinin especializada, Como estos tres niveles expresan la segregacin en la ciudad de Santiago?

    4. Let's explore a problematic urban situation linked with the mixed level mentioned before, What are the main aspects positive andnegative in the production of public spaces in your area?

    4. Exploremos una problemtica urbana vinculada en el nivel mixto antes mencionado, Cuales son los principales aspectos positivos y

    negativos en la produccin de espacios pblicos a nivel local?

    5. In "The urban revolution", Lefebvre proposes three concepts that I would like to deepen with you:

    Activate the urban problematic as a vital part of political agendas in order to transform social injustices.

    Self-management of the space, which must go from private level to global level.

    The right to the city, specifically related to allow to every dweller of the urban to have access to the benefits of urban life.

    5. En "La revolucin urbana", Lefebvre propone tres conceptos que me gustara profundizar con usted:

    Activar la problemtica urbana como parte vital de las agendas polticas hacia una transformacin de las injusticias socialesPromover la autogestin del espacio, la cual debe ir cambiando de nivel desde el privado, pasando por el mixto, hasta llegar al global,

    incidiendo tambin en las economas que se generan en dichos niveles.

    El derecho a la ciudad, especficamente relacionado con lograr que todos los habitantes tengan acceso a los beneficios de la vida

    urbana.

  • 8/11/2019 1 Francisco Ethical Application Form NOT Signed

    18/18

    18

    Month/Year Survey to measure urban life perception of public space level in users

    Encuesta para medir percepcion de vida urbana a nivel del espacio publico en usuarios

    #

    Please, rate these statements about this public space, in relation to your agreement or disagreement.

    Por favor, evale estas afirmaciones sobre este espacio publico segun su acuerdo o desacuerdo

    QuestionnaireStrongly Agree

    Muy de Acuerdo

    Agree

    De AcuerdoNeutral Disagree

    En Desacuerdo

    Strongly Disagree

    Muy desacuerdo

    5 4 3 2 1

    1. Este espacio publico representa lo que espero de vivir en

    la ciudad.

    1.This public space represents what I expect from live in the

    city.

    2. Este espacio publico me hace sentir orgulloso/a de mi

    municipalidad.

    2.This public space makes me feel proud of my municipality.

    3. Me siento identificado/a con este espacio publico.

    3. I feel identified with this public space.

    4. Este es el mejor espacio publico de Santiago.

    4. This is the best public space in Santiago.5. Me gustaria realizar muchas modificaciones a este

    espacio publico.

    5. I would like to do several modifications to this public

    space.

    6. Este espacio publico mejora mi calidad de vida.

    6. This public space improves my quality of life.

    7. Venir a este espacio publico me hace sentir enojo.

    7. Coming to this public space makes me feel angry.

    8. Venir a este espacio publico me hace sentir bien.

    8. Coming to this public space makes me feel good.

    9. Me gustaria que me inviten a participar para re-disear

    este espacio publico.

    9. I would like an invitation to participate in re-design this

    public space.

    10. Siento que tengo el derecho a cambiar este espacio

    publico.

    10. I feel with the right to change this public space.