VMware Farm Optimization By Jeremy Kampwerth [email protected].
1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon...
-
Upload
ethen-leonards -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon...
![Page 1: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Developing Indicators of Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Quality for AT Reuse
ProgramsPrograms
Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish RedmonModerators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud
Pass It On CenterPass It On Centerwww.passitoncenter.orgwww.passitoncenter.org
![Page 2: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
AgendaAgenda
– Vision and goals of Indicators of QualityVision and goals of Indicators of Quality– Overview of the development processOverview of the development process– Themes of feedback on first two Themes of feedback on first two
versionsversions– Design of Prototype Design of Prototype IQIQ--ATR Online ATR Online
Assessment ToolAssessment Tool– Next steps for IQ and Online ToolNext steps for IQ and Online Tool
![Page 3: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Vision and Goals for Vision and Goals for Indicators of Quality for AT Indicators of Quality for AT
ReuseReuseIQIQ--ATRATR
• IQIQ--ATRATR is a living document that grows and is a living document that grows and develops as AT Reuse Programs develop.develops as AT Reuse Programs develop.
• IQIQ--ATRATR Online will be a dynamic, interactive Online will be a dynamic, interactive tool to assess an AT Reuse Program. tool to assess an AT Reuse Program.
• IQIQ--ATRATR will link to Pass It On Knowledge Base will link to Pass It On Knowledge Base to provide references to information and to provide references to information and models to assist with improving the Reuse models to assist with improving the Reuse Program.Program.
3
![Page 4: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Vision and Goals for Vision and Goals for IQIQ--ATRATR
4
Knowledge Base supportsIQ-ATR Self-Assessment Tool
IQ-ATR andKnowledge Base inform Successful Practices
Successful Practices inform Knowledge Base
IQIQ--ATRATR
![Page 5: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
This is not the first project:This is not the first project:Other Related QI InitiativesOther Related QI Initiatives• The SMART ExchangeThe SMART Exchange
– Led by Shelley Kaplan, UCP in AtlantaLed by Shelley Kaplan, UCP in Atlanta• 1989-1991, NIDRR grant1989-1991, NIDRR grant• Developed indicators for AT useDeveloped indicators for AT use
The rationale for many of the SMART The rationale for many of the SMART Exchange indicators are relevant to AT Exchange indicators are relevant to AT reuse indicators.reuse indicators.
![Page 6: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Other Related QI Other Related QI InitiativesInitiatives
• QIATQIAT– Quality Indicators for Assistive Quality Indicators for Assistive
Technology Services in School SettingsTechnology Services in School Settings– Developed in 1998Developed in 1998
QIAT is an outstanding working model QIAT is an outstanding working model of quality indicators for AT use in a of quality indicators for AT use in a specific environment.specific environment.
![Page 7: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Validating the IQ-ATRValidating the IQ-ATR
1.1. Have we defined a set of factors or Have we defined a set of factors or processes known to lead to successful processes known to lead to successful outcomes?outcomes?
2.2. Can we create a review instrument to Can we create a review instrument to determine if the factors/processes are in determine if the factors/processes are in place?place?
3.3. Is the indicator useful for internal Is the indicator useful for internal quality improvements?quality improvements?
4.4. Can the indicator be used as an external Can the indicator be used as an external measure of quality across programs of measure of quality across programs of the same type and activities?the same type and activities?
![Page 8: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Developing theDeveloping the IQIQ--ATRATR
• Two Webinars on Quality IndicatorsTwo Webinars on Quality Indicators• A meeting of program professionals and A meeting of program professionals and
PIOC team members in Atlanta to develop PIOC team members in Atlanta to develop initial draftinitial draft
• Distribution of draft to developers and Distribution of draft to developers and interested partiesinterested parties
• Editing of draft based on feedback, Editing of draft based on feedback, including alteration of restrictive formatincluding alteration of restrictive format
• Development of assessment tool prototypeDevelopment of assessment tool prototype
![Page 9: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Developing the first Developing the first draftdraft
• Reviewed past quality indicatorsReviewed past quality indicators• Reviewed guidelines for writing quality indicatorsReviewed guidelines for writing quality indicators• Small groups edited and added to draft of quality Small groups edited and added to draft of quality
indicatorsindicators
![Page 10: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
First draft done: First draft done: Critique time!Critique time!
QI for AT Reuse Development Meeting in Atlanta, QI for AT Reuse Development Meeting in Atlanta, March 23 & 24 with occupational therapists, March 23 & 24 with occupational therapists, program directors and other key informants. program directors and other key informants. Thank you!Thank you!
![Page 11: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Categories of IndicatorsCategories of Indicators
• Program Program OperationsOperations
• User ServicesUser Services• SustainabilitySustainability• ManagementManagement• Human ResourcesHuman Resources
• MarketingMarketing• AccountingAccounting• Organizational Organizational
StructureStructure• Emergency Emergency
PreparednessPreparedness• Partnerships and Partnerships and
CollaborationCollaboration
![Page 12: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Suggestions from Suggestions from reviewers:reviewers:
• Reorganize format: categories and Reorganize format: categories and sequencesequence
• Combine some topics; separate some Combine some topics; separate some topicstopics
• Consider strictures of tabular formatConsider strictures of tabular format• Add rationale for categoriesAdd rationale for categories• Reorganize into “core” indicators and Reorganize into “core” indicators and
options based on program type options based on program type • Add specific AT State program indicatorsAdd specific AT State program indicators
![Page 13: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Version 2Version 2
• Restrictive five-cell Restrictive five-cell response format was response format was abandoned in favor of a abandoned in favor of a flexible checklist of key flexible checklist of key factors for considerationfactors for consideration
• Indicators were Indicators were combined or split as combined or split as neededneeded
• New version was New version was presented to National presented to National Task Force – which Task Force – which recommended a thorough recommended a thorough language review language review
![Page 14: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Version 2.1Version 2.1
• NTF sub-committee (Rik Opstelten, Brian NTF sub-committee (Rik Opstelten, Brian Bard, Kerri Morgan and Lindsey Bean) Bard, Kerri Morgan and Lindsey Bean) reviewed the language and recommended reviewed the language and recommended changes.changes.
• Oops! Name change! QIAT recommended Oops! Name change! QIAT recommended against expansion of their name and against expansion of their name and possible confusion. (Hence, IQ-ATR.)possible confusion. (Hence, IQ-ATR.)
• Language updated, and some major issues Language updated, and some major issues were confronted before building the were confronted before building the Online Tool.Online Tool.
![Page 15: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Major ChallengesMajor Challenges
• OrganizingOrganizing the indicators into CORE the indicators into CORE indicators and implementing indicators and implementing appropriate ‘branching’ based on appropriate ‘branching’ based on program typeprogram type
• WeightingWeighting the categories and the the categories and the indicators to create an appropriate indicators to create an appropriate “result” measure for the program“result” measure for the program
• ImplementingImplementing online assessment tool online assessment tool and links to Knowledge Baseand links to Knowledge Base
![Page 16: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Organizing the Organizing the IndicatorsIndicators
Variables affecting grouping:Variables affecting grouping:• Type of organizationType of organization• AT reuse activities (reassign, AT reuse activities (reassign,
refurbish, exchange, recycle)refurbish, exchange, recycle)• Types of equipment (DME, Types of equipment (DME,
computers, all?)computers, all?)
How to deal with the possible combinations?How to deal with the possible combinations?
![Page 17: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Weighting Categories & Weighting Categories & IndicatorsIndicators
1. Survey designed and individuals asked 1. Survey designed and individuals asked to rank: to rank:
• Categories in order of importanceCategories in order of importance• Indicators in order of importance Indicators in order of importance
within categorieswithin categories
2. Ph.D. statistician recommended 2. Ph.D. statistician recommended weighting methodology based on weighting methodology based on ranking, but it required a standard ranking, but it required a standard number of responses.number of responses.
![Page 18: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
To weight or not to To weight or not to weight?weight?
• Based on the ranking of categories Based on the ranking of categories and indicators, it is possible to and indicators, it is possible to produce a numeric “score” from the produce a numeric “score” from the online tool.online tool.
• For the initial assessment tool, it For the initial assessment tool, it was decided not to produce numeric was decided not to produce numeric results, but advisory messages results, but advisory messages supported by lists of resources for supported by lists of resources for each indicator.each indicator.
![Page 19: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Version 3Version 3• Challenge:Challenge: A return to the five-cell format A return to the five-cell format
would lose ease-of-use that made the flexible would lose ease-of-use that made the flexible checklist of key factors so attractivechecklist of key factors so attractive
• Challenge:Challenge: Too many variables to group Too many variables to group indicators by program typeindicators by program type
Solution: Solution: Retain the flexible lists of key factors for consideration. Retain the flexible lists of key factors for consideration. Create standard set of responses to assess compliance.Create standard set of responses to assess compliance. Allow program to determine if indicator applies.Allow program to determine if indicator applies. No numeric scores – even hidden – at this timeNo numeric scores – even hidden – at this time
![Page 20: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
IQ-ATR and theIQ-ATR and theOnline Program Assessment Online Program Assessment
ToolTool• Sharon Meek and the PIOC web Sharon Meek and the PIOC web
developers from REACH, Inc. developers from REACH, Inc. developed the prototype of the developed the prototype of the interactive toolinteractive tool
www.passitoncenter.org/iq-atreusewww.passitoncenter.org/iq-atreuse
![Page 21: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21Home Page: A brief introduction to how the IQ-ATR tool works
![Page 22: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
RegistrationRegistration
Create an account for personal use or register as a guest.
![Page 23: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23Directions explain the response choices.
![Page 24: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Category in the yellow bar. The name of the indicator and the text of the indicator are followed by the Rationale and the Key Factors for Consideration. The standard set of responses follows. User selects a response and clicks Next.
![Page 25: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
User receives a results page for each category and may stop or continue to the next category. KB or other sources are suggested for indicators that do not meet all Key Factors for the promising practice.
![Page 26: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Next StepsNext Steps
IQ-ATR:IQ-ATR: Share and solicit additional feedback Share and solicit additional feedback Revise Revise IQIQ--ATRATR based on based on
recommendationsrecommendations Design a validation processDesign a validation process
![Page 27: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Next StepsNext StepsOnline Program Assessment Tool:Online Program Assessment Tool: Gather feedback from pilot usersGather feedback from pilot users Revise online tool and make “updatable” to Revise online tool and make “updatable” to
keep synchronized with Knowledge Base (KB)keep synchronized with Knowledge Base (KB) Allow user to choose sequence of categoriesAllow user to choose sequence of categories Have NTF review KB content for Have NTF review KB content for
appropriateness and usefulness as appropriateness and usefulness as recommended at May meetingrecommended at May meeting
Identify or create content to fill reference Identify or create content to fill reference gaps in Knowledge Basegaps in Knowledge Base
Decide whether responses should be Decide whether responses should be weighted and tallied for a quantitative (rather weighted and tallied for a quantitative (rather than general) result.than general) result.
![Page 28: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Not enough Not enough knowledge. . .knowledge. . .
• Referencing Indicators of Quality to Referencing Indicators of Quality to content in the Knowledge Base highlighted content in the Knowledge Base highlighted the gaps in supporting information.the gaps in supporting information.
• The content that does exist needs to be The content that does exist needs to be strengthened with more comprehensive strengthened with more comprehensive presentation of needed policies and presentation of needed policies and procedures.procedures.
• The existing content has not been The existing content has not been reviewed by NTF panels as recommended reviewed by NTF panels as recommended in May 2009.in May 2009.
![Page 29: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
How you can helpHow you can help
• Review the IQ-ATR and send commentsReview the IQ-ATR and send commentshttp://passitoncenter.org/contenthttp://passitoncenter.org/content • Try the online tool and send feedbackTry the online tool and send feedbackhttp://passitoncenter.org/IQATReusehttp://passitoncenter.org/IQATReuse • Contribute content or suggest resources Contribute content or suggest resources
for the Knowledge Base for the Knowledge Base
Please send comments and suggestions to:Please send comments and suggestions to:[email protected]@[email protected]@passitoncenter.org
![Page 30: 1 Developing Indicators of Quality for AT Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth and Trish Redmon Moderators: Carolyn Phillips, Joy Kniskern and Liz Persaud.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062621/551be6eb550346c3588b60ab/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
DISCLAIMERThis work is supported under a five-year cooperative agreement # H235V060016 awarded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, and is administered by the Pass It On Center of the Georgia Department of Labor – Tools for Life. However, the contents of this publication do not necessarily represent the policy or opinions of the Department of Education, or the Georgia Department of Labor, and you should not assume endorsements of this document by the Federal government or the Georgia Department of Labor.