1 DETERMINING ORGAN FUNCTION

2
Listening to Molecules iThera Medical GmbH www.ithera-medical.com [email protected] Phone +49 (0) 89 700 74 49 - 0 Determining organ function through quantification of MSOT kinetics Multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) has been increas- ingly used for preclinical molecular imaging studies. However, it also holds promise as a functional imaging technique. Akin to the MRI-BOLD imaging sequence, MSOT can quantify oxygenation in tissues as an indicator of neural activity, vascularity and/or tu- mor activity. Furthermore, MSOT can also be used to assess organ function through the visualization and quantification of contrast agents that are subject to specific clearance mechanisms. This provides an alternative to traditional methods of assessing or- gan function, which may include invasive blood tests or biopsies, or functional imaging techniques like PET and SPECT, which in- volve ionizing radiation, or various MRI sequences, which require extensive costs and infrastructure. In preclinical models, MSOT offers high spatial resolution and sub-second temporal resolu- tion with molecular specificity. As such, it offers the ability to non-invasively study organ function and disease repeatedly in the same animals during the development of disease. Figure 1 demonstrates how MSOT can be used to quantify renal function [1]. IRdye800CW (Li-Cor) undergoes glomerular filtrati- on and is eliminated from circulation by the kidneys. Following systemic injection, the clearance of IRdye800CW can be visualized in cross-sectional images over time (panel 1a), or as a paramet- ric map showing maximum MSOT signal with a temporal color code (panel 2b). Control animals were compared to adriamcycin (ADR)-intoxicated mice with reduced kidney function, with the intoxicated mice showing increased transit times of the contrast agent from the renal cortex to the renal pelvis (panel 1c and 1d). 1 Figure 2 shows the performance of MSOT with regard to quanti- fying liver function [2]. Indocyanine green (ICG), which is subject exclusively to hepatobiliary clearance, was injected i.v. into con- trol or acetaminophen (APAP)-intoxicated mice with decreased liver function. The clearance of ICG from the blood (panel 2a) by the liver was quantified as a marker of liver function, showing a slower clearance rate in the intoxicated mice (panel 2b). FIGURE 1: Assessment of renal function associated with kidney toxicity FIGURE 2: Assessment of liver function and toxicity DETERMINING ORGAN FUNCTION (A) MSOT images of a typical control (top) and ADR-administered (bottom) mouse before and after the administration of IRDye800CW. Region of interests (ROIs) depicted in yellow (cortex) and red (papilla/pelvis region). Times indicated above apply to both control and ADR- treated animal. (B) Temporal color maps of control and ADR-administered mice reveal a delay in IRDye800CW clearance kinetics in the treat- ed mice. (C) Characteristic plot of mean pixel intensity (MSOT arbitrary units) from ROIs drawn around the renal cortex (black) and papilla/ pelvis region (grey). (D,E) Graphs showing distribution of TMAX delay (D) and the excretion half-life in the cortex (E) in ADR-administered and control animals. Data points (D,E) represent individual animals (circles = control, n = 5; squares = ADR-administered, n = 6) and lines represent mean ± standard error. Asterisks indicate significance of two-sample t-tests: p ≤ 0.05 (*). (A) Region of interest depicted in white (Ischiatic vessels) from the lumbar cross section. (B) ICG half-life significantly increased after APAP-over- dose compared to untreated mice at 3, 6 and 24 h. Bars represent mean ± standard error of group of animals (black = control, n = 5; white = APAP (300 mg/kg) overdose, n = 8-10). Asterisks indicate significance of two-sample t-tests: p ≤ 0.05 (*), p ≤ 0.005 (**). CTRL ADR high low IRDye800CW A Pre-Injection 15s 45s 1min 30s 3min B CTRL ADR 3.5 0 T max (minutes) C C P P 1 mm 3 mm CTRL ADR 250 200 150 100 50 0 Excretion half-life (cortex) (s) CTRL ADR 250 200 150 100 50 0 T max delay (s) time (min) 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 1 3 4 5 7 8 9 11 12 13 15 16 17 19 20 Mean pixel intesity Cortex Pelvis T max delay C E D A 100 0 ICG signal (a.u.) 3 mm APAP-overdose time-points 3h 24h 200 150 100 50 0 ICG Half-life (s) 6h ** B

Transcript of 1 DETERMINING ORGAN FUNCTION

Page 1: 1 DETERMINING ORGAN FUNCTION

Listening to Molecules

iThera Medical GmbH www.ithera-medical.com [email protected] Phone +49 (0) 89 700 74 49 - 0

Determining organ function through quantification of MSOT kineticsMultispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) has been increas-ingly used for preclinical molecular imaging studies. However, it also holds promise as a functional imaging technique. Akin to the MRI-BOLD imaging sequence, MSOT can quantify oxygenation in tissues as an indicator of neural activity, vascularity and/or tu-mor activity. Furthermore, MSOT can also be used to assess organ function through the visualization and quantification of contrast agents that are subject to specific clearance mechanisms. This provides an alternative to traditional methods of assessing or-gan function, which may include invasive blood tests or biopsies, or functional imaging techniques like PET and SPECT, which in-volve ionizing radiation, or various MRI sequences, which require extensive costs and infrastructure. In preclinical models, MSOT offers high spatial resolution and sub-second temporal resolu-

tion with molecular specificity. As such, it offers the ability to non-invasively study organ function and disease repeatedly in the same animals during the development of disease.

Figure 1 demonstrates how MSOT can be used to quantify renal function [1]. IRdye800CW (Li-Cor) undergoes glomerular filtrati-on and is eliminated from circulation by the kidneys. Following systemic injection, the clearance of IRdye800CW can be visualized in cross-sectional images over time (panel 1a), or as a paramet-ric map showing maximum MSOT signal with a temporal color code (panel 2b). Control animals were compared to adriamcycin (ADR)-intoxicated mice with reduced kidney function, with the intoxicated mice showing increased transit times of the contrast agent from the renal cortex to the renal pelvis (panel 1c and 1d).

1

Figure 2 shows the performance of MSOT with regard to quanti-fying liver function [2]. Indocyanine green (ICG), which is subject exclusively to hepatobiliary clearance, was injected i.v. into con-trol or acetaminophen (APAP)-intoxicated mice with decreased

liver function. The clearance of ICG from the blood (panel 2a) by the liver was quantified as a marker of liver function, showing a slower clearance rate in the intoxicated mice (panel 2b).

FIGURE 1: Assessment of renal function associated with kidney toxicity

FIGURE 2: Assessment of liver function and toxicity

DETERMINING ORGAN FUNCTION

(A) MSOT images of a typical control (top) and ADR-administered (bottom) mouse before and after the administration of IRDye800CW. Region of interests (ROIs) depicted in yellow (cortex) and red (papilla/pelvis region). Times indicated above apply to both control and ADR-treated animal. (B) Temporal color maps of control and ADR-administered mice reveal a delay in IRDye800CW clearance kinetics in the treat-ed mice. (C) Characteristic plot of mean pixel intensity (MSOT arbitrary units) from ROIs drawn around the renal cortex (black) and papilla/pelvis region (grey). (D,E) Graphs showing distribution of TMAX delay (D) and the excretion half-life in the cortex (E) in ADR-administered and control animals. Data points (D,E) represent individual animals (circles = control, n = 5; squares = ADR-administered, n = 6) and lines represent mean ± standard error. Asterisks indicate significance of two-sample t-tests: p ≤ 0.05 (*).

(A) Region of interest depicted in white (Ischiatic vessels) from the lumbar cross section. (B) ICG half-life significantly increased after APAP-over-dose compared to untreated mice at 3, 6 and 24 h. Bars represent mean ± standard error of group of animals (black = control, n = 5; white = APAP (300 mg/kg) overdose, n = 8-10). Asterisks indicate significance of two-sample t-tests: p ≤ 0.05 (*), p ≤ 0.005 (**).

CTR

LA

DR

high

low

IRD

ye80

0CW

A Pre-Injection 15s 45s 1min 30s 3min

Before inj. 1 minute post inj. 10 minutes post inj.

B CTRLADR3.5

0

T max

(m

inu

tes)

CC

PP

1 mm

3 mm

CTRL ADR

250

200

150

100

50

0

Excr

etio

n h

alf-

life

(co

rtex

) (s

)

CTRL ADR

250

200

150

100

50

0

T Max

(s)

CTRL ADR

250

200

150

100

50

0

T max

del

ay (

s)

time (min)

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

0 1 3 4 5 7 8 9 11 12 13 15 16 17 19 20

Mea

n p

ixel

inte

sity Cortex

PelvisTmax delay

C ED

A 100

0

ICG

sig

nal

(a.

u.)

3 mm APAP-overdose time-points3h 24h

200

150

100

50

0

ICG

Hal

f-lif

e (s

)

6h

**B

Page 2: 1 DETERMINING ORGAN FUNCTION

iThera Medical GmbH www.ithera-medical.com [email protected] Phone +49 (0) 89 700 74 49 - 0

FIGURE 3: MSOT imaging of gastric emptying

In summary, the study of organ function is paramount for translational research projects. The depth penetration, imaging speed, spatial resolution and molecular specificity of MSOT is well suited to study gastrointestinal, liver and kidney organ function by quantifying the clearance of commercially available contrast agents as surrogate markers of function.

Conclusions

References

A common side effect of medication is gastrointestinal intolerance. Symptoms can include reduced appetite, diarrhea, constipa-tion, gastrointestinal (GI) inflammation, nausea and vomiting. Such effects often have a dramatic impact on compliance with a treatment regimen. Therefore, characterization of GI tolerance is an important step when establishing a novel therapeutic ap-proach. In figure 3, ICG was administered to mice via oral gavage, and whole body MSOT scans over time revealed the clearance of ICG from the stomach, and transit to the GI [3].

2DETERMINING ORGAN FUNCTION

Panel (a) shows the ICG signal distribution at multiple time points after oral gavage of an ICG-containing solution. MSOT images show a single-wavelength optoacoustic image (grayscale, 900 nm) as an anatomical reference with an overlay of multispectrally resolved ICG signal (green). Panel (b) shows ex vivo sectioning of animals sacrificed at 15 and 75 min post ICG administration, with an RGB image showing reference anatomy and location of the fluorescent ICG shown in green. Panel (c) shows the quantification of MSOT signals from mice (n = 3) (open circles), with mod-eled data shown as a black line. Red squares indicate fluorescence measured ex vivo in mice (n = 1).

MSOT Imaging Protocol

Acquisition System

Single-Wavelength Image Acquisition/ Display Rate

10 Hz

Multispectral Acquisition Wavelengths used

700/715 / 730 / 760 / 800 / 830and 860 nm

Analysis Method

Model-based tomographic image reconstruction; Spectral unmixing by linear regression

MSOT inVision 256-TF small animal scanner

[1] Scarfe L., Rak-Raszewska A., Geraci S., Darssan D., Sharkey J., Huang J., Burton N.C., Mason D., Ranjzad P., Kenny S., Gretz N., Lévy R., Kevin Park B., García-Fiñana M., Woolf A.S., Murray P., Wilm B., Measures of kidney function by minimally invasive techniques correlate with histological glomerular damage in SCID mice with adriamycin-induced nephropathy. Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 2;5:13601.

[2] Courtesy of Dr. Daniel Antoine and Nathalie Brillant, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, August 2016.

[3] Morscher S., Driessen W.H., Claussen J., Burton N.C., Semi-quantitative Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography (MSOT) for volumetric PK imaging of gastric emptying, Photoacoustics. 2014 Jun 27;2(3):103-10.

aliver

t = 5 min t = 40 min t = 75 min

stomach

b

5 mm

1

0

ICG

sig

nal

(a.

u.)

t = 15 min t = 75 min

1

00 50 100

Sig

nal

(a.

u.)

Time (min)

MSOT2-compartmental modelValidation

c