1 Board of Trustees Presentation Christine A. Poon Dean & John W. Berry, Sr. Chair in Business Board...
-
Upload
fay-horton -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Board of Trustees Presentation Christine A. Poon Dean & John W. Berry, Sr. Chair in Business Board...
1
Board of Trustees Presentation
Christine A. PoonDean &
John W. Berry, Sr. Chair in Business
2
“I’d like to leave a legacy to help create a school that would bring out the best in kids. . .
the kind of students that make an impact on the country and world itself.”
- Max M. Fisher
3
Our Vision
Forge a vast network of
partnerships and collaborations with the
rest of the university and the
global business community
thereby elevating our
research, teaching, student experience
and the practice of business.
4
Our Students
Au 2003 Au 20120
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Undergraduate
33%
Au 2003 Au 2012750
800
850
900
950
1000
Graduate
17%
5
Our People
Faculty
Tenure and Tenure Track 91
Clinical 9
Senior Lecturers 33
Visiting 6
Subtotal 139
Staff
185
Total 324
6
Our Structure
5 Departments
6 Centers
Executive Education Unit
Undergraduate Programs Office
Graduate Programs Office
Career Management
Development/Advancement
7
Our Finances
16%
35%
24%
23% 2%
Current Sources FY 13
State Subsidy
UG Fee Revenue
Graduate Fee Revenue
Outreach Activity Revenue
Sponsored Research
$72.1MM
8
U.S. News & World Report
Undergraduate
Overall: Publics: Supply Chain Management & Logistics:Production & Operations Management :Accounting: Finance: Marketing:
2005 2012-13
MBA program: Top 50 27
Executive MBA program: 13 14**
Undergraduate program: 43 34
2004
1710
3
8139
14
2013
178
5
6101113
*USNWR Overall and Public rankings are based on a combination of reputational scores and program data; specialization rankings are based solely on reputation surveys.**Number reflects the most recent ranking of EMBA programs in 2011
Our Rankings
Business Week
9
• Faculty
• Undergraduate Program
• Graduate Program
• Outreach• Centers and Executive Education
• Tell the Fisher Story
Discussion Items
10
Faculty
11
Excellent Progress in Research Impact and Productivity
12
Financial TimesSchool 2013 U.S. Research Rank
Harvard 1
Pennsylvania 2
UC Berkeley 3
MIT, Duke 4
Stanford, Chicago, NYU 6
Northwestern, Michigan 9
Columbia 11
Ohio State 12
Texas Austin 16
North Carolina 17
Indiana 27
13
Assistant Full Chair/Distinguished
28
Associate
27 20 16
Faculty Retention
14
Undergraduate Program
15
Our Undergraduate RankingsFisher Texas Indiana
Rank 34 9 13
Average SAT/ACT (6%) 1305 1362 1299
Median Starting Salary (10%) $50K $55K $53K
Academic Quality (30%) 35 35 28
Student Survey (30%) 45 11 20
Recruiter Survey (20%) 13 4 1
16
Student Experience• Increase number of students with a four-year Fisher experience
• Dedicated Office for Student Experience
• Increase number of honor/honors-like programs
Financial
Services
Consumer Packaged
Goods
Manufacturing
Health Care
Energy/ Sustainability
Business Analytics
Industry Clusters
Dean’s Leadership Academy
Honors, Honors
Accounting, Honors Cohort
17
Graduate Programs
18
Program 2003 2012 Change
FTMBA 287 240 -16%
WPMBA 262 295 +13%
MAcc 95 84 -12%
MHR 71 111 +56%
SMF 0 43 NA
MBLE 0 78 NA
MBOE 0 31 NA
EMBA 81 71 -12%
Total 796 953 +20%
19
Outreach
20
• Interdisciplinary
• Academic Strength and Interest
• Economic Interest to Region/Nation
• Generate Innovative Research
• Collaboration among Companies and College
• Student Engagement
Idealized Center of Excellence
21
Build Partnership with the Business Community through Centers of Excellence
Facilitate a powerful connection with
business community
Center for Operational Excellence
Center for Entrepreneurship
The Risk Institute
Center for the Middle Market
Big Data
Nationwide Center for
Advanced Analytics
And elevates our research and teaching
22
Tell the Fisher Story
23
There is a singular driving force behind what we do here at Fisher. Go Beyond. It is the core of Max Fisher’s
compelling legacy – that with our intellect and heart, we go beyond what’s expected, what’s ordinary, what’s
comfortable. Our uniquely prepared students make a meaningful and lasting impact in business, in community,
and in the world. This drive defines us. It makes us Fisher. Go Beyond.
Go Beyond: The Essence
24
Supplement
25
Since 1916, The Ohio State University Fisher College of Business has produced exceptional leaders who meet the challenges of a changing global business environment through creative and effective solutions.
In 1993, the college received a gift from alumnus Max. M. Fisher, a leading industrialist, philanthropist and public servant. Mr. Fisher's desire to see his alma mater become one of the premier management institutions in the country spearheaded the construction of a state-of-the-art, six-building campus. In recognition of his commitment, the college was named the Max M. Fisher College of Business.
Since then, the college has undergone a corporate turnaround; narrowing the focus of its programs, recruiting leading faculty, placing a renewed emphasis on experiential learning, and offering a wide range of international study options. Faculty and staff have also established new scholarship and fellowship opportunities, strengthened their commitment to diversity, and created innovative academic and corporate partnerships.
As a result, Fisher's international reputation continues to rise and is reflected in rankings which place the college among the top 25 business schools in the nation at both the undergraduate and graduate levels.
3. Letter from the Dean/ Information about the college
Fisher College of Business website: http://www.cob.ohio-state.edu/
Strategic Plan website: www.go.osu.edu/FCOBstrategicplan2012
26
4. College Structure and Leadership
Departments (5)
Department of Management & Human Resources Chair, David B. Greenberger
Department of Accounting & MIS Chair, Waleed Muhanna
Department of Management Sciences Chair, Peter Ward
Department of Finance Chair, Ingrid Werner
Department of Marketing & Logistics Chair, Walter Zinn
Christine A. Poon Dean and John W. Berry, Sr. Chair in Business
Research & Business Partnership Centers (11)
Center for Entrepreneurship
Center for Operational Excellence (COE)
Center for Business Performance Management (CBPM)
Center for International Business Education and Research (CIBER)
Center for Real Estate Education and Research
Charles A. Dice Center for Financial Economics
Initiative for Managing Services
Innovation Initiative
National Center for the Middle Market
Nationwide Center for Advanced Customer Insights
Global Supply Chain Forum
27
4. College Structure and Leadership (Continued)
Associate Deans
Anil Makhija, Senior Associate Dean
Karen Hopper Wruck, Senior Associate Dean
H. Rao Unnava, Associate Dean for Executive Programs
Pat West, Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs
Support Unit Directors
Joddi Giacobbi, Chief Information Officer
Cynthia Anderson, Interim Executive Director, Office of External Relations
Barb DeYoung, Executive Director, Fiscal and Budget
Melinda McDonald, Executive Director, Undergraduate Programs
Francisco-Xavier Gomez-Bellenge, Associate to the Dean for Special Projects
Ann Hamilton, Executive Director, Marketing Communications
David Harrison, Director, Office of Minority Student Services
Larry Murphy, Executive Director, Executive Education
Jeffrey Rice, Executive Director, Career Management
Nancy Lahmers, Executive Director, Graduate Programs
Kurt Roush, Executive Director, Global Business Office
Christine A. Poon Dean and John W. Berry, Sr. Chair in Business
28
5. Academic ProgramsUndergraduate
Business Major with specializations in Accounting, Aviation Management, Economics, Finance, Human Resources, Information Systems, International Business, Logistics, Marketing, Operations, Real Estate, and Insurance; a General Business degree is available on the smaller campuses
GraduateMasters: Full-time MBA, MBA for Working Professionals, Master of Accounting, Master of Human Resource Management, Specialized Masters-Finance, Master in Business Logistics EngineeringPhD: Human Resource Management, Business Administration, Accounting/MIS
ExecutiveExecutive MBA, Master of Business Operational Excellence
29
9. Undergraduate Graduation Rate
The six-year graduation rate of the college has increased by over 8 percentage points since 2007
Graduation Rate and Cohort Size* 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Fisher College of Business 78.1% 82.5% 78.4% 83.5% 85.2% 86.4%676 722 741 726 750 878
Columbus campus 71.2% 72.7% 74.9% 78.0% 79.7% 82.4%5,964 5,940 6,354 6,037 5,940 6,266
* 2007 represents the entering class of 2001
30
10. Undergraduate Student/Faculty Ratio and Class Size
Percentage of
classes under 20Percentage of classes between 20 and 49
Percentage of classes of 50 or more
Student to Faculty Ratio
Fisher College of Business 7% 65% 28% 49 to 1University 27% 57% 16% 19 to 1
Fisher College of Business University 0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Percentage of Classes by Size: Autumn 2012
Percentage of classes of 50 or morePercentage of classes between 20 and 49Percentage of classes under 20
31
12. Faculty: Tenure Track FTE by Rank
In the past 10 years Assistant Professor FTE has surpassedAssociate Professor FTE
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Professor 38 41 36 34 31 33 35 36 37 35
Associate Professor 33 32 31 30 26 25 23 22 21 23
Assistant Professor 17 15 11 16 19 22 25 26 25 31
Instructor 1 2 1 1 - - 1 - 2 1
Total 89 90 79 81 76 80 84 84 85 90
2012
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
102030405060708090
100
Instructor Assistant ProfessorAssociate Professor Professor
32
13. Diversity & Inclusion: Percent of Tenure Track Faculty FTE by Gender
Over the past ten years, the percentage of tenure track Business faculty FTE who are female increased by 39%
2012
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 -
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Female Male
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012Male 71 72 62 62 57 62 63 62 64 65 Female 18 18 17 20 19 18 21 22 21 25 Grand Total 89 90 79 82 76 80 84 84 85 90
33
14. Diversity & Inclusion: Percentage of Tenure Track Faculty FTE by Ethnicity
2012
In the last 10 years, underrepresented minority faculty FTE increased from 3 to 8, an increase of 167%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012Asian 12 11 9 10 10 10 13 14 14 18Undisclosed 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 4URM 3 4 4 5 5 7 7 7 7 8White 71 72 64 64 59 61 62 61 61 60 Grand Total 89 90 79 82 76 80 84 84 85 90
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Asian Undisclosed URM White
34
15. Faculty Recruitment and Retention: Years in Tenure Track
Source: Faculty Analytics, OHR
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20125 or less 30 29 14 20 19 27 34 33 35 37Between 6 and 10 7 8 19 16 16 15 13 7 7 11Between 11 and 15 13 9 10 10 7 6 7 14 13 14Between 16 and 20 15 16 13 11 13 11 7 8 8 421 or more 23 27 24 25 22 23 25 23 23 25
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
102030405060708090
100
Tenure Track Faculty: Years in Track
5 or less Between 6 and 10 Between 11 and 15 Between 16 and 20 21 or more
Length of time in track has been fairly stable with a slight shift toward faculty with fewer years in track
35
16. Faculty Recruitment and Retention: Turnover & Retirement Eligibility
Source: Faculty Analytics, OHR *Retirement Eligibility is based on years of service and age
• 19% of the faculty are currently eligible to retire
• 47% will be eligible in the next 10 years
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Retirement Eligibility of Tenure Track Faculty
10.1 or more years5.1 to 10 years2.1 to 5 years0.1 to 2 yearsCurrently Eligible
Over the past 10 years, 27 of the 52 voluntary terminations were due to retirement
36
Our Finances
Fiscal Year Five Year Changein Millions 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 $ %
General Fund 47.3 50.3 54.1 55.9 53.9 6.6 14%Research/OSP 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.3 0.8 160%Earnings & Conferences 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.2 2.6 0.2 8%Development & Endowment 10.5 10.6 9.2 9.4 10.1 -0.4 -4%Fed, State, Priv Grants/Contracts 3.2 2.2 3 5 3.7 0.5 16%Others -0.2 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.7 -350%Total 63.8 65.9 69.8 73.8 72.1 8.3 13%
2009 2010 2011 2012 20130
20
40
60
General Fund Research/OSP Earnings & ConferencesDevelopment & Endowment Fed, State, Priv Grants/Contracts Others
• GF accounts for 75% of all current sources and the major source of growth
• Research/OSP has the most growth at 160%
37
Fisher College of Business - Current Sources Fisher Style
In Millions
FY 2012 FY 2013
Current Sources % of Total Current Sources % of Total
State Subsidy 11.2 15.19% 11.3 15.67%
UG Fee Revenue 24.9 33.83% 25.4 35.29%
Graduate Fee Revenue 19.8 26.83% 17.2 23.80%
Outreach Activity Revenue 16.9 22.93% 16.9 23.44%
Sponsored Research 0.9 1.22% 1.3 1.80%
TOTAL 73.7 100.00% 72.1 100.00%
38
22. Status of Facilities
Source: Physical Planning and Real Estate
Building Name Ownership
FCI Composite
Total Building
ASF
College Occupie
d ASFCollege ASF %
Total Building CRV
College Occupied Facilities Current
Replacement Value
College Total Liability
College Remaining
Facility Value
Converse Hall OSU OWNED 59.3% 43,865 1,355 3.1% $ 18,369,176 $ 567,428 $ 230,943 $ 336,485 Fisher Hall OSU OWNED 95.5% 61,574 61,574 100.0% $ 40,125,082 $ 40,125,082 $ 1,805,629 $ 38,319,453 Gerlach Hall OSU OWNED 95.6% 33,990 33,990 100.0% $ 20,207,580 $ 20,207,580 $ 889,134 $ 19,318,447 Schoenbaum Building OSU OWNED 95.1% 30,094 11,023 36.6% $ 17,923,042 $ 6,564,953 $ 321,683 $ 6,243,270 Mason Hall OSU OWNED 95.4% 34,534 34,534 100.0% $ 20,041,192 $ 20,041,192 $ 921,895 $ 19,119,297 Pfahl Hall OSU OWNED 95.5% 23,364 2,672 11.4% $ 14,056,182 $ 1,607,521 $ 72,338 $ 1,535,182 $ 89,113,756 $ 4,241,621 $ 84,872,135
Fisher College of Business FCI Calculation College Occupied Facilities Current Replacement Value $ 89,113,756 FCI = $ of Remaining Facility ValueCollege Remaining Facility Value $ 84,872,135 $ Current Replacement ValueCollege FCI 95.2%
Overall Quality of Facilities: 95.2%