1 Biomarkers in ecotoxicology. 2 Biomarkers Classic definition: Biochemical, physiological or...
-
Upload
bertram-johns -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Biomarkers in ecotoxicology. 2 Biomarkers Classic definition: Biochemical, physiological or...
1
Biomarkers in
ecotoxicology
2
BiomarkersClassic definition: Biochemical, physiological or histological indicators of either exposure to or effects of, xenobiotic chamicals at the suborganismal or organismal level
Nato workshop (1993): A biological response that can be related to an exposure to, or toxic effect of, an environmental chemical or chemicals
Depledge (1993): A biolochemical, cellular, physiological or behavioural variation that can be measured in tissue or body fluid samples at the level of the whole organism (either individuals or populations) that provides evidence of exposure (exposure biomarkers) to and/or effects (health biomarkers) of one or morechemical pollutants
3
Health and stressHealth (Bayne et al., 1985): The residual capacity of an organism to withstand stress.
Stress (Brett 1958): A state produced by an environment or other factor which extends the adaptive response of an animal beyond the normal range, or which disturbs the normal functioning to such an extent that the chances of survival are significantly reduced
Stressor (Lugo, 1981): A stressor is any condition or situation that causes a system to mobilise its resources and increase its energy expenditure. Stress is the response of the system to the stressor via this increase in energy expenditure.
4
The driving forces behind biomarker development
• The problems with chemical analysis
• What do we measure?
• Temporal fluctuations in exposure
• Sensitivity vs effect?
• Bioavalability?
• Proof of exposure
• Proof of effect
• Prediction of ecological effects
5
Impaired fitness
Disturbed population andecosystem stability
Chemical pollution- speciation- bioavailable residues
Sensoryinterference
Absorption
Molecular responsesPhysiological responses
Structural damage
Exposure / effectbiomarkers
Effect / healthbiomarkers
Pre
dic
tiv
eR
eact
ive
6
BiomarkersAn ideal Health biomarker is sensitive to chemical stress and is irrefutably linked to the Darwinian fitness of the organism.
Darwinian fitness is the combined relative probability of survival and rate of reproduction of the individual.
An ideal Exposure biomarker is both sensitive and specific to exposure by a single chemical or group of chemicals.
The ideal biomarker in ecotoxicology combines the properties of both types.
Depledge, 1993
7
Homeostasis
Healthy
Compensation
Stressed
Reversible
Non-compensation
curable
Irreversible
Non-curable
Hea
lth
Sta
tus
Inte
nsi
ty o
f B
iom
arke
r re
spo
nse
Intensity of Exposure
Depledge’s biomarker christmass wish 1993
8
Health BiomarkersExposure Biomarkers
High specificity Medium/low specificity
Immunological responses Alad MFO
Scope for growth Egg-shell thinning AChE inhibition
Adenelate energy charge Metalothioneins
AChE inhibition DNA alterations
Egg-shell thinning Stress proteins
Hæms and porphorins Vitellogenin?
Behavioural alterations
9
Alad: a highly specific biomarker for lead
poisoning
10
Lead poisoning
• A historically prominent environmental toxin
• Symptomer: Porphyria/anaemia
Abdominal pain
Constipation
Peripheral neuropathy, Madness
Weight loss • Requirement: early warning biomarker
• ALAD: 5-aminolaevulnic acid dehydratase
11
ChlorophylVitamin B12 etc
Pb Pb
Pb
12
The ALAD monomer
Zn binding site
13
14
Protoporphyria in ducks fed lead contaminated food
Heinz et al, 1999
15Time (weeks)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Bo
dy
Mas
s (g
)
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
The effect of lead contaminated diet on duck body weight
24% Pb sediment in commercial diet
24% clean sediment in commercial diet
Heinz et al, 1999
16
Hem
oglo
bin
(g/d
l)13,0
13,5
14,0
14,5
15,0
15,5
16,0
16,540
42
44
46
48
Hem
ato
crit
val
ues
as
%
Con
Con
24%
3 %
Pb
6 %
Pb
12 %
Pb
24 %
Pb
Ala
d (I
U)
0
100
200
300
The effect of Pb contaminated
diet on blood parameters
in ducks
*
Heinz et al, 1999
17
Biomarker developmentAfter Hugget et al. (1989)
• Relative sensitivity
• Inherent variability
• Biological specificity
• Chemical specificity
• Time to manifestation
• Linkage to higher level effects
• Field applicability
• Field validation
18
Esterase inhibition
19
Esterase classification
A-esterases(hydrolyse OP’s)
Paraoxonases
DFPase
B-esterases(Inhibited by OP’s)
Acetylcholinesterase
Buturylcholinesterase
Neurotoxicesterase
Carboxylesterase
C-esterases: Do not interact with OP’s or Carbamates
20
-+
H3C-N-CH2-CH2-O-C-CH3
OH
OCH3CH3
-
Acetylcholine-receptor complex
-+
H3C-N-CH2-CH2-OH
O
OCH3CH3
-CH3
+C
Acetylcholine hydrolysed but bound
Hyd
roly
sis
-OH
CH3COOH+
(CH3)NCH2CH2OH
Regenerated enzyme + choline +acetic acid
Pro
duc
t re
lea
se (
rapi
d)
-OH
RO
Organophosphate-receptor complex
O-P-S-R
OR
-OH
O=P-S-R
OR
Hyd
rolysis
-
O
O=P-S-R
OR
-
OH
Prod
uct release
V slow
AChE Inhibition
21
Biomarker developmentAfter Hugget et al. (1989)
• Relative sensitivity
• Inherent variability
• Biological specificity
• Chemical specificity
• Time to manifestation
• Linkage to higher level effects
• Field applicability
• Field validation
22
Relative specificity
• Species differences
• Intraspecific differences
•Use of oximes to reactivate enzyme
•Brain AChE shows least variablilty
N
CH3
CH
NO
2PAM
H
23
Strategy for distinguishing Carbamates and OP’s
(Rotenburg et al, 1995)
24
Relative specificity
• Species differences
• Intraspecific differences
•Use of oximes to reactivate enzyme
•Brain AChE shows least variablilty
• Diurnal changes (up to 150% in starling)
• Seasonal changes (Brain AChE lowest var.)
• Age
N
CH3
CH
NO
2PAM
H
25
Effect of age IP
erc
en
tag
e o
f ad
ult
activ
ity
100
80
60
40
20
04 18 365Age of starlings (days)
Grue et al., 1981
26
Effect of age IIP
lasm
a B
Ch
E (
µm
ol/m
in/l
pla
sma
) 1200
1000
800
600
400
2001 2 12
Age of mallard (weeks)
Bennett and Benet., 1991
4 7
300
200
100
Plasm
a B
Ch
E (µ
mo
l/min
/l plasm
a)
27
Relative specificity
• Species differences
• Intraspecific differences
•Use of oximes to reactivate enzyme
•Brain AChE shows least variablilty
• Diurnal changes (up to 150% in starling)
• Seasonal changes (Brain AChE lowest var.)
• Age
• Temperature/diet
28
Effects of temperature and dieton ChE activity in QuailP
lasm
a C
hE
(IE
/l p
lasm
a) 3
2
1
1 3 28
Days
Ratner, 1982
147
Controls
Cold
Underfed
Parathion(15 mg/kg)
29
Biomarker developmentAfter Hugget et al. (1989)
• Relative sensitivity
• Inherent variability
• Biological specificity
• Chemical specificity
• Time to manifestation
• Linkage to higher level effects
• Field applicability
• Field validation
30
Chemical Effect Animal Reference
DDE, PCB’s Plasma ChE up Quail Dieter (1974)
Crude oil Eratic changes in ChE
Mullet Chambers et al. (1979)
Cd, Hg, Pb Brain AChE down Rat Hrdina et al. (1976)
Pb Brain AChE down Rat Modak et al. (1975)
Cd ChE down Crab Reddy and Venugopal (1990)
Chemical specificity?
31
Biomarker developmentAfter Hugget et al. (1989)
• Relative sensitivity
• Inherent variability
• Biological specificity
• Chemical specificity
• Time to manifestation
• Linkage to higher level effects
• Field applicability
• Field validation
32
.
Starling serumChE activity, 6hrs and • 24hrs after OP ingestion
Thompson et al 1991
33
.
Starling serum BChE activity, 6hrs and • 24hrs after OP ingestion
Thompson et al 1991
34
Biomarker developmentAfter Hugget et al. (1989)
• Relative sensitivity
• Inherent variability
• Biological specificity
• Chemical specificity
• Time to manifestation
• Linkage to higher level effects
• Field applicability
• Field validation
35
%
Links to fitness-related behaviours
Activity budgets of captive male starlings dosed with dicrotophos to give a 50% inhibition of AChE.
Grue and Shipley, 1981
36
Biomarker developmentAfter Hugget et al. (1989)
• Relative sensitivity
• Inherent variability
• Biological specificity
• Chemical specificity
• Time to manifestation
• Linkage to higher level effects
• Field applicability
• Field validation
37
0
20
40
60
80
Zone of normal variation
Zone of reversible effects
Zone of irreversible effects
1 3 10 mg/Kg
280 420 ?
Dose of Fenitrothiong/ha
The utility of AChE mesurements in environmental management
% in
hibi
tion
of A
ChE
38
Date Event Development stage Reference
1958Abnormal breakages in Peregrine falcon eggs
Problem? Ratcliffe (1958)
1965Dramatic decline in raptors in the holarctic (Madison meeting)
Time sequence
Consistency of replication
Hickey (1969)
1967Demonstration of the 1st occurance in 1940’s in UK
Time sequence Ratcliffe (1967)
1968In US decline in many raptors associated to 20% thinning
Time sequence
Link between biomarker and higher levels
Hickey & Anderson (1968)
1970Link to DDE in Alaskan eggs
First captivity exp. With Kestrel
Specificity of association
Link between biomarker and cause
Cade et al. (1971)
Wiemeyer and Porter (1970)
1973Enzymatic changes in avian oviduct caused by DDE
Mechanistic links between levels
Peakall et al. (1973)
1974Demonstration of DDE in eggs collected in 40’s
Specificity of association Peakall (1974)
1975
Demonstration of similar effects in field and controlled exp.s
Correlation between residues and thinning
Specificity of assoc
Strength of assoc
consistency
Lincer (1975)
Peakall et al. (1975)
39
Conclusions
• Depledge’s Christmass wish is unlikely to be fulfilled in near future
• It is important to understand toxic mechanistic when attempting to understand environmental dammage
• Attaching blame to an environmental sinner will also in the future involve the use of biomarkers