1 Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment...121 Our study was conducted in the North East and...
Transcript of 1 Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment...121 Our study was conducted in the North East and...
1
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 1
Influence of land sharing and land sparing strategies on patterns of vegetation and 2
terrestrial vertebrate richness and occurrence in Australian endangered eucalypt 3
woodlands. 4
5
Damian R. Michael*a, b, Jeff T. Wood a, Thea O’Loughlin a and David B. Lindenmayer a, b 6
7
a Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, 8
ACT 0200 Australia. bNational Environmental Science Programme, Threatened Species 9
Recovery Hub. 10
*Corresponding author: [email protected] 11
12
Word count: (7440 - including References, Tables and Figures) 13
14
15
16
Running Head: Influence of land management on biodiversity. 17
18
19
2
Abstract 20
Native vegetation placed under an agri-environment scheme (AES) is purported to support 21
greater biodiversity than vegetation managed for intensive livestock grazing, and 22
conservation reserves are purported to support greater biodiversity than land sharing under 23
AES. These predictions underpin financial incentive delivery programs that enable 24
landholders to adopt environmentally friendly agricultural practices. To evaluate these 25
predictions, we established a biodiversity monitoring program in endangered temperate 26
eucalypt woodland communities in southern Australia. We compared vegetation variables 27
and vertebrate species richness and abundance among sites under different land management 28
between 2010 and 2014. Our sites included: 1) woodland remnants on private property 29
recently placed under an AES land management agreement (land sharing), 2) woodland 30
remnants in State conservation reserves as reference areas (land sparing), and 3) woodland 31
remnants used for intensive livestock production as controls. We used hierarchical 32
generalized linear models to examine patterns of biodiversity among management classes and 33
over time. We found conservation reserves were structurally more complex and floristically 34
richer compared to production sites, and AES supported greater cover of native perennial 35
grass. Reptile and amphibian species richness and abundance, and total bird species richness 36
did not differ significantly among management classes, although AES and reference sites 37
supported more birds of conservation concern. Arboreal marsupials were significantly more 38
species rich in conservation reserves than AES. Temporal patterns in vertebrate species 39
richness were related to post-drought climatic conditions. Our findings suggest that strategies 40
involving land sharing under AES are as effective as land sparing (e.g. conservation reserves) 41
for bird conservation, but alternative strategies may be required to enhance habitat for less 42
mobile species such as frogs and reptiles, or species dependant on old growth vegetation such 43
as arboreal marsupials. 44
3
Keywords: Agricultural landscape; arboreal marsupials; birds; management intervention; 45
reptiles; temperate woodland. 46
47
1. Introduction 48
With the global population approaching nine billion people, there is mounting pressure to 49
provide food security while at the same time arrest the decline of biodiversity (Brussaard et 50
al., 2010; Godfray et al., 2010; Chappell and LaValle, 2011; Tscharntke et al., 2012). 51
However, attempts to integrate production and conservation present a major conservation 52
challenge (Tilman et al., 2002; Habel et al., 2015), as approximately 40% of the earth’s land 53
is used for agriculture and the estimated rates of biodiversity loss are calculated to be 1,000 – 54
10,000 times the pre-human background rate of extinction (Chappell and LaValle, 2011). In 55
recent years, strategies to minimize human impacts on the land include land sharing and land 56
sparing (Fischer et al., 2008; Chappell and LaValle, 2011; Kleijn et al., 2011). The former 57
strategy involves integrating biodiversity conservation and low-yield food production on the 58
same land (Phalan et al., 2011b). An example of this strategy is the European Union’s agri-59
environment scheme, a policy instrument that involves paying farmers to modify agricultural 60
practices to mitigate the negative effects of agricultural intensification on biodiversity (Kleijn 61
et al., 2011; Concepcion et al., 2012). The latter strategy involves separating land for 62
conservation from high-yielding crop land (Fischer et al., 2008). Protected areas are one 63
example of this strategy. These areas represent clearly defined geographical spaces that are 64
recognised, dedicated and managed, through legislation, to achieve the long term 65
conservation of nature, associated ecosystem services and cultural values (Dudley et al., 66
2010). Understanding which of these two strategies can accommodate greater biodiversity in 67
4
agricultural landscapes around the world remains a key question (Kleijn et al., 2011; Habel et 68
al., 2015). 69
70
In 2008, the Australian Government established the Caring for Our Country initiative 71
(Commonwealth of Australia 2009). This initiative delivered grants to State Government 72
organisations and natural resource management agencies. The North East Catchment 73
Management Authority (NECMA) in Victoria, Australia, was a successful recipient of a grant 74
which funded the project ‘Improving landscape scale conservation of threatened grassy 75
woodland ecosystems in the Greater Murray Goulburn catchment’. The aim of this project 76
was to establish contractual agreements with private landholders to manage approximately 77
600 ha of endangered grassy woodland vegetation for biodiversity outcomes. This significant 78
financial investment by the Australian Government in threatened native vegetation on private 79
property in south-eastern Australia provided the motivation for this study (Commonwealth of 80
Australia 2009).This project, governed by NECMA, is analogous to the European Union’s 81
agri-environment scheme (AES) (Kleijn and Sutherland, 2003; Whittingham, 2007), which 82
involves paying landholders to adopt environmentally friendly farming practices. 83
84
Whilst biodiversity in protected areas is relatively well studied and monitored, many AES 85
have been criticized for their lack of monitoring and evaluation (Kleijn and Sutherland, 2003; 86
Tscharntke et al., 2005; Whittingham, 2007; Kleijn et al., 2011; Concepcion et al., 2012). 87
Furthermore, the majority of studies that have examined the effectiveness of AES involve 88
investigations on invertebrates (Fuentes‐Montemayor et al., 2011; Holland et al., 2012; 89
Delattre et al., 2013; Holland et al., 2014; Wood et al., 2015) or birds (Baker et al., 2012; 90
5
Lindenmayer et al., 2012a; MacDonald et al., 2012; Prince et al., 2012; Hiron et al., 2013; 91
Bright et al., 2015). This is, in part, because of the ease in which these taxa can be studied 92
(Whittingham, 2011). By contrast, studies on mammals (Broughton et al., 2014) and 93
ectothermic vertebrates are scarce and represent a key knowledge gap in the ecological 94
literature on agri-environmental schemes (Lindenmayer et al., 2012b; Michael et al., 2014) 95
and would add valuable information to the land sparing versus land sharing debate (Kleijn et 96
al., 2011; Habel et al., 2015). 97
98
We sought to address the question of whether the strategies of land sharing versus land 99
gazetted for conservation (land sparing) had complimentary vegetation patterns and richness 100
of vertebrate fauna in endangered eucalypt woodland communities. In doing so, we explored 101
two questions that underpin biodiversity conservation in commodity production landscapes: 102
1) Does native vegetation placed under AES support greater vertebrate species richness and 103
abundance than vegetation managed for primary production outcomes? 2) Do conservation 104
reserves support greater vertebrate species richness and abundance than sites under AES? 105
Remnant vegetation placed under a management agreement has the potential to support good 106
quality native vegetation and high levels of biodiversity (Lindenmayer et al., 2012a; Michael 107
et al., 2014). We postulated that management interventions such as reducing livestock 108
grazing pressure, controlling weeds of National significance and restricting the removal of 109
fallen timber are likely to result in improved native vegetation structure and condition, which 110
in turn, may lead to improved habitat values and positive biodiversity outcomes. We also 111
predicted that there would be a significant difference in vegetation structure and measures of 112
vertebrate diversity between sites managed for production outcomes, sites placed under 113
management agreements in 2010 (AES) and conservation reserves, in accordance with 114
6
differences in land use history and past disturbance regimes. With these two above questions 115
in mind, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of land sharing and land sparing strategies in 116
conserving and improving woodland biodiversity. 117
118
2. Methods 119
2.1. Study Area 120
Our study was conducted in the North East and Goulburn Broken catchment management 121
areas of Victoria. This region is bordered by the Murray River in the north, the township of 122
Merton in the south (36º 58′ 42′′ S 145º 42′ 33′′ E), Wises Creek Flora Reserve in the east 123
(36º 03′ 17′′ S 147º 12′ 58′′ E) and the township of Locksley in the west (36º 49′ 06′′ S 145º 124
18′ 31′′ E) (Figure 1). The predominant type of native vegetation in our study region is 125
temperate eucalypt woodland, of which, over 85% has been cleared for agriculture and 126
livestock grazing (Hobbs and Yates, 2000). The remaining stands off fragmented vegetation 127
include several endangered grassy woodland communities listed under the Environment 128
Protection Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. The two endangered woodland communities 129
in our study area include Box Gum Grassy Woodland dominated by white box Eucalyptus 130
albens, yellow box E. melliodora and Blakely’s red gum E. blakelyi; and Buloke Woodland 131
dominated by Buloke Allocasuarina luehmannii and grey box E. microcarpa. The quality and 132
quantity of remnant vegetation in our study area varies according to land use history and past 133
clearing, with most remnant vegetation occurring on hillsides or along drainage lines. Sites 134
with minimal livestock grazing pressure are dominated by native grasses and forbs, whereas 135
intensive production sites with a history of fertilizer use are dominated by exotic annual 136
grasses and broad-leaved weeds. 137
7
2.2. Experimental design 138
Under the Australian Government’s Caring for Our Country initiative, the North East and 139
Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority (CMA) received a grant to improve and 140
protect 580 ha of endangered grassy woodland vegetation. Expressions of interest were 141
advertised and eligible landholders received funds and entered into management agreements 142
to undertake conservation actions such weed control and fencing native vegetation to exclude 143
or reduce livestock grazing pressure during the spring and summer months. 144
145
In April 2010, 13 discrete landscape units (paddocks containing threatened native vegetation) 146
that ranged in size from 9 ha - 200 ha (mean = 53 ha) were placed under a management 147
agreement (agri-environment scheme) and selected for biophysical monitoring. New fences 148
were constructed where necessary and new grazing regimes were adopted before biophysical 149
surveys were conducted. These areas were selected based on attaining benchmark vegetation 150
condition criteria, such that structurally diverse and floristically rich sites were targeted over 151
poorer condition sites. A single 200 m long transect (monitoring site) was placed randomly 152
within patches of native vegetation at a minimum distance of 50 m from the edge of the 153
remnant. These sites were paired with native vegetation managed for production purposes 154
(control) on the same property to account for inter-farm differences in management practices. 155
Control sites were selected to approximate the same vegetation type as AES but differed in 156
having below benchmark vegetation condition scores. In addition to these paired sites, we 157
selected the nearest conservation reserve/roadside reserve (protected area) within 15 km of 158
the same vegetation type to serve as reference sites. Conservation reserves in this region are 159
relatively small, have not been grazed for more than a decade and are subject to periodic 160
weed control. Thus, our study design included three different management classes: (1) AES 161
8
sites (N = 13) - remnant vegetation that was in former production areas and placed under a 10 162
year conservation management agreement with the CMA in 2010. These areas were formerly 163
set stocked, were not subject to targeted weed control and had no restrictions on timber 164
removal prior to this study. (2) Production sites (N = 10) - remnant vegetation managed for 165
primary production, with a set-stock grazing regime, and (3) Conservation reserves (N = 11) - 166
remnant vegetation in nature reserves managed by Parks Victoria. Thus, our study 167
encompassed 34 permanent sites on 18 farms (Figure 1). 168
169
2.3. Survey Protocols 170
We surveyed vegetation, amphibians, reptiles, arboreal marsupials and birds on four 171
occasions between May 2010 and December 2014. No data were collected in 2013 due to the 172
project transitioning to bi-annual surveys and a long-term monitoring phase.We collected 173
percentage cover abundance estimates for vegetation variables using the point intercept 174
method (Gibbons et al., 2008), whereby the presence/absence of vegetation attributes were 175
recorded ten times at one metre intervals. We applied this method twice along our 200 m 176
monitoring transects (between 0 - 50 m and 150 - 200 m) to calculate a percent score for 177
each attribute. The key vegetation variables we selected were those predicted to fluctuate 178
with season and management; including native grass, exotic grass, broad leaved weeds, bare 179
ground and leaf litter. We measured seedling recruitment of Eucalypt species and native 180
shrubs (e.g. Acacia sp.), and measured the length of logs (greater than 1 m) within two 50 x 181
20 m plots located at opposite ends of the transect. We also measured native plant species 182
richness from a 20 x 20 m plot located mid-way along the transect. 183
184
9
We surveyed amphibians and reptiles at each site once a year during August using time- and 185
area- constrained (30 min x 1 ha) active searches of natural habitat (200 m x 50 m search 186
area) and inspections of artificial refuges (AR) arrays (Michael et al., 2012). Each AR array 187
consisted of four railway sleepers (1.2 m in length), four roof tiles and one double stack of 1 188
m² corrugated steel sheet. AR arrays were established within the 1 ha search area and placed 189
100 m apart. Using a combination of active searches and AR survey techniques increases the 190
probability of detecting cryptic herpetofauna (Michael et al., 2012). Surveys were conducted 191
on clear days between 0900 - 1400 hours. 192
193
We conducted spotlighting surveys of arboreal marsupials once each year during November 194
using a time- and area- constrained (20 min x 1 ha) search protocol. We commenced 195
spotlighting surveys one hour after dusk and terminated five hours later to reduce observer 196
fatigue and potential bias in detectability. We used a hand held (9V) battery powered 197
spotlight to detect animal movement and/or eye shine. Only individuals within 50 m of the 198
transect were included in the analysis to avoid recording species in adjacent fields and 199
potentially under different land use. 200
201
Our bird counting protocols entailed conducting five minute point interval counts (Pyke and 202
Recher, 1983) at the 0 m, 100 m and 200 m points along a permanent transect. All species 203
seen or heard within 50 m of the transect were recorded and used in the analysis. To account 204
for observer bias and weather conditions, each site was surveyed by two different observers 205
on sequential days during June (Austral winter) and October (Austral spring) (Lindenmayer 206
et al., 2009). We completed counts between 0530 - 0930 hours and did not undertake surveys 207
10
during inclement weather. We classified birds of conservation concern based on Reid (1999) 208
or if they were listed under the NSW Threatened Species ACT 1995. 209
210
2.4. Data Analysis 211
To allow for between- and within-site variation, we fitted hierarchical generalized linear 212
models (Lee et al., 2006) to species richness and abundance. We used vegetation variables, 213
amphibian, reptile, bird and arboreal marsupial species richness and abundance as response 214
variables, and management class (treatment effect) and year (temporal effect) as predictors in 215
the analysis. For responses which were percentages, we used a quasi-binomial distribution 216
with a logit link function, and we used a beta distribution with a logit link function for the 217
random effects of site and plots within site where that was appropriate for birds and 218
vegetation variables. For counts, we assumed a quasi-Poisson distribution with a log link, and 219
a gamma distribution with a log link for the random effects. For fallen timber, we assumed 220
normal distributions for both the response and the random effects. The effective degrees of 221
freedom for the estimation of variance components, 25 for site and for plot within site and 222
more for other components, were large enough to confidently estimate variances and standard 223
errors with sufficient accuracy, overcoming the limitations of small sample size. We used 224
Wald tests for assessing the significance of effects. We restricted our analysis of arboreal 225
marsupials and birds to those detected within 50 m of each transect and excluded water birds 226
or species flying overhead unless they were obviously using the site. We combined data from 227
the two endangered woodland vegetation communities and performed all analyses using 228
GenStat v17. 229
230
3. Results 231
3.1. Vegetation variables 232
11
We found significant differences in the mean values of several vegetation variables among 233
management classes. The number of shrub seedlings ( 22χ = 12.27, P = 0.002; Figure 2b), the 234
percent cover of leaf litter ( 22χ = 15.63, P < 0.001; Figure 2g) and native plant species 235
richness ( 22χ = 9.7, P < 0.05) was highest in conservation reserves; the percent cover of exotic 236
broad leaved weeds ( 22χ = 9.98, P = 0.007; Figure 2c) was highest on production sites, and 237
the percent cover of native grass ( 22χ = 6.65, P = 0.036; Figure 2e) was highest on AES. We 238
found significant temporal differences in cover abundance estimates for all variables 239
measured. Overall, the percent cover of broad leaved weeds ( 23χ = 42.86, P < 0.001; Figure 240
2c) and bare ground ( 23χ = 79.19, P < 0.001; Figure 2h) declined between 2010 and 2014, and 241
the amount of fallen timber increased between 2010 and 2014 ( 23χ = 56.82, P < 0.001; Figure 242
2d). The percent cover of native grass ( 23χ = 117.79, P < 0.001; Figure 2e) peaked in 2011, 243
whereas the percent cover of exotic grass ( 23χ = 130.71, P < 0.001; Figure 2f) was lowest in 244
2011. We also found significant positive interactions between management and survey year 245
for several variables. Overstorey eucalypt recruitment was significantly high in conservation 246
reserves in 2012 ( 26χ = 34.34, P < 0.001; Figure 2a), the cover of exotic broad leaved weeds 247
was significantly low in production sites in 2014 ( 26χ = 26.22, P < 0.001; Figure 2c) and 248
amounts of fallen timber was significantly high in conservation reserves in 2014 ( 26χ = 26.83, 249
P < 0.001; Figure 2d). 250
251
3.2. Amphibian species richness and abundance 252
We obtained 186 observations of eight frog species from three families (see supplementary 253
data Table S1). Approximately 75% of all observations were of two species; Eastern Banjo 254
Frog Limnodynastes dumerilii and Spotted Marsh Frog L. tasmaniensis. We found no 255
12
significant difference in amphibian species richness ( 22χ = 1.20, P = 0.548; Figure 3a) or 256
abundance ( 22χ = 3.99, P = 0.136; Figure 3b) among management classes. We identified 257
highly significant differences in species richness ( 23χ = 12.09, P < 0.01; Figure 3a) and 258
abundance ( 23χ = 40.43, P < 0.001; Figure 3b) between years. Amphibian species richness 259
and abundance peaked in 2011 and declined thereafter. We found no significant interaction 260
between management and year for amphibian species richness ( 26χ = 2.59, P = 0.857; Figure 261
3a) or abundance ( 26χ = 5.09, P = 0.532; Figure 3b). 262
263
3.3. Reptile species richness and abundance 264
We obtained 584 observations of 18 reptile species from five families (see supplementary 265
data Table S1). Approximately 70% of all observations were of four species; Boulenger’s 266
Skink Morethia boulengeri (40%), Eastern Striped Skink Ctenotus spaldingi (16%), Three-267
toed Earless Skink Hemiergis talbingoensis (14%) and the Ragged Snake-eyed Skink 268
Cryptoblepharus pannosus (7%). We found reptile species richness increased along a 269
gradient from production sites, AES sites to conservation reserves. However, differences 270
among management types were not statistically significant (species richness; 22χ = 3.91, P = 271
0.142; Figure 3c: species abundance; 22χ = 405, P = 0.132, Figure 3d). By contrast, we 272
identified highly significant differences in reptile species richness ( 23χ = 27.36, P < 0.001; 273
Figure 3c) and abundance ( 23χ = 23.33, P < 0.001; Figure 3d) between years. Reptile species 274
richness and abundance peaked during the 2011 and 2012 surveys. We found no significant 275
interaction between management and year for reptile species richness ( 26χ = 4.03, P = 0.672; 276
Figure 3c) or abundance ( 26χ = 4.56, P = 0.601; Figure 3d). 277
13
3.4. Bird species richness 278
We recorded 4517 observations of 121 bird species from 37 families (see supplementary data 279
Table S1). We found no significant difference in total bird species richness ( 22χ = 2.36, P = 280
0.307; Figure 3e) among management classes. We identified highly significant differences in 281
bird species richness among years ( 23χ = 84.10, P < 0.001; Figure 3e) and seasons ( 2
1χ = 282
12.30, P < 0.001). More bird species were detected in 2011 and during the spring surveys. 283
We found no significant interaction between management and survey year ( 26χ = 8.57, P = 284
0.192; Figure 3e) or between management and season ( 22χ = 1.81, P = 0.418). However, we 285
identified a significant interaction between year and season ( 23χ = 23.46, P < 0.001), where 286
more bird species were detected in spring 2011. 287
288
When we examined 16 bird species of conservation concern, we identified a significant 289
difference in species richness among management classes ( 22χ = 6.63, P = 0.036; Figure 3f) 290
and survey year ( 23χ = 15.375, P = 0.002; Figure 3f), but not between seasons ( 2
1χ = 0.96, P = 291
0.333). Furthermore, we found no significant interaction between management and survey 292
year ( 26χ = 8.09, P = 0.233; Figure 3f), management and season ( 2
2χ = 0.16, P = 0.927), or 293
survey year and season ( 23χ = 2.35, P = 0.501). Overall, significantly more bird species of 294
conservation concern were recorded on AES and conservation reserves than production sites. 295
296
3.5. Arboreal marsupial species richness and abundance 297
14
We recorded 256 observations of six species of arboreal marsupial from four families (see 298
supplementary data Table S1). More than 80% of all observations were of the Common 299
Brushtail Possum Trichosurus vulpechula and the Common Ring-tailed Possum 300
Pseudocheirus peregrinus. We identified a significant difference in arboreal marsupial 301
species richness among management classes ( 22χ = 9.45, P = 0.009; Figure 3g) but not 302
between years ( 23χ = 6.64, P = 0.084) (Figure 6). On average, significantly more species were 303
detected in AES compared to production sites and significantly more species were detected in 304
conservation reserves than AES. We found no significant difference in arboreal marsupial 305
abundance among management classes ( 22χ = 5.49, P = 0.064; Figure 3h), although we 306
identified a significant difference in arboreal marsupial abundance between years ( 23χ = 307
14.24, P < 0.01; Figure 3h). The numbers of individuals recorded were highest in 2010 and 308
2012. We found no significant interaction between management and survey year for arboreal 309
marsupial species richness ( 26χ = 4.04, P = 0.671; Figure 3g). However, we identified a 310
significant interaction between management and survey year for arboreal marsupial 311
abundance ( 26χ = 15.34, P = 0.018; Figure 3h), where significantly fewer individuals were 312
recorded on production sites in 2012. 313
314
4. Discussion 315
We sought to evaluate the influence of different land management uses on vegetation patterns 316
and vertebrate species richness and occurrence in endangered temperate eucalypt woodland 317
vegetation communities. Under both land sparing (conservation reserves) and land sharing 318
(agri-environment scheme) strategies, comparatively high numbers of birds of conservation 319
concern were supported than compared to agricultural production sites. Likewise, arboreal 320
15
marsupial species richness and abundance was highest under a land sparing strategy, but AES 321
still supported significantly more arboreal marsupial species than agricultural production 322
sites. The relative benefits of AES or conservation reserves for supporting high herpetofaunal 323
diversity was not apparent in this study. 324
325
Agri-environment schemes are increasingly being adopted around the world to maintain 326
agricultural productivity while at the same time integrating biodiversity conservation – a key 327
premise of land sharing strategies (Fischer et al., 2008; Phalan et al., 2011b). However, it is 328
recognized that land sharing schemes may not guarantee benefits to all biodiversity in all 329
agricultural landscapes (Kleijn et al., 2001; Kleijn et al., 2006; Phalan et al., 2011a; Michael 330
et al., 2014). Furthermore, conservation reserves may not comprehensively protect 331
biodiversity dependent on some endangered ecological communities (Scott et al., 2001; 332
Rodrigues et al., 2004). We highlight the contrasting responses of different taxa to these two 333
strategies. In the remainder of this paper we discuss the influence of these land use strategies 334
on patterns of vegetation and vertebrate diversity and suggest ways to improve future AES to 335
maximize the protection of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. 336
337
4.1. Effect of land management on vegetation patterns 338
Protected areas such as conservation reserves and roadsides are predicted to have greater 339
vegetation structural complexity and floristic diversity than remnant vegetation in agricultural 340
landscapes due to the exclusion of livestock grazing, logging and soil disturbances (Bennett, 341
1991). Our results indicate that conservation reserves in our study area are floristically rich, 342
support high percent cover of leaf litter and more recruitment of eucalypt saplings and shrub 343
16
seedlings than AES or production sites (Figure 2a, b). This pattern is consistent with the 344
response of native vegetation to reduced livestock grazing pressure (Dorrough & Moxham, 345
2005). By contrast, we found AES supported greater cover of native grass than conservation 346
reserves or production sites (Figure 2e), a result we expected considering areas of high 347
quality native vegetation were targeted for investment. The temporal changes in vegetation 348
patterns we observed in this study reflect seasonal rainfall patterns; noticeably with a peak 349
and trough in native and exotic grass cover in 2011, a year of above average high rainfall. 350
Our findings also highlight the complex interaction between climate and management. For 351
example, eucalypt recruitment and fallen timber were significantly higher in conservation 352
reserves during 2011 and 2014 respectively (Figure 2a, d). This suggests that some attributes 353
of native vegetation (e.g. eucalypt recruitment) respond markedly better under different 354
management scenarios during climatically favorable years. 355
356
4.2. Effect of land management on patterns of vertebrate diversity 357
At the outset of our study, we predicted that AES would support greater vertebrate richness 358
than production sites. A second prediction was that conservation reserves would support 359
greater vertebrate richness than AES sites. Our data provide inconclusive evidence to 360
determine which strategy is best for amphibians or reptiles. On average, reptile species 361
richness and abundance was highest on AES compared to controls, and conservation reserves 362
supported greater reptile diversity than AES sites (Figure 3c, d). However, the differences 363
among these management classes were not statistically significant. This result is congruent 364
with other studies on ectotherms that report low site-level species richness, an artifact of past 365
habitat loss and widespread declines in herpetofauna (Brown et al., 2008; Mac Nally et al., 366
2014). 367
17
Despite low site-level species richness, our data do not concur with other researchers that 368
small conservation reserves (including small linear road reserves) play a disproportionately 369
more important role in protecting reptiles in fragmented agricultural landscapes than other 370
land tenures (Driscoll, 2004; Brown et al., 2008; Mendenhall et al., 2014). Our findings 371
suggest, by lack of statistical significance among treatments, that reptiles are capable of 372
persisting in some production landscapes (albeit at low densities), particularly if habitat 373
requirements are met (Fischer et al., 2005; Michael et al., 2015) and grazing pressure remains 374
low (Howland et al., 2014). In a similar study, Michael et al. (2014) found that reptile species 375
richness and composition were similar between production areas and sites under an agri-376
environment scheme in southern New South Wales. Considering the lack of difference in 377
reptile diversity between management classes, conservation efforts to improve reptiles will 378
need to extend beyond conservation reserves or patches of remnant vegetation and consider 379
approaches to improve habitat in the interconnecting farming matrix. This will include 380
improving the carrying capacity of crops and grazing land for reptile biota by restoring 381
critical ground cover habitat such as fallen timber and bush rock, two critical resources upon 382
which many reptiles depend (Michael et al. 2015). 383
384
With respect to birds, we found no statistically significant difference in mean species richness 385
among management classes (Figure 3e). However, when we restricted the analysis to birds of 386
conservation concern, we found that AES and conservation reserves supported, on average, 387
three times more species than production sites (Figure 3f). This finding highlights the value 388
of AES and protected areas in protecting a suite of birds that have declined since European 389
settlement (Ried, 1999; Montague-Drake et al., 2009). This finding also emulates patterns 390
reported in another study from southern NSW which found the same suite of birds benefitted 391
18
from AES (Lindenmayer et al., 2012a). In the previous study, modified grazing regimes led 392
to an increase in shrub recruitment and improved structural complexity, key predictors of the 393
presence of declining woodland birds (Montague-Drake et al., 2009; Lindenmayer et al., 394
2012a). However, short-term land management agreements (10 years in most cases) may not 395
provide native vegetation with enough time to recover from intensive grazing pressure. We 396
argue, that inperpetuity conservation covenants with private landholders are required to 397
provide a long-term solution to native vegetation regeneration and habitat rehabilitation on 398
farms. 399
400
Arboreal marsupials were another group to differ statistically in measures of diversity among 401
management classes. In this group, we found a strong gradient in species richness and 402
abundance from production sites to conservation reserves, the difference between 403
management classes being almost twofold (Figure 3g, h). With the exception of the Koala 404
Phascolarctos cinereus, all species of arboreal marsupial detected in this study are hollow-405
dependant (Gibbons and Lindenmayer, 2002). The relationship between arboreal marsupial 406
density, patch size and the number of den sites (tree hollows) is well documented (van der 407
Ree et al., 2001; Harper et al., 2008; Crane et al., 2010) as is the importance of maintaining 408
roadside vegetation and conservation reserves (Crane et al., 2014). However, a key challenge 409
in conserving arboreal marsupials in agricultural landscapes is to improve habitat 410
connectivity (Cunningham et al., 2007). Traditionally, this has proved to be a challenge for 411
land managers as it often requires adopting management practices that facilitate eucalypt 412
regeneration such as modifying grazing regimes at a farm- and landscape-scale (Ikin et al., 413
2015), or undertaking extensive tree plantings. Instead, alternative strategies to increase 414
arboreal marsupial habitat may include increasing the width of roadside vegetation (van der 415
19
Ree et al., 2001; Crane et al., 2014) and expanding vegetation around existing conservation 416
reserves. 417
418
4.3. Trends over time 419
Climate changes associated with El Nino Southern Oscillation can have predictable effects on 420
wildlife populations in landscapes where productivity is strongly limited by precipitation 421
(Holmgren et al., 2006). For most vegetation variables and three of four vertebrates groups, 422
we found highly significant differences in species richness among years (Figures 2 and 3). 423
These patterns are consistent with increased population numbers (and detectability) following 424
the Millennium drought which ended in 2010, and subsequent above average rainfall across 425
the study area in the years 2010 to 2012 (the mean average rainfall for Benalla, a town 426
situated in the centre of our study area declined significantly since 2012, Bureau of 427
Meteorology, 2015). Furthermore, temporal variation in measures of diversity between 428
management types highlights the importance of considering management responses in 429
different years when designing future AES. For example, we found the abundance of arboreal 430
marsupials declined markedly on production sites in 2012 (Figure 3h). This pattern may have 431
been driven by differences in predator-prey relationships between sites where feral predatory 432
animals were controlled (e.g. AES) and sites where predators were not controlled (e.g. 433
production sites). 434
435
The relationship between rainfall parameters and population-level increases is well 436
documented for amphibians (Wassens et al., 2013; Mac Nally et al., 2014). For example, 437
periods of above average rainfall can prolong breeding events and breeding success, which 438
20
can lead to an increase in adult frog densities and detection rates (Mac Nally et al., 2014). 439
Our amphibian data were partly driven by the abundant spotted marsh frog Limnodynastes 440
tasmaniensis, a habitat generalist that has good dispersal ability and opportunistically breeds 441
in rain-fed ponds (Wassens et al., 2013). In addition, the relationship between rainfall 442
patterns and reptile diversity is more complex and less well understood (see Read et al., 2012; 443
Pastro et al., 2013). In one study, Dickman et al. (1999) found juvenile abundance of two 444
agamid species was related to rainfall in the preceding summer and autumn, consistent with 445
enhanced survival, growth and clutch size. However, within-year rainfall also drove changes 446
in vegetation cover, which led to a shift in the relative abundance of the two species 447
(Dickman et al., 1999). The peak and subsequent decline in the detection rate of herpetofauna 448
in this study is likely to be associated with post-drought rainfall patterns, suggesting it may 449
take many years before the causal effects of management can be separated from the 450
background effects of climate. 451
452
4.4. Conclusion 453
Our findings from an agricultural landscape in south-eastern Australia suggest that land 454
sharing and land sparing have contrasting benefits for farm biodiversity. Land sharing 455
strategies, under an agri-environment scheme, and conservation reserves can support 456
relatively species rich assemblages of birds, including many species of conservation concern. 457
However, AES may have only limited benefit for protecting populations of arboreal 458
marsupials due to the lack of hollow-bearing trees in agricultural landscapes. Furthermore, 459
the comparative benefit of land sharing and land sparing for maintaining herpetofaunal 460
diversity remains inconclusive, and future incentive schemes may need to focus on improving 461
the carrying capacity and dispersal potential for reptiles in the broader agricultural matrix. 462
21
Another important consideration for future AES is to take into account interactions between 463
year (and associated climatic conditions) and management because differences in measures of 464
diversity may be masked in poor (drought years) compared to above average rainfall years. 465
466
Acknowledgments 467
This study was funded by the North East and Goulburn Broken Catchment Management 468
Authorities, the Australian Research Council and the Australian Government’s Caring for our 469
Country initiative. We thank Greta Quinlivan, Mary Munroe, Jenny Wilson and Steve Wilson 470
for supporting this work. Jacqui Slingo, Lachlan McBurney, David Blair, Mason Crane, 471
Sachiko Okada, Christopher MacGregor, Daniel Florance, Scott Lucas and Malcom Miles 472
assisted with field work. Surveys were conducted in accordance with The Australian National 473
University Animal Care and Ethics protocols (F.ES.01.10) under a scientific research permit 474
issued by the Department of Sustainability and Environment (10005355). 475
476
References 477
Baker, D.J., Freeman, S.N., Grice, P.V.,Siriwardena, G.M. 2012. Landscape‐scale responses 478
of birds to agri‐environment management: a test of the English Environmental 479
Stewardship scheme. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 871-882.Bennett, A.F. 1991. Roads, 480
roadsides, and wildlife conservation: a review. In Nature conservation 2: the role of 481
corridors (Eds D.A.Saunders R.J. Hobbs), pp 99 -118, Surrey Beatty and Sons, 482
Chipping Norton, New South Wales, Australia. 483
22
Bright, J.A., Morris, A.J., Field, R.H., Cooke, A.I., Grice, P.V., Walker, L.K., Fern, J.,Peach, 484
W.J. 2015. Higher-tier agri-environment scheme enhances breeding densities of some 485
priority farmland birds in England. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 203, 69-79. 486
Broughton, R.K., Shore, R.F., Heard, M.S., Amy, S.R., Meek, W.R., Redhead, J.W., Turk, 487
A., Pywell, R.F. 2014. Agri-environment scheme enhances small mammal diversity 488
and abundance at the farm-scale. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 192, 122-129. 489
Brown, G.W., Bennett, A.F., Potts, J.M. 2008. Regional faunal decline–reptile occurrence in 490
fragmented rural landscapes of south-eastern Australia. Wildl. Res. 35, 8-18. 491
Brussaard, L., Caron, P., Campbell, B., Lipper, L., Mainka, S., Rabbinge, R., Babin, D., 492
Pulleman, M. 2010. Reconciling biodiversity conservation and food security: 493
scientific challenges for a new agriculture. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2, 34-42. 494
Chappell, M.J., LaValle, L.A. 2011. Food security and biodiversity: can we have both? An 495
agroecological analysis. Agric. Human Values, 28, 3-26. 496
Commonwealth of Australia (2009) Environmental Stewardship Strategic Framework. 497
Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. 498
Concepcion, E.D., Diaz, M., Kleijn, D., Baldi, A., Batary, P., Clough, Y., Gabriel, D., 499
Herzog, F., Holzschuh, A., Knop, E. 2012. Interactive effects of landscape context 500
constrain the effectiveness of local agri‐environmental management. J. Appl. Ecol., 501
49, 695-705. 502
Crane, M.J., Lindenmayer, D.B., Cunningham, R.B. 2010. The use of den trees by the 503
squirrel glider (Petaurus norfolcensis) in temperate Australian woodlands. Aust. J. 504
Zool. 58, 39-49. 505
Crane, M.J., Lindenmayer, D.B., Cunningham, R.B. 2014. The value of countryside elements 506
in the conservation of a threatened arboreal marsupial Petaurus norfolcensis in 507
23
agricultural landscapes of south-eastern Australia - The disproportional value of 508
scattered trees. PloS One 9, e107178. 509
Cunningham, R.B., Lindenmayer, D.B., Crane, M., Michael, D.,MacGregor, C. 2007. Reptile 510
and arboreal marsupial response to replanted vegetation in agricultural landscapes. 511
Ecol. Appl. 17, 609-619. 512
Delattre, T., Vernon, P., Burel, F. 2013. An agri-environmental scheme enhances butterfly 513
dispersal in European agricultural landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 166, 102-109. 514
Dickman, C.R., Letnic, M., Mahon, P.S. 1999. Population dynamics of two species of dragon 515
lizards in arid Australia: the effects of rainfall. Oecologia 119, 357-366. 516
Dorrough, J., Moxham, C. 2005. Eucalypt establishment in agricultural landscapes and 517
implications for landscape-scale restoration. Biol. Conserv. 123, 55-66. 518
Driscoll, D.A. 2004. Extinction and outbreaks accompany fragmentation of a reptile 519
community. Ecol. Appl. 14, 220-240.Dudley, N., Parrish, J.D., Redford, K., Stolton S. 520
2010. The revised IUCN protected area management categories: the debate and ways 521
forward. Oryx 44, 485-490. 522
Fischer, J., Brosi, B., Daily, G.C., Ehrlich, P.R., Goldman, R., Goldstein, J., Lindenmayer, 523
D.B., Manning, A.D., Mooney, H.A., Pejchar, L., Ranganathan, J., Tallis, H. 2008. 524
Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? 525
Front. Ecol. Environ. 6, 380-385. 526
Fischer, J., Fazey, I., Briese, R., Lindenmayer, D.B. 2005. Making the matrix matter: 527
challenges in Australian grazing landscapes. Biodivers. Conserv. 14, 561-578. 528
Fuentes‐Montemayor, E., Goulson, D., Park, K.J. 2011. The effectiveness of 529
agri‐environment schemes for the conservation of farmland moths: assessing the 530
importance of a landscape‐scale management approach. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 532-542. 531
24
Gibbons, P., Lindenmayer, D. 2002. Tree hollows and wildlife conservation in Australia. 532
CSIRO publishing. Collingwood, Melbourne. 533
Gibbons, P., Briggs, S.V., Ayers, D.A., Doyle, S., Seddon, J., McElhinny, C., Jones, N., 534
Sims, R. and Doody, J.S. 2008. Rapidly quantifying reference conditions in modified 535
landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 141, 2483-2493. 536
Godfray, H.C.J., Beddington, J.R., Crute, I.R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J.F., Pretty, 537
J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S.M., Toulmin, C. 2010. Food security: the challenge of 538
feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812-818. 539
Habel, J., Teucher, M., Hornetz, B., Jaetzold, R., Kimatu, J., Kasili, S., Mairura, Z., Mulwa, 540
R., Eggermont, H., Weisser, W., Lens, L. 2015. Real-world complexity of food 541
security and biodiversity conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. DOI 10.1007/s10531-015-542
0866-z. 543
Harper, M.J., McCarthy, M.A., van der Ree, R. 2008. Resources at the landscape scale 544
influence possum abundance. Austral Ecol. 33, 243-252. 545
Hiron, M., Berg, A., Eggers, S., Josefsson, J., Part, T. 2013. Bird diversity relates to agri-546
environment schemes at local and landscape level in intensive farmland. Agric. 547
Ecosyst. Environ. 176, 9-16. 548
Hobbs, R.J., Yates, C.J. 2000. Temperate eucalypt woodlands in Australia: biology, 549
conservation, management and restoration. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, 550
Sydney. 551
Holland, J., Oaten, H., Moreby, S., Birkett, T., Simper, J., Southway, S., Smith, B. 2012. 552
Agri-environment scheme enhancing ecosystem services: A demonstration of 553
improved biological control in cereal crops. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 155, 147-152. 554
25
Holland, J.M., Storkey, J., Lutman, P.J.W., Birkett, T.C., Simper, J., Aebischer, N.J. 2014. 555
Utilisation of agri-environment scheme habitats to enhance invertebrate ecosystem 556
service providers. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 183, 103-109. 557
Holmgren, M., Stapp, P., Dickman, C.R., Gracia, C., Graham, S., Gutierrez, J.R., Hice, C., 558
Jaksic, F., Kelt, D.A., Letnic, M. 2006. Extreme climatic events shape arid and 559
semiarid ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 4, 87-95. 560
Howland, B., Stojanovic, D., Gordon, I.J., Manning, A.D., Fletcher, D., Lindenmayer, D.B. 561
2014. Eaten out of house and home: Impacts of grazing on ground-dwelling reptiles in 562
Australian grasslands and grassy woodlands. PloS One 9, e105966. 563
Ikin, K., Mortelliti, A., Stein, J., Michael, D., Crane, M., Okada, S., Wood, J., Lindenmayer, 564
D. 2015. Woodland habitat structures are affected by both agricultural land 565
management and abiotic conditions. Landscape Ecol. 30, 1387-1403. 566
Kleijn, D., Baquero, R., Clough, Y., Diaz, M., Esteban, J.D., Fernandez, F., Gabriel, D., 567
Herzog, F., Holzschuh, A., Johl, R. 2006. Mixed biodiversity benefits of 568
agri‐environment schemes in five European countries. Ecol. Letters 9, 243-254. 569
Kleijn, D., Berendse, F., Smit, R., Gilissen, N. 2001. Agri-environment schemes do not 570
effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Nature 413, 723-725. 571
Kleijn, D., Sutherland, W.J. 2003. How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in 572
conserving and promoting biodiversity? J. Appl. Ecol. 40, 947-969. 573
Kleijn, D., Rundlof, M., Scheper, J., Smith, H.G., Tscharntke, T. 2011. Does conservation on 574
farmland contribute to halting the biodiversity decline? Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 474-575
481. 576
Lee, Y., Nelder, J.A., Pawitha, Y. 2006. Generalized linear models with random effects : 577
unified analyses via h-likelihood. Chapman & Hall/CDC, New York. 578
26
Lindenmayer, D.B., Wood, J., MacGregor, C. 2009. Do observer differences in bird 579
detection significantly influence inferences about environmental impacts? Emu 109, 580
100-106. 581
Lindenmayer, D., Wood, J., Montague-Drake, R., Michael, D., Crane, M., Okada, S., 582
MacGregor, C., Gibbons, P. 2012a. Is biodiversity management effective? Cross-583
sectional relationships between management, bird response and vegetation attributes 584
in an Australian agri-environment scheme. Biol. Conserv. 152, 62-73. 585
Lindenmayer, D.B., Zammit, C., Attwood, S.J., Burns, E., Shepherd, C.L., Kay, G., Wood, J. 586
2012b. A novel and cost-effective monitoring approach for outcomes in an Australian 587
biodiversity conservation incentive program. PloS One 7, e50872. 588
Mac Nally, R., Nerenberg, S., Thomson, J.R., Lada, H., Clarke, R.H. 2014. Do frogs bounce, 589
and if so, by how much? Responses to the ‘Big Wet’ following the ‘Big Dry’ in 590
south‐eastern Australia. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 223-234. 591
MacDonald, M.A., Maniakowski, M., Cobbold, G., Grice, P.V., Anderson, G.Q.A. 2012. 592
Effects of agri-environment management for stone curlews on other biodiversity. 593
Biol. Conserv. 148, 134-145. 594
Mendenhall, C.D., Frishkoff, L.O., Santos-Barrera, G., Pacheco, J., Mesfun, E., Quijano, 595
F.M., Erhlich, P.R., Ceballos, G., Daily, G.C., Pringle, R.M. 2014. Countryside 596
biogeography of Neotropical reptiles and amphibians. Ecology 95, 856-870. 597
Michael, D.R., Cunningham, R.B., Donnelly, C.F., Lindenmayer, D.B. 2012 Comparative use 598
of active searches and artificial refuges to survey reptiles in temperate eucalypt 599
woodlands. Wildl. Res. 39, 149-162. 600
Michael, D.R., Kay, G.M., Crane, M., Florance, D., MacGregor, C., Okada, S., McBurney, 601
L., Blair, D., Lindenmayer, D.B. 2015 Ecological niche breadth and microhabitat 602
27
guild structure in temperate Australian reptiles: Implications for natural resource 603
management in endangered grassy woodland ecosystems. Austral Ecol. 51, 494-504. 604
Michael, D.R., Wood, J.T., Crane, M., Montague-Drake, R., Lindenmayer, D.B. 2014. How 605
effective are agri-environment schemes for protecting and improving herpetofaunal 606
diversity in Australian endangered woodland ecosystems? J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 494-504. 607
Montague-Drake, R., Lindenmayer, D., Cunningham, R. 2009 Factors affecting site 608
occupancy by woodland bird species of conservation concern. Biol. Conserv. 142, 609
2896-2903. 610
Pastro, L. A., Dickman, C. R., Letnic, M. 2013. Effects of wildfire, rainfall and region on 611
desert lizard assemblages: the importance of multi-scale processes. Oecologia 173, 612
603-614. 613
Phalan, B., Balmford, A., Green, R.E, Scharlemann, J.P. 2011a. Minimising the harm to 614
biodiversity of producing more food globally. Food Policy 36, S62-S71. 615
Phalan, B., Onial, M., Balmford, A., Green, R.E. 2011b. Reconciling food production and 616
biodiversity conservation: Land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333, 617
1289-1291. 618
Prince, K., Moussus, J.P., Jiguet, F. 2012 Mixed effectiveness of French agri-environment 619
schemes for nationwide farmland bird conservation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 149, 74-620
79. 621
Pyke, G.H., Recher, H.F. 1983. Censusing Australian birds: a summary of procedures and a 622
scheme for standardisation of data presentation and storage, in: Davies, S.J. (Ed.), 623
Methods of censusing birds in Australia. Proceedings of a symposium organised by 624
the Zoology section of the ANZAAS and the Western Australian Group of the Royal 625
Australasian Ornithologists Union. Department of Conservation and Environment, 626
Perth, pp. 55-63. 627
28
Read, J.L., Kovac, K.J., Brook, B.W., Fordham, D.A. 2012. Booming during a bust: 628
asynchronous population responses of arid zone lizards to climatic variables. Acta 629
Oecologica 40, 51-61. 630
Reid, J.R.W. 1999. Threatened and declining birds in the New South Wales sheep-wheat belt: 631
I. diagnosis, characteristics and management. Consultancy report to NSW National 632
Parks and Wildlife Service. CSIRO Wildlife and Ecology, Canberra. 633
Rodrigues, A.S., Andelman, S.J., Bakarr, M.I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T.M., Cowling, R.M., 634
Fishpool, L.D., da Fonseca, G.A., Gaston, K.J., Hoffmann, M. 2004. Effectiveness of 635
the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428, 640-636
643. 637
Scott, J.M., Davis, F.W., McGhie, R.G., Wright, R.G., Groves, C., Estes, J. 2001. Nature 638
reserves: Do they capture the full range of America's biological diversity? Ecol. Appl. 639
11, 999-1007. 640
Tilman, D., Cassman, K.G., Matson, P.A., Naylor, R., Polasky, S. 2002. Agricultural 641
sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418, 671-677. 642
Tscharntke, T., Clough, Y., Wanger, T.C., Jackson, L., Motzke, I., Perfecto, I., Vandermeer, 643
J., Whitbread, A. 2012. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future 644
of agricultural intensification. Biol. Conserv. 151, 53-59. 645
Tscharntke, T., Klein, A.M., Kruess, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Thies, C. 2005. Landscape 646
perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - Ecosystem service 647
management. Ecol. Letters 8, 857-874. 648
van der Ree, R., Soderquist, T.R.,Bennett, A.F. 2001. Home-range use by the brush-tailed 649
phascogale (Phascogale tapoatafa) (Marsupialia) in high-quality, spatially limited 650
habitat. Wildl. Res. 28, 517-525. 651
29
Wassens, S., Walcott, A., Wilson, A., Freire, R. 2013. Frog breeding in rain-fed wetlands 652
after a period of severe drought: implications for predicting the impacts of climate 653
change. Hydrobiologia 708, 69-80. 654
Whittingham, M.J. 2007. Will agri‐environment schemes deliver substantial biodiversity 655
gain, and if not why not? J. Appl. Ecol. 44, 1-5. 656
Whittingham, M.J. 2011. The future of agri‐environment schemes: biodiversity gains and 657
ecosystem service delivery? J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 509-513. 658
Wood, T.J., Holland, J.M., Hughes, W.O., Goulson, D. 2015. Targeted agri‐environment 659
schemes significantly improve the population size of common farmland bumblebee 660
species. Mol. Ecol. 24, 1668-1680. 661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
30
Figure 1. Location of long-term biodiversity monitoring sites in North-eastern Victoria, 673
south-eastern Australia. Reference sites represent conservation reserves, controls represent 674
intensively grazed production sites, and CMA represent sites funded under an agri-675
environment scheme. 676
Figure 2. Predicted mean values (95% CI) for eight vegetation variables and the interaction 677
between management class and survey year in North East Victoria, south-eastern Australia. 678
Reference sites represent conservation reserves, controls represent intensively grazed 679
production sites, and AES represent sites funded under an agri-environment scheme. 680
Figure 3. Predicted mean species richness and abundance (95% CI) of all vertebrate groups 681
and the interaction between management class and survey year in North East Victoria, south-682
eastern Australia. Reference sites represent conservation reserves, controls represent 683
intensively grazed production sites, and AES represent sites funded under an agri-684
environment scheme. 685
686
687
31
688
32
689
690
33
691
692