1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
-
Upload
tfaber2933 -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
0
Transcript of 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
1/18
3881 Building Utilization Page 5-3
Existing/Adequate
(K-2) Lower Elementary
(3-5) Upper Elementary
(6-8) Junior High
(9-12) High School
Sub Totals
Remodeled
(K-2)Lower Elementary
(3-5) Upper Elementary
(6-8) Junior High
(9-1 2) High School
Sub Totals
Proposed New
(K-2)Lower Elementary
(3-5) Upper Elementary
(6-8) Junior High
(9-12)High School
Sub Totals
Total TeachingStations
List # ofTeaching
Stations
30
30
List # ofTeachingStations
o
0
List # ofTeachingStations
0
30
Current Gr. Structure
Proposed Gr. Structure
9-12
9-12
CapacityX Factor
x 20 =
x25
x 22.5 =
x 21.25 =
Capacityx Factor
x 20 =
x 25
x 22.5 =
x 21.25 =
CapacityX Factor
x 20 =
x 25
x 22.5
x 21.25 =
TotalCapacity
Projected5-Year
Pn r/->l man t
Utilization Percentage(Projected 5-Year Enrollment / Total Capacity)
Capacity
0
0
0
63 8
63 8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
638
488
77%
1 Listthe numberof teaching station inappropriatecolumn.
2 Calculate otal capacity usingtheapplicable capacity factor.
3 Enter five(5) year projectedenrollment.
4 Calculate building utilizationrate.
5 Attach floor andsite plan of thebuilding.Show the rooms and category (adequate,remodeled, proposed new,closed).Number the teaching stations inconsecutive order.
List# ofFacility to be Closed Teaching x
Stations
(K-2)Lower Elementary x
(3-5) Upper Elementary x
(6-8) Junior High x
(9-12) High School x
Total Teaching Stations 0
Square Footage forClosed Facility
CapacityFactor
20 =
25 =
22.5
21.25 =
TotalCapacity
Capacity
0
0
0
0
0
Please transfer applicable informationto the Utilization Summary othe application.
n Page 7 of
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
2/18
Page 6-3
Facility Condition Assessment
Project Number
Perform w alkthrough inspection of the facility including special-use areas such as the cafeteria, art rooms, industrial arts areas,and science labs. Please complete the following assessment form by responding to ALL statements.
High School
Please provide an overall assessm entof each section or comment on anydeficiencies or special circumstances:
Health SectionYe sX "
No N/A____________________________________1 Visible mold/damage does not exist due to past or present water/moisture leaks.2. Indoor surfaces are free of loose and peeling paint.3. |AiF temperature is comfortable throughout the building. X4. jUnique/objectionable odors are not present in specific areas_or throughout the'"bui~!ding7 ~ ' "~ ~x
Overall assessmentor comments:
Life Safe ty Section HZHm j Yes I NO j N/A1 . |Lightedexit signs are present at each entrance/exitand are clearly v isible. X2 . iJ ire suppressiqn_equigment is pjesenj injotchen, science rooms and corridors. X.L j Washroom facilities have barrier free accessibility. _ X4. [Building access is limited to select, controlled entries, X"~|
Overallassessment or comments:
structural section Ye s i N O iN / A ~1 . Inside masonry wallsdo not show visible signsof cracks beyondn q r r n _ a j _aging._ X
_ 2_ Surface cracksdo no? exist around perimeterof interior/exterior doorsand windows. ____ | "x3. Roof structure doesnot show visible signsof damage. __ X4. [Building exterioris intact and does not show visible deteriorationbeyond"normal aging. ___ _ X
Overall assessment or comments: Some interior masonry cosmetic cracking in storeroom at loading dock area . Some interior concrete floor cosmetic crackingat library entrance.
Mechanical Section _j ^ Ye s j_ N O _ _[ _ N / A ^1. "I Windows and exterior doors prevent inefficient air leakage. X2 jWater pressure exists [o_wash_ha_ndsL sijp_glv_water fountains, and flush toilets. _ X _3. I Water drains quickly from sinks. _ X __ j __ j __4, iFloor area near toilet s and sinks is dry ___ X _
Dverallassessment or comments. Someair infultrationat door thresholdsat some exteriordoors.
Electrical Section j Ye s j N O | N / A1 | Lighting system providesadequate intensity, diffusion, anddistribution orFllumination. _ X2. Electrical controlsare safely protectedand accessible. __________ i X ; ____ j ____3 . |Classrooms have sufficient outletsto prevent regularuse of electrical extension cords. __ ___ X j _ [_4. jThe proximity~oTeTectricalsystems or panels is dryand free of standing water. __ _____________ [ __ X __[ __ [ _____
Jverallassessment or comments:
Certificate by Registered Architectcertify that I have assessed the factors described above and that the conditions relative to the facility are true and correct to the bes t of my knowledge and belief.
Scott T. Hoeft Integrated Designs, Inc.* 1301032176
ignature Printed Name
[email protected] 810-229-6767
Firm Name andLicense Number
810-229-2701
Dale E-mail Address Fax Number Area Code and Telephone Number
7_0
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
3/18
3881 Page 4-4
Project Sheet
Name of School Building: Bus Garage
Description of Proposal or Series 1 Project:New maintenance garage.Buses.
Description of Proposal or Series 2 Project:
Description of Proposal or Series 3 Project:
Instructional Technology DescriptionNA
Site Work Description
NA
Cost per Sq Ft 103.53
Cost per Sq Ft
Type of Project:0 New Building >Ne wConstruction SquareFt 1,500EHAddition(s) >New Addition Square Ft.
- D RemodelingD Facility Closing -> O Demolish O Retain for future use O Convert to non-instructional
D Site Work O Sell or Lease O Undetermined
Statement describing any existing environmental or usability problems the proposed project will address.(ex: asbestos, energy use, or ADA requirements)NA
Estimated Cost of Proposed Construction Project: (Attach analysis showing ho w cost estimates were calculated.)
Total Proposal/Series 1 Proposal/Series 2 Proposal/Series 3
N ew Construction
RemodelingConstruction Contingencies
Instructional TechnologyLoose Furnishing/Equipment
BusesSite WorkSite Acquisition
Architectural Fees and CostsCM Fees and Costs
Estimated Costs(Not including election or bond issuance costs)
$155,300$0
$155 ,30_
$ o$1,509,266
__ $0__ _ _ _ _ $ 0 _
_|10,690$14,320
$10,9_75
_$0
$0
_$532,064_
O
$977,202
$10,690$14,320
$1,700,551 $723,349 $977,202 $0
Certificate by Registered ArchitectI certify that the details of the proposed project(s) described above and the attached detail relative to the construction project(s) are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief
Signature
10/28/10
Date
Ootl T. I looft
Printed Name
scott(5)intdesians.com_
E-mailAddress
Integrated Oeoignc, Inr
810-220-6767Fax Number
Firm Name an d License Number
81 -229-2701Area Code and Telephone Number
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
4/18
Wolgast Corporation BEAVERTONRURALSCHOOLS 11/4/2010Integrated Designs CONCEPT BUDGET SUMMARY
School Descriptiop BudgetBeaverton Rural Schools
Bu s Garage Series 11,500 Sq Ft Maintenance Building $105,300.00Fuel Tank @ Bus Garage $50,000.00
Construction Cost Subtotal $155,300.00
A/E Fees $10,690.00CM Fees $10,415.00Construction Support Cost $3,905 00Contingency $10,975.00Buses $532,064.00Furniture/Equipment $0.00Technology $0.00
TOTAL COSTS $723,349 .00
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
5/18
3881 Building Utilization Page 5-4
[Bus Garage
Existing/Adequate
(K-2) Lower Elementary
(3-5) Upper Elementary
(6-8) Junior High
(9-12) High School
Sub Totals
Remodeled
(K-2) Lower Elementary
(3-5) Upper Elementary
(6-8) Junior High
(9-12) High School
Sub Totals
Proposed New
(K-2) Lower Elementary
(3-5) Upper Elementary
(6-8) Junior High
(9-12) High School
Sub Totals
Total TeachingStations
List # ofTeaching
Stations
0
List # ofTeachingStations
0
List # ofTeachingStations
0
0
Current Gr. Structure
Proposed Gr. Structure
NA
NA
Capacityx Factor
x 20 =!
x 25
x 22.5
x 21.25 =
Capacityx Factor
x 20 =
x 25
x 22.5 =
x 21.25 =
Capacityx Factor
x 20 =
x25
x 22.5
x 21.25 =
TotalCapacity
Projected5-Year
Pnrnl mont
Utilization Percentage(Projected 5-Year Enrollment / Total Capacity)
Capacity
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NA
NA
NA
1 List the number of teaching station inappropriate column.
2 Calculate total capacity u sing theapplicable capacity factor.
3 Enter five(5) year projected enrollment.
4 Ca lculate building utilizationrate.
5 Attach floorand site plan of the building.Show the rooms and category (adequate,remodeled, proposednew, closed).Number the teaching stations inconsecutive order.
List # ofFacility to be Closed Teaching x c to
Stations
(K-2)Lower Elementary x 20
(3-5) Upper Elementary x 25 =
(6-8) Junior High x 22.5
(9-12) High School x 21.25 =
Total Teaching Stations 0
Square Footage for TotalClosed Facility Capacity
Please transfer applicable informationto the Utilization Summary on Page 7 ofthe application.
Capacity
0
0
0
0
0
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
6/18
Page 6-4
Facility Condition Assessment
Project Number
Perform walkthrough inspection of the facility including special-use areas such as the cafeteria, art rooms, industrial arts areas ,and science labs. Please complete the following assessment form by responding to ALL statements.
Bu s Garage
Please provide an overall assessm entof each section or comment on anydeficiencies or special circumstances:
Health Section1 jVisible mold/damage does no t exist due to past or present water/moisture leaks2. jIndoor surfaces are free of loose an d peeling paint.
Ye s | No ; N/A
Air temperature is comfortable throughout the building4. Unique/objectionable odors are not present in specific areas or throughput the building.
xx
Overall assessment or comments:
Life Safety SectionLighted exit signs are present at each entrance/exit and are clearly visible.
Yes | No J_ N/Ai X
2 ._ Fire suppression equipment is present in kitchen, science_rpoms_ and corridors.3. [Washroom facilities have barrier free accessibility.
_4. jBuilding access is limited to select, controlled entries.Overall assessment or comments:Washroom facilities accessible, but toilet room fixtures and toilet stall configeration do not meet the current barrier free requirements
i I *1 L X
X
structural section1. [Inside masonry walls do not show visible signs of cracks bey qnd_nprmaIagjng^
Yes j No j N/A_
2. Surface cracks do not exist around perimeter of interior /exterior door s and windows.3. Roof structure does not show visible signs of damage.
j | I_
XX
_ 4 . jBuilding exterior is intact and does not show visible deterioration beyond normal aging,Overall assessment or comments: Existing metal siding contains cosmetic denting at several locations.
Mechanical Section Y e s1. Windows and exterior doors prevent inefficient air leakage.
No ; N/A
XWater pressure exists to wash hands, supply water fountains, and flush toilets.
Water drains quickly from sinks._ 4 j Floor area near toilets and sinks is dry.
XX
Overall assessment or comments:
Electrical SectionLighting system provides adequate intensi ty, diffusion, and distribution of illumination.
Yes i No j N/A
Electrical controls are safely protected and accessible.Classrooms have sufficient outlets to prevent regular use of_ejectri_cal_extens[qnCoords.
4. JThe proximity of electTlcalsystems or panels is dry and free of standing water.Overall assessment or comments:
Certificate by Registered ArchitectI certify that I have assessed the factors described above and that the conditions relative to the facility are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Scott T. Hoeft Integrated Designs,Inc. * 1301032176
Signature Printed Name
icottf5?intdesiqns com 810-229-6767
Firm Name andLicense Number
810-229-2701
E-mailAddress Area Code and Telephone Number
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
7/18
3 8 8 1 Page 4- 5
Project Sheet
Name of School Building: PreschoolBuilding
Description of Proposal or Series 1 Project:Remove and replace approximately 3,000s.f. of roof ares.
Description of Proposal or Series 2 Project:
Description of Proposal or Series 3 Project:
Instructional Technology DescriptionNA
Site Work Description
NA
Cost per Sq Ft
Cost per Sq Ft
Type of Project:D New Building > New Construction SquareFt
D Addition(s) *New Addition Square Ft
0 RemodelingD Facility Closing ~> O Demolish O Retain for future use O Convert to non-instructional
D Site Work O Sell or Lease O Undetermined
Statement describing any existing environmental or usability problems the proposed project will address.( e x : asbestos, energy use, or ADA requirements)Energy efficiency will be increased with the removal and Replacementof roofing materials.
Estimated Cost of Proposed Construction Project: (Attach analysis showing how cost estimates were calculated.)
Total Proposal/Series 1 Proposal/Series 2 Proposal/Series 3
New Construction
Remodeling
Construction Contingencies
Instructional Technology
Loose Furnishing/Equipment
Buses
Site Work
Site Acquisition
Architectural Fees and Costs
CM Fees and Costs
Estimated Costs( N o t including election or bond issuance costs)
SO
$21,900
$0
$21,900
_ $ 1 _ , 6 4 5 _
$0
$1,645
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
J 1 , 6 0 0
$2,145
$0
J 5 1 . 6 J D O
$2,145
$27,290 $27,290 $0 $0
Certificate by Registered Architectc e r t i f yt h a t t h e d e t a i ls o f t h e p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t ( s ) d e s c r ib e d a b o v e a n d t h e a t t a c h e d d e t a i l r e la t i v e t o t h e c o n s t r u c t io n p r o j e c t ( s ) a r eIrue a n d c o r r e c t t o th e b e s t o f m y k n o w l e d g e a n d b e l i e f .
Scott T. Hoeft Integrated Designs, Inc. #1301032176
Signature
10/28/10Date
Printed Name
scott < 8 >intdesiqns.comE-mail Address
_8JO-22_0-676JFax Number
Firm Name and License Number
810-229-2701 _Area Code andTelephoneNumber
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
8/18
3881 Building Utilization Page 5-5
Existing/Adequate
(K-2) Lower Elementary
(3-5) Upper Elementary
(6-8) Junior High
(9-12) High School
Sub Totals
Remodeled
(K-2) Lower Elementary
(3-5) Upper Elementary
(6-8) Junior High
(9-12) High School
Sub Totals
Proposed New
(K-2) Lower Elementary
(3-5) Upper Elementary
(6-8) Junior High
(9-1 2) High School
Sub Totals
Total TeachingStations
List # ofTeaching
Stations
0
List # ofTeachingStations
0
List # ofTeachingStations
0
0
Current Gr. Structure
Proposed Gr. Structure
NA
NA
CapacityX Factor
x 20 =
x 25 =
x 22.5 =
X 21.25 =
CapacityX Factor
x 20 =
x 25
x 22.5 =
x 21.25 =
Capacity* Factor
x 20 =
x 25
x 22.5
x 21.25 =
TotalCapacity
Projected5-Year
F^rtiVkllm int
Utilization Percentage(Projected 5-Year Enrollment / Total Capacity)
Capacity
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NA
NA
NA
1 List the number of teaching station inappropriate column.
2 Calculate total capacity using th eapplicable capacity factor.
3 Enter five (5 ) year projected enrollment.
4 Calculate building utilization rate.
5 Attach floor and site plan of the building.Show th e rooms and category (adequate,remodeled, proposed new, closed).Number the teaching stations inconsecutive order.
List # ofFacility to be Closed Teaching x ^ paci ^ = Capacity
Stations
(K-2) Lower Elementary x 20 = 0
(3-5) Upper Elementary x 25 = 0
(6-8) Junior High x 22.5 = 0
(9-1 2) High School x 21.25 = 0I
Total Teaching Stations 0
Square Footage for TotalClosed Facility Capacity
Please transfer applicable informationto the Utilization Summary on Page 7 ofthe aoolication.
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
9/18
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
10/18
Page 6-5
Facility Condition Assessment
:t Number
irm walkthrough nspection of the facility including special-use are=>s such as the cafeteria, art rooms, industrial arts areas,icience labs. Please complete the following assessment form by responding to ALL statements.
Preschool Building
Please provide an overall assessmentof each section or comment on anydeficiencies or special circumstances:
th Section | _ _ Ye s _|_NO j N /AVisible mold/damage does not exist due to past or present water/moisture leaks, XIndoor surfaces are free of loose and peeling paint. XAir temperature is comfortable throughout the building XUnique/objectionable odors are not present in specific areas or throughout the building^ XI assessment or comments:
Safety Section ITZZZTTZZIZZZ Y e s N^ 1 N/ALighted exit signs are present at each entrance/exit and are clearly visible. XFire suppression equipment is present in kitchen, sc ience rooms and corridors. j N A ~Washroom facilities have barrier free accessibility. XBuilding access is limitedJo elect, controlled entries. _ XI assessment o r comments .
oom facilitiesaccessible, but toiletroom fixtures and toilet stallconfigerationdo not meet the current barrierfree requirements
:tural section ~ !_Yes _ N O _ I _N/AInside masonry walls do not show visible signs of cracks Beyond normal aging. j XSurface cracks do not exist around perimeter of interior/exterior doors and_wjndows^_ j X _Roof structure does not show visible signs of damage. XBuilding exterior is intact and does not show visible deterioration_beypnd norrna[agjn_g. _ _ Xassessment or comments: Existingmetal siding contains cosmetic denting at several locations
lanicalSection N/ AA/indowsand exterior doors prevent inefficient air leakage.
A/ater pressure exists to wash hands, supply water fountains, and flush toilets./Vater drains quickly from sinks. _rloor area near toilets and sinksjs dry.__assessment or comments:
rical Section.ighting system provides adequate intensi ty, diffusion, and distribution of illumination. _Electricalcontrols are safely protected and accessible.Classrooms have sufficient outlets to prevent regular use of e]ectrica[extension cords^'he proximity of electrical systems or panels is dry_andjre[ of standjnc;j/vater._assessment or comments:
N ;A
Certificate by Registered Architect
that I have assessed the factors described above an d that the conditions relativeto the facilityare true an d correct to the best of myknowledge an d belief.
Scott T. Hoeft Integrated Designs,Inc. # 1301032176
Printed Name
Firm Nameand License Number
810-229-6767E-mailAddress Area Code and Telephone Number
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
11/18
3881 Page 4-6
Project Sheet
Name of School Building: Administration Building
Description of Proposal or Series 1 Project:Remove and replace approximately 3,535 s.f. of roof area.
Description of Proposal or Series 2 Project:
Description of Proposal or Series 3 Project:
Instructional Technology DescriptionNA
Site Work Description
NA
Cost per Sq Ft
Cost per Sq Ft
Type of Project:D New Building > New Construction SquareFt
D Addition(s) > New AdditionSquare Ft.
G DRemodelingD Facility Cosing -* O Demolish O Retain for future use O Convert to non-instructional
D Site Work O Sell or Lease O Undetermined
Statement describing any existing environmental or usability problems the proposed project will address.(ex: asbestos, energy use, or ADA requirements)Energy efficiency will be increased with the removaljand replacernent^ofroofing materials^._
Estimated Cost of Proposed Construction Project: (Attach analysis showing how cost estimates were calculated.)
Total Proposal/Series 1 Proposal/Series 2 Proposal/Series 3
New Construction
Remodeling
Construction Contingencies
Instructional Technology
Loose Furnishing/Equipment
Buses
Site Work
Site Acquisition
Architectural Fees and Costs
CM Fees and Costs
Estimated Costs(Not including election or bond issuance costs)
$o$9,450-
$p$o
$_9,450
_ 5559_5P.
$0
$_ $ 0
$535
$715
$11,250
_ $ _ p _$535$715
$11,250 $0 $0
Certificate by Registered Architectcertify that the details of the proposed project(s)described above and the attached detail relative to the construction project(s) are true an d correct to the best of myknowledge an d belief
Signature
_10/28/irjDate
TScptt_T.Jjoeft_PrirJtecTName ~
810-220-6767
lntegrated_Designs, Inc. #1301032176Firm Mamfi and License Number
810-229-2701Fax Number Area Code and T elephone Number
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
12/18
Wolgast Corporation BEAVE RTO N RURAL SCHO OLSIntegrated Designs CONCEPTBl IDGET SUMMARY
School Description Budgeteaverton Rural Schools
Central OfficeRoof Replacement $9,450.00
Construction Cost Subtotal $9,450.00
A/E Fees $535.00CM Fees $520.00Construction Su pport Cost $195.00Contingency $550.00Buses $0.00Furniture/Equipment $0.00Technology $0.00
TOTAL COSTS $11,250.00
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
13/18
38 1 Building Utilization Page 5-6
Administration Building
Existing/Adequate
ub Totals
Remodeled
ub Totals
Proposed New
(-2) Lower Elementary
i-5) Upper Elementary
i-8) Junior High
i-12) High School
ub Totals
Total TeachingStations
List # ofTeaching
Stations
0
List # ofTeachingStations
0
List # ofTeachingStations
0
0
urrent Gr. Structure
oposed Gr. Structure
N A
NA
CapacityX Factor
x 20 =
x 25
x 22.5 =
x 21.25 =
CapacityFactor
x 20 =
x 25
x 22.5 =
x 21.25 =
Capacityx Factor
x 20 =
x 25
x 22.5
x 21.25 =
TotalCapacity
Projected5-Year
pnml mant
Utilization Percentage(Projected 5-Ye ar Enrollment / Total Capacity)
Capacity
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NA
NA
NA
1 List the number of teaching station inappropriate colum n.
2 Calculate total capacity using theapplicable capacity factor.
3 Enter five (5) year projected enrollment.
4 Calculate building utilization rate.
5 Attac h floor and site plan of the building.Show the room s and category (adequate,remodeled, proposed new, closed).Number the teaching stations inconsecutive order.
List* ofFacility to be Closed Teaching x c P < =
r*. raCiOrStations
(K-2) Lower Elementary x 20 =
(3-5) Upper Elementary x 25 =
(6-8) Junior High x 22.5
(9-12) High School x 2 1 2 5 =
Total Teaching Stations 0
Square Footage for TotalClosed Facility Capacity
Capacity
0
0
0
0
0
Please transfer applicable informationto the Utilization Summary on Page 7 ofthe aoolication.
. i;
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
14/18
Page 6-6
Facility Condition Assessment
;t Number
rm walkthrough inspection o f the facility including special-use a reas such as the c afeteria, art rooms, industrial arts areas,cience labs. Please complete the following assessm ent form by responding to ALL statements.
Preschool Building
Please provide an overall assessmentof each section or comment on anydeficiencies or special circumstances:
th Section _ _ i _ Y 5 s _! N O I N / AVisible mold/damage d oes not exist due to past or presentwater/moisture jgaks. XIndoor surfacesare free of loose and peeling paint. x"T~"Air temperature is comfortable throughoutthe building. ~"xUnique/objectionable odors are not present in specific a reas or throughout Thebuilding. X~I assessment o r comments:
Safety Section j Y e s i N O | N / ALightedexit signs are present at each en trance/exit and are clea rly visible. ~ XFire suppression equipmentis present in kitchen, science roomsand_corridors. T ~NA~Washroom facilities have barrier free accessibility. >fBuildingaccess is limited toselect, controlledentries. "Z*T~I assessment or comments:oom facilities accessible,but toilet room fixturesand toilet stall configeration do not meet the current barrier free requirements.
:turai section ! _ _ Ye s[ _ N O _ _ | _ N / A _Inside maso nry wallsdo not show visiblesigns of cracks beyond normal aging. _ NASurface cracks do not exist aroun d perimeter of interior/e xteriordoors jnd windows. __XRoof structure doesno t show v isible signsof damage _XBuildingexterior is intact an d does no t show visible deterioration Beyondnormaj aging. Xa s s e s s m e n tor comments: Existing metal siding contains cosmetic dentingat several locations.
lanical Section [ Yes J_ N _ O _ _ |N /AMndows and exterior doorsprevent inefficient air leakage. __XA/ater pressure existsto wash hands, supply water fountains,and flush toilets. X_
/Vater drains quickly from sinks. Xrloor area n ear toiletsand sinks is dry. X j jassessment or comments
rical Section !_Yes j N O i N / Alighting'systemprovidesadequaTiTntensity,diffusion,and~distributibriroflTluTniiTatjonr'" XElectrical controlsare safely protected and accessible. XClassrooms hav e sufficient outletsto prevent regularuse of electrical extension cord s. i NAfhe proximityof electrical system sor panels is dry and free o^sjaiding_water. Xassessment or comments:
Certificate by Registered Architect
that I have assessed the factors described above and that the conditions relative to the facility are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Scott T. Hoeft IntegratedDesigns. nc * 1301032176Printed Name
:ott(S)intdesiqns-Com 810-229-6767
Firm Name and License Number
810-229-2701
E-mailAddress Area Codean d Telephone Number
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
15/18
Utilization Summary
(Name of School D strict: Beaverton Rural Schools (Dstrict Code Number: 26-010
List ALLdistrict facilitiesin the following order: elementary schools,junior high/middle schools, high schools,and non-instructional facilities.
Proj No.
1
Name of School Facility
Primary School
2 Middle School
3 High School
4 Bus Garage / Maintenance
SiPreshool
6 AdministrationBuilding
Bus Garage / Maintenance
Service Building
Current GradeStructure
K-3
4 - 8
9 - 1 2
na
na
na
na
Proposed GradeStructure
K- 3
Projected5-Year Enrollment
Adequate Pupil Remodel PupilCapacity Capacity NewPu
342J 310 1 20 1"4 - 8 49 1
9 - 1 2 488
na| na
naj na
na
nai
na ! na
Storage / Primary School na! na
Athletic Storage na na
Lockers/ Concessions na j na
na
635 0|
638 0-
na na
na na|
na naj
na na naina | na na j
na na na!
nai na na
na! na naj !
Press Box / Storage nai na|_ nai na na
iAthletic Storage nai ! i
na ; na] na; na
IStorage /Middle School na! na| na na na
\ \ \ I j
Total Pupilpit Capacity Capacity Utilization%
Closed PupilCapacity
70 1_ 400 86% na
O J 63 5 77 %
0 638 j 76%
na i na na
na
na
na
na! na na na
naj na| na na
na{ na| na
na na naI
na na na
na naj na
na
na
na
na
na na | nai na
na L na na
na naj na
na na na
i
na
na
na
Subtotals by School District's Grade Configuration
Elementary School
Middle School
Highj5chool
Total:
K- 3
4 - 8
9- 12
K - 3
4 - 8
9 - 1 2
I
342
491
488
1321
310|_ . . . - . . .635 1
638 1
1 5 8 3 J
20'
O j
o j20)
7 0 i
0
0
70
400
635
638
1673
110%j
77%!
76%
82 % j
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
16/18
Facility Summary
| Name of School D strict: Beaverton Rural Schools Dstrict Code Number:26-010
List ALL district facilities in the following order: elementary schools, unior high/middle schools, high schools, and non-instructional facilities
Pro/".Mo.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Col. 1
Facility Type'
Instructional
Instructional
Instructional
Bus Garage
Col 2
Name of School Facility
Primary School
Mddle School
High School
Bus Garage / Maintenance
Non-Instructional Preschool
Non-instructional / Adrnjn istr ation BuildingAdministration
Non-instructional / BusGarage
Non-instructional / ServiceBuilding
Non-instructional /Storage, Primary School
Co. 3
Address
1 27 Tonkin Street
Col.4
City
Beaverton
440 South Ross Street i BeavertonI
3090 Crockett Road Beaverton
3384 M-18 JBeaverton
1 06 Tonkin j Beaverton
468 South Ross Street i Beaverton!
Col 5 Col.
YearBuilt Year(s) Ren
1953 1962, 6
1965 198
1997i
new
1935 1963,
1972
Bus Garage / Maintenance j1 22 Tonkin Street ! Beaverton 1 942
Service Building
Storage / Primary
Stadium Athletic Storage
[122 Tonkin Street JBeaverton i 1942
127 Tonkin Street
3090 Crockett Road
Stadium / Fieldhouse \ Lockers / Concessions 13090 Crockett Road
Stadium | Stadium Press Box /Storage 13090 Crockett Road
Stadium
Storage
Athletic Storage 3090 Crockett Road
Storage / Middle School 406 Ross
Beaverton
Beaverton.... .
1985 !
1986 :
Beaverton 2003
Beaverton i 1986
Beaverton ; 1976
Beaverton j1992
i
5 Col. 7
modeled Site Size (Acres)
7,97 10j
Col. 8
Total Sq.Ft.
32,281
5 16 j 34,075
Col. 9WeightedAverage
Age
33.30
3730
1 ' \33 102,330 1300
|
i 5
97 i 2
2
2
2_ L . _. ..
incl in Primary
incl in HighSchool
incl in HighSchool
incl in HighSchool
incl in HighSchool
incl in Mddlei School
72
8,000
25,222
3,535
1,540
Col. 10
New S/leCAcres)
0
0
0
NA 0
49.17 0
28
NA
~ "" '2,160 NA
280 25.
1 344 24
3,950 7
704 24
0
0
0
0
0
I0
0
448 34 0
1,728 18 0
217,597
Col. 1 1
Bldg InUse? Y/N
Y
Y
v
S
Y
:, YY
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Col. 12Sq Ft ofClosedFacility
0
0
0
0
0
1,540j
2,160
0
0
0
0
0
0
Col 13
Disposition ofClosed Facility"
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Demolish
Demolish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-----
"Facility Type:Instructional
Non-Instructional
Bus GarageStorage
Stadium
"Cosed Facility Ref:1. Demolish
2. Convert to non-instr.
3. Sell or lease4. Retain for future use
5. Undetermined
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
17/18
Cost Summary
Name of SchoolDistrict: Beaverton Rural Schools [District Code Number: 26-010
Pro/.
#
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Total
Cosf per
Sq Foot
2
$21.36
$20.35
$9.32
$0.00
$10.14
$33.75
New Cons
SqFeet
3
22,000
0
0
1,500
0
0
New
Construction
4
$3,042,200
$05U
$155,300
$0$0
$3,197,500
Remodeling
5
$689,594
$693,550
$954,115
$0
$21,900
$9,450
$2,368,609
Contingency
6
$257,419
$77,920
$143,190
$10,975
L $1,645
$550
$491,699
Instructional
Technology
7
$196,709
$54,040
$335,350
$0
$0
$0
$586,099
Loose Fum
and Equip
a
$80,000
$0
$10,000
$0
$0
$0
$90,000
Buses
9
$0
$0
$0
$1,509,266
$0
$0
$1,509,266
Site Work
10
$312,500
$562,000
$1,487,800
$0
$0
$0
$2,362,300
Site
Acquisition
11
$0
$0$0$0
$0
$0
$0
A/EFees
and Costs
12
$264,056
$75,900$181,730
$10,690
$1,600
$535
$534,511
CMFees
and Costs
13
$353,671
$101,655
$243,405
$14,320
$2,145
$715
$715,911
Project
Costs
14
$5,196,149
$1,565,065
$3,355,590
$1,700,551
$27,290
$11,250
$11,855,895
Election/
Issue Costs
15
$124,115
$37,383$80,152
$40,619
$652
$269
$283,190
Total
Cost16
$5,320,264
$1,602,448
$3,435,742
$1,741,170
$27,942
$11,519
$12,139,08517. % of Project Costs : (= The total of each column /the total of Column 14)
26.97% 19.98% 4.15% 4.94% 0.76% 12.73% 19.93% 0.00% 4.51%[ 6.04%| 100.00%
18. Election/Bond Issue Costs:
Bond (and Local) Attorney:
Financial Advisor:
Qualification Fee:
Treasury Filing Fee:
Auditor Review:
M.A.C.Fee:
Miscellaneous Costs*:
$29.141
$27,910
$8,900
$1,193
$1,000
400
% of Proi Cost
0.25%
0.24%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0 0.00%
(Prorate the total for each project in
Capitalized Interest:
OfficialStatement:
Election Notices:
Bond Dscount:
Credit Rating:
Total Other Costs:
$0
$11,000
$18,658
$158,488
$26,500
$283,190
% of Proi Cost
0.00%
0.09%
0 16%
1.34%
0.22%
2.39%
Co l 14 and distribute prorate within Col15)
19. Funding:
Total Estimated Cost of Project: $12,139.085
LESS:
Estimated Interest Earnings: $39,125
Other (specify):
AMOUNTOF PROPOSED ISSUE
(Amount to be Qualified)$12,099,960
'Explanation of Miscellaneous Costs:
-
8/7/2019 1-23-11 BRS State Treasury bond app 2
18/18
3881, Worksheet 1: Useful Life Calculation
A school district must demonstrate thatthe weighted average maturityof the qualified bond issue doesno texceed 120% of the average reasonably expected useful lifeof the facilities, excluding landan d siteimprovements, being financed withthe proceeds of the qualified bonds.
The following table liststhe recommended average useful lifeof the categories of asse ts that should beconsidered in this calculation. If a specific item is not listed, it should be a ssigne d to the m ost closely relatedcategory.
Asset Cateory
New School Building
Useful LifeYears
" 40Building Improvements - interior and exterior remodeling such as plumbing, electrical" HVAC, fire!suppression, security systems, elevators, etc.Roofing
I
Flooring20_
, ...... ...~ ,. :
Furnishings and Equipment - furnitureand fixtures thatare not a structuralcomponent of abuilding suchas desks, chairs, tables, storage units, office equipment, copiers,fax machines,communications equipment, kitchen equipmentand appliances, athletic equipment, etc.
10
10
Technology Infrastructure-cables, networks, etc.BusesTechnology (instructionalan d non-instructional)- computers, printers, scanners, etc.
Use the wo rkshee t below to calculate the weighted a verage useful life of a ssets included inprojects funded by bond proceeds.
Asset Type
School Buildings
Building Improvements
Roofing
Flooring
Furnishing/ Equipment
TechnologyInfrastructure
Technology (instr/non-instr)
Buses
Col. 1
AverageUseful Lifeof Asset (in
Years)
40
30
20
10
10
10
5
6
Col. 2
Timebetween
Bonds IssueDate andPurchase
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Col. 3
UsefulLifeof Assetfrom Bond Issue Date
Col. 4
ExpenditureAmount
Col. 5
Allocation ofRelated
ProfessionalFees
Col. 6
TotalCosts(Incl.Related
Fees)
Col. 7
% of TotalCost
40 3,418,325 212,481 3,630,806 41.92%I
30
20
10
10
10
5
6
Total for purposes of determining weighted avg useful life
1,440,296 89,528
Col. 8
AverageUseful Lifeof
Assets (inyears)
16.77
1,529,824 17.66% 5.30I
708,400 44,033 752,433 8.69% 1.74
1 1 ,442
90,000
479,345
586,099
1,509,266
8,243,173
710
4,607
29,795_ -
12,152 0.14%!
94,607 1.09%
509,140
36,432 622,531
0
417,586
1,509,266
5.88%
7.19%
17.43%
8,660,759 | 100.00%
0.01
0.11
0.59
0.36
1.05
25.92
120% of average useful life of assets 31.11