09 Project Logistics

download 09 Project Logistics

of 8

Transcript of 09 Project Logistics

  • 7/31/2019 09 Project Logistics

    1/8

    M i d - A t l a n t i c D a t a C e n t e r 5 A s h b u r n , V A Page 16

    Lindsay Hagemann | Construction ManagementDr. Messner | AE Faculty ConsultantSenior Thesis Final Report

    April 7,2009

    MADC5isatwophaseconstructionprojectwhichbeganpreconstructioninearlyJuly2007.Itisa

    uniquephasingplansincetheentirebuildingcoreandshellwillactuallybebuiltwithonlytheinterior

    portionofthebuildingbeingphased.

    Theprojectspreconstructionanddesignphaseslastedforeightmonths.Theweatheratthistimeis

    muchmorefavorableforconstructionsincethewintermonthsfinishjustasthesiteworkwasscheduled

    tobegin.ConstructionmobilizationwasinitiatedinearlyFebruary2008,whichisaslightoverlapofthe

    preconstruction/designphase,followedimmediatelybysiteworkandfoundations.

    PrecasterectionbeganinearlyMay2008,justasthefoundationworkwasfinishing,andlasted

    approximately4months,makingitthelongestconstructiondurationfortheproject.Theprecastwas

    sequencedusingtwocrewsthatwerespacedaboutaweekapart.Crew1placedprecastmembers

    betweencolumnlinesAD,whileCrew2placedmembersbetweenDG.PleaseseeAppendixBfora

    completedetailoftheerectionplan.

    Unlikemosttypicalbuildingschedules,theinteriorworkbeginspriortobeingwatertight.Thisismainly

    duetothefactthattheprojectisonsuchatightschedule.Iftheprojecthadtowaituntilthebuilding

    waswatertight,thentheprojectdurationwouldbeextendedatleast4months.Instead,theinstallation

    ofMEPoverhead,fireprotection,interiorpartitions,MEPequipment,accessfloors,anddoorsand

    hardwarecanoccuroncethereisenoughslabongradepoured.Overall,theinteriorworkisdiligently

    completedasaparadeoftradeswithineachroomprogressingfromwesttoeast.

    PleaseseeAppendixBforthesummaryGanttchartforMADC5.

    ConstructionforMADC5beganinearlyFebruary2008.TheprojectisscheduledtofinishinearlyMarch

    2009,justover13monthsofconstruction.Beingthatthebuildingisapproximately360,000SF,a

    detailedconstructionscheduleisvitaltosuccessfullycompletingsuchalargescaleprojectinashort

    amountoftime.Appropriatephasingandsequencingwasutilizedthroughouttheprojecttofacilitate

    theprocess.

  • 7/31/2019 09 Project Logistics

    2/8

    M i d - A t l a n t i c D a t a C e n t e r 5 A s h b u r n , V A Page 17

    Lindsay Hagemann | Construction ManagementDr. Messner | AE Faculty ConsultantSenior Thesis Final Report

    April 7,2009

    Theoveralldurationissomewhatdeviousduetothewaytheprojectwasphased.Thirteenmonthsto

    completealargeprojectisquiteimpressive,however,thebuildingwillnotbefullybuiltoutduringthat

    period.InteriorworkforMADC5isphased,whiletheentirebuildingshell,foundations,MEP

    underground,andslabongradewillbeconstructedasoneentity.Phase1andPhase2evenlysplitthe

    buildingwiththeofficeportionconsideredPhase1construction.Eachphasehasfourteencomputer

    rooms,eightUPSrooms,eightenginegeneratorrooms,onemediumvoltageroom,andonechiller

    plant.Phase2constructionwillbehelduntilreleasedbytheowner.

    Figure4depictstheoverallfloorplan,firstlevelontopandthemezzaninelevelonthebottom,for

    MADC5.ThelightbluesectiononthewestsideofthebuildingisconsideredPhase1.Phase2isthe

    areashownasthedarkbluesectionontheeast.

    PleaseseeAppendixBforthedetailedGanttchartforMADC5.

    Figure4Overallplanshowingthetwophases.

  • 7/31/2019 09 Project Logistics

    3/8

    M i d - A t l a n t i c D a t a C e n t e r 5 A s h b u r n , V A Page 18

    Lindsay Hagemann | Construction ManagementDr. Messner | AE Faculty ConsultantSenior Thesis Final Report

    April 7,2009

    Thenatureofthebuildingisdirectlyresponsibleforthewaythattheprojectwassequenced.Firstand

    foremost,thereare21subcontractorswithapproximately500workersonsite,whichcausessevere

    congestionanddelaysifleftunorganized.Toremedythis,theconstructionmanagerhasdevelopeda

    specificsequencewhereworkprogressesasaparadeoftrades,beginningonthewestandadvancingto

    theeast.Assoonasatradehasfinishedworkinagivenarea,thenexttradefollowsimmediatelyin

    ordertomeetthetightschedule.Sitework,foundations,undergroundMEP,andprecasterection

    initiatetheparade.Approximatelytwoweeksafterprecaststarts,slabongradeworkbeginsforthe

    computerrooms,UPSrooms,andenginegeneratorroomsandfollowsinthesamedirection.Likewise,

    oncetheconcretehascuredenoughandtheconcretecontractorshaveadvanced,interiorworkonthe

    aforementionedroomsensues.Unlikemostcaseswhereabuildingiscompletelyenclosedpriorto

    interiorwork,interiorconstructionbeginsassoonastheimmediatelysurroundingareaiswatertight.

    Forexample,finishesareinstalledinthefirstcomputerroomonthewestsidewhiletheentireeastside

    ofthebuildingisexposedtotheelements.Thissequencingplancontinuesforthedurationofthe

    project.

    Thefollowingthreetables,Table4,Table5,andTable6,illustratethetypicalroomsequencesfor

    computerrooms,UPSrooms,andenginegeneratorrooms:

    Table4ComputerRoomSequence

    Duration

    Activity

    SealConcreteFloors 2d

    MEPOverhead/PullWire 10d

    FireProtection 5d

    BelowFloorChilledWaterPipe 15d

    PaintPrecastTees 5dInteriorPartitions 5d

    MEPRoughInPartitions 5d

    PrimePaint 5d

    LightingBuss/Fixtures/FireAlarmDevices 10d

    InstallEPOKiosk 5d

    SetDBoards/Terminate 5d

    InsulateChilledWaterPiping 5d

    Pipe/InsulateCRAH's 5d

    UnderfloorFireAlarm 5d

    SetCRAHStands/CRAHUnits 10d

    IncipientDetection 10d

    FinishPaint 5dGroundingGrid 5d

    AccessFlooring 5d

    Doors/Hardware 5d

    Base 2d

    Superclean 4d

    FinalClean 5d

  • 7/31/2019 09 Project Logistics

    4/8

    M i d - A t l a n t i c D a t a C e n t e r 5 A s h b u r n , V A Page 19

    Lindsay Hagemann | Construction ManagementDr. Messner | AE Faculty ConsultantSenior Thesis Final Report

    April 7,2009

    Table5UPSRoomSequence

    Duration

    Activity

    SealConcreteFloors 1d

    PullCable 10d

    MEPOverhead 15d

    InteriorPartitions 10dPaintPrecastTees 2d

    "SetSwitchgear(M's,C's)" 5d

    FireProtection 5d

    MEPRoughInPartitions 5d

    PrimePaint 1d

    SetCRAHUnit/Terminate/Pipe 10d

    InstallOverheadBuss 5d

    TerminateSwitchgear 5d

    SetPillerUnit 5d

    Lighting 15d

    Doors/Hardware 5d

    SetIP 5d

    TerminatePiller/IPUnits 10d

    FinishPaint 3d

    Base 2d

    FinalClean 5d

    Table6EngineGeneratorRoomSequence

    Duration

    Activity

    InstallLouvers/Attenuation/Dampers/PlenumsNorthWall 15d

    MEPOverhead 5d

    PourConcreteFuelCurbs 2d

    FireProtection 3d

    InteriorPartitions 5dSet/PipeDayTanksEG1Aand1B 15d

    MEPRoughInPartitions 5d

    EpoxyMembraneinFuelContainmentCurbs 2d

    PaintPrecastTees 2d

    PrimePaint 2d

    Lighting 15d

    InstallExhaustSupportsandMufflers/SCR's 15d

    SetEG1Aand1B 5d

    FinalMufflerConnections 2d

    InstallLouvers/Attenuation/Dampers/PlenumsSouthWall 10d

    PullCable/TerminateEG1Aand1B 20d

    InstallPlenumFromRadiatortoLouvers 2dFinishPaint 3d

    EpoxyGeneratorRMFloors 5d

    InstallUnitHeaters 5d

    Doors/Hardware 3d

    CompletePneumatics 3d

    Base 1d

    FinalClean 5d

  • 7/31/2019 09 Project Logistics

    5/8

    M i d - A t l a n t i c D a t a C e n t e r 5 A s h b u r n , V A Page 20

    Lindsay Hagemann | Construction ManagementDr. Messner | AE Faculty ConsultantSenior Thesis Final Report

    April 7,2009

    Table7ProjectCostBreakdown

    Cost Cost/SF

    OverallCostsActualBuildingConstructionCost $148,720,000 $414

    TotalProjectCost $170,916,000 $475

    BuildingSystemsCosts

    BuildingConcrete $8,957,000 $25

    StructuralPrecast $1,696,000 $5

    AccessFloor $2,110,000 $6

    FireProtection $1,308,000 $4

    Mechanical $33,232,000 $93

    Electrical $47,087,000 $131

    Security $1,150,000 $4

    MechanicalControls $3,100,000 $9MechanicalEquipment $4,406,000 $13

    ElectricalEquipment $26,798,000 $75

    TotalBuildingArea: 360,000SF

    TotalBuildingPerimeter: 3,646LF

    StoryHeight: 236FT

    RSMeansValue: $137.50/SF

    StoryHeightAdjustment: Negligible

    PerimeterAdjustment: Negligible

    TimeAdjustment: CurrenttimeNoadjustmentneeded.

    LocationFactor: 0.92(Fairfax,VAisclosestlocationtoAshburn)

    FinalRSMeansValue: $126.50/SF

    ProjectTotalCost: $45,540,000

    AsshownaboveinTable7,theRSMeansSquareFootEstimateisnotevenclosetotheactualcostof

    thebuilding.MADC5isanextremelylargedatacenterthatcannotbeaccountedforusingRSMeans,

    whichonlysizesupto40,000SFand800LFwhereasMADC5is360,000SFand3,646LF.Anyadjustments

    tothestoryheightandperimeterwouldhaveanegligibleeffectonthesquarefootvaluesincethevaluesdecreaseasthesizeofthebuildingincreasesandthedifferencesbetweenthevaluesisso

    extreme.Inaddition,thebuildingestimatedoesnotaccountforthe$33millionofMEPcontrolsand

    equipmentinvolvedwiththedatacenter.PleaseseeAppendixCforthedetailedRSMeansSquareFoot

    analysis.

  • 7/31/2019 09 Project Logistics

    6/8

    M i d - A t l a n t i c D a t a C e n t e r 5 A s h b u r n , V A Page 21

    Lindsay Hagemann | Construction ManagementDr. Messner | AE Faculty ConsultantSenior Thesis Final Report

    April 7,2009

    TotalProjectCost: $19,579,868 $55/SF

    TotalBuildingCost: $18,179,868 $51/SF

    Unfortunately,theD4CostEstimatesoftwaredoesnothaveadatabaseforanythingsimilartoadata

    center.Thisismorelikelyattributedtothefactthatdatacentersaremoreofanewdesignin

    comparisontothetypicalcommercialbuildingsfeaturedinthesoftware.Therefore,theD4Cost

    softwareisinappropriatetouseforestimating.Toillustratethis,anestimatehasbeendevelopedbased

    offanindustrialbuilding,SiemensWestinghouseFuelCellFacility,withsizedat190,000SF.Asshown

    above,thetotalprojectcostisapproximately$150millionshortofthetrueestimate.Pleasesee

    AppendixCforthedetailedD4CostParametricanalysis.

    MADC5hadacombinationofconstructionrequirements,insuranceandpermits,generalconditions,

    andlaborfallingwithinthegeneralconditionsthatgeneratesanestimateamountof$7,025,338,as

    showninTable8below.Incomparisontotheoverallprojectcost,thisnumberisapproximately4.1%oftheoverallbudget.Thevaluemaybeslightlylowthentheaveragepercentandcouldbeattributedto

    thefactthattheconstructioncontingencywasnotincludedaswellasdifferingstaffingcosts.

    Table8GeneralConditionsSummary

    PleaseseeAppendixCforadetailedbreakdownoftheGeneralConditionsestimate.

    Thefollowingassumptionsweremadethroughouttheestimateprocess:

    x CostDataprovidedbyRSMeans2008andHolderConstructionCompany.Thenumbersfrom

    HolderwereprovidedasestimatesbasedontheirhistoricaldataandRSMeans.Thesevalues

    werederivedbymyselfandprojectteammembers.

    x RSMeans2008wasutilizedtoderiveindividualstaffingsalariesforthejob.

    x WherestaffsalarieswerenotavailableinRSMeans,alogical10%increasewasusedforeach

    respectivelevel.

    x ValuesprovidedfromHolderwerelumpsumamounts,notaunitcost.Thus,thetotalcostwas

    dividedbytheprojectdurationtoderiveacost/unitvalue.Thisvaluewillbebeneficialfora

    futureanalysis.

    x ConstructionDurations:13monthsor58weeks

    o Nonworkingdaysandholidaysarenotaccountedfor,ratherbasedoffofthestandard

    calendar

  • 7/31/2019 09 Project Logistics

    7/8

    M i d - A t l a n t i c D a t a C e n t e r 5 A s h b u r n , V A Page 22

    Lindsay Hagemann | Construction ManagementDr. Messner | AE Faculty ConsultantSenior Thesis Final Report

    April 7,2009

    x Staffingdurationsarebasedoffofstartdatesonthejob.(InformationreceivedfromHolder)

    x Allstaffisassumedtobeonthejobthroughcompletionsincetheprojectteamisunsureof

    statusofPhase2.

    Alltakeoffcalculationsforthestructuralestimatewereperformedbyhandbasedoffoftheconstructiondocumentsandprecastshopdrawings.Aspreviouslymentioned,thedatacenterportion

    ofthebuildingissymmetrical;therefore,thetakeoffneededtoonlybepreparedforhalfofthebuilding

    andsimplymultipliedbyafactoroftwotoaccountfortheotherhalf.Acompletetakeoffhadtobe

    doneforbothfloorsoftheofficebuildingsincethisportionwasnotsymmetrical.

    Thefollowingassumptionsweremadethroughoutthetakeoff:

    x Allconcreteispumped.

    x Formworkwasaddedasanallowancevalueprovidedbythecontractor(whousesRSmeansand

    historicaldata)duetosporadicusethroughouttheproject.

    x OpenShoplabor

    x Fairfax,VAwasusedasthelocationfactor(0.92).ItwastheclosestcitytoAshburn;however,

    thecostmaybehigherduetoaslightlyhighercostoflivinginFairfax.Thecalculationsinclude

    thisfactorwithintheunitcosts.

    x Overheadandprofitareomittedfromthecostestimate

    x RSMeans2008Onlineandaverageunitcostestimatesfromtheprecastsubcontractor(The

    ShockeyPrecastGroup)wereutilizedforthecostcalculations.

    PleaseseeTable9belowforasummaryofthestructuralsystems.Acompletedetailedestimatecanbe

    foundinAppendixC.

    Table9StructuralSystemsSummaryEstimate

    StructuralSystemsSummaryEstimate

    Division Description TotalCost

    02465 Caissons $161,716

    03210 Rebar $436,486

    03220 WeldedWireFabric $260,850

    03310 NormalWeightConcrete $2,051,131

    03310 FormworkAllowance $270,000

    03310 ConcretePlacement $403,763

    03310 CIPPiers $267,630

    03310 CIPSpreadFooting $344,501

    03310 CIPContinuousFooting $126,055

    03310 CIPSlabonGrade $1,821,380

    03310 CIPToppingSlab $1,242,534

    03310 CIPStairs $3,063

    03410 PrecastConcrete $9,219,840

    TOTAL $16,608,949

  • 7/31/2019 09 Project Logistics

    8/8

    M i d - A t l a n t i c D a t a C e n t e r 5 A s h b u r n , V A Page 23

    Lindsay Hagemann | Construction ManagementDr. Messner | AE Faculty ConsultantSenior Thesis Final Report

    April 7,2009

    TheestimatetotalforMADC5is$16,608,949.IncomparisontotheTechnicalAssignment1assignment,

    thisnumberismuchlowerwithapercentdifferenceof25.12%.However,thevaluesutilizedforTech.1

    werebasedoffofpreliminaryvaluesfortheproject.Amorerecentestimateinvolvingthescheduleof

    valuesforthestructuralsystemsprovidesamuchstrongerestimatetocompare.PleaseseeTable10

    belowforthecomparison.

    Table10StructuralSystemsCostComparison

    System Tech1 Tech2 System SOV Tech2

    PrecastConcrete $11,695,484 $9,219,840 PrecastConcrete $9,706,654 $9,219,840

    CIPConcrete $8,956,928 $7,227,393 CIPConcrete $7,204,000 $7,227,393

    Caissons $728,079 $161,716 Caissons $493,044 $161,716

    Total $21,380,491 $16,608,949 Total $17,403,698 $16,608,949

    %Difference 25.12% %Difference 4.67%

    DifferencesbetweentheTech.1,thescheduleofvalues,andTech.2valuescanbeattributedtoseveral

    items.Closeoutcosts,changeorders,mobilization/demobilization,andshippingarenotaccountedforwithintheprecastconcretevalue.Initially,thelargediscrepancybetweentheCIPconcreteestimatesis

    duetoinclusionofcloseout,changeorders,contingency,contractorsfee,constructionrequirements,

    andexcavationcosts.Asforthecaissonestimate,entitiessuchasmobilization/demobilization,bonds,

    layout,extrareinforcement,andcloseoutareresponsibleforthecostgap.Overall,differingunitprices

    betweenRSMeansandcontractor/subcontractorvaluesallinfluencethe4.67%differential.Fora

    bettercomparisonofthematerialsandlabor,theabovementionedentitieshaveallbeenremovedfrom

    oftheoriginalestimate.