08 Fall Final

7/31/2019 08 Fall Final

1/12

Fall 2008 Edition

Take Your Best Shot andStop the Old Mill Parking Lot Redevelopment

Florence Smith McDowell 1931-Cannon at Old Mill

Campaign To Stop the Proposed Old Mill10-storey Condominium on Greenspacealong the Humber, Canadas 26th HeritageRiver.GET INVOLVED!

By: Anna Traer KPRI DirectorWI LL CI TY COUNCI L SERVE and PROTECT Toron tosGreenspace system and the historical, cultural,heritage and tour ist int erests of t he Old Mill area?

The Communitys resolve has not waned. Kingsway ParkRatepayers Inc., Toronto Historical Association, numerousratepayers, residents and heritage groups and residentscontinue the campaign to stop the proposed development ofa 10-storey condominium across the street from the historicOld Mill Inn. Despite Councils vote in favour of thedevelopment on March 4, 2008, efforts are being made toreopen the matter before Council for further debate on thegrounds that prior to the vote:

1. Council did not request or receive a Heritage I mpactStatement pursuant to Torontos Official Plan, Chapter 3.1.5that states any developments near a Heritage Site needs aHeritage Impact Statement; continues on page 4

The Old Mill area along the Humber RiverWhat are its historical, heritage, cultural and tourist interests?By: Madeleine McDowell Chair, Humber Heritage Committee

Here, directly across from the Old Mill Parking lot on a boulder to withstand the ice and floods is theNational bronze Plaque, written in Mississauga, English and French, commemorating the designation ofthe Humber as a Canadian Herit age River.The Toront o Carryi ng Place or le Portage de Toronto is an aboriginal trail more than 4000 years old,which follows the high ground on the east bank of the Humber, and was a link in the native trade routebetween the Gulf of Mexico and the North Shore of Lake Huron/Lake Superior. The French subsequentlyused it and later the British. A portion of the Trail is visible from here. It is redolent of names suchas Brule, Hennepin, Pere, Joliet, La Salle and Du Lhut continues on page 6

Florence Smith McDowell 1931 (Right)Cannon at Old Mill, located on the siteof the proposed 10-storeycondominium development, directedtowards and overlooking the Humber

Valley, before it was moved to asecluded area near the Old Mill chapel(Below)

The Kingsway ParkRatepayers Inc.

(KPRI) NewsletterRepresenting the Sunnylea & Kingsway Areas TUwww.kingswayratepayers.com

The KPRI Board of Directors invit e you t o our

7 t h Annual Membership Wine and CheeseSpecial Guests: Mayor David Miller, Councillor Peter Milczyn

and our Local RepresentativesTuesday, November 25 t h 2008. 7:30 pm 9:30 pm

Big Papas Trat t oria. 298 2 Bloor St. West.Members only. (One-year Memberships $20 can be purchased at the door)

Madeleine McDowellat Old Mill Bridgepillar 1952

7/31/2019 08 Fall Final

2/12

Page 2 KPRIFall 2008

7/31/2019 08 Fall Final

3/12

KPRIFall 2008 Page3

Montgomery Road TrafficCalming ReportBy: Linda L. McCarron KPRI Director

On February 13, 2007 a petition, as per city policy, signed byover 70% of the residents on Montgomery Road wasforwarded to Councillor Miczyn. As a result of this petition theTraffic Operations - Etobicoke York Department issued the

results of a traffic study in December 2007. A synopsis of thisreport was hand delivered to each residence on MontgomeryRoad. Montgomery Road is classified as a COLLECTOR ROADthe same as The Kingsway. This Traffic Operations reportindicated that the 85th percentile for vehicle speeds was45km/h to 51km/h. The posted speed limit is MAXIMUM 40km/h. (Particularly in a School Zone). The technical summarywhich allows "criteria points" for pedestrian generation omittedOur Lady of Sorrows Elementary School, Etobicoke CollegiateHigh School, The Montgomery Road Pool, Fitness Centre,

Arena and Tennis Courts. Also omitted were Sharon HouseConvalesent Home, the Montgomery Inn and the BaptistChurch. The road has been assessed in 2008 by the RoadOperations Department and should be scheduled for

reconstruction in the next five years under the City CapitalWork Projects. The design should include sidewalks on theWEST side only and narrow 26" curb to curb traffic lanes (aproven traffic calming device).

The issue of excessive speed not only affects the residents onMontgomery Road, but countless residents living east ofMontgomery who must attempt to cross the road to access allof the establishments listed.

New Two Way for The KingswayBy: Mary L. Campb ell KPRI DirectorThe KPRI had requested and the design was approved for anew 2 way roadway on The Kingsway from GovernmentRoad to before Royal York Road. I.e. The 2 way wouldNOT extend to Royal York Road where there is a right turnonly. This would enable residents after many years to beable to turn to the right/east out of their driveways, and gosouth.

*The new centre lines and signs are now in place as of

October 23, 2008 with much thanks to Mr. Eric Leon fromthe city.

Councillor Lindsay-Luby has confirmed that she will contactthe Traffic Operations Department and have the traffic calmingissue re-investigated. Councillor Milczyn has also been madeaware of this request. Upon completion of the study the issuewill be brought to community council for debate.

7/31/2019 08 Fall Final

4/12


View of the upper parking lot that the former City ofEtobicoke rezoned in 1984 from Commercial to PrivateOpen Space limited to surface parking as part of the landexchange deal. For details of the land exchange deal seearticle under the caption "Why some taxpayers are upsetover the multi-million dollar windfall of the Old Mill ownerswho acquired prime land off Old Mill Road at a netpayment of $0 at taxpayers' expense".

Campaign To Stop the Proposed OldMill 10-storey Condominium onGreenspace along the Humber, Canadas26th Heritage River.GET INVOLVED!Continued from front page

2. Council did not consider the impact of the 10-storeycondominium with respect to historical, heritage, cultural andtourist interests in the area, including the designation of the

Humber as Canadas 26 t h Herit age River , thedesignation of the Old Mill Bridge under the OntarioHeritage Act by the City of York and the City of Etobicoke,and the numerous plaques near the Old Mill, such thatcommemorate the Old Mill Ruins, the life of explorert ienne Brl, the Toronto Carry ing Place Trail and the50th anniversary of the Hurr ican Hazel Disaster in 1954.3. Council did not receive full disclosure and information onthe land exchange deal in 1984 involving the Old Mill,Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, City of Etobicokeand City of York that in essence prohibited any buildingon the entir e parking area, including the upper parkinglot, site of the proposed development.

Why some taxpayers are upset over t he mult i-mill iondollar windf all of the Old Mill owners who acquiredprime land off Old Mill Road at a net paym ent of $0 attaxpayers expense and are not upholding t heirbargain in the land exchange deal that l imit s the useof the upper parking lot t o surface parking only?Aland exchange occurred in 1984 between the owners of theOld Mill, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority andthe former Cities of Etobicoke and York. Staff did not reportthe land exchange deal to Council prior to the vote in March2008. The deal was made to accommodate the Old Mill Innsneed to expand its parking facility after it obtained a permitissued by the Conservation Authority to build a parkingstructure. After much debate recorded in the City of YorkPlanning Board minutes and City of York Council minutes, theOld Mill relinquished the permit and acquired prime land offOld Mill Road from the Conservation Authority (for $500) andfrom the City of York (for $2000) to expand its surfaceparking lot in exchange for its land-locked property off theHumber River that the Conservation Authority acquired (for$2500), amounting to a net payment of $0 . The dealinvolved the City of Etobicoke to rezone the ENTIRE parkingarea (upper and lower parking lots) from Commercial toPrivate Open Space limited to surface parking. Restrictivecovenants prohibiting development were filed on title to theproperties exchanged in the deal. The intent w as thatthere w ould be no build on the ENTI RE parking area,including the upper parking lot, site of t he proposeddevelopment. Old Mill acquiesced to the deal byrelinquishing the permit and by further entering into anagreement with respect to landscaping the area. Forcomplete details and supporting documents, visit KPRIswebsite.

Why is i t important to get involved? The Old Mill areahas significant importance to our history, heritage, cultureand tourism. Up until this time, despite the encroachment ofmodern life, the scene of the Humber has remained pastoraland idylic to this day. We have been able to preserve thehistoric setting and vistas of the Humber. This developmentwould be the first significant blight imposing itself above the

A scenic view of the Humber, across from the proposed 10-storey condominium that will drastically impact on thepastoral and serene setting of the Old Mill area ifdevelo ed.

7/31/2019 08 Fall Final

5/12

KPRIFall 2008 Page5

View of the site of the proposed development from the OldMill chapel.

Tree canopy between the lower and upper parking lots;322 trees will be removed for the proposed development.

View of the lower parking lot, which is in the floodplain.

tree line along the banks of the Humber Valley. Please takethe time to read the article by Madeleine McDowell, Chair ofthe Humber Heritage Committee (The Old Mill By theHumber Some of the historical, heritage, cultural andtourists interests in its vicinity) and the article by LisetteMallet of the Socit dHistoire de Toronto, who is theCoordinator for Le sentier Partag-the Shared Path, anhistorical park project on the Humber. Lisette is involved inplans to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the designation ofthe Humber as Canadas 26th Heritage River, the plaque for

which is located directly across the river from the proposeddevelopment site.

How can you assist? The Old Mill area is of City-wide,Province-wide and Country-wide importance. Please spreadthe word and have people contact the Mayor, theirCouncillor, MPP and MP to state their opposition to theproposed 10-storey Old Mill condominium on Greenspace andto request Council to reopen the Old Mill matter or notapprove the by-laws for amendments in zoning from PrivateOpen Space to Sixth Density Residential and amendmentsin the Toronto Official Plan by deleting lands from the GreenSpace System and redesignating the lands from Parks andOpen Space Areas Natural Area to ApartmentNeighbourhood. We look to you t o put pr essure to bear

on Council to do the right t hing.How can KPRI assist y ou? Visitwww.kingswayratepayers.com for a precedent email thatyou may forward to the Mayor and Councillors and copy toMPPs, MP and KPRI or call 416-233-1695 for assistance.

A copy of this article appears on KPRIs website. Pleaseforward it to your friends and colleagues to participate in thisdemocratic process for full disclosure and accountability.

Old Mill photos were taken by John Prince, KPRI Director onOctober 18, 2008.

Ten Thousand Villages is a nonprofit program ofthe Mennonite Central Committee; most of their employees

are volunteers. They buy products from artisans in Third

World countries and pay a fair price for their products. The

stores offer many attractive items such as tea, coffee,

chocolate, dried fruit, nuts, soaps, placemats, jewelry, trinket

boxes, toys, cookbooks, leather goods etc.

For further information,

check out www.tenthousandvillages.ca

7/31/2019 08 Fall Final

6/12


Signage at the Old Mill Subway that provides information onthe Discovery Walks Humber Trail from the mouth of theHumber at Lake Ontario to Etienne Brule Park, across fromthe proposed development site.

Sign at thenorth-eastcorner of

BloorStreet andOld MillTrail thatreads"HistoricSite TheOld Mill"

Photo of grass area across from the Old Mill Inn where thecannon was prominently located before its move to thecurrent secluded location.

The Old Mill area along the Humber RiverWhat are its historical, heritage, cultural andtourist interests?

Continued from front page

Benjamin Frobisher recommended it as the preferred route tothe West in the 1780s, it was mapped by Augustus Jones by1793, Lieut. Gov. Simcoe traveled it in 1793 and GeneralBrock dispatched a detachment up it to capture Fort

Mackinac from the Americans in 1812. The National Sites andMonuments Plaque to the Toronto Carrying Place is located ina small park to the south of Baby Point on Humbercrest Blvd.

Here betw een Lake Ont ario and Weston is 5 miles ofriver valley virtually devoid of Urban intrusion,complete wit h tr ails, where w alkers and cyclistsmarvel at t he blissful quiet and isolation f rom a city ofalmost 2.5 mill ion .

Here, at Old Mill Road, w as the fir st crossing place onthe Humber . (Teiaiagon, the Seneca name for the nearbyvillage, means where it crosses the river)

Here the steep Ravine is interrupted, providing a slope downto the River.

Here was the probable location of a French sawmill.

Here prior to 1793 was a series ofFirst Nationsencampments, the most recent of which was theMississauga Nation.

Here, to the north, is the height of land now known as BabyPoint and protected by the steep ravine slope, it was thelocation of the 17th century Seneca village of Teiaiagon ,with a population close to 5,000. Later, in 1720, it was thelocation of the first French tr ading fort , the MagasinRoyal, on the Toronto Carrying Place.

Here on the stone wall at the entrance to the Old Mill diningroom, is located one of the first plaques to commemorate thelife of explorer Et ienne Brule the first white man to see

Lake Ontario, and his journey down the Toronto CarryingPlace in 1615.

Across the River is the place where Robert Rene Cavelier deLaSalle camped for two weeks in August of 1680, and withwhich his record of his journey of discovery to the Mississippibegins on August 22nd 1680.

Here, moved from the Parking Lot to the north side of OldMill Road, is a Cannon, possibly traceable back to the FrenchRegime in Toronto.

Here is the historic Toronto River which LieutenantGovernor John Graves Simcoe renamed the HumberRiver , with Canadas 26th Heritage River Designation.

Here was Torontos first industr ial building - the Kings

Mill a sawmill built in 1793, to provide the boards for FortYork and the new Town of York. Mrs. Simcoe wrote of theexcellence of the bread that the millers wife made.

Here shortly to the south were the Dennis Boat Yards,builders of Naval ships, such as the Yacht Toronto, for whichthe Kings Mill supplied the wood.

Here, there followed a series of Mills, both Grist andSawmills, the last of which the Gamble Mi ll was built in1846 by Wm. Tyrell. It burnt in 1881, and its ruinsbecameknown as The Old Mill.

Linda L. McCarron has been dealing withLEAFTree Plant ing organizat ion regardingthe TTC property on Montgomery Road. If anyone iscontemplating planting trees on private property, you maywant to take a look at the LEAF website. They offer a hugevariety of indigenous trees and shrubs that help to supportour native birds and butterflies. The site is:www.leaftoronto.org. Their staff are very helpful in makingsuggestions regarding location of species on your propertyand soil conditions. Their prices more than reasonablecompared to most local Nurseries.s

7/31/2019 08 Fall Final

7/12

KPRIFall 2008 Page

Photos of current location of cannon in a secluded cornernear the Old Mill chapel.

View from the historic Old Mill Bridge built in 1916 anddesignated under the Heritage Act by the City of York andthe City of Etobicoke. The proposed development thatwould appear over the right crest of the bridge wouldsignificantly impact on the pastoral and idylic setting ofthis unique enclave in the Humber Valley.

National plaque on a boulder to withstand the ice andfloods is written in Mississauga, English and Frenchcommemorating the designation of the Humber as aCanadian Heritage River in 1999. The 10 year anniversarycelebration will take place next year. The plaque is locateddirectly across from the proposed development site.

Here are the remains of the millr ace from Gambles Mill.

Here is Robert Hom e Smit hs Old Mil l Tea Garden ,which opened in August 1914 on the first day of the FirstWord War.

Here, down the steps at the Old Mill Tea Garden is thePlaque commemorating the Old Mill Ruins, erected by theEtobicoke Historical Board, the Etobicoke Historical Societyand the Ontario Heritage Foundation.

Here is engineer Frank Barbers Old Mill Bridge, built in

1916 and Designated twenty years ago under the OntarioHeritage Act by the City of York and the City of Etobicoke.

Here, to the south a few hundred metres, is the ProvincialPlaque commemoratin g the 50th Anniversary of theHurri cane Hazel Disaster in 1954, the high water crest of21 feet hitting the rail of the Old Mill Parking Lot, andwashing out the approaches to the Old Mill Bridge.

Here at the oxbow and shallowin gof t he River ice buildsup in a spectacular spring breakup.

Here you can watch the Salmon l eaping in the fall.

Here you can watch Cormorants, Kingfishers, Great BlueHeron, Great Whit e Egret s, Green Heron and BlackCrested Night Heron , as well as a variety ofSea Gulls.

Ducks and Geese.Here are remnants of the native Black Oak Savanna,one of only six left in North America, with trees from a genepool dating back 10,000 years.

All th is is accessible at Old Mill Stat ion to anyone byTTC Subway and they may see a picture ofDennis YachtToronto and a map of the Discovery Walk s Humber Trail as they arrive or leave there.

7/31/2019 08 Fall Final

8/12


Dunpar OMB case and Court rulingre: Dundas and Prince Edward NorthBy: Mary L. Campbell KPRI Director

Please review our previous newsletters for details on thisissue, also available on our website: www.kpri.ca s

The OMB ruling was challenged by the city and KRAPP. InOctober the Judge ruled in favour of Dunpar. The City andKRAPP lost their appeal.

The full text of the decision may be found at:

http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onscdc/doc/2008/2008canlii50802/2008canlii50802.html

Toronto ( City) v. Dunpar Developments I nc., 2008CanLI I 508 02 ( ON S.C.D.C.)

Print: PDF FormatDate:2008-10-03Docket: 73/08 - 76/08URL:http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onscdc/doc/2008/2008canlii50802/2008canlii50802.htmllNoteup: Search for decisions citing this decision

COURT FI LE NO.: 73/08 and 76/08DATE: 20081003SUPERI OR COURT OF JUSTI CE ONTARI O(DI VI SI ONAL COURT)

RE: CITY OF TORONTO, (APPLICANT) V. DUNPARDEVELOPMENTS INC. AND KINGSWAY RESIDENTS AGAINSTPOOR PLANNING, (RESPONDENTS)

- AND -

RE: KINGSWAY RESIDENTS AGAINST POOR PLANNING,(APPLICANT) V. DUNPAR DEVELOPMENTS INC. AND CITY OFTORONTO, (RESPONDENTS)

BEFORE: Justice D. Aston

COUNSEL: Thomas H. Wall and Stephen Bradley, for

the Applicant, City of TorontoCharles Campbell and Dawne Jubb, for the Appellant

Kingsway Residents Against Poor Planning

A. Dryer and A. Brown, for the Respondent DunparDevelopments

HEARD AT TORONTO: September 29, 2008

E N D O R S E M E N T

Ast on J.

[1] The City of Toronto (the City) and Kingsway ResidentsAgainst Poor Planning (Kingsway) both bring identicalmotions seeking leave to appeal to the Divisional Court froman OMB decision dated February 6, 2008 (the Campbell

decision).[2] Leave to Appeal is sought with respect to four specificquestions:(i)Did the Board err in failing to apply or properly interpret s.2.1 and 24 of the Planning Act?(ii)Did the Board err in approving a zoning by-lawamendment without finding that the amendment conformedto the Citys in force Official Plan policies?(iii)Did the Board err in law and misconstrue the ClergyPrincipal in deciding that the repealed Etobicoke Official Planwas the determinative Official Plan, rather than the Citys inforce Official Plan?(iv)Did the Board err and exceed its jurisdiction by failing toapply the six-storey height restriction for the Commercial

Residential Strip contained in s. 4.4 of the repealedEtobicoke Official Plan to the seven/eight storey height limitpermitted by the zoning by-law amendment approved by theBoard?

[3] Pursuant to s. 96 of the Municipal Act, leave is onlygranted:(a)on a question of law,(b)if the question of law is sufficiently important to warrantthe attention of the Divisional Court, and(c)there is reason to doubt the correctness of the decision orthe Boards interpretation of the law.

[4] The Board decided as a threshold issue, on a motionbrought by Kingsway and supported by the City, that the

repealed Etobicoke Official Plan (EOP) could not beamended that Dunpars pending Appeal to the Boardseeking such relief was a nullity (the Jackson decision).However, the Jackson decision also clearly contemplated the

7/31/2019 08 Fall Final

9/12

KPRIFall 2008 Page9

weight to be given to evidence on the former EtobicokeOfficial Plan and the current Toronto Official Plan is a matterfor the hearing.

[5] The Application of the Clergy Principle was within theBoards discretion as a matter of its own practice andprocedure. In both the Jackson decision and the Campbelldecision, the Board acknowledged flexibility in the applicationof that principle. Evidence was ultimately heard, consideredand weighed in the context of both Official Plans. As requiredby s.2.1 of the Planning Act, the Board had regard to the

Citys decisions in relation to the planning matters in questionand to the information and material City Council consideredin making its decisions. All that evidence was led, or couldhave been led, by Kingsway and the City.

[6] It is not an error of law for the Board to conclude that theToronto Official Plan (TOP) was not the Official Plan ineffect for the purposes of the Appeal before it. To holdotherwise would be to effectively abolish the Clergy Principle.The Clergy Principle is well established, notwithstanding thelanguage of s.24 of the Planning Act.

[7] A fair reading of the Campbell decision in its entiretysupports the conclusion the Board would have granted a sitespecific amendment of s.4.4.4 of the EOP to accommodate

Dunpars proposal for its seven/eight storey development butfor the Jackson decision which took such an amendment outof consideration. Member Campbell properly concluded shewas bound by the unchallenged Jackson decision in thatregard. However, the Board did not exclude evidence relatingto planning policy, planning considerations or the new TOP.To the contrary, the Campbell decision considered andweighed all the evidence tendered, giving reasons forpreferring some expert evidence over other evidence.Member Campbell went on to specifically consider whetherthe proposed building was consistent with principles of goodplanning, and was appropriate having regard to thePlanning Act, the PPS, both Official Plans, the DundasStreet West Avenue Study, the applicable zoning by-laws

(including the Dundas Street West Avenues by-law) and therelevant Urban Design Guidelines, including the DundasStreet West Urban Design Guidelines.

[8] The Board did not ignore the evidence tendered by the

City or Kingsway; it merely discounted its importance indetermining the evidence in this area is of limitedrelevance.

[9] In determining that the evidence relating to the TOP wasadmissible and relevant but not determinative, the Boardapplied the Clergy Principle in a manner consistent with thediscretion of the Board and its decisions in Dumart v.Woolwich(Township) [1997] OMBD No. 1817 and JamesDick Construction Limited v. Caledon (Town) [2003]OMBD No. 1195.

[10] I conclude the Board committed no error on anyquestion of law. The motions for leave to appeal aretherefore dismissed.

[11] By agreement, costs in favour of the respondent DunparDevelopments Inc. are fixed at $10,000.00 inclusive of GST

and disbursements. If the moving parties are unable to agreeon the apportionment of those costs, brief writtensubmissions may be made within the next 30 days.

Aston J.

2800 Bloor Street West application Bloor & TheKingsway Update

By: Mary L. Campbell KPRI Director

The developer,Living Life Retirement Residences Inc. hasadvised that they will present revised plans at a communitymeeting, most likely in late October/ early November, 2008.

After that time the KPRI will meet with the developer.

7/31/2019 08 Fall Final

10/12


7/31/2019 08 Fall Final

11/12

KPRIFall 2008 Page1

The Shared Path-Le Sentier Partag

An Historical park along theHumber RiverBy: Lisette Mallet Coordinator for Le sentierPartag-the Shared Path

The Humber River, originally known as the Toronto River,and the Toronto Carrying Place gave our city its name. It

played a key role in our Native, French and English history,and provided the foundation of our early economicdevelopment. An outflow of the Oak Ridges moraine, theriver is of primary ecological importance, and shelters anabundance of plant and animal life.

For over a decade and especially in the last 18 months theSocit dhistoire de Toronto (SHT) has been stronglyadvocating the creation of a Toronto Historical Park - aheritage greenway or Shared Path along the Humber River.The SHT wishes to take advantage of the existing park andtrail network and to capitalize upon the Humber Riversnatural and cultural heritage. Its purpose is to highlight theinter-relationship of the First Nations, French and English orthe Shared Path along the Humber River in Toronto.

The Historical park project is making progress. The Torontoand Region Conservation Authority ( TRCA) formally adoptedthe proposition to create a historical park along the Humberand has forwarded this endorsement to the Parks Director atthe City of Toronto. Parks Planning has formed aninterdepartmental committee within the city involving TRCA,Heritage Toronto and Socit d'histoire to see this projectthrough as far as it is possible within our means. We'vedetermined some of its objectives and are in the process ofdetermining some of the actions that will have to take placeto meet these objectives.

Meanwhile a few actions are already underway according tothe opportunities. The South Kingsway/Queenswayintersection reconfiguration means improvements to theJean-Baptiste Rousseaux site and the Carrying Place trail.

Some tree planting has already occurred in Etienne BrlPark etc.

This project is huge yet simple and we count on communitysupport to build something to show the rest of the countrythat Toronto truly has a soul and its not at the Eaton Centre.

For more information you can check our website at:www.sht.ca

Or contact the projects coordinator:

Lisette Mallet

Coordinator for Le sentier Partag-the Shared Path

An historical park project by Socit d'histoire de Toronto

[email protected]

416.534.1079

Or contact the projects coordinator:

Lisette Mallet

Coordinator for Le sentier Partag-the Shared Path

An historical park project by Socit d'histoire de Toronto

[email protected]

416.534.1079

7/31/2019 08 Fall Final

12/12


See List of KPRI Directors atTUwww.kingswayratepayers.comUT

For information please email [email protected]

UKPRI Membership Form (to June 2009) U

Renewal New Member 1 Year ($20) 5 Years ($90)

Name:________________________________________

Address:______________________________________

Tel:___________________Fax#:__________________

E-mail:_______________________________________

Postal:________________________Please make cheques payable to:The Kingsway Park Ratepayers Inc.

Mail to: KPRI c/o F. Campbell, 184 Prince Edward Drive,

Etobicoke, ON M8Y 3W9

Can You Volunteer Some Time?

Webmaster Board of Directors Roads & Traffic

Newsletter Petitions Development and Overbuilding

Questions?Email [email protected]

Newsletter Layout by Adam Seeto

Interested in the

KPRIs E-mail Updates?If you are not currently receivingour e-mail alerts and wish to bekept up-to-date by e-mail withthe issues and developments ofyour neighbourhood, simplysend an e-mail to [email protected] your name, address,telephone and the subject line.

Be The First To Know !

Advertise in the KPRI Newsletter!

Full Page: $1100Half Page: $600

Quarter Page: $350Business Card: $175

E-mail inquires to: [email protected]

08 Fall Final

Documents

Transcript of 08 Fall Final