05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching
-
Upload
lawrie-hunter -
Category
Education
-
view
1.323 -
download
0
description
Transcript of 05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching
![Page 1: 05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051820/55393166550346b04c8b4931/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Lawrie HunterKochi University of Technology
http://www.core.kochi-tech.ac.jp/hunter/
Concept mappingdecision matrix
JALTCALLJune 6, 2009
![Page 2: 05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051820/55393166550346b04c8b4931/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: 05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051820/55393166550346b04c8b4931/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002________________________Software vs. tangibles
-tangibles first, because quick, and to encourage revisions (paper is cheap)-software for presentation, sharing, editing, beauty
_______________________________Training
-extensive contained warmups
-for Teacher's observation-L's need support?-L's need constraint?
-for peer commenting-look quickly at shapes only-look carefully at node content and links
Mapping typemind maps / relation maps (Novakian) / structure maps
1. Mind maps-for amassing 'thoughts'-relations only by association-for rearranging, clustering, prioritizing (software good for this)
2. Relation maps (Novakian maps)-for relating concepts in articulately related pairs-CMC debate going on now about declarative reading or not (cf. Tifi)
3. Structure maps (e.g. ISmaps)-for representation of syntactic structures at the level of
-sentence-paragraph-short technical summary articles
-not necessarily one unified map-background information may be
-a separate map-a layer (font color, sidebar, etc.)
-persuasion may be 'picture frames' or title bars or submapsConstraint1. Architectural constraint
- by size- by content
2. Rhetorical constraint-by rhetorical device limitations
3. Relational constraint-by Novakianism
Software vs. tangibles
Training
Mapping type
Constraint
![Page 4: 05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051820/55393166550346b04c8b4931/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002________________________Software vs. tangibles
-tangibles first-because quick-to encourage revisions (paper is cheap)
-software for presentation, sharing, editing, beauty
Software vs. tangibles
Training
Mapping type
Constraint
![Page 5: 05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051820/55393166550346b04c8b4931/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002________________________Training
-extensive contained warmups
-for Teacher's observation-L's need support?-L's need constraint?
-for peer commenting-look quickly at shapes only-look carefully at node content and links
Software vs. tangibles
Training
Mapping type
Constraint
![Page 6: 05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051820/55393166550346b04c8b4931/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002________________________Mapping type
-mind maps -relation maps (Novakian) -structure maps
Software vs. tangibles
Training
Mapping type
Constraint
mind maps
relation maps
structure maps
![Page 7: 05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051820/55393166550346b04c8b4931/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002________________________Mapping type
1. Mind maps-for amassing 'thoughts'-relations only by association
-for rearranging, clustering, prioritizing (software good for this)
Software vs. tangibles
Training
Mapping type
Constraint
mind maps
relation maps
structure maps
![Page 8: 05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051820/55393166550346b04c8b4931/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002________________________Mapping type
2. Relation maps (Novakian maps)-for relating concepts in articulately related pairs-CMC debate going on now about declarative reading or
not (cf. Tifi)
Software vs. tangibles
Training
Mapping type
Constraint
mind maps
relation maps
structure maps
![Page 9: 05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051820/55393166550346b04c8b4931/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002________________________Mapping type
3. Structure maps (e.g. ISmaps)-for representation of syntactic structures at the level of
-sentence-paragraph-short technical summary articles
-not necessarily one unified map-background information may be
-a separate map-a layer (font color, sidebar, etc.)
-persuasion may be 'picture frames' or title bars or submaps
Software vs. tangibles
Training
Mapping type
Constraint
mind maps
relation maps
structure maps
![Page 10: 05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051820/55393166550346b04c8b4931/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002________________________Constraint
1. Architectural constraint- by size- by content
2. Rhetorical constraint-by rhetorical device limitations
3. Relational constraint-by Novakianism
Software vs. tangibles
Training
Mapping type
Constraint
structural
rhetorical
relational
![Page 11: 05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051820/55393166550346b04c8b4931/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002________________________Constraint
1. Architectural constraint- by size- by content
Software vs. tangibles
Training
Mapping type
Constraint
architectural
rhetorical
relational
![Page 12: 05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051820/55393166550346b04c8b4931/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002________________________Constraint
2. Rhetorical constraint-by rhetorical device limitations
Software vs. tangibles
Training
Mapping type
Constraint
architectural
rhetorical
relational
![Page 13: 05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051820/55393166550346b04c8b4931/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002________________________Constraint
3. Relational constraint-by Novakianism
Software vs. tangibles
Training
Mapping type
Constraint
architectural
rhetorical
relational