044 - Spring 1999 · park land). In Fori Worth, it's 20 per thousand. And in Austin, it's 27.St per...

2
a i •» •> t spring 5 C I T E / / N F $ A [ first glance, I louston can seem cnchantingly tush. Alongside the bayous that wend through the city an almost primeval growth flourish- es. The streets of many neighborhoods stretch beneath a canopy ot interlocking tree branches. And oat along the urban edges, expanses ot emerald lawns stretch toward the horizon. But as Houston Parks and Recreation Director Oliver Spcllman |r. knows, this image can be deceptive. Its semi-tropical setting helps hide the fact that in terms ot K Parks and Recreation Director Oliver Spellmon Jr. says Houston can't afford to put off addressing ifs need far green space. counts the surface of some of its lakes as park land). In Fori Worth, it's 20 per thousand. And in Austin, it's 27.St per thousand. The National Recreation and I'ark Association recommends between 21.25 and .*()..5 acres per thousand popu- lation as a good figure to shooi lor, and the Urban Land Institute agrees, recom- mending 25.5 acres ol park land per thousand residents. While I louston has 509 park sites, only 277 of those are developed. And though many of the developed parks have been improved thanks to the Parks to Standard program begun under Mayor Bob Lanier, when the Parks to Standard money runs out in 2002, more than half of those parks will still need some renovation. It was nisi those facts thai Spcllman and Mayor Lee Brown laid out in mid- March at a press conference in Hermann Park, the purpose ol which was ro intro- duce a new master plan lor Houston's parks. The plan, the lirst of its kind to be put together in decades, offers up a num- ber of aggressive notions, Chief among them is to add 68 new parks that would expand 1 louston's urban green space by more than 25 percent. Among those new- parks would be two in excess of 200 acres, one northwest of the city near the intersection ot 1-10 and Beltway S, and tin- other in the far southwest near Mustang Bayou. Hut also included would be ten new pocket parks (parks under an THE GREENING OF HOUSTON BY MITCHHI.I. J. SHIELDS Parks and Recreation Director Oliver Spellman Jr. would like to plant a few seeds, and watch them grow along with the city's building boom. public green space — green space that anyone can use, ami that isn't locked away behind private fences CM restricted to private use — I loustoii lags behind most cities of its size, and quite a lew cities that are smaller. The numbers tell the story: Currently, Houston has 2o.s Y? acres ol park land to serve a population estimated in 1997 at 1.87 million. That breaks down to approximate!) I I acres per thousand people. In Dallas, the figure is closer to 21,3 per thousand (though that number is a bit skewed, since Dallas acre), two new neighborhood parks (one to ten acres), and one new regional park (50 to 200 acres) inside the increasingly built-up boundaries of tile 610 1 nop. Such an increase in public green space could help provide just the sort of urban balance that many have found lacking in the current boom in inner city development. But plans, as Houston has found out more than a few times in the [List, can be easy to come by. What's harder is putting a plan into action. And if this particular plan is to do more than gather dusi in someone's drawer, it will depend greatly on the efforts of Oliver Spcllman Jr. In most CIIV administrations, parks duet tor is nut a particularly high profile posi- tion. Bui when Oliver Spellman arrived in Houston a year ago to take over the Parks and Recreation Department, he found himself thrust immediately into the spotlight. The re.isou w.is the city's youth soccer program, which had taken on a life of its own, becoming the tail that wagged the rest of the Parks and Recreation dog. It was clear that the soccer program had not only grown out of control, but that the attention focused on it and its problems were sap- ping the morale and energy of the rest ol the department. I leaning up a mess was not what Spellnian had hoped to be turning his attention to MI his first weeks of work, bur it was something that his background at least had prepared him for. A native of Baton Rouge, the 4.5-year-old Spellman spent his earliest years running around the open spaces ol 1 ouistana. Then in the tnid-'60s his family relocated to New York City, where he learned that stretches of green were something to be treasured. It was in New York around 1981 that Spellman began his career in parks. The citv was looking to expand its urban ranger program, which is the enforcement division of New York's parks department, and Spellman decided to take his back- ground in criminal law and procedure and give the job a try. Prom enforcement he moved into mainstream park adminis- tration, and eventually became head of all the parks operations in the borough ol Queens. Then in 199.* he received a call from the mayor of Cleveland asking if he'd like to take over the park system there. And in I 948 In- received another call, this one from the newly elected Lee Brown, who wanted to know if Spellman .. o t i l d be lured ti i I louston. It was not the lust time Spellman had heard from a I louston mayor. In l ' i. In had been part ot Bob I anier's search for a new Parks and Recreation director, and though he'd gone ro Ohio instead, Spellman had retained an interest in Houston. "In part, I was attracted by the chance to gel back to a Southern cli- mate," Spellman says. "Cleveland can get pretty cold. But at the same time, I was attracted by Houston's potential. I knew it had some problems, but I also knew ih.it it offered a lot of opportunity. If you're really interested in being a parks director, you look for urban challenges." And among the nation's urban challenges, I louston was near the top of the list. Spellman's lirst priority after arriving in Texas was to get the parks bureaucracy back in working order. As he notes, one

Transcript of 044 - Spring 1999 · park land). In Fori Worth, it's 20 per thousand. And in Austin, it's 27.St per...

Page 1: 044 - Spring 1999 · park land). In Fori Worth, it's 20 per thousand. And in Austin, it's 27.St per thousand. The National Recreation and I'ark Association recommends between 21.2

a i •» •> t spring 5

C I T E / / N F $

A[ first glance, I louston can seem cnchant ing ly tush. Alongside the bayous that wend t h rough the

ci ty an a lmost pr imeva l g r o w t h f lour ish -es. T h e streets o f many ne ighborhoods stretch beneath a canopy ot in te r lock ing tree branches. And oat a long the urban edges, expanses ot emera ld lawns stretch t o w a r d the h o r i z o n .

But as Hous to n Parks and Recreat ion D i rec to r O l i ve r Spcl lman |r. knows , this image can be decept ive. Its semi- t rop ica l sett ing helps hide the fact that in terms ot

K

Parks and Recreation Director Oliver Spellmon Jr. says Houston can't afford to put off addressing ifs need far green space.

counts the surface o f some o f its lakes as park land) . In For i W o r t h , it's 20 per thousand. A n d in Aus t i n , it's 27.St per thousand . The N a t i o n a l Recreat ion and I'ark Associat ion recommends between 21.25 and .*()..5 acres per thousand popu -la t ion as a good f igure to shooi lor, and the Urban Land Inst i tute agrees, recom-mend ing 25.5 acres o l park land per thousand residents.

Wh i l e I l ous ton has 509 park sites, on ly 277 of those are developed. A n d t hough many of the developed parks have been imp roved thanks to the Parks to Standard p rog ra m begun under M a y o r Bob Lanier, when the Parks to Standard money runs out in 2 0 0 2 , more than hal f of those parks w i l l st i l l need some renova t i on .

It was nisi those facts tha i Spcl lman and M a y o r Lee B r o wn la id out in m i d -M a r c h at a press conference in H e r m a n n Park, the purpose o l wh i ch was ro in t ro-duce a new master plan lor Houston 's parks. The p lan , the l irst o f its k i n d to be put together in decades, offers up a num-ber of aggressive no t ions , Chief among them is to add 68 new parks that w o u l d expand 1 louston 's u rban green space by more than 25 percent. A m o n g those new-parks w o u l d be t w o in excess of 200 acres, one nor thwest o f the c i ty near the intersect ion ot 1-10 and Beltway S, and tin- o ther in the far southwest near Mus tang Bayou. Hut also included w o u l d be ten new pocket parks (parks under an

THE GREENING OF HOUSTON BY M I T C H H I . I . J . S H I E L D S

Parks and Recreation Director Oliver Spellman Jr. would like to plant a few seeds, and watch them grow along with the city's building boom.

publ ic green space — green space that anyone can use, ami that isn't locked away behind pr ivate fences CM restricted to pr ivate use — I lousto i i lags behind most cit ies o f its size, and qui te a lew cit ies that are smaller. The numbers tell the story: Cur ren t l y , Hous to n has 2o.s Y? acres o l park land to serve a popu la t i on estimated in 1997 at 1.87 m i l l i o n . Tha t breaks d o w n to approx imate ! ) I I acres per thousand people. In Dal las, the f igure is closer to 21,3 per thousand ( though that number is a bit skewed, since Dal las

acre), t w o new ne ighborhood parks (one to ten acres), and one new regional park (50 to 200 acres) inside the increasingly bu i l t - up boundar ies o f ti le 610 1 nop .

Such an increase in pub l ic green space cou ld help p rov ide just the sort o f u rban balance that many have f o u n d lack ing in the current b o o m in inner city deve lopment . But plans, as H o u s t o n has f o u n d out more than a few t imes in the [List, can be easy to come by. What 's harder is pu t t i ng a plan in to ac t ion . A n d if th is par t i cu la r p lan is to d o more than gather dusi in someone's drawer , it w i l l depend great ly on the ef for ts of O l i ve r Spcl lman Jr.

• In most CIIV admin i s t ra t i ons , parks due t tor is nut a par t i cu la r ly h igh pro f i le posi-t i on . Bui when O l i ve r Spel lman ar r ived

in H o u s t o n a year ago t o take over the Parks and Recreat ion Depa r tmen t , he found h imsel f th rus t immed ia te l y i n t o the spot l ight . The re.isou w.is the ci ty 's you th soccer p r o g r a m , w h i c h had taken o n a l i fe o f its o w n , becoming the ta i l tha t wagged the rest of the Parks and Recreat ion d o g . It was clear that the soccer p rog ram had not on l y g r o w n o u t o f c o n t r o l , but that the a t ten t ion focused on it and its p rob lems were sap-p i n g the mora le and energy o f the rest o l the depar tment .

I leaning up a mess was not w h a t Spel lnian had hoped to be t u r n i n g his a t ten t ion to MI his first weeks o f w o r k , bur it was someth ing that his backg round at least had prepared h im for. A nat ive of Baton Rouge, the 4.5-year-old Spel lman spent his earl iest years runn ing a round the open spaces o l 1 ou is tana. Then in the tn id- '60s his fami ly relocated to N e w York Ci ty , where he learned that stretches of green were someth ing to be treasured.

It was in N e w York a roun d 1981 that Spel lman began his career in parks. The citv was l o o k i ng to expand its u rban ranger p r o g r a m , w h i c h is the enforcement d iv is ion o f New York 's parks depar tment , and Spel lman decided to take his back-g round in c r im ina l law and procedure and give the job a try. Prom enforcement he moved i n to mainst ream park admin is-t r a t i o n , and eventual ly became head of all the parks operat ions in the borough o l Queens. Then in 199.* he received a cal l f r o m the mayo r o f Cleveland ask ing if he'd l i ke to take over the park system there. A n d in I 948 In- received another ca l l , this one f r o m the newly elected Lee B r o w n , w h o wan ted to k n o w if Spel lman .. o t i ld be lured ti i I l ous ton .

It was not the lust t ime Spel lman had heard f r o m a I lous ton mayor. In l ' i . In had been part ot Bob I anier's search fo r a new Parks and Recreat ion director, and though he'd gone ro O h i o instead, Spel lman had retained an interest in H o u s t o n . " I n par t , I was at t racted by the chance to gel back to a Southern c l i -ma te , " Spel lman says. "C leve land can get pret ty c o l d . But at the same time, I was at t racted by Houston 's po ten t ia l . I knew it had some prob lems, but I also knew ih.it it of fered a lot o f oppor tun i t y . If you ' re really interested in being a parks d i rector , you look for u rban chal lenges." A n d a m o n g the nat ion's urban challenges, I lous ton was near the top of the list.

Spellman's l i rst p r io r i t y after a r r i v i ng in Texas was to get the parks bureaucracy back in w o r k i n g order. As he notes, one

Page 2: 044 - Spring 1999 · park land). In Fori Worth, it's 20 per thousand. And in Austin, it's 27.St per thousand. The National Recreation and I'ark Association recommends between 21.2

' p I M M M 1 I I C I T E / I N E S

Parks for Houston PROPOSED NEW PARKS A • • • * -T. »

Pocket Park Neighborhood Park Community Park Regional Park Metro Park Linear Park Expansion of Existing Park

EXISTING PARKS I B • •tv •

City County Slate Spark Site

, ' . / BiopoMri Higrmay,

/ \ / L«jnr> UftM

1 1 City Umll f 1 Xwp*» N*ig«i<*Mu>«d»

bLngtf r.mily X.*«* , '>n. I Hwtl-»*mitv tttkMtafltul

HouMen XT J X mh». r h i i

P.r.» »™j ^IC' l l t ton M H I | > Ct,iL Pi , ( .« . , . , by

Vernon Q- Henry And Aixucialex. rnc RUl,rit*« C i m i u l w l . Anil L . n i * . , , ? . AJCMUCII

A map ol needed parks, as seen in the Houston Paths and Retreation Department's proposed master plan.

th ing lie's learned IN that .i parks depar t -ment is on ly as good .is lis support ser-vices — personnel , purchas ing, ma in tc nance, whatever. "Parks is v iewed as being a leisure ac t i v i t y , " he says. " W e l l , it's a business, one that in I lous ton has a $61 m i l l i on budget. You have to run it w i t h the same a t ten t ion to deta i l tha t you ' d run a f o r t u n e 5011 company . "

Mis second p r io r i t y was lay ing out a p lan ot future ac t i on . Short ly after he set-t led i n , Spel lman began meet ing w i t h the nonpro f i t s that have h is tor ica l ly suppor t -

ed park issues in Hous to n — the Park People, Friends o f I l e rmann I 'ark, the M e m o r i a l I'ark Adv isory Board — and whi le he found a lot of a t tent ion to spe-v i l k di ta i l , I I MM, i i became dea l to h im that there was no th i ng that looked at the parks system as a who le . A n d so w i t h the hack ing of M a y o r b r o w n , Spel lman set ou t to put in place a master p lan.

• In terms of his first p r io r i t y . Spel lman has received considerable praise. A m o n g those w h o w o r k w i t h Parks and

Recreat ion, it's general ly conceded that he has tu rned the depar tment a r o u n d , t ak ing an all b in demora l ized ins t i tu t ion and g iv ing it new energy. I he response to his second pr ior i ty remains t o he seen. There's no deny ing that the master plan unveiled in H e r m a n n Park is admirably comprehensive. Prepared by consu l tant Vernon ( i . Henry , whose connect ion w i t h Hous ton parks includes being one of the rounders of the Park People and tune spent as a park planner tor the c i ty , it lays ou t in a lmost daun t i ng derail just

what parks resources I lous ton now has, and what parks resources it w i l l need i f popu la t ion trends cont inue .

1'he next step is publ ic hearings, and then , perhaps in the f a l l , rak ing the p lan before C i t y Counc i l , but the wors t t h i ng to d o , Spel lman says, w o u l d be to fa i l to push the plan n o w that one is on the table. " A master p lan is really a requi red document for cit ies tha t are serious about their park space," he says. " W i t h i t , we can real ly answer a lot o f quest ions about

I where we shou ld go. W i t h o u t i t , about all g we can do is just try not t o sl ip f r o m j> where we are . "

Recogniz ing that asking fo r money I is a sure way to generate ob ject ions, the !~ plan emphasizes checking the property e inventor ies of o ther c i ty depar tments for - unused land that can he t rans formed in to

parks , l int it doesn't shy away f r o m po in t i ng out that as more and more peo-ple move back to the inner ci ty, and as more and more acres begin to sprout new cons t ruc t ion , n o w is the t ime to bu i ld up park laud lo r the fu ture . If he's learned one t h i ng in his short t ime in I l ous ton , Spel lman notes, he's learned that " t h e price o f land is on ly go ing to go up. So if there is a need tor add i t iona l publ ic green space inside o l I nop M O , and we believe there is, we need an acqu is i t ion system that starts as soon as we can. The pr ice, and the oppo r tun i t y , jusi isn't go ing to gel an) better." •

Art Goes Public I or years, I l ous ton has lagged behind other commun i t i es o f its si/e in its c o m -mi tmen t to pub l ic ar t . but now, thanks to a nod of suppor t f r o m M a y o r Lee B r o wn and the ef forts of a g r o u p of design pro-fessionals and civic leaders, i t appears that the city may be we l l on the was t oward enactment o f an ord inance that w o u l d p rov ide fund ing lor ar t is t i t enhancement ot capi ta l w o r k s projects.

T h o u g h nobody invo lved w i t h the proposed ord inance can say at the moment just when it might be presented to C i t y Counc i l , discussions have been tak ing place over the last few mon ths to try to cratt a proposal d ia l w o u l d game i b road suppor t . The central f igure behind the effort has been Jessica Cus ick , civic art d i rector for the C uh i i ra l Arts ( ounc i l o l Hous ton and Harr is Coun ty ( I \ ( M i l l . W i t h t w o decades o l exper i -ence in publ ic art programs in New l o r k ,

I os Angeles, and I l ous ton , Cusick is a veteran o f po l i t i ca l battles over public-ar t f und ing . N o t surpr is ingly, given 1 h u M o n ' s h i s io r i i reliance on pr ivate s,v to r suppor t fo r the ar ts , Cusick is qu ick to underscore the fact that the ord inance is a w o r k in progress. " G e t t i n g the lan-guage that adequately addresses broader design issues is d i f f i c u l t , " she says. " W e S. I I I ' i | i is i take somebody else's ord inance and apply it here."

The pol i t ica l w i l l to support c i ty fund ing of publ ic art has been a long t ime com ing . In late 1993, Ci ty t ounc i l passed a resolut ion encouraging the incorpora -t i on of publ ic a n i n i o s . i p u . i l wo rks pro-jects, but appropr ia ted no money to make d o i n g so easier. Then du r i ng the last years ot the 1 an icr admin i s t ra t i on , the budget to r C A C I I I I's civic a n and design pro g ram was slashed d u r i n g a b i t ter l ight in w h i c h the city's major pe r fo rm ing arts ins t i tu t ions wrested con t ro l o f much o f the city's arts fund ing .

The elect ion of b r o w n , t hough . brought in a mayor w h o views civic art as a qua l i t y -o f - l i te complement to his no t i on o f "ne ighborhood-o r ien te d gov-e rnmen t . " ( ity ( ounc i l members w h o are expected to marshal the ord inance th rough the process include Amuse Parker and Chr is Hell, the latter the spon-sor o f a f ledgl ing p i lo t project cal led br ight to b l igh t that 's intended to com-bine publ ic .\ifi.\ pr ivate resources to gci i-t r i ty decaying landmarks .

Wh i l e a cents-for-art o rd inance may be new to I l ous ton , the concept is wel l established in most o ther ma jo r cit ies. I he first percent tor-ar t ord inance was

enacted in Phi ladelphia 40 years ago, and coda) m a i n cities earmark I percent o f then capital works budget for the c o m -miss ion, ins ta l la t ion , and maintenance o f w o r k s of c iv ic ar t , a l though some leading pub l ic ar t cities such as M i a m i designate as much as 2 percent. The publ ic a n movement took oft in a b ig way in the

1970s w h e n Sun Belt h o o n i t o w n s , most notab ly Phoenix , d rew artists in to the design ani l cons t ruc t ion of major public w o r k s projects. This propel led publ ic . in hew,I I , I t in standard " t i n beau t i f u l " aspirat ions by ins t i l l ing educat ional value, greater c o m m u n i t y pr ide , or a dose • •I whiniss in to mundane publ i i , projects.

T h e f inancia l scope o l Houston 's p ro posed ord inance is the most fundamenta l del.nl tha i rein.mis to be i roned o u t , t hough the p rog rammat ic scope of the ord inance is also a mat ter of some debate, l o r example , one unanswered quest ion revolves a round whether some funds should be dedicated to the restora l ion o l ex is i ing wo rks of publ ic ar t . But even that quest ion, assuming as it does that publ ic money and publ ic arr go together, paints a p ic ture previously unseen in H o u s t o n . — fint Y\tuk