02 Jazz singer - Film History Final
-
Upload
mahendra-solanki -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of 02 Jazz singer - Film History Final
8/7/2019 02 Jazz singer - Film History Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/02-jazz-singer-film-history-final 1/8
Josh Terwey
Film History Research Paper
FTVF1F11
The Marketing of The Jazz Singer and Blackfaced Posters
Today, we have the luxury of a highly evolved multi-billion dollar movie
marketing industry. Radio, television, billboards, newspapers, and the internet are all
crammed with print or video advertisements for films. No matter if you are an avid film
buff or the average movie-goer, film advertisements influence which movies we decide to
see. Can you imagine going to the cinema, paying your $8.00 and sitting in a dark theater
to watch a film you have seen no advertisements for? Absolutely zero advertisements?
Some people may think they are not influenced by the mass media, but everyone is on
some level. We are all consumers of media, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, whether
consciously or unconsciously. Whether it’s a director, actor, genre, writer, or subject
matter there is always some marketable element of a film that draws audiences to the
cinema. It is now easier than ever to mass market a film not only nationally, but globally.
As opposed to the exclusive print advertisements of early cinema marketing, today
someone in Melbourne Australia can, at the click of a mouse, watch a trailer for an
American film that won’t be released for weeks. With the proliferation in movie
marketing techniques, films have become increasingly globalized, reaching larger and
more diverse audiences. This, therefore, leads to more ticket sales and more profits, all
because of the marketing of films. In the early days of film marketing, there were no
luxuries such at television or internet and, consequently, marketers of early films had
only the printed medium with which to advertise their films. With the growing popularity
8/7/2019 02 Jazz singer - Film History Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/02-jazz-singer-film-history-final 2/8
of films, more and more were being created and released every year. Marketers,
therefore, had to get creative with their print advertisements; they had to focus on specific
aspects of their film, aspects that set it apart from others. Instead of posters with simply
the title of the film on them, popular actors and actresses began appearing on
advertisements. This was the beginning of film marketing. By 1927, however, posters and
other printed mediums were still the only available means with which to market films.
This, of course, was the year the first “talkie” was released, Warner Brothers’ The Jazz
Singer (1927). A landmark film on many different levels, The Jazz Singer is most widely
recognized for introducing synchronized dialogue in film. An achievement of this
magnitude alone would be enough for a marketing campaign. The Jazz Singer ’s
marketing, despite its legacy as the first talkie in history, however, was focused more on
Al Jolson’s blackface minstrelsy than the groundbreaking Vitaphone sound
synchronization process, as represented by the original poster advertisements for the film.
The plot of The Jazz Singer was no surprise to the American public at the time of
its release in early October, 1927. The story of Jack Robin, a young jewish boy from the
lower East side of New York was originally published as a short story entitled “The Day
of Atonement” published in Everybody’s Magazine in January 1922 (Carringer, 12).
Later, the author of “The Day of Atonement”, Samson Raphaelson, sold his short story to
Broadway producer Al Lewis in 1925, and it was then renamed The Jazz Singer
(Carringer, 12). The Broadway production of The Jazz Singer saw a sustained, successful
run of thirty-eight weeks despite relatively negative reviews such as this in September 15,
1925 New York Times review:
“The play is a shrewd and well-planned excursion into the theatre…and assuredly so
written that even the slowest of wits can understand it. The Jazz Singer takes no chances
with its audiences; it strives always to be successful. The distinct discernibility of the
8/7/2019 02 Jazz singer - Film History Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/02-jazz-singer-film-history-final 3/8
effort probably will be an unimportant factor in the play’s career” (Carringer, 13).
A review in the American goes on to describe the stage adaptation of The Jazz Singer as a
“garish and tawdry Hebrew play” and that it is performed with “ludicrous and maudlin
pomposity” (Carringer, 13). Although receiving such negative reviews, the play ran for
thirty-eight weeks, and was a moderate success. The public, most notably the Jewish
community in New York, therefore, had at least an inkling of the story at the heart of The
Jazz Singer . Consequently, film periodicals of the time shifted their focus on the
introduction of the Vitaphone process that was said to be a part of the upcoming film
version of the play. Even before marketing for the film began, the possibility of the
Vitaphone playing a part in The Jazz Singer was the focus of the respected Moving
Picture World magazine. In the May 28, 1927 issue of Moving Picture World , it was
announced that The Jazz Singer would be the “first Vitaphone production to be made by
Warners on the coast” and that this would be the “first motion picture made with
Vitaphone sequences” resulting in “an epoch in motion picture production” (Carringer,
18). Given that the plot and story elements of the play were already published and well
known, Moving Picture World ’s article focused on the fact that The Jazz Singer would be
the first film with full sequences of Vitaphone synchronization, a revolution they saw as
the major attraction for The Jazz Singer . This development, however revolutionary, was
not the focus of the Warner Brothers’ marketing campaign; an error that would never be
made today, given we have the luxury of hindsight. We know today how remarkable this
was, an insight Warner Brothers did not fully appreciate, as represented in their
marketing for the film. Such a development in film history would be a selling point for
any film, regardless of stars, directors or genre. Rather, Warner Brothers decided to
market the film based on Al Jolson’s face--his blackface.
8/7/2019 02 Jazz singer - Film History Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/02-jazz-singer-film-history-final 4/8
In order to accurately analyze the poster advertisements for the film, the act of
blackface itself must first be understood within the context of the Jewish community.
What would be considered extremely racist and offensive today, blackface minstrelsy
was a common method of entertainment in the Vaudevilles of the early twentieth century.
Before appearing in films, the majority of Al Jolson’s stage performances relied on his
blackface routines. Blackface was almost exclusively a Jewish invention, as it has clear
references to the religious history of the Jewish people. These parallels are actually quite
obvious, given that
“The two types of songs that Jolson used most often in his blackface repertoire exemplify
the nostalgia for slavery and exile inherent in Jewish minstrelsy: Mammy and Back-to-
Dixie. In both types, Jewish songwriters of the 1910s and 1920s imagined that African-
American identity was founded on being strangers and in dreaming of home” (Alexander,
135).
Being that The Jazz Singer is the story of a young Jewish cantor from the lower East side
of New York, Warner Brothers decided to market the film using Al Jolson’s blackface
routines on their movie posters. In this original poster advertisement for The Jazz Singer ,
Al Jolson’s face is completely covered in black makeup, effectively masking his whole
face (Dirks, 2). The fact that the star of the film is unrecognizable is completely foreign
to today’s marketing techniques. Star power is the main driving force behind every major
marketing campaign for films today. Moreover, the revolution of the Vitaphone process
is nowhere to be seen on this poster--if a poster essentially masks it’s star’s face, it needs
8/7/2019 02 Jazz singer - Film History Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/02-jazz-singer-film-history-final 5/8
to present something else to draw the
audience to the cinemas. This poster
pitches the film to it’s audience solely
on Al Jolson’s disguised face. In this
second original poster for the film,
Warner Brothers decided to picture
Jolson’s face minus the makeup, but still
included a screenshot of one of his blackface performances (Dirks, 3). Additionally, this
poster, just like the first, neglects to make any mention of the sound synchronization
process. The third poster is much like this second one in that it includes both Jolson’s
face in makeup, and his normal face (Dirks, 1). This fourth poster is the most overt in its
blackface presentation of Jolson (Dirks, 3). The whole poster is black, highlighting only
Jolson’s eyes, mouth, part of his
shirt, and his gloved
hands. In each one of
these four posters,
Warner Brothers
claims that this film is
their
“Supreme Triumph”, yet none of them explain why. It is the synchronized Vitaphone
8/7/2019 02 Jazz singer - Film History Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/02-jazz-singer-film-history-final 6/8
sequences that made this film a triumph, but the marketing makes no light of this
milestone in film history. Lastly, this photo is of the actual premiere of The Jazz Singer at
the Warner Brothers’ own theater in
New York on October 6, 1927
(Schoenherr, 1). As you can see, the
massive, oversized poster for the film
once again only shows Jolson
performing his blackface minstrelsy.
Interestingly, however, this
advertisement actually mentions
Vitaphone, but it only appears at the premiere. Moreover, all the poster mentions is
“Vitaphone”, not how it works, or what sound is synchronized. What made this film
special was that it synchronized dialogue, something not mentioned on this or any other
poster for The Jazz Singer . This major oversight was corrected with Warner Brothers next
Vitaphone “talkie”, The Singing Fool in 1928. An original 1928 poster for The Singing
Fool reads, “Vitaphone Talks” even above Al Jolson’s name and the title of the film
(Gomery, 53). The Singing Fool was so popular “that it would come to stand as US box-
office champion from 1928-1940, when it was replaced by Gone With the Wind ” (1939)
(Gomery, 53). By marketing The Singing Fool as a film with specifically synchronized
Vitaphone dialogue sequences, it became one of Warner Brothers’ most successful films
of all time. This was a marketing method lost on Warner Brothers when advertising for
The Jazz Singer .
The marketing for The Jazz Singer is an excellent example of the evolution of
8/7/2019 02 Jazz singer - Film History Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/02-jazz-singer-film-history-final 7/8
movie marketing techniques on two different levels. First, Warner Brothers saw their
miscalculation by not marketing recorded dialogue with The Jazz Singer and corrected it
with The Singing Fool . Additionally, the obvious racially offensive poster advertisements
for the film would never be shown today. Advertisers today would find other ways to
attract audiences to a given film, namely if there was a revolutionary breakthrough like
the Vitaphone synchronization process first introduced with The Jazz Singer . Today’s
audiences can look back at The Jazz Singer and fully appreciate what it did for film
production and history. At the time, dialogue in film couldn’t be fully appreciated, as the
audiences of 1927 really had nothing to compare synchronized sound to. Indeed, many
people in the film industry at the time were severely opposed to the introduction of
sound, feeling that it would reduce the visual “language” of movies. Film periodicals and
publications, however, saw the revolutionary impact of the Vitaphone process, as is
evident in Moving Picture World ’s article proclaiming that recorded dialogue would
usher in a new “epoch” in filmmaking. On some level, the Warner Brothers had to have
known how revolutionary the Vitaphone was, but still insisted on marketing the film as a
blackfaced Al Jolson performance vehicle. Had they advertised it like they did on their
very next film The Singing Fool , the impact, audiences, and box office take would have
been much, much larger. Although the marketing for The Jazz Singer was less than ideal
for a film that introduced such a revolutionary achievement, the film eventually became
so popular that “The Jazz Singer [is] to the silent mimes in 1927 what Black Tuesday was
to be to the financiers of the Jazz Age in 1929” (Sarris, 31).
8/7/2019 02 Jazz singer - Film History Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/02-jazz-singer-film-history-final 8/8
Work Cited
Alexander, Michael. Jazz Age Jews. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Dirks,
Balio, Tino. The Jazz Singer. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1979.
Dirks, Tim. “The Jazz Singer (1927).” AMC. <http://www.filmsite.org/jazz.html>.
Gomery, Douglas. The Hollywood Studio System: A History. London: British Film
Institute, 2005.
Sarris, Andrew. “You Ain’t Heard Nothin’ Yet. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Schoenherr, Steven. “The Jazz Singer.” University of San Diego.
<http://history.sandiego.edu/gen/filmnotes/jazzsingernotes.html>. September
2005.