Where are we now ?APNIC Technical Workshop

Dec 11 – 13, 2018, Shenzhen, China

Hosted By:

Agenda

• IPv6 End-user Readiness

• IPv6 Performance

• Industry Trends• Observations

IPv4 Exhaustion

http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/ 20181130

3

Global IPv6 End-User Readiness

IPv6 capable = 18.15 (30/11/2018)106.5% increase in last 24 months!

https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/ 20181130

Global IPv6 End-User Readiness

https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/ 20181130

IPv6 Economy League tableCC Economy IPv6 Capable

IN India 53.96%

BE Belgium 53.25%US United States 46.28%DE Germany 34.19%GR Greece 33.21%MY Malaysia 32.26%

FI Finland 30.70%

UY Uruguay 30.57%TW Taiwan 28.63%

CH Switzerland 27.23%BR Brazil 26.75%

LU Luxembourg 24.94%JP Japan 24.88%

GB United Kingdom 24.82%https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/ 20181130

Percentages of total IPv6 user population (2018 ISOC Report)

Percentages of total IPv6 user population in countries with high levels ofdeployment.

https://www.internetsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/2018-ISOC-Report-IPv6-Deployment.pdf

IPv6 Traffic Volume Rank in Operators

http://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/ 20181130

How About Asia?CC Economy IPv6 CapableIN India 53.96%

MY Malaysia 32.26%

TW Taiwan 28.63%

JP Japan 24.88%VN Vietnam 20.67%

TH Thailand 20.07%

LK Sri Lanka 10.38%

SA Saudi Arabia 9.55%

SG Singapore 8.93%

MO Macao SAR 8.82%KR South Korea 7.17%CN China 4.08%

https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/ 20181130

India

India IPv6 Capable: 53.96%

https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/ 20181201

India IPv6 Leaderboard

ASN Organization IPv6 Capable AS55836 Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited 86.01%AS38266 Vodafone Essar Ltd. 47.70%AS45271 IDEA Cellular Limited 37.69%AS45609 Bharti Airtel Ltd. 22.63%AS55441 TTSL-ISP DIVISION 19.64%

https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/ 20181201

Malaysia

Malaysia IPv6 Capable: 32.26%

https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/ 20181201

Malaysia IPv6 LeaderboardASN Organization IPv6 Capable AS4818 DiGi Telecommunications Sdn. Bhd. 51.14%

AS9534 MAXIS-AS1-AP 37.02%

AS4788 TM Net 33.69%

AS10030 Celcom Internet Service Provider 28.75%

AS38322 WEBE Digital 26.14%

AS38466 U Mobile 21.95%

AS9930 TIME dotCom Berhad 8.24%

https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/ 20181201

Malaysia IPv6 Leaderboard (2 years)

AS4818 DiGi 51.14%

AS9534 MAXIS 37.02%

https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/ 20181201

Motivation for Early Market

• Simplify network design

• Commitment to Internet Tech Evolution

• Government Encouragement• Capability to support growth, IoT, Smart Cities, future

services • Reduce load on CGN

• Lower CAPEX

Three-stages of IPv6 Growth• Fast growth driven by single, early

market driver– Incld. Australia, Bhutan, South Korea, Taiwan

• Initial roll-out followed by spread to other Internet Service Providers– Incld. India, New Zealand, Sri Lanka, Thailand,

Viet Nam

Taiwan

• Mature IPv6 market with rich availability from access providers and deployment by providers of Internet services (incld. content, cable TV, cloud)– Incld. Japan, Malaysia, Singapore

India

Malaysia

China

https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/ 20181201

IPv6 Capable: 4.08%

China IPv6 LeaderboardASN Organization IPv6

Capable AS23910 CERNET2 82.58%AS4538 China Education and Research Network Center 32.39%AS132525 CMNET-HEILONGJIANG-CN 26.19%AS4816 CHINANET-IDC-GD China Telecom(Group) 21.40%AS56048 CMNET-BEIJING-AP China Mobile 12.22%AS56044 CMNET-AS-LIANGNING China Mobile 10.01%AS24400 CMNET-V4SHANGHAI-AS-AP 9.69%AS134774 CHINANET-GUANGDONG-SHENZHEN-MAN 9.01%

https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/ 20181201

IPv6 Traffic Volume Rank - China

http://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/ 20181201

IPv6 Performance

• Is IPv6 as robust as IPv4:– Do all TCP connection attempt succeed?

• Connection failure = No ACK for acknowledged SYN

– IPv4 connection failure sits at 0.2%– IPv6 connection failure sits at 1.8%

http://www.potaroo.net/presentations/2016-02-22-ipv6-performance.pdf

IPv6 Performance

• Is IPv6 as fast as IPv4? (IPv6 unicast)– Comparison of RTT (e2e)

• Time since SYN till ACK (factors out any congestion issues)

– IPv6 is faster about half of the time• 36-90ms faster

– IPv6 as fast as IPv4

http://www.potaroo.net/presentations/2016-02-22-ipv6-performance.pdf

IPv6 Performance

• Testing HTTP Traffic

– TechArk Network Operat or Measurement Activity (NOMA) conducted preliminary tests of IPv6 performance for HTTP traffic using RIPE Atlases.

– Found performance of IPv6 is better when measuring to a “near” target

https://blog.apnic.net/2017/09/29/network-operator-perspective-ipv6-performance/

IPv6 in Action: Performance

• IPv6 at LinkedIn

– For some select networks in Europe, LinkedIn is seeing up to 40% performance improvements over IPv6, and in the US, up to 10%.

– TCP timeout on IPv4 over mobile carrier networks is as high as 4.6% and IPv6 timeouts are on a much lower side at 1.6%.

https://blog.apnic.net/2016/05/13/linkedin-ipv6-measurements/

Industry Trend: Content-Top 1000 Websites IPv6

http://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/ 20181201

Industry Trend: Devices Worldwide

Mobiles +50% of all visible devices

Since Oct 2016

Mobile

Desktop

Tablet

http://gs.statcounter.com/platform-market-share/desktop-mobile-tablet/ 20181201

IPv6 Enabled Devices

• Android and Windows Phone support 464XLAT transitiontechnology

• Apple iOS IPv6-only network support since version 9. Reports of Carrier Update for dual-stack since at least iOS 11.3.

• All Apple AppStore apps must include IPv6 support since early 2016

IPv6 Mobile Network and TechnologyCarrier Economy Note

Verizon Wireless USA Deployed dual stack transition technology in 2011

T-Mobile USA Deployed 464XLAT transition technology in 2012

SK Telecom Korea Deployed 464XLAT transition technology in 2014

Telstra Australia Deployed 464XLAT transition technology in 2016

Reliance Jio India Deployed dual stack transition technology in 2016

AIS Thailand Deployed dual stack transition technology in 2016 (Fiber) and 2017 (3G/4G)

Bhutan Telecom Bhutan Deployed dual stack transition technology in 2018 (3G/4G)

Chunghwa Telecom Taiwan Deployed dual stack transition technology in 2018

Questions?