0 Median Growth Percentile CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT Students Morey Middle School.
27
1 Median Growth Percentile CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT Students Morey Middle School 2009 2010 2011 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 36 42 52 46 60 56 Non-GT GT 399 382 386 376 CSAP Math 373 371
-
Upload
rory-maden -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
1
Transcript of 0 Median Growth Percentile CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT Students Morey Middle School.
1
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsMorey Middle School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
3642
5246
6056
Non-GT GT
399 382 386 376
CSAP Math
373 371
2
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsMorey Middle School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
42
51 49
5952
57
Non-GT GT
399 383 386 376
CSAP Reading
371 373
3
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsMorey Middle School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
5046
5056
5964
Non-GT GT
399 383 387 376
CSAP Writing
371 373
4
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsArchuleta Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
56
64
53
72
62
39
Non-GT GT
147 22 29 32
CSAP Math
146 159
5
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsArchuleta Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
50 5055
51
62
43
Non-GT GT
119 22 30 31
CSAP Reading
112 125
6
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsArchuleta Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
52 52 51
6358 58
Non-GT GT
123 22 30 31
CSAP Writing
114 126
7
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsCarson Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
6155
70
81
65 68
Non-GT GT
49 47 53 57
CSAP Math
39 42
8
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsCarson Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
5458
34
6773
Non-GT GT
49
47 53 57
CSAP Reading
38 42
9
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsCarson Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
30
54
6359 58
67
Non-GT GT
49 47 53 57
CSAP Writing
38 42
10
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsCory Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
30
71
52
67
8177
Non-GT GT
50 67 71 56
CSAP Math
50 68
11
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsCory Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
52 52
6466 68
77
Non-GT GT
50 66 71 56
CSAP Reading
50 68
12
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsCory Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
59
69
5763
76 74
Non-GT GT
49 67 71 56
CSAP Writing
50 68
13
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsEdison Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
40
3026
46
68
56
Non-GT GT
97 64 67 82
CSAP Math
86 77
Data slightly differ from data presented on 8/26/11 due to updates in how GT/Non-GT categories were calculated.
14
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsEdison Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
42 43 42
5562 63
Non-GT GT
CSAP Reading
94 65 67 8287 77
Data slightly differ from data presented on 8/26/11 due to updates in how GT/Non-GT categories were calculated.
15
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsEdison Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
4437 39
44
64
72
Non-GT GT
96 65 67 82
CSAP Writing
87 77
Data slightly differ from data presented on 8/26/11 due to updates in how GT/Non-GT categories were calculated.
16
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsGust Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
68
52
6156
77
60
Non-GT GT
91 41 33 44
CSAP Math
86 95
17
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsGust Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
43 45 44
5357 58
Non-GT GT
78 40 29 42
CSAP Reading
72 85
18
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsGust Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
67
4349
61 63
54
Non-GT GT
78 40 29 42
CSAP Writing
74 86
19
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsPolaris at Ebert
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
56 54 54
61 6267
Non-GT GT
19 133 121 122
CSAP Math
23 18
20
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsPolaris at Ebert
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80 76
56
74
65
76
67
Non-GT GT
19 133 121 120
CSAP Reading
23 18
21
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsPolaris at Ebert
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
51
68
48
58 6065
Non-GT GT
19 133 121 121
CSAP Writing
23 18
22
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsSouthmoor Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
57
36
5764 61
32
Non-GT GT
56 72 74 97
CSAP Math
62 58
23
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsSouthmoor Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
57
31
48
5652 54
Non-GT GT
56 73 74 96
CSAP Reading
62 57
24
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsSouthmoor Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
41
49
38
53
66
51
Non-GT GT
56 73 74 97
CSAP Writing
62 58
25
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsTeller Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
41
31 33
56
68
38
Non-GT GT
57 22 28 35
CSAP Math
60 48
26
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsTeller Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
56
46
31
71 70
53
Non-GT GT
57 22 28 35
CSAP Reading
59 48
27
Med
ian
Gro
wth
Perc
en
tile
CSAP MGPs by GT vs. Non-GT StudentsTeller Elementary School
2009 2010 201110
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
51
28
39
76
51 49
Non-GT GT
57 22 28 35
CSAP Writing
60 48
