TQMI 2011 TQMI 2010 TQMI 2011 Sellafield 25 years of quality.

35
TQMI 2011 TQMI 2010 TQMI 2011 Sellafield 25 years of quality

Transcript of TQMI 2011 TQMI 2010 TQMI 2011 Sellafield 25 years of quality.

TQMI 2011 TQMI 2010 TQMI 2011

Sellafield25 years of quality

TQMI 2011

The Car 1986

2

The Car 2011

TQMI 2011

The PC 1986

3

The PC Now

TQMI 2011

The Phone 1986

4

The Phone Now

TQMI 2011

Who were the quality companies in 1986?

• IBM• Rank Zerox• Jaguar• Most Japanese majors• BMW/Mercedes

5

TQMI 2011

Which qualities did they demonstrate in 1986?

• Value for money• Reliability?• Efficiency• Elegance

But that was not the norm - still heavy reliance on inspection

6

TQMI 2011

Who are the quality companies in 2011?

• Grundfos• Ricoh• Siemens Healthcare• Bosch• BMW• GE• Glaxo

7

TQMI 2011

Which qualities do they demonstrate?

• Value for money• Reliability• Efficiency• ElegancePlus• Environmentally friendly• Socially responsible• Engaged with staff, stakeholders and customers

8

TQMI 2011

Which standards applied in1986?

• BS 5750• BS 5882• Generally set our own standards

All Primarily inspection focused

9

TQMI 2011

Which standards apply in 2011?

• BS 9001• GSR3• WANO• INPO

Now comparison is against the best practice

10

TQMI 2011

BNFL in 1986

• Very top down- little involvement of the workforce• Inefficient (cost plus contracts, silo mentality)• BUT world leader - others came to see SIXEP,

Pond 5, Thorp• Quality circles started

11

TQMI 2011

Quality Tools used from 1986

• TPM• TQM• Systematic Approach - Coverdale• Six Sigma• Kaizen• Balanced Scorecard• PDCA• SPC• Brainstorming

12

TQMI 2011

Sellafield Sites in 2011

Have had many quality improvement initiatives• TQM• Self Assessment (Excellence Model)• Fast Forward• Standards and Expectations• Six Sigma• Currently-

• Excellence – ACE Man• Project Peer Assist Events• Standard Nuclear Performance Model -INPO

13

TQMI 2011

Pillars of Excellence

INDIVIDUAL EXCELLENCEINDIVIDUAL EXCELLENCE

SAFETYSAFETY

BEST VALUEBEST VALUE

AAC

CID

EN

T F

RE

EC

CID

EN

T F

RE

E

CCO

NT

RO

L D

OS

EO

NT

RO

L D

OS

E

EEV

EN

T F

RE

EV

EN

T F

RE

E

MME

ET

E

ET

C

OM

MIT

ME

NT

SC

OM

MIT

ME

NT

S

AAT

TE

ND

AN

D

TT

EN

D A

ND

U

SE

TR

AIN

ING

US

E T

RA

ININ

G

NNIL

RE

WO

RK

IL R

EW

OR

K

QUALITYQUALITY SCHEDULESCHEDULE COSTCOST

EXCELLENCE IN EXCELLENCE IN EVERYTHING WE DOEVERYTHING WE DO

INDIVIDUAL EXCELLENCEINDIVIDUAL EXCELLENCE

SAFETYSAFETY

BEST VALUEBEST VALUE

AAC

CID

EN

T F

RE

EC

CID

EN

T F

RE

E

CCO

NT

RO

L D

OS

EO

NT

RO

L D

OS

E

EEV

EN

T F

RE

EV

EN

T F

RE

E

MME

ET

E

ET

C

OM

MIT

ME

NT

SC

OM

MIT

ME

NT

S

AAT

TE

ND

AN

D

TT

EN

D A

ND

U

SE

TR

AIN

ING

US

E T

RA

ININ

G

NNIL

RE

WO

RK

IL R

EW

OR

K

QUALITYQUALITY SCHEDULESCHEDULE COSTCOST

EXCELLENCE IN EXCELLENCE IN EVERYTHING WE DOEVERYTHING WE DO

14

TQMI 2011

Quality Tools used elsewhere

• European Excellence/Baldridge model-holistic approach to quality

• Process management• Employee engagement• Culture Change

15

TQMI 2011 TQMI 2010 TQMI 2011

Main changes in 25 years• Internet,

• Terrorism,• Compliance and regulation,

• H&S• Environmental awareness

•Medical science•Facebook

•Reality TV shows! •Summary-many improvements but.....

TQMI 2011

Chernobyl 1986Fukushima 2011

TQMI 2011

Chernobyl 1986= Fukushima 2011– can never relax

Quality is not the norm and needs continuous attention

Main threat - fluctuations in leadership and direction

18

TQMI 2011 19

Some Drivers of Change?

CUSTOMERS

EMPLOYEES

ENVIRONMENT

COMPETITORS

TECHNOLOGYSOCIETY

GOVERNMENT

REGULATORS

Stakeholders Global Environment

AmbitionMarket / Arena

IMPROVE!!

OWNERS

PARTNERS

GLOBISATION

MARKET TRENDS

NEW ENTRANTS

STRATEGIC THEMES

VISION

19

TQMI 2011 20

Many of the pressures for change have been around for a while...but:

• We are managing in times when change happens ever more quickly

• The degree of uncertainly is increasing – who can really predict the future (a Tsunami in Japan leads to 600 job losses in Cumbria)

• The pressure for change can often be mobilised more quickly – in 4 days the News of the World went from clear market leader for over 40 years to closure

•It is now said that 80% of the value of an organisation are the “intangibles” (e.g. Culture, talent, governance and brand) as these “equip” organisations for future success in this environment.

What has changed?

TQMI 2011 21

• If it isn’t broke don’t fix it.Or:• However good it is today; if it isn’t perfect

for tomorrow we can still try to improve it.

Which Mentality...?

PDCA/Radar Thinking is an essential practice and a habit

Or put another way – it is no longer enough to be a learning

organisation; the need is to look forward, learn and act.

TQMI 2011

The 8 Fundamental Concepts of Excellence

TQMI 2011

The Business Excellence Model

Learning, Creativity and InnovationLearning, Creativity and Innovation

StrategyProcesses, Products & Services

People Results

CustomerResults

Society Results

Key Results

People

Partnerships &Resources

Leadership

TQMI 2011

The Business Excellence Model incorporates all company activities

EDDTalent Man.PDJA-TrainingStrategic Competence Development360° feedbackExit interviews

Shop Floor ExcellenceSales Excellence Process mapsIMSSix SigmaISO 9001, 14001 etc

Employee Motivation Survey360° feedbackFocus Groups

ControllingWorking CapitalGrowthPBTCost to Serve

Ext./Int. Customer SurveySales Excellence SurveyCustomer Compliant SystemWarranty rate

Co2 reductionWaste /SafetyISO 14000

SRMActivity Based CostingSCMIT systems e.g. SAPControlling

EDDTalent managementPDJABE trainingMission, vision, valuesBE-THINK-INNOVATE360 degree feedback

Strategy MapBalanced ScorecardsAction PlansCore competencies

TQMI 2011

Profile of Leaders

Engagement in

Improvement

Analysis of Organisation AA vs. Recession

Savings from Suppliers (4a)

Focus on cost/value (4b)

Reduction in waste (4c)

Focus on Improvement Skills (3b)

Engagement in improvement activities (3c/3d)

Volume

Profitability

Reduced Waste

Potential to Recover (9b)

Keeping Customers

Brand Reputation

Process Improvements (5b)

Waste reduction (5d)

Customer Relations(5e)

Rapid “Planning” and communication of goals (2c/2d)

Visible Leadership

TQMI 2011

The BE Model and RADAR

Enablers – Approaches, Deployed

KEY

RESULTS

PeopleResults

SocietyResults

Results

CustomerResults

Innovation Creativity and Learning

LEADERSHIP

People

Strategy

Partnerships & Resources

P P

AND

S

AssessAnd

Refine

TQMI 2011

Plan anddevelop

Approaches

Assess and RefineApproaches and

Deployment

Determine requiredResults

DeployApproaches

The RADAR Concept

TQMI 2011

Radar/PDCA

An alternative viewof Radar

TQMI 2011 TQMI 2010 TQMI 2011

Excellent Organisations

TQMI 2011

Customs and Tax Office Department Of PsychiatryDentist ConsultancySchool Conference CentreChamber of Commerce HotelBank BreweryRoad Building Dept University

Previous Finalists include a....

TQMI 2011

Excellent Organisations

• The annual EFQM Excellence Award identifies “leaders in Excellence”

• These come from many countries, sectors and backgrounds

• The size and type of organisations varies considerably

• Any common features?

TQMI 2011

Some Characteristics

1. Minimal fire-fighting / recurring problems2. A common understanding and vision3. Constant well managed change4. Engaged people and stakeholders5. An upward flow of ideas6. Efficient and effective use of data7. Innovation is normal8. Pride and the desire that drives further

improvement9. A culture that gives a competitive advantage10. Excellent results (for all stakeholders)

TQMI 2011

The EFQM Model – an Alternative Picture

Results

Value stream, value creation

Key results 9a, 9b

Customer results6a, 6b

Society results8a, 8bResources,

4b, 4c, 4d, 4e Systems/Processes,

Improvements 5a

Partners,Suppliers 4a

People3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 3e

Strategy,Planning, Targets

2a, 2b, 2c, 2d

Vision, Mission, Values

Leadership1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e

People results7a, 7b

Value added targets

Value Adding Processes, 5b, 5c, 5d, 5e

TQMI 2011

Change Management Model

Pressure for Change

A Clear Shared Vision

Capacity for Change

Actionable First Steps

TQMI 2011 TQMI 2010 TQMI 2011

Thank youJohn Carson

TQMI [email protected]