Status of Pending Legislation and Reauthorizations Julia Martin [email protected] Brustein &...
-
Upload
anis-wilkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Status of Pending Legislation and Reauthorizations Julia Martin [email protected] Brustein &...
Status of Pending Legislation and Reauthorizations
Julia [email protected]
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLCFall Forum 2014
Agenda
Review: What has Congress done lately?
Progress on Policy Legislation
New Trends
Outlook for the 114th Congress
2
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
What has Congress Done Lately?
As of end of September, 113th Congress has passed 163 bills
Least of any Congress (112th: 283; 111th: 383) 18 are bills to rename Post Offices or federal
courthouses Includes:
A limited number of appropriations bills A very limited number of non-controversial pieces of
education reauthorization legislation WIA CCDBG (pending) ESRA (pending)
3
What has Congress Done Lately?
Congress scheduled only 15 days of “lame duck” session between elections and end of year/end of 113th Congress
Focus on “must-pass” legislation only i.e. appropriations
4
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Policy Legislation
5
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
6
Fiscal Is
sues
Everything else
Why Isn’t Education a Priority?
Limited opportunities to move legislation Limited time left on legislative calendar High degree of partisanship
High number of “must-act” issues and priorities Constant crisis situation
Significant possibility of primary challenges, electoral turnover Education not a deciding issue for most voters
7
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Why Isn’t Education a Priority?
Bottom line: Congress is focusing on issues where they Can / must take significant action Can / must move quickly Will maximize opportunity to drive positive publicity /
raise money
8
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
WIOA: The Rare Success
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (H.R. 803) passed Congress on July 9th, 2014 Product of “pre-conference” discussion among
bipartisan group of lawmakers “Streamlines” WIA by eliminating some programs
(but maintains major targeted programs) Makes some changes to makeup of State, local
WIBs (to increase role of businesses/employers) Expands scope of AEFLA program Sets new common performance metrics for all
programs
9
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Charter Schools Success and Opportunity through Quality Charter Schools Act (H.R. 10)
Would combine two existing federal programs (Charter School Grant Program and Charter School Credit Enhancement Program)
15% can be reserved by ED for charter school financing 10% can be reserved by ED for “national activities” Priority to States with more open charter laws
Changes to lotteries: Would allow grants to go to schools that use weighted lotteries that
“give slightly better chances for admission to …educationally disadvantaged students” (if permitted by State)
Permits students to go from one charter to another without having to re-enter lottery
Authorizes an additional $50 million annually for the Charter Schools Program (CSP)
Passed House in May 2014 (awaiting action in Senate)
10
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Early Education
Administration plan announced in President’s State of the Union address $77 billion in subsidized universal pre-K for low/middle-
income families over next decade Federal share paid for through increase in tobacco
taxes (maybe) States receive funding for adopting certain
quality standards Including class size, education level and pay of instructors,
State-level inspections and audits, etc. Federal share drops from 90% to 25% over 10-year period
11
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Early Education
Strong Start for America’s Children Act (S. 1697) Focus on universal, voluntary pre-K for low-income three
and four-year-olds Funds would be disbursed based on a state’s share of four-
year olds living at or below 200% of the poverty line Requires set staff qualifications, class size requirements,
salaries, early learning and development standards, longitudinal data systems
No action to date Questions remain about federal role, how to offset cost
12
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
IDEA
No action to date
Focus is on “full funding” of existing federal obligation “Full funding” = 40% of excess cost of educating
students with disabilities Harkin bill would gradually bring up funding levels
to full federal commitment But these initiatives stall because of cost
Unlikely to move before ESEA
13
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
ESEA Reauthorization: Senate
Strengthening America’s Schools Act of 2013 (S. 1094) passed out of Committee on party line vote June 12, 2013 Based largely on waivers, October 2011 ESEA legislation Requires States to adopt standards, assessments,
performance targets Sets “n-size” at 15 students Increased data/reporting requirements (cross-tabulation) Interventions in priority/focus schools Adds personnel expenditures to comparability calculation States must implement teacher/principal evaluations
Committee Chairman Tom Harkin (D-IA) says he hopes to get it to the floor, but prospects still murky
14
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
ESEA Reauthorization: House
15
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Few similarities between bills mean easy conference/ agreement unlikely Consensus: reauthorization will wait until mid- to late 2015 (or later!)
Legislators will start fromscratch in 2015
Impact of ESEA waivers still TBD
ESEA Reauthorization: Overall
16
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Perkins
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act originally due for reauthorization in 2012
Bill introduced in Senate in June 2014 Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) and Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH) Would reauthorize, promote alignment with other programs,
workforce needs
Some information sessions, one “field hearing” by House CTE caucus in October 2014
No significant action to date
17
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Child Care and Development Block Grant
Bipartisan, bicameral “pre-conference committee” drafted new compromise legislation unveiled in September Based largely on Senate bill from March
Compromise bill would: Require States to conduct background checks of employees, including
checking state criminal and sex-offender registries and state-based abuse and neglect registries
Require States to set aside more money to boost program quality (increasing from 4 percent of total now to 9% after 5 years)
Ensure that program staff are trained in basic safety measures like CPR Increase State monitoring and oversight responsibilities Require States to check family eligibility for subsidies no more than once a
year (focus on continuity of child care)
18
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Child Care and Development Block Grant
Compromise bill introduced in House as amendment to Senate legislation in September, passed easily Under “suspension of the rules” procedure
Stalled in Senate by hold on legislation from Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) Toomey wanted Senate to vote on his own K-12 background checks
bill first
Senate leadership filed cloture motion to overcome hold with vote during “lame duck” session
Senate voted 96-1 to overcome hold; bill passed Senate 88-1 on November 17th
19
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
New Trends
20
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
The New Normal Case study bills: WIOA and CCDBG
In both cases, reauthorization of legislation was: relatively uncontroversial modest in scope, requiring no additional funds but had been stalled for years (WIA: 1998, CCDBG:
1996) House and Senate each released text of reauthorization
bills But bills were highly partisan, passed only one chamber
Compromise legislation announced after little-publicized meetings of “pre-conference committees”
21
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
The New Normal
Pre-Conference committees allow bills to bypass normal legislative process Including potential pitfalls of Committee/amendment
Final compromise bills pass with broad bipartisan support after limited debate
Lesson: substantive legislation is now most effectively passed through extra-legislative process
22
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
The New Normal
Pros: Actually moves substantive policy
legislation
Cons: Takes away some avenues for public/
stakeholder/ lawmaker input Only works for “non-controversial”
legislation Only works for legislation without
significant cost increases
23
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
The New Normal
How far can Congress take this? IDEA reform - NO
Focus is on funding, and that makes a bill more contentious ESEA Reauthorization - NO
Depends on building consensus between Democrats, Republicans Will changes be significant/ structural? Will there be changes to funding formula?
HEA - Maybe Depends on consensus, scope of changes
Perkins - Maybe Depends on consensus, scope of changes
24
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Administration Initiatives
25
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
E-Rate
President Obama’s “ConnectED” initiative Supported in FY 2015 budget proposal Accompanied by new financial/in-kind contributions from private
companies
FCC passed resolution in July 2014 to: Add $2 billion (in FCC cash on hand) to program Encourage consortium applications, transparency Re-work formula (based on student population) in two-year field test Focus on wi-fi and phase out other services (voice/paging)
Some room for additional input on funding distribution, consortium-based purchasing
New proposal in November 2014 – will increase E-Rate fees to add 62% more to budget (FCC vote December 11)
26
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Resource Equity Guidance New guidance issued October 1
No new laws/requirements/sanctions
BUT does say OCR review will look at: Equal access to educational opportunities, such as Advanced
Placement courses, gifted and talented programs, college-preparatory programs, and extra-curricular activities;
Equal access to qualified teachers, school leaders, and support staff; Equal access to school facilities, including factors such as
overcrowding, lighting, and accessibility for students with disabilities;
Equal access to technology and instructional materials, such as laptops, internet, calculators, and library books;
Disciplinary policies
27
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Teacher Distribution Equity Suggested additional waiver renewal priority:
Progress toward equity in teacher distribution Pulled when clear States not making progress toward original
priorities
July 2014 announcement said ED would ask all States to file new equity plans by April 2015, would:
Release State equity data Develop new technical assistance system
November 2014: ED delays due date of systems until June 1, 2015 Sends State equity data to EDFacts directors Offers FAQs document (“draft guidance”)
28
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
ESEA Waivers
29
Source: Ed WeekBrustein & Manasevit, PLLC
ESEA Waivers Impact still TBD
give relieve to some districts/States (unless don’t qualify/waiver revoked)
cause conflict with Congress (and States, as compliance issues, high-risk, revocations continue)
promote administration priorities (but Common Core, testing coming under fire)
Let Congress delay work on reauthorization? "Waivers were a temporary fix that we tried to do on a law that was
outdated, that had perverse incentives, that was hurting children and hurting adults. And lawmakers need to step up in a bipartisan way and do their job. Nothing we have done prevents them, prohibits them... That's just absolutely a dishonest excuse and they need to get past their dysfunction.“ (Secretary Duncan to Education Week, Sept. 2014)
30
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
ESEA Waivers
New waiver guidance (issued November 2014) allows extensions until 2017-18 or 2018-19 Well into new presidency
Will likely continue until ESEA reauthorized
ED must navigate space between offering as many waivers as possible, and not wanting to give some special breaks Continue designation of states as high-risk and waiver
revocation But not asking for evidence on success
31
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Outlook for the 114th Congress
32
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Outlook for 114th Policy
With Republican takeover of Senate, more leverage over President
Priorities: Repeal Affordable Care Act (or portions thereof) Reduce federal spending Reform tax code, including Estate Tax Pressure administration on use of Presidential/ executive
authority School choice/ charters
33
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Outlook for 114th
Policy, cont. More immediate debate on:
Immigration ISIS/Syria Homeland security
With possible (but by no means certain) longer-term action on HEA Student loans ESEA
34
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Disclaimer
This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice or a legal service. This presentation does not create a client-lawyer relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC and, therefore, carries none of the protections under the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct. Attendance at this presentation, a later review of any printed or electronic materials, or any follow-up questions or communications arising out of this presentation with any attorney at Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC. You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances.
35
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC