© DiabetesLoopholes3.amazonaws.com/Mentis/TheDiabetesLoophole/dldl/TheDiabetes... · ... just so...

13
1 © DiabetesLoophole.com

Transcript of © DiabetesLoopholes3.amazonaws.com/Mentis/TheDiabetesLoophole/dldl/TheDiabetes... · ... just so...

Page 1: © DiabetesLoopholes3.amazonaws.com/Mentis/TheDiabetesLoophole/dldl/TheDiabetes... · ... just so corporate fat cats can ... type 2 diabetes who were put on a low-carbohydrate diet

1

© DiabetesLoophole.com

Page 2: © DiabetesLoopholes3.amazonaws.com/Mentis/TheDiabetesLoophole/dldl/TheDiabetes... · ... just so corporate fat cats can ... type 2 diabetes who were put on a low-carbohydrate diet

2

© DiabetesLoophole.com

Copyright © 2016 SuccessVantage Pte Ltd

All rights reserved.

Published by Reed Wilson.

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any

form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopied, recorded, scanned, or otherwise, except

as permitted under Canadian copyright law, without the prior written permission of the author.

Notes to the Reader:

While the author and publisher of this book have made reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy

and timeliness of the information contained herein, the author and publisher assume no liability

with respect to losses or damages caused, or alleged to be caused, by any reliance on any

information contained herein and disclaim any and all warranties, expressed or implied, as to the

accuracy or reliability of said information.

The publisher and the author make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or

completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties. The advice and

strategies contained herein may not be suitable for every situation. It is the complete responsibility

of the reader to ensure they are adhering to all local, regional and national laws.

This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the

subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that neither the author nor the publisher is

engaged in rendering professional services. If legal, accounting, medical, psychological, or any other

expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

The words contained in this text which are believed to be trademarked, service marked, or to

otherwise hold proprietary rights have been designated as such by the use of initial capitalization.

Inclusion, exclusion, or definition of a word or term is not intended to affect, or to express judgment

upon the validity of legal status of any proprietary right which may be claimed for a specific word or

term.

The fact that an organization or website is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential

source of further information does not mean that the author or publisher endorses the information

the organization or website may provide or the recommendations it may make. Further, readers

should be aware that the websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between

when this work was written and when it is read.

Individual results may vary.

Page 3: © DiabetesLoopholes3.amazonaws.com/Mentis/TheDiabetesLoophole/dldl/TheDiabetes... · ... just so corporate fat cats can ... type 2 diabetes who were put on a low-carbohydrate diet

3

© DiabetesLoophole.com

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 4

THE CONSPIRACY ............................................................................................... 5

THE COST OF DIABETES ...................................................................................... 7

KILLER DIABETES DRUG: ORINASE ...................................................................... 9

KILLER DIABETES DRUG: REZULIN .................................................................... 11

KILLER DIABETES DRUG: AVANDIA ................................................................... 12

DO YOU REALLY NEED A DIABETES DRUG? ...................................................... 13

Page 4: © DiabetesLoopholes3.amazonaws.com/Mentis/TheDiabetesLoophole/dldl/TheDiabetes... · ... just so corporate fat cats can ... type 2 diabetes who were put on a low-carbohydrate diet

4

© DiabetesLoophole.com

INTRODUCTION

If you’ve been diagnosed with diabetes (or even prediabetes), chances are, your doctor

would have recommended that you start on a drug regimen immediately.

Your doctor might have sold you on the idea that a drug regimen allows you to live a

“normal” life where you won’t ever have to make any compromises, like changing your

lifestyle, or going on a restrictive diet. You won’t ever have to hit the gym, and you can still

eat whatever you want, as long as you’re on the prescribed medication.

What if you were told that there exists a multibillion dollar industry dedicated to making

you a lifetime customer of such drugs?

What if you knew that there’s an entire industry committed to keeping you diabetic instead

of completely curing you, just so corporate fat cats can fleece your hard-earned money on a

regular basis as you cling to the hope of living a normal life, free from the dreaded disease?

Page 5: © DiabetesLoopholes3.amazonaws.com/Mentis/TheDiabetesLoophole/dldl/TheDiabetes... · ... just so corporate fat cats can ... type 2 diabetes who were put on a low-carbohydrate diet

5

© DiabetesLoophole.com

THE CONSPIRACY

Investors, stockbrokers, and fund managers all around the world are cashing in on what

they’re calling the “enormous investment opportunity” in what is really a global epidemic. If

you’ve seen the news lately, you would have noticed how stocks in the healthcare industry

have skyrocketed, thanks to news of healthcare reform.

There’s a perfectly good reason for that:

The Wolves of Wall Street know they’re going to make a killing on the new legislation on

healthcare. Specifically, on the global diabetes epidemic that’s been going on for years now.

If that’s not enough to get you hot under the collar, then you’re in for a rude awakening.

The sad truth is, numerous studies have proven that the most effective way to prevent

prediabetes from progressing to type 2 diabetes (or even reverse it, in the cases of those

already diagnosed with the disease) is through simple diet and lifestyle changes.

For example, back in 2006, a study conducted in Sweden found that obese patients with

type 2 diabetes who were put on a low-carbohydrate diet for 22 months saw remarkable

improvement. They were able to lower their blood sugar levels without being put on a

weight loss regimen, and those who were dependent on insulin ended up cutting their

average daily dosage by half.

Biochemistry professor Richard Feinman, PhD, said,

“Many people are essentially cured of their (type 2) diabetes by low-carbohydrate diets, but

that message is not getting out.”

Indeed, such studies are often ignored because no one has ever championed the cause

enough to bring to light the ugly truth about diabetes and the industry that’s making billions

of dollars from the suffering of diabetics around the world.

Most doctors brush off such results as hogwash, believing that any drug-free solution would

involve some form of restrictive diets or lifestyle change that their patients will never follow

through, so the easiest and “most effective” solution is to “cure” patients through diabetes

drugs.

Page 6: © DiabetesLoopholes3.amazonaws.com/Mentis/TheDiabetesLoophole/dldl/TheDiabetes... · ... just so corporate fat cats can ... type 2 diabetes who were put on a low-carbohydrate diet

6

© DiabetesLoophole.com

In fact, the American Diabetes Association (ADA), an organization that is largely supported

by drug companies and food manufacturers, does not recommend such diets because

according to its spokesman Nathaniel G. Clark, MD, “patients find them too restrictive.”

And it doesn’t help that Big Pharma, the drug companies making billions of dollars in

revenue from the rampant diabetes epidemic, keep trotting out their armies of sales

representatives to promote the latest miracle drugs to US physicians.

It is my hope that by the time you’re done with this book, you’re able to arm yourself with

the knowledge that there is an alternative, drug-free solution for you if you’ve been

diagnosed with diabetes. Check out this free presentation that details a groundbreaking

technique that lowers your blood sugar levels and keeps them in check.

Page 7: © DiabetesLoopholes3.amazonaws.com/Mentis/TheDiabetesLoophole/dldl/TheDiabetes... · ... just so corporate fat cats can ... type 2 diabetes who were put on a low-carbohydrate diet

7

© DiabetesLoophole.com

THE COST OF DIABETES

It should really come as no surprise that Wall Street is clamoring for a piece of the

multibillion dollar diabetes pie. In 2009, the diabetes market in the US alone was worth

$174 billion, with oral drugs making up approximately 39% of the entire market. In fact,

market analysts estimate that the demand for drugs, devices, and monitoring systems for

diabetes will continue to grow, and the market will reach a value of over $55 billion in 2016.

So, what are organizations like the ADA doing to put a stop to this travesty?

Well... nothing, really.

As mentioned earlier, the ADA is largely supported by drug companies and food

manufacturers. They stand to make millions of dollars in revenue just by selling its Seal of

Approval to food manufacturers that sell food products that cause diabetes in the first

place. The New York Times even revealed the minimum cost required to a qualify for the

Seal:

$500,000.

Companies such as Cadbury and Kraft Foods pay millions to the ADA for the privilege of

slapping the organization’s Seal of Approval onto their products, so that you and millions of

others like you will unwittingly purchase foods that actually increase your risk of diabetes…

all because you believed the ADA endorsed such foods as healthy choices.

And we haven’t even talked about the ADA’s connection with Big Pharma.

The ADA has been in bed with Big Pharma since the 1940s. In fact, the organization was

founded with a gift from drug company Eli Lilly, and twice in the past ten years, its Executive

Committee has been headed by former top executives of drug or medical equipment

companies.

And thanks to its cosy relationship with the ADA, Big Pharma is able to sell $15 billion worth

of diabetes drugs every year.

All things considered, should it be any surprise to anyone that the ADA might not have your

best interest in mind?

So, who can you trust, really?

Page 8: © DiabetesLoopholes3.amazonaws.com/Mentis/TheDiabetesLoophole/dldl/TheDiabetes... · ... just so corporate fat cats can ... type 2 diabetes who were put on a low-carbohydrate diet

8

© DiabetesLoophole.com

The government? Not when corporations are pulling the strings. For example, did you know

that in 2009, more than $57,000,000 went into influencing elected representatives to

downplay the harm that would be inflicted on the public’s health from consuming unhealthy

food products? Guess who signed the checks? That’s right; fast food and soda lobbyists.

What about your doctor?

I wouldn’t bet on it, because doctors are in just as deep with Big Pharma. This may come as

a shock to you, but many doctors are largely educated by Big Pharma’s representatives,

particularly when it concerns new drugs that the industry plans to make a killing off of.

What’s even more disturbing is the fact that more than half of residency programs that train

US doctors accept financial support from Big Pharma in the form of payment for meals,

housing, textbooks, and education, as revealed by The New York Times back in February

2010.

Big Pharma’s influence doesn’t just end there. Big Pharma spends $16 billion each year to

influence doctors into recommending the various pharmaceutical products that will line the

pockets of industry fat cats with billions of dollars of profit. And the scary thing is, virtually

every doctor in the system would have had some kind of financial relationship with Big

Pharma at some point in their career.

It wouldn’t be fair to put all the blame on your doctor. Considering Big Pharma has been

there from the start, steering their education toward reliance on drugs for pretty much

every known disease imaginable, the real culprit you should really be mad at is Big Pharma.

Because these drug companies are the ones that have been lying straight to your face.

Page 9: © DiabetesLoopholes3.amazonaws.com/Mentis/TheDiabetesLoophole/dldl/TheDiabetes... · ... just so corporate fat cats can ... type 2 diabetes who were put on a low-carbohydrate diet

9

© DiabetesLoophole.com

KILLER DIABETES DRUG: ORINASE

Introduced by the Upjohn Company back in 1957, Orinase was a sugar-lowering sulfa drug

that was hailed as a new wonder drug that could stop diabetes and even prevent the full

blown onset of the disease in patients who showed no symptoms but had a mild form of it

(i.e. prediabetes).

The sinister truth about Orinase is that the company behind this “wonder drug” was actually

creating its own disease, one that would allow it to sell products to an entirely new market.

Upjohn simply ran with the belief everyone had at the time that lowering blood sugar levels

would also reduce the risk of developing diabetic complications. The company claimed

Orinase could prevent “hidden diabetes” turning into a more severe case of diabetes.

Of course, thanks to doctor recommendations, 800,000 patients in the US ended up being

on Orinase by the end of the 1960s. People hoping to avoid diabetes were taking it on the

assumption that the pill reduced their likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes and diabetic

complications such as heart disease.

Little did they know they were actually killing themselves.

In the largest diabetes study ever conducted, independent researchers discovered that

12.7% of diabetics on Orinase had died of heart disease. This was in comparison to a mere

5% who were given a placebo. The “wonder drug” was actually causing more than TWICE

the heart disease deaths compared to doing nothing!

This was especially troubling when you consider the fact that by comparison, the number of

patients who died despite being on insulin versus the number of people who managed their

condition through diet alone were pretty much the same. That means those who were on

“traditional” diabetes medication (i.e. insulin) were far better off than those on Orinase,

which proved that the “wonder drug” wasn’t as miraculous as Upjohn made it out to be.

The Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) recommended physicians to stop prescribing

sulfonylurea drugs like Orinase to their patients, but the ADA actually rejected the FDA’s

recommendation, stating that it didn’t see the need for anyone to abandon the use of such

drugs.

Page 10: © DiabetesLoopholes3.amazonaws.com/Mentis/TheDiabetesLoophole/dldl/TheDiabetes... · ... just so corporate fat cats can ... type 2 diabetes who were put on a low-carbohydrate diet

10

© DiabetesLoophole.com

This coming from an organization claiming to be looking out for the best interest of

diabetics, despite the resounding evidence against drugs like Orinase!

By 1975, the number of patients on Orinase skyrocketed to a whopping 1.5 million, even

though it was estimated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) that close to 15,000

people were dying from the drug every single year.

The FDA then required manufacturers to include warning labels alerting patients to the

dangers Orinase presented. Yet, the requirement didn’t go into effect until a ridiculous 9

years later, in 1984.

Since its introduction into the market, it’s estimated that “tens of thousands of deaths”

were caused by Orinase and other similar sulfonylureas. Orinase is no longer in production,

but a generic form of the drug is still being prescribed to this day.

Page 11: © DiabetesLoopholes3.amazonaws.com/Mentis/TheDiabetesLoophole/dldl/TheDiabetes... · ... just so corporate fat cats can ... type 2 diabetes who were put on a low-carbohydrate diet

11

© DiabetesLoophole.com

KILLER DIABETES DRUG: REZULIN

Created by Warner-Lambert, Rezulin was to be “the next big thing” in the diabetes market.

It was supposed to help patients reduce their intake of insulin by targeting insulin resistance

in the muscles. In January 1999, the FDA fast-tracked its approval, despite the fact that

every diabetes drug it had ever approved turned out catastrophic.

Sure enough, a few months after Rezulin was introduced to the public, serious problems

came to light.

Dozens who were prescribed the drug ended up being hospitalized with liver problems,

some even fatal. The problem became so severe that Britain decided to ban the drug

completely, but guess what the FDA did back stateside?

That’s right; it simply issued a warning to US physicians, and left it at that.

By March 1999, the number of patients suffering from liver failure attributed to the use of

Rezulin reached 43, with the number of fatalities hitting 28. Even though a high-ranking FDA

official called Rezulin “one of the most dangerous drugs in America,” the drug remained on

the market until March 2000, and only after it was implicated in 391 deaths.

Since its introduction right up till its ban in March 2000, Rezulin made $2 billion in sales for

Warner-Lambert.

Page 12: © DiabetesLoopholes3.amazonaws.com/Mentis/TheDiabetesLoophole/dldl/TheDiabetes... · ... just so corporate fat cats can ... type 2 diabetes who were put on a low-carbohydrate diet

12

© DiabetesLoophole.com

KILLER DIABETES DRUG: AVANDIA

There is a particular drug that’s still on the market today, called Avandia. Introduced by

GlaxoSmithKline, it’s one of the many glucose-lowering drugs that US physicians can choose

to prescribe to patients. Just like Rezulin, Avandia was fast-tracked onto the market, without

conclusive evidence that it was effective or even safe to use, especially when compared to

simple dieting and lifestyle modification.

There was, however, a shocking revelation about Avandia increasing the risk of heart attacks

by 43%, as stated in a prominent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Not only that, but a whopping 64% of patients on the drug are at risk of dying from

cardiovascular complications. This means that patients who aren’t on the drug are TWICE as

likely to avoid a cardiovascular-related death than those on the drug!

Here’s the shocking truth:

GlaxoSmithKline, the company that manufactures Avandia, knew the drug’s fatal “side

effects” all along as far back as 2003, thanks to its own study. Yet the company hid its

findings from the FDA and the public for years. Avandia was still aggressively marketed to

the public despite having caused as many as 83,000 heart attacks, with the company

persuading doctors to recommend the drug to their patients, even going as far as

threatening doctors who dared to publicly speak out against it.

Which should come as no surprise, because right up till the public became aware of its

dangers, Avandia made GlaxoSmithKline more than $3 billion in sales in 2006 alone.

Despite severe restrictions on its sale, Avandia is still being prescribed by doctors even to

this day. If you’re on Avandia and you’re concerned about the various health risks it

presents, you may want to consider the drug-free solution recommended in this free

presentation .

Page 13: © DiabetesLoopholes3.amazonaws.com/Mentis/TheDiabetesLoophole/dldl/TheDiabetes... · ... just so corporate fat cats can ... type 2 diabetes who were put on a low-carbohydrate diet

13

© DiabetesLoophole.com

DO YOU REALLY NEED A DIABETES DRUG?

While glucose-lowering medications may prove effective in lowering your blood sugar levels,

they’re actually short term “band aid” solutions. Such medications only keep your blood

sugar at a certain range, but they don’t get to the root of the problem.

Diabetes is a metabolic disorder affecting more than just your blood sugar. It affects your

organ and hormonal system in the body. Lowering your blood sugar to “acceptable levels” is

akin to mopping up water from a leaky pipe, as opposed to fixing the pipe itself.

There are also hidden, serious dangers to glucose-lowering medications that you may not be

aware of. Because these medications are meant to lower blood sugar quickly, you may end

up triggering hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) episodes, which in itself is extremely

dangerous.

As mentioned earlier, these drugs won’t get to the root of the problem where diabetes is

concerned. They won’t help protect, repair, or regenerate beta cells, which are the very cells

in your pancreas that produce insulin. They won’t reduce the inflammation responsible for

diabetic complications.

While you may need a diabetes drug depending on your situation, there is still one drug-free

solution you can consider with the advice of your physician or healthcare provider.

Click here to check out the free presentation that details a groundbreaking, drug-free

technique that does what no diabetes drug in history has ever done before: completely

eradicate diabetes from the human body.