Firm that is sole seller of product without close substitutes Price Maker not a Price Taker There...
-
Upload
maximillian-terry -
Category
Documents
-
view
249 -
download
2
Transcript of Firm that is sole seller of product without close substitutes Price Maker not a Price Taker There...
CHAPTER 15 MONOPOLY
WHAT IS A MONOPOLY? Firm that is sole seller of product
without close substitutes Price Maker not a Price Taker There are barriers to entry thru:
Monopoly Resources, Gov’t Regulation or Production Process
Will produce when P > MC
MONOPOLY RESOURCES One firm has sole ownership of a key
resource used in production of a good DeBeers is good example with diamonds
GOVERNMENT-CREATED MONOPOLIES Usually created because of use of
patents and copyrights Trade-off is less competition, but
encourages research & development
NATURAL MONOPOLIES A single firm can supply a good/service
to a market at a smaller cost than 2 or more firms could
There are economies of scale, ATC falls as scale becomes larger
HOW MONOPOLIES MAKE PRODUCTION & PRICING DECISIONS
Demand curve for monopolist is downward sloping, not perfectly elastic as in a competitive market
A MONOPOLY’S REVENUE MR is always less than P for monopolist True because of downward shaped D
curve When monopolist increases Q, there is
an output effect (higher Q, increases TR) and a price effect (lower P, decreases TR)
MR can even be negative if price effect is greater than output effect
DEMAND & MR CURVES
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION Also produce where MR = MC just like
competitive markets However for a monopoly:
P > MR = MC So monopolist sets Q where MR = MC
then goes up to Demand curve to set P
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION
MONOPOLY’S PROFIT Profit = (P – ATC) x Q
WELFARE COST OF MONOPOLIES
Does a monopoly maximize total surplus?
To do this, we would need to produce where Demand & MC intersect
DEADWEIGHT LOSS Monopolist produces less than the
socially efficient quantity of output Similar to situation with a tax, but
instead of tax revenue it is profit to the monopolist
MONOPOLY’S PROFIT: SOCIAL COST? Monopoly’s profit gives producers more
surplus than consumers’ surplus, but keeps same total surplus as it would have had
Deadweight loss is created by inefficiently low level of output, not really the higher price
PRICE DISCRIMINATION Selling the same good at different prices
to different customers Ex: Hardback vs. Paperback Novels Strategy for monopolists to increase
profit Requires ability to separate customers
based on their willingness to pay Can raise economic welfare by lowering
DWL, shows up as higher producer surplus
ARBITRAGE Buying a good at a lower price in one
market and reselling it in another market at a higher price
This prevents price discrimination by monopolists
PERFECT PRICE DISCRIMINATION
Monopolist knows exactly each customer’s willingness to pay and can charge each person a different price
In this case, consumer surplus is zero and total surplus equals the firm’s profit – no DWL
EXAMPLES OF PRICE DISCRIMINATION
Movie tickets Airline prices Discount coupons Financial aid Quantity discounts
PUBLIC POLICY1. Antitrust Laws- Sherman Antitrust Act (1890)- Clayton Antitrust Act (1914)• Allows gov’t to prevent mergers that
limit competition, and can break up companies that reduce social welfare
• Can the gov’t effectively judge social benefit vs. social cost?
PUBLIC POLICY2. Regulation- Often regulate prices of natural
monopolies (PUCO)- Where does the gov’t set the price? MC
pricing?• Problem with that is MC < ATC for
monopolist, so this would mean the company loses $
REGULATION Alternatives:1. Subsidize the monopoly: but this
creates need for taxes to pay for it & more DWL
2. Average-cost pricing: like a tax on the good because P no longer = MC
3. MC-pricing also gives no incentive to monopolist to lower costs (unless you let them keep part of cost savings as profit)
PUBLIC POLICY3. Public Ownership- Common in Europe; in U.S., we do this
with Post Office- Problem again is creating incentive to
cut costs
PUBLIC POLICY4. Doing Nothing- All “solutions” to monopolies have their
drawbacks, so many economists prefer doing nothing