© Egon Moesby, Aalborg University Denmark, 2004 International Workshop on Project Organized Problem...

1

© Egon Moesby, Aalborg University Denmark, 2004

Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Implementation of POPBL

- from the administration point of view

Egon Moesby

Director of Studies, Head of Study board Basic Studies of Science and Engineering

Deputy Director of UICEE Problem Based Learning Centre for Engineering Education - UCPBL

Aalborg University, Denmark [email protected]

2


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Who is making the decision?

And how can it be carried out?

3


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Executive Level

Academic Directors

Teachers

Administration and support

A R

adical d

ecision

on

ch

ang

e

Moesby, E. 2004. Submitted paper to World Transactions on Engineering Technology Education (WTE&TE), UICEE, Monash University, Australia, under the title "Reflections on making a change towards Project Oriented and Problem-Based Learning (POPBL)". Expected published in Volume 3, No. 2, December 2004.

4


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Executive Level

Academic Directors

Teachers


A p

rog

ress

ive

imp

lem

enta

tio

n o

f th

e n

ew e

du

cati

on

al m

od

el


5


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

A three-step model of

phases in an implementation

1. The Adoption Phase

2. The Implementation Phase

3. The Institutionalization

6


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

We need to know what we whish to reach when introducing a new

educational model.

We need to have a common understanding of what we are

talking about.

7


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Personal level

System/group level

Institutional level


8


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Personal level

9


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Personal level

• Practice within traditional models.

• Single performance.

• Does not change the examinations.

10


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Personal level

System/group level

11


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

System/group level

• Cause for considering change in the courses and programme objectives.

• Cause for considering change in the organization’s teaching and learning methods.

• Cause for considering change in the organization’s examination methods

• Cause for considering change in the organization’s teaching and learning culture.

• Cause for considering change in the organization itself.

• Cause for considering change in the examination methods and in the objectives.

12


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Personal level

System/group level

Institution level

13


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Institutional level

• The students are cooperative partners in the planning of the education.

• The teaching and learning is contextual and experienced based.

• The teaching and learning is cross-disciplinary (interdisciplinary).

• Students are self directed and partners in their project work.

14


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

• Managerial areas

• Programme areas

• Teaching areas

• Administrational areas

• Public relations areas

• Institution-parents areas, etc

Changes influence many areas:

15


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

How far can “we” actually go then?

16


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Non project

Supporting courses

25 %

Project

Supporting courses

25 %

Project - 50 %

Support to student learning – courses and project

The “Aalborg Model” split between courses and project.

The “Project Unit”

17


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

NPSP PS

P PS NPS

P PS NPS

But the split between courses and project can be different.

18


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Course Project

Personal Level


Personal level

System/group level

Institution level

19


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Course Project

Course Project

Personal Level


Personal level

System/group level

Institution level

20


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

CourseCourse

CourseCourse ProjectProject

Personal Level or System/group Level


Personal level

System/group level

Institution level

21


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Pro

jec

tP

roje

ct

CourseCourse

CourseCourse

CourseCourse

System/group Level


Personal level

System/group level

Institution level

22


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

CourseCourse

CourseCourse

CourseCourseP

roje

ct

Institutional levelMoesby, E. 2004. Submitted paper to World Transactions on Engineering Technology Education (WTE&TE), UICEE, Monash University, Australia, under the title "Reflections on making a change towards Project Oriented and Problem-Based Learning (POPBL)". Expected published in Volume 3, No. 2, December 2004.

Personal level

System/group level

Institution level

23


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

CourseCourse

CourseCourse

CourseCourse

Theme frame

Pro

ject

Institutional level


Personal level

System/group level

Institution level

24


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Elements in a transition plan

25


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k Vision

Action Plan

Definition of criteria of success

Adoption

Communication

(Make it know)

Training programme

Evaluation programme

Implementation

N times in loop

Communicate it

26


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Executive Level

Academic Directors

Teachers


A R

adical d

ecision

on

ch

ang

e


27


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Executive Level

Academic Directors

Teachers


A p

rog

ress

ive

imp

lem

enta

tio

n o

f th

e n

ew e

du

cati

on

al m

od

el


28


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Executives

Academic Directors

Teachers

Supporting Staff

Programme start

Start up seminar

Training programme activity

Working activity

29


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

This was a brief look into how an implementation may look like

seen from an administrative point of view.

So, please! Any questions?

30


Inte

rnat

iona

l Wor

ksho

p on

Pro

ject

Org

aniz

ed P

robl

em B

ased

Lea

rnin

g - P

OPB

L –

Esbj

erg,

Den

mar

k

Thank you very much for your

attention.

Hope to see you again.

© Egon Moesby, Aalborg University Denmark, 2004 International Workshop on Project Organized Problem...

Documents

Transcript of © Egon Moesby, Aalborg University Denmark, 2004 International Workshop on Project Organized Problem...