© Copyright, The Joint Commission 2014 T HE H EALTHCARE E NVIRONMENT John Maurer, SASHE, CHFM, CHSP...
-
Upload
dalton-lumpkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of © Copyright, The Joint Commission 2014 T HE H EALTHCARE E NVIRONMENT John Maurer, SASHE, CHFM, CHSP...
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
2014
THE HEALTHCARE ENVIRONMENT
John Maurer, SASHE, CHFM, CHSP
Engineering Department
The Joint Commission
Department of Engineering 2014 - 2
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
RISK ICON
Integrated into the Manuals, E-dition, AMP, & FSA Tool All products will display a single icon at the EP level
for three risk-focused categories:1. National Patient Safety Goals2. Accreditation program-specific risk area standards3. Selected direct/indirect impact standards
In addition, the FSA Tool will use the R icon to identify the fourth risk category:
4. RFI standards from current cycle survey events.
Risk• Proximity to patient• Probability of harm• Severity of harm• Number of patients at risk
Department of Engineering 2014 - 3
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
Standard/NPSG 2012 Non Compliance 2013 Non Compliance
LS.02.01.20 61% 52%
RC.01.01.01 51% 52%
LS.02.01.10 46% 48%
EC.02.05.01 34% 47%
IC.02.02.01 42% 46%
LS.02.01.30 39% 45%
EC.02.03.05 40% 45%
EC.02.06.01 35% 39%
LS.02.01.35 34% 36%
MM.03.01.01 35% 35%
Department of Engineering 2014 - 4
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
Standard/NPSG 2012 Non Compliance 2013 Non Compliance
EC.02.02.01 30% 34%
PC.01.03.01 25% 27%
EC.02.05.07 23% 23%
MM.04.01.01 26% 22%
EC.02.05.09 23% 21%
PC.03.01.03 19% 20%
LD.01.03.01 17% 19%
EC.02.03.01 19% 19%
HR.01.02.05 16% 19%
PC.02.01.03 25% 18%
Department of Engineering 2014 - 5
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
TOP 10 CITED STANDARDS: 2011 - 2013
Standard 2011 2012 2013
LS.02.01.20: Means of Egress #2 #2 #1
LS.02.01.10: General Bldg Req’s #3 #3 #3
EC.02.05.01: Utility Systems Risks #13 #10 #4
LS.02.01.30: Protection #4 #6 #6
EC.02.03.05: Fire Safety Systems #5 #5 #7
EC.02.06.01: Built Environment #11 #7 #8
LS.02.01.35: Extinguishment #10 #9 #9
Department of Engineering 2014 - 6
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#1 LS.02.01.20 EP 13
The hospital maintains the integrity of the means of egress
Anything in the egress corridor more than 30 minutes is storage
Dead end corridors may be used for storage Less than or equal to 50sqft space
Carts Allowed:Crash Carts Isolation CartsChemo Carts
Department of Engineering 2014 - 7
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
“IF THE CORRIDOR LOOKS CLUTTERED…IT PROBABLY IS”
Educate StaffWhat is the Risk?
Patient movement Staff movement Additional Staff responding to emergency
patient care
Department of Engineering 2014 - 8
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#3 LS.02.01.10 EP 5 – 7 & 9
Building and fire protection features are designed and maintained to minimize the effects of fire, smoke, and heat.EPs 5 – 7 Door issuesEP 9 Fire Barrier Penetrations
Barrier Management
Department of Engineering 2014 - 9
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
BARRIER MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM . . .at no cost to the attendee . . .
Department of Engineering 2014 - 10
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
BARRIER MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM Program Developers:
Joint CommissionFirestop Contractors International AssociationUnderwriters Laboratories
Participating Organizations:American Society for Healthcare Engineering AWCI & Gypsum InstituteFire Damper IndustryFire Rated Glazing IndustryNational Concrete Masonry Association
Department of Engineering 2014 - 11
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#4 EC.02.05.01 EP 6
Ventilation system is unable to provide appropriate pressure relationships, air-exchange rates and filtration efficiencies Specific areas lack
negative or positive pressures in relationship to adjacent areas • i.e. Endoscopy Processing Room should be
negative to the egress corridor the correct number of air changes per hour Improper filtration
• MERV = minimum efficiency reporting value
Department of Engineering 2014 - 12
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
WHAT IS VENTILATION? Ventilation is moving air from one location to another Supply Air
Outside air is conditioned by cooling or heating as the air moves through a series of coils To save energy in some systems the returned air
is blended with outside air Next the air is cleaned by filters and discharged into
the occupied space As the air moves through the building in ducts, the
ducts pass through barriers (walls) To protect the barrier dampers are in place
Department of Engineering 2014 - 13
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
VENTILATION
Exhaust SystemRemoving the air from an occupied space
is accomplished by the exhaust systemExhausted air is either removed from the
building or re-conditioned and re-usedAs air is removed, it is replaced by supply
air This is how air exchanges occur New air in, old air out
Department of Engineering 2014 - 14
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
VENTILATION
Based on how much air is exhausted and how much air is supplied, the area is either negative, neutral or positiveMore air out, negative pressureSame air in and out, neutral More air in, positive pressure
Normally the cleanest location should be more positive, and the least clean the most negative
Department of Engineering 2014 - 15
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
SCREENING Tissue test: only to be used as a pre-screening tool to
evaluate if further investigation needs to occur To perform the flutter test take a tissue and let it hang
just off the floor near the bottom edge of a door If the tissue indicates incorrect air flow, stabilize the area
by closing doors and windows, wait a few minutes and re-test
If the organization presents a Testing & Balancing report the following questions should be asked
• when was the balancing done (seasonal issues) • are any specific requirements (such as keeping a
door closed) needed to achieve satisfactory results
Department of Engineering 2014 - 16
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
SURVEY PROCESS EC.02.05.01 EP 6 will generate a CLD
If the organization can repair the process that led to non-compliance the LSCS may review
Following LSCS review, the LSCS may contact the Central Office to discuss the possibility of reducing the CLD to SLD, with no change to the finding
Resolution should include the area affected by the equipment identified as non-compliant, not just the identified room/area i.e. ensure zone is balanced Is there an ongoing process to assess
Department of Engineering 2014 - 17
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
HLD SELF CONTAINED UNITS (I.E. GUS) High Level Disinfection (HLD) for semi critical devices are found in
and outside the Central Sterile areas Gluteraldehyde User Stations (GUS) disinfection soak stations, or
similar self contained HLD units such as those using 0.55% ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA)
The Joint Commission will focus on the processes and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Many of the chemical disinfectants are potentially toxic and may
require adequate precautions, including face/eye shields and gloves
Ventilation Requirements: None. Rooms must meet specific room requirements, however
Storage: in a manner that will protect from contamination or damage, such as hanging in a cabinet with doors
Department of Engineering 2014 - 18
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
IMPORTANT NOTE
ASHRAE voted in July 2013 to move endoscopy procedure rooms from positive to N/A, in Addendum W.
Therefore, if an organization had made a documented decision based on risk assessment to no longer monitor endoscopy procedure rooms as per the 2013 ASHRAE action, we would accept this.
If the organization has not made a documented decision, the room should be evaluated as per the below table and construction date.
No change to bronchoscopy procedure rooms.
Department of Engineering 2014 - 19
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
GUIDELINES VENTILATION TABLE: ENDOSCOPY & BRONCHOSCOPY
ENDOSCOPY BRONCHOSCOPY
EditionPROCEDURE PROCESSING (CLEANING) PROCEDURE
PRESSURE DIRECT EXHAUST PRESSURE DIRECT EXHAUST PRESSURE DIRECT
EXHAUST
2014 (pending) N/A N/A Negative (-) YES Negative (-) YES
2010 Positive (+) N/A Negative (-) YES Negative (-) YES
2006 Neutral N/A Negative (-) YES Negative (-) YES
2001 Negative (-) N/A N/A N/A Negative (-) YES
1996/97 N/A N/A N/A N/A Negative (-) YES
1992/93 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
1987 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
1979 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Department of Engineering 2014 - 20
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#6 LS.02.01.30
The hospital provides and maintains building features to protect individuals from the hazards of fire and smoke.EP2 Hazardous Areas
Primarily door issuesEPs 16 – 23 Smoke Barriers &
Doors
Department of Engineering 2014 - 21
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#7 EC.02.03.05
The hospital maintains fire safety equipment and fire safety building features.Features of fire protection
Inventory required to ensure all devices are tested
Documentation of testing is required
Department of Engineering 2014 - 22
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
NEED FOR INVENTORY EC.02.03.05 EP 1 – 20:
Each device that is required to be tested must be documented in an inventory If x devices were tested last year, and x-1 were tested
this year, which device was missed?• Each device must be on the inventory to identify
which device was missed• Total number of devices (quantity) is not adequate
Lack of an inventory (written, electronic or other) results in a finding at the EP Findings solely for lack of inventory is not scored at
EC.02.03.05 EP 25
Department of Engineering 2014 - 23
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.03.05EPs 1 -20: Missing documentation: score the EP as non-
compliant Also write a finding at EP 25 for documentation
not being readily available to the AHJ• If acceptable documentation appears, finding
at EP 1 – 20 might be removed during survey• EP 25 remains
LD.04.01.05 EP 4: Staff held accountable If 3 or more findings at EC.02.03.05 EP 1 – 20
Department of Engineering 2014 - 24
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.03.05
During survey specific documentation is reviewed
If the documentation for a specific EP is not available a finding is written as non-compliant for that EPThe documentation should be readily available
If the organization clarifies after survey:Joint Commission Engineers will review and
evaluate complianceLD.04.01.05 EP 4 remains
Department of Engineering 2014 - 25
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#8 EC.02.06.01 EP 1 & 13
EP 1 Interior spaces meet the needs of the patient population and are safe and suitable to the care, treatment and services providedThe organization must provide a safe
environment Unsecured oxygen cylinders Outdoor safety is scored at
EC.02.01.01 EP 5
Department of Engineering 2014 - 26
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.06.01 EP 13 EP 13 The organization maintains ventilation,
temperature and humidity levels suitable for the care, treatment and services provided
Ventilation: • i.e. doors held open by air pressure; odors
Temperature: • Hot / Cold calls
Humidity• Primary concern is for areas >60%RH
− Mold growth is possible EP 20: Patient care areas are clean and free of offensive
odors
Department of Engineering 2014 - 27
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#9 LS.02.01.35 EP 6
EP 9: There are 18” or more of open space maintained below the sprinkler deflector to the top of storage.
NOTE: Perimeter wall and stack shelving may NFPA 13-1999, 5-6.6
Department of Engineering 2014 - 28
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
18” RULE
18”18”
OK OK OKWrong
Wall Wall
Ceiling
Perimeter Shelving Perimeter
Shelving
Department of Engineering 2014 - 29
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#11 EC.02.02.01 EP 3 – 5
EP’s 3 – 5: Personal Protective Equipment and the process to manage hazardous materials and waste handling and exposures
EP’s 6 – 7: Hazardous energy sourcesEscorts to Hot Lab based on organization
policy Perspectives, July 2012
Department of Engineering 2014 - 30
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EYE WASH STATION FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS: OSHA
Score Eye Wash issues at EC.02.02.01 EP 5 Risk assess location / application based on OSHA recommendation to
reduce the risk of injury from contact with caustic and corrosive materials in areas such as Power Plant Lab
Placed so that the eyewash is within 10 seconds or 55 feet from where the corrosive chemicals is used
Weekly flush until clear is required Annual inspection to ensure the system is fully functional Mixing valve recommended to achieve tepid
Risk assess potential exposure to determine if cold water only would be acceptable
Department of Engineering 2014 - 31
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EYE WASH STATION: RECOMMENDED LOCATIONS (I.E. OSHA)
Medical services and first aid 1910.151(c) The eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive
materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body shall be provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.
Formaldehyde 1910.1048(i)(3) If there is any possibility that an employee's eyes may be splashed with
solutions containing 0.1 percent or greater formaldehyde, the employer shall provide acceptable eyewash facilities within the immediate work area for emergency use.
Battery charging and changing 1917.157(i) Facilities for flushing the eyes, body and work area with water shall be
provided wherever electrolyte is handled, except that this requirement does not apply when employees are only checking battery electrolyte levels or adding water.
Department of Engineering 2014 - 32
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
Department of Engineering 2014 - 33
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#13 EC.02.05.07 EP 6
EPs 4 – 7 Missed Generator & Automatic Transfer
Switch (ATS) Tests12 times per year between 20 & 40 days
Each emergency generator must be tested with a load of at least 30% of nameplate
Each ATS must be tested Missed triennial 4 hour test
Department of Engineering 2014 - 34
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#15 EC.02.05.09 EP 3
Medical Gas SystemsEP 1: Inspection Testing and MaintainingEP 2: Test when modified, installed or repaired EP 3: ObstructionsEP 3: Labeling
Contents of piping Areas served
• Accuracy
Department of Engineering 2014 - 35
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
# 18 EC.02.03.01 EP 1 & 9 – 10
Fire Safety (EP 1) Open junction boxesMore than 300cuft of nonflammable medical
gases (i.e. oxygen) per smoke compartment, open to the egress corridor
Fire Plan (EP 9 & 10)Lack of fire safety training as per fire plan
Surgical site fires
Department of Engineering 2014 - 36
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
CMS ISSUE
January 2011 the Joint Commission adopted the 2010 FGI Guidelines for Design & Construction of Health Care Facilities Included in the Guidelines is the ASHRAE 170-
2008 document with >20% RH lower limit April 2013 CMS Issued S&C-13-25-LSC & ASC
which is “a categorical LSC waiver permitting new and existing ventilation systems to operate with a RH of >20 percent, instead of >35 percent…”
Department of Engineering 2014 - 37
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
RH 20 – 60% RANGE CMS first issued a Categorical Waiver in S&C 13-25-LSC &
ASC to align with the 2010 FGI Guidelines for Design & Construction of Health Care Facilities use of ASHRAE 170-2008 Reduced the relative humidity (RH) in certain areas to a
range of 20 – 60% This 2013 CMS action matched the Joint Commission’s
1/2011 adoption of the 2010 Guidelines and the 20 – 60% RH range provided
The S&C had two criteria1. Document the decision 2. Declare at the beginning of a survey the decision
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
2012 LIFE SAFETY CODEUPDATE
THE FOLLOWING ARE AVAILABLE WITH CERTAIN PROVISIONS.
THESE ARE BASED ON CMS S&C 13-58-LSC
Department of Engineering 2014 - 39
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
BACKGROUND
The Joint Commission provided CMS with a list of items, based on later editions of the Life Safety Code, that would immediately have a positive impact on all healthcare
CMS acted on the Joint Commission recommendation in the form of a State & Certification letter (S&C 13-58-LSC)The action is a series of Categorical Waivers
Department of Engineering 2014 - 40
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
PROCESS
If the organization decides to adopt these categorical waivers they must1. Ensure full compliance with the appropriate code reference2. Document the decision to adopt the categorical waiver
For Life Safety Code items annotate the “Additional Comments” Section in the Statement of Conditions™ Basic Building Information (BBI)
For Environment of Care items document by Minutes in discussion at the Environment of Care Committee (or equivalent)
3. Declare the decision at the beginning of any survey See also November 2013 Perspectives
Department of Engineering 2014 - 41
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
S&C 13-58-LSC
1. Openings in exit enclosures2. Emergency generators and standby power systems3. Doors, locking arrangements4. Suites5. Extinguishing requirements6. Clean waste and patient record recycling containers7. Medical gas alarmsPlus four: see S&C 12-21-LSC8. Wheeled equipment in egress corridors9. One alternative kitchen cooking arrangement10. Direct vent gas fireplaces and solid fuel-burning fireplaces11. Combustible decorations on walls, doors, and ceilings
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
2014
THE HEALTHCARE ENVIRONMENT
UPDATE, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1
Department of Engineering 2014 - 43
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
TIME RE-DEFINEDThe Joint Commission EC chapter defines time as:
Daily, weekly, monthly are calendar references Quarterly will be once every three months +/- 10 days
January 1, 2014 Semi-annual is 6 months from the last scheduled event
month +/- 20 days Annual is 12 months from the last scheduled event
month +/- 30 days 3 years is 36 months from the last scheduled event
month +/- 45 daysNOTE 1: The above does not apply to required frequenciesNOTE 2: An alternative of developing either a unique, written policy or adopting
NFPA definitions when available is acceptable
Department of Engineering 2014 - 44
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
QUARTERLY: +/- 10 DAYSSEMIANNUAL: +/- 20 DAYS
ANNUAL: +/- 30 DAYSDue Date
Due Date
Scheduled Month
Scheduled Month20 202020
30 303030
July Sept OctAug NovJune Dec
Jan F M A J J O N
Semiannual
Annual
+ +
JanM A S D
Frequencies required by Code may not be modified (e.g. EC.02.05.07 EP 4 & 7)
10 10 10 10
Jan February March AprQuarterly
Department of Engineering 2014 - 45
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
Score EC.02.03.01 EP 1 …fire risk12 ‘E’ cylinders (<300ft³) per smoke compartment (22,500ft²) may be
open to the egress corridor in a rack or appropriate holdersBetween 300 and 3000ft³ must be stored in a room that is limited
construction with doors that can be locked “In use” verses “in storage”
Properly secured to a gurney is considered “in use” Properly racked is “in storage” Empty are NOT considered part of the 12 in storage Empty and full must be stored (racked) separately
MEDICAL GAS SAFETY
Department of Engineering 2014 - 46
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
Score EC.02.06.01 …unsafe condition Unsecured cylinders
Laying on top a gurney mattress; leaning against the wall Free standing Comingling of full and empty cylinders
Transfilling liquid oxygen Transfer of any gases from one cylinder to another in patient care areas
of health care facilities is prohibited. Transfilling of liquid oxygen only in an area that is:
• mechanically ventilated• sprinklered• ceramic or concrete flooring• separated with at least 1 hour construction from any patient care
areas
MEDICAL GAS SAFETY
Department of Engineering 2014 - 47
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
MEDICAL GAS SAFETY
5 Key Steps to ensuring Medical Gas Safety Make sure all medical gas cylinders are always
secured. Make sure full and partial or empty cylinders are
physically separated to prevent staff confusion when retrieving a cylinder during an emergency.
Consider any open cylinders as “empty” and keep these cylinders physically separated from full cylinders.
Monitor and manage the amount of nonflammable medical gases stored in patient care areas
Make sure all repairs are completed by qualified staff.
Department of Engineering 2014 - 48
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
MEDICAL GAS SAFETY
Minimizing fire risk NFPA 99-2005 Section 9.4.3 (see also CMS S&C-07-10)
allows up to 300 cubic feet of nonflammable medical gas in cylinders to be available to an egress corridor. One e-cylinder holds approximately 25 cubic feet
A full E cylinder with a malfunctioning valve could create an oxygen enriched environment, resulting in a potential fire risk. Adding additional full gas cylinders to the area may present even a greater fire risk, so organizations must comply with the limit of 12 E cylinders open to the means of egress.
See also December 2012 Perspectives
Department of Engineering 2014 - 49
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
Department of Engineering 2014 - 50
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
THE ALARMING PROBLEM
More and more devices and alarms More patients connected to alarms or
alarm-based devices 150-400+ alarms per patient per day in a
typical critical care unit Alarm-based devices are not standardized
in many organizations Inconsistent use of alarms due to flexible
alarm setting features
Department of Engineering 2014 - 51
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
Department of Engineering 2014 - 52
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
Department of Engineering 2014 - 53
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
Department of Engineering 2014 - 54
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
onNATIONAL PATIENT SAFETY GOAL
Department of Engineering 2014 - 55
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
NPSG ON ALARM MGMT
In Phase I (beginning January 2014) Hospitals will be required to:
establish alarms as an organization priority and identify the most important alarms to manage based on
their own internal situations. Input from medical staff and clinical depts Risk to patients due to lack of response, malfunction Are specific alarms needed or contributing to
noise/fatigue Potential for patient harm based on internal incident
history Published best practices/guidelines
Department of Engineering 2014 - 56
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
NPSG ON ALARM MGMT
In Phase II (beginning January 2016) Hospitals will be expected to:
develop and implement specific components of policies and procedures that address at minimum: Clinically appropriate settings When they can be disabled When parameters can be changed Who can set and who can change parameters and who
can set to “off” Monitoring and response expectations Checking individual alarm signals for accurate settings,
proper operation and detectability educate those in the organization about alarm system
management for which they are responsible
Department of Engineering 2014 - 57
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
onRESOURCES
Department of Engineering 2014 - 58
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
Department of Engineering 2014 - 59
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
OTHER RESOURCES
AAMI website page on Clinical Alarms: http://www.aami.org/htsi/alarms/index.html
ECRI website page on Alarm Management resources: https://www.ecri.org/Forms/Pages/Alarm_Safety_Resource.aspx
Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority: http://patientsafetyauthority.org/ADVISORIES/AdvisoryLibrary/2011/sep8(3)/Pages/105.aspx (physiologic alarm management)
Healthcare Technology Foundation: http://thehtf.org/clinical.asp (national clinical alarm survey)
Department of Engineering 2014 - 60
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT
Address leadership accountability for hospitals and critical access hospitals
Found in EM and LD, effective January 2014:LD.04.01.05EM 03.01.01EM.03.01.03LD.04.04.01
See the July 2013 Perspectives
Department of Engineering 2014 - 61
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT Require the organization to identify a leader to
oversee emergency management Require the organization to consider input from
staff at different levels when evaluating exercises and responses to events
Require senior hospital leaders to review EM planning activities, performance in exercises, and responses to actual events to facilitate improved communication of problem areas and implementation of hospitalwide solutions
Department of Engineering 2014 - 62
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
LD.04.01.05 EP 12
Someone accountableStaff implementation of the four phases of EMStaff implementation across the six critical
areasOrganization-wide collaboration Identification and collaboration with
community
Note: Addresses matters that are not part of incident commander role
Department of Engineering 2014 - 63
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EM.03.01.01 EP 4
Evaluating effectiveness of planning
EP 4: The annual emergency management planning reviews are forwarded to senior hospital leadership for review Note: Senior hospital leadership refers to those
leaders with responsibility for organization-wide strategic planning and budgets (vice presidents and officers). The hospital may determine that all senior hospital leaders participate in reviewing emergency management reviews, or it may designate specific senior hospital leaders to review this information.
Department of Engineering 2014 - 64
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EM.03.01.03 EP 13: EVALUATION
Organization evaluates effectiveness of EOPEvaluate through a multidisciplinary process Includes relevant input from ALL levels of staff
affected
Department of Engineering 2014 - 65
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EM.03.01.03 - EVALUATION
Organization evaluates effectiveness of EOP Evaluation of exercises and events to include
deficiencies and opportunities for improvement Deficiencies and opportunities for improvement are
communicated to the improvement team responsible for monitoring environment of care issues and to senior hospital leadership.
(See also EC.04.01.03, EP 1; EC.04.01.05, EP 3; LD.04.04.01, EP 25) Modifications to EOP based on evaluations Future exercises/events reflect changes made and/or
interim measures found in modified EOP
Department of Engineering 2014 - 66
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
LD.04.04.01 EP 25
Senior hospital leadership directs implementation of selected hospital-wide improvements in emergency management based on the following: Review of the annual emergency management planning reviews (See
also EM.03.01.01, EP 4) Review of the evaluations of all emergency response exercises and all
responses to actual emergencies (See also EM.03.01.03, EP 15) Determination of which emergency management improvements will
be prioritized for implementation, recognizing that some emergency management improvements might be a lower priority and not taken up in the near term.
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
2014
THE HEALTHCARE ENVIRONMENT
UPDATE EFFECTIVE JULY 1
Department of Engineering 2014 - 68
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.03.03 EP 3
When quarterly fire drills are required, at least 50% are unannounced. Fire drills are held at unexpected times and under varying conditions.
Added: “Fire drills are held at unexpected times and under varying conditions.”
Department of Engineering 2014 - 69
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.03.03 EP 4
Staff who work in buildings where patients are housed or treated participate in drills according to the hospital’s fire response plan.
Note: When drills are conducted between 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., the hospital may use
alternative methods to notify staff instead of activating audible alarms.
Replaced “building’s fire alarm system.”
Department of Engineering 2014 - 70
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
CMS ISSUE
Joint Commission met with CMS and discussed manufacturers’ recommendations, Life Safety Code adoption and other issuesCMS has indicated that The Joint Commission may
continue to use their current process for equipment and utilities management State agents will not be so instructed
ASHE & AAMI met with CMS to continue to discuss the concerns related to equipment management Responded by clarifying several issues
Department of Engineering 2014 - 71
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
S&C 14-07-HOSPITAL
S&C 12-07-Hospital Superceded A hospital may adjust its maintenance, inspection, and testing
frequency and activities for facility and medical equipment from what is recommended by the manufacturer, based on a risk-based assessment by qualified personnel, unless: Other Federal or state law; or hospital Conditions of
Participation (CoPs) require adherence to manufacturer’s recommendations and/or set specific requirements. • For example, all imaging/radiologic equipment must be
maintained per manufacturer’s recommendations; or The equipment is a medical laser device; or New equipment without a sufficient amount of maintenance
history has been acquired.
Department of Engineering 2014 - 72
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
S&C 14-07-HOSPITAL The organization inspects, tests & maintains new
medical equipment or operating components of utility systems in accordance with manufacturers’ recommendations with insufficient maintenance history to support the use of alternative maintenance strategies. Maintenance history may be gathered from
documented evidence such as Provided by the organizations contractors Available publically from nationally recognized
sources Through the organizations experience over time
Department of Engineering 2014 - 73
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.04.03 EP 24
For [organizations] that use Joint Commission accreditation for deemed status purposes: The [organization] inspects, tests, and maintains the following in accordance with manufacturers’ recommendations (See also EC.02.04.01, EPs 3 and 4):
Medical lasers Imaging and radiologic equipment (whether used for diagnostic or
therapeutic purposes) New medical equipment with insufficient maintenance history to
support the use of alternative maintenance strategies. Note: Maintenance history may be gathered from documented
evidence provided by the [organization’s] contractors available publically from nationally recognized sources, or through the [organization’s] experience over time
Department of Engineering 2014 - 74
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.05.05 EP 6
For [organizations] that use Joint Commission accreditation for deemed status purposes: The [organization] inspects, tests, and maintains new operating components of utility systems in accordance with manufacturers’ recommendations with insufficient maintenance history to support the use of alternative maintenance strategies. Note: Maintenance history may be gathered from documented evidence:
provided by the [organization’s] contractors available publically from nationally recognized sources
or through the [organization’s] experience over time
Department of Engineering 2014 - 75
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
S&C 14-07-HOSPITAL: EVALUATING PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS
The equipment management programs must have written policies & procedures
Evaluating the program: How is equipment evaluated to ensure no
degradation of performance? How are equipment-related incidents investigated?
How to sequester equipment deemed unsafe? Is there a performance process to evaluate if
modifications to the maintenance strategy is needed?
Department of Engineering 2014 - 76
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
S&C 14-07-HOSPITAL: SURVEY STRATEGIES
Evaluate the accuracy of the inventory Are imaging/radiologic equipment and medical laser devices
exempt from the alternative maintenance program? Verify the inspection, testing & maintaining activities and
frequencies are documented Evaluate the process for equipment being maintained, including
qualified personnel Ask staff questions related to the alternative maintenance
program Equipment inclusion process Assignment of maintenance strategies and frequencies
Verify evaluation of the program is occurring and being reported
Department of Engineering 2014 - 77
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.05.07 EP 1
At least monthly, the hospital performs a functional test of battery-powered lights required for egress for a minimum duration of 30 seconds. The completion date of the tests is documented.
Replaced “At 30 day intervals…”
Department of Engineering 2014 - 78
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
Three phases of implementation for hospitals, critical access hospitals, and ambulatory care organizations Includes ambulatory care organizations that have achieved
Advanced Diagnostic Imaging certification Phase 1, effective July 1, 2014
Exceptions: not applicable to dental cone beam CT radiographic imaging studies performed for diagnosis of conditions affecting the maxillofacial region or to obtain guidance for the treatment of such conditions.
Phase 1.5: minimum qualifications for radiologists performing CT scans
Phase 2: fluoroscopy qualifications for non-radiologists performing imaging exams and cone beam CT, and for dental or oral surgical procedures
Department of Engineering 2014 - 79
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
Phase 1: Effective July 1, 2014 Computed tomography (CT), nuclear medicine (NM),
positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Minimum competency for radiology technologists, including registration and certification by July 1, 2015
Annual performance evaluations of imaging equipment by a medical physicist
Documentation of CT radiation dose in the patient’s clinical record
Meeting the needs of the pediatric population through imaging protocols and by considering patient size or body habitus when establishing imaging protocols
Department of Engineering 2014 - 80
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
Phase 1: Effective July 1, 2014 Management of safety risks in the MRI environment Collection of data on incidents during which identified
radiation dose limits have been exceeded Minimum quarterly review of staff dosimetry results
New, replacement or modification to rooms Medical physicist to perform structural shielding
design New equipment or rooms where ionizing radiation is
emitted or radioactive material is stored Medical physicist to perform radiation protection
survey
Department of Engineering 2014 - 81
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING630 792 5900
George Mills, MBA, FASHE, CEM, CHFM, CHSP, Green Belt
Director
Anne Guglielmo, CFPS, LEED, A.P., CHSP
Engineer
John Maurer, SASHE, CHFM, CHSP
Engineer
Kathy Tolomeo, CHEM Engineer
James Woodson, P.E., CHFM
Engineer
Department of Engineering 2014 - 82
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
These slides are current as of 4/7/2014. The Joint Commission reserves the right to change the content of the information, as appropriate.
These slides are only meant to be cue points, which were expounded upon verbally by the original presenter and are not meant to be comprehensive statements of standards interpretation or represent all the content of the presentation. Thus, care should be exercised in interpreting Joint Commission requirements based solely on the content of these slides.
These slides are copyrighted and may not be further used, shared or distributed without permission of the original presenter or The Joint Commission.
THE JOINT COMMISSION DISCLAIMER